Exploring social processes in transformation: the case of a collaborative water partnership in South Africa

References

• Abel N, Cumming DHM, Anderies JM. 2006. Collapse and reorganization in social-ecological systems: questions, some ideas, and policy implications. Ecol Soc. 11(1):17. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art17/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander P. 2010. Rebellion of the poor. South Africa’s service delivery protests - a preliminary analysis. Rev Afr Polit Econ. 37(123):25–29. doi:10.1080/03056241003637870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkire S. 2008. Concepts and measures of agency. OPHI Working Paper No. 9. Oxford (UK): Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24119459.
   Google Scholar
• Archer M. 2003. Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris C. 1999. On organizational learning. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R. 2008. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Change. 18(1):86–98. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino F, Wittmayer JM. 2016. Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: a multi-actor perspective. J Environ Pol Plan. 18(5):628–649. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Ann Rev Psychol. 52(1):1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1. PMID: 11148297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett M, Duvall R. 2005. Power in international politics. Int Organ. 59(1):39–75. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beier C, Lovecraft AL, Chapin T. 2009. Growth and collapse of a resource system: an adaptive cycle of change in public lands governance and forest management in Alaska. Ecol Soc. 14(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art5/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs R, Westley FR, Carpenter SR. 2010. Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc. 15(2):9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art9/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohensky EL. 2008. Discovering resilient pathways for South African water management: two frameworks for a vision. Ecol Soc. 13(1):19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art19/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand U. 2016. “Transformation” as a new critical orthodoxy: the strategic use of the term “Transformation” does not prevent multiple crises. GAIA. 25(1):23–27. doi:10.14512/gaia.25.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron R. 2014. Vertical decentralisation and urban service delivery in South Africa: does politics matter? Dev Policy Rev. 32(S1):s81–100. doi:10.1111/dpr.12070.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen MB, Schmidt VA. 2016. Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. J Eur Public Policy. 23(3):318–337. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O. 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc. 11(2):8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin B, Gosnell H, Cosens B. 2014. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc. 19(3):56. doi:10.5751/ES-06824-190356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, Daly HE. 1992. Natural capital and sustainable development. Conserv Biol. 6(1):37–46. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot RS, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387(6630):253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daedlow K, Beckmann V, Arlinghaus R. 2011. Assessing an adaptive cycle in a social system under external pressure to change: the importance of intergroup relations in recreational fisheries governance. Ecol Soc. 16(2):3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art3/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Ouden T, 2015. A contribution to the understanding and strengthening of network governance [ MSc thesis]. Wageningen University and Research Centre. http://edepot.wur.nl/347962.
   Google Scholar
• Dorado S. 2005. Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organ Stud. 26(3):385–414. doi:10.1177/0170840605050873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DWA] Department of Water Affairs. 2009. Water reconciliation strategy for the KwaZulu-Natal coastal metropolitan areas. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• [DWA] Department of Water Affairs. 2013. National water resource strategy. 2nd ed. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• [DWAF] Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. 2004. National water conservation and water demand management strategy. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• El Bilali H. 2019. The multi-level perspective in research on sustainability transitions in agriculture and food systems: a systematic review. Agriculture. 9(4):74. doi:10.3390/agriculture9040074.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A. 1998. What is agency? Am J Sociol. 103(4):962. doi:10.1086/231294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabinyi M, Evans L, Foale SJ. 2014. Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecol Soc. 19(4):28. doi:10.5751/ES-07029-190428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fath BD, Dean CA, Katzmair H. 2015. Navigating the adaptive cycle: an approach to managing the resilience of social systems. Ecol Soc. 20(2):24. doi:10.5751/ES-07467-200224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood RL, Room NRA. 2018. A systemic approach to processes of power in learning organizations: part I – literature, theory, and methodology of triple loop learning. Learn Organ. 25(4):260–272. doi:10.1108/TLO-10-2017-0101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox IK. 1976. Institutions for water management in a changing world. Nat Resour J. 16:743–758. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol16/iss4/3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q. 2004. Trust, social capital, and organizational effectiveness. MPIA major paper. Blacksberg (VA): Virginia Polytachnic Institute and State University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251443327.
   Google Scholar
• Future Earth. 2014. Strategic research agenda 2014: priorities for a global sustainability research strategy. International Council for Science (ICSU), Paris. https://futureearth.org/2014/12/04/future-earth-strategic-research-agenda-2014-published/
   Google Scholar
• Gale M. 2020. Water governance in South Africa: capacity development in river basin management [ MSc thesis]. Netherlands: Utrecht University. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/400453.
   Google Scholar
• Garud R, Karnoe P. 2005. Distributed agency and interactive emergence. In: Floyd SW, Roos J, Jacobs CD Kellermanns FW, editors. Innovating strategy process. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; p. 88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Trans. 1(1):24–40. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Gelcich S, Hughes TP, Olsson P, Folke C, Defeo O, Ferna´ndez M, Foale S, Gunderson LH, et al. 2010. Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107; p. 16794–16799.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens A. 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert P. 2018. A broad definition of agential power. J Political Power. 11(1):79–92. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin NR. 2003. Five kinds of capital: useful concepts for sustainable development. Working Paper 03–07. Medford (MA): Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University.
   Google Scholar
• Grizzetti B, Liquete C, Pistocchi A, Vigiak O, Zulian G, Bouraoui F, De Roo A, Cardoso AC. 2019. Relationship between ecological condition and ecosystem services in European rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Sci Total Environ. 671:452–465. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson LH, Holling CS, editors. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward C, Lukes S. 2008. Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: a dialogue. J Power. 1(1):5–20. doi:10.1080/17540290801943364.
   Google Scholar
• Herrfahrdt-Pähle E, Pahl-Wostl C. 2012. Continuity and change in social-ecological systems: the role of institutional resilience. Ecol Soc. 17(2):8. doi:10.5751/ES-04565-170208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrfahrdt-Pähle E, Schlüter M, Olsson P, Folke C, Gelcich S, Pahl-Wostl C. 2020. Sustainability transformations: socio-political shocks as opportunities for governance transitions. Glob Environ Change. 63:102097. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson JM, Ramesh M. 2002. Globalisation makes of states what states make of it: between agency and structure in the state/globalisation debate. New Polit Econ. 7(1):5–22. doi:10.1080/13563460120115499.
   Google Scholar
• Holling CS. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems; local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC Munn RE, editors. Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 292–317.
   Google Scholar
• Holling CS. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems. 4(5):390–405. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hordijk M, Sara LM, Sutherland C. 2014. Resilience, transition or transformation? A comparative analysis of changing water governance systems in four southern cities. Environ Urban. 26(1):130–146. doi:10.1177/0956247813519044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [HSRC] Human Sciences Research Council. 2021a. Data extract from Evaluation of Public Opinion Programme (EPOP) (1998-2001). Pretoria: HSRC.
   Google Scholar
• [HSRC] Human Sciences Research Council. 2021b. Data extract from South Africa Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) (2003 – 2018). Pretoria: HSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt G, Zunckel K, Dini J, Hughes C, de Winnaar G, Mander M, Hay D, Pringle C, J. McCosh, and I. Bredin, editors. 2015. Investing in ecological infrastructure to enhance water security in the uMngeni River catchment. Green Economy Research Report No. 1. Midrand: Green Fund, Development Bank of Southern Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen Å, Gerger Swartling Å, Wamsler C, Andersson K, Arran JT, Hernández Vivas DI, Stenström TA. 2018. Transforming urban water governance through social (triple‐loop) learning. Environ Policy Gov. 29(2):144–154. doi:10.1002/eet.1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein PJ, Seybert LA, editors. 2018. Protean power: exploring the uncertainty and unexpected in world politics. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keast RL, Mandell M, Brown KA. 2006. Mixing state, market and network governance modes: the role of government in “crowded” policy domains. Int J Organ Theory Behav. 9(1):27–50. doi:10.1108/IJOTB-09-01-2006-B002.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J. 2007. Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sust Dev World. 14(1):78–91. doi:10.1080/13504500709469709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern F. 2011. Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 29(6):1116–1134. doi:10.1068/c1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachman DA. 2013. A survey and review of approaches to study transitions. Energy Policy. 58:269–276. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach M, Reyers B, Bai X, Brondizio ES, Cook C, Díaz S, Espindola G, Scobie M, Stafford-Smith M, Subramanian SM. 2018. Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: a social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Global Sustainability. 1:e13. doi:10.1017/sus.2018.12.
   Google Scholar
• Legro J. 2000. The transformation of policy ideas. Am J Pol Sci. 44(3):419–432. doi:10.2307/2669256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling C, Dale A. 2013. Agency and social capital: characteristics and dynamics. Comm Dev J Adv. [accessed 2013 Jan 4]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234076088.
   Google Scholar
• López J, Scott J. 2000. Social structure. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz-Sisitka H, Pahl-Wostl C, Meissner R, Scholz G, Cockburn J, Jalasi EM, Stuart-Hill S, Palmer C. Forthcoming. Towards qualitative cross case analysis of transformative processes in the face of resource nexus challenges. Ecosyst People.
   Google Scholar
• MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Kay K, Milstein B. 1998. Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cult Anthropol Methods. 10(2):31–36. doi:10.1177/1525822X980100020301.
   Google Scholar
• Manual J, Maze K, Driver M, Stephens A, Botts E, Parker A, Tau M, Dini J, Holness S, Nel J. 2016. Key ingredients, challenges and lessons from biodiversity mainstreaming in South Africa: people, products, process. OECD Environment Working Papers No. 107. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5jlzgj1s4h5h-en.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft J. 2011. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ Innov Soc Trans. 1(1):70–75. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Medema W, Wals A, Adamowski J. 2014. Multi‐loop social learning for sustainable land and water governance: towards a research agenda on the potential of virtual learning platforms. NJAS Wagening J Life Sci. 69(1):23–38. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2014.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner R. 2021. eThekwini’s green and ecological infrastructure policy landscape: towards a deeper understanding. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner R, Turton A. 2003. The hydrosocial contract theory and the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. Water Policy. 5(2):115–126. doi:10.2166/wp.2003.0007.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner R, Warner J. 2021. Indigenous paradiplomacy and the Orokawe hydroelectric dam on the Kunene River. Reg Cohes. 11(1):21–48. doi:10.3167/reco.2021.110103.
   Google Scholar
• Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs. 2014. SIP 19: Ecological Infrastructure for Water Security. Unpublished Report Version 6.1. Pretoria: Department of Water and Environmental Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Moore M-L, Tjornbo O, Enfors E, Knapp C, Hodbod J, Baggio JA, Norström A, Olsson P, Biggs D. 2014. Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations. Ecol Soc. 19(4):54. doi:10.5751/ES-06966-190454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert E, Pahl-Wostl C, Rees Y, Searle B, Tàbara D, Tippett J. 2007. Social learning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecol Soc. 12(1):19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myeong S, Seo H. 2016. Which type of social capital matters for building trust in government? Looking for a new type of social capital in the governance era. Sustainability. 8(4):322. doi:10.3390/su8040322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namugize JN, Jewitt G, Graham M. 2018. Effects of land use and land cover changes on water quality in the uMngeni river catchment, South Africa. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C. 105:247–264. doi:10.1016/J.PCE.2018.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkhata AB, Breen CM, Freimund WA. 2008. Resilient social relationships and collaboration in the management of social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 13(1):2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art2/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2001. The well-being of nations: the role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264189515-en.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Bodin Ö, Folke C. 2010. Building transformative capacity for ecosystem stewardship in social–ecological systems. In: Armitage D Plummer R, editors. Adaptive capacity and environmental governance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 263–285. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4_13.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T. 2004. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecol Soc. 9(4):2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Galaz V, Boonstra WJ. 2014. Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecol Soc. 19(4):1. doi:10.5751/ES-06799-190401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS. 2006. Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 11(1):18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C. 2009. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change. 19(3):354–365. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C. 2019. The role of governance modes and meta-governance in the transformation towards sustainable water governance. Environ Sci Policy. 91:6–16. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C, Becker G, Knieper C, Sendzimir J. 2013. How multilevel societal learning processes facilitate transformative change: a comparative case study analysis on flood management. Ecol Soc. 18(4):58. doi:10.5751/ES-05779-180458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson J, Schulz K, Vervoort J, van der Hel S, Widerberg O, Adler C, Hurlbert M, Anderton K, Sethi M, Barau A. 2017. Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environ Innov Soc Trans. 24:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelling M, Manuel-Navarrete D. 2011. From resilience to transformation: the adaptive cycle in two Mexican urban centers. Ecol Soc. 16(2):11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art11/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle C, Bredin I, McCosh J, Dini J, Zunckel K, Jewitt G, Hughes C, de Winnaar G, Mander M. 2016. An investment plan for securing ecological infrastructure to enhance water security in the uMngeni River catchment. Midrand, South Africa: Green Fund, Development Bank of Southern Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam RD. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands K, Taylor J, Barnes G, Morgan B. 2013. Securing ecological infrastructure in the uMngeni catchment: a socio-ecological contextual profile. Unpublished Report. South Africa: Wildlife and Environment Society.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 1996. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act No. 36 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• [SAHRC] South African Human Rights Commission. 2018. Water and sanitation research brief: monitoring the implementation of the Commission’s recommendations from its 2014 report on access to water and sanitation. Johannesburg: South African Human Rights Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Salvia R, Quaranta G. 2015. Adaptive cycle as a tool to select resilient patterns of rural development. Sustainability. 7(8):11114–11138. doi:10.3390/su70811114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [SANBI] South African National Biodiversity Institute. 2013. Ecological infrastructure: nature delivering services. Fact sheet. Pretoria: SANBI.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström A, Rova C. 2010. The network structure of adaptive governance - a single case study of a fish management area. Int J Commons. http://www.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/ijc/article/view/156/102.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino A. 2015. The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learn Culture Soc Interact. 4:1–3. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafft K, Brown D. 2003. Social capital, social networks, and social power. Soc Epistemol. 17(4):329–342. doi:10.1080/0269172032000151795.
   Google Scholar
• Shezi L. 2013. Service delivery protests as a catalyst for development: the case of eThekwini Municipality. MSc Thesis. University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Sievers-Glotzbach S, Tschersich J. 2019. Overcoming the process-structure divide in conceptions of social-ecological transformation: assessing the transformative character and impact of change processes. Ecol Econ. 164:106361. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy. 34(10):1491–1510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl T. 2011. Institutional power, collective acceptance, and recognition. In: Ikäheimo H Laitinen A, editors. Recognition and Social Ontology. Leiden: Brill; p. 349–372.
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE. 1995. The art of case study research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE. 2005. Qualitative case studies. In: Denzin NK Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; p. 443–466.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart-Hill S, Lukat E, Pringle C, Pahl-Wostl C. 2020. Coordination beyond the State to solve complex water problems—insights from South Africa. Bonn: DIE Briefing Paper Number 21/2020, German Development Institute. doi:10.23661/bp21.2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom SM, Allen CR. 2019. The adaptive cycle: more than a metaphor. Ecol Complex. 39:100767. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland C, Roberts D. 2014. Why leadership matters in water and climate governance. Opinion Paper 12, Chance2Sustain. Bonn: EADI. http://www.chance2sustain.eu/fileadmin/Website/Dokumente/Dokumente/Publications/D4.53_Opinion_pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland C, Roberts D, Douwes J. 2019. Constructing resilience at three scales: the 100 Resilient Cities Programme, Durban’s resilience journey and water resilience in the Palmiet catchment. Hum Geogr. 12(1):33–49. doi:10.1177/194277861901200103.
   Google Scholar
• Tadesse G, Kassie GT. 2017. Measuring trust and commitment in collective actions: evidence from farmers’ marketing organizations in rural Ethiopia. Int J Soc Econ. 44(7):980–996. doi:10.1108/IJSE-09-2015-0253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai H-S. 2015. Cross-scale and cross-level dynamics: governance and capacity for resilience in a social-ecological system in Taiwan. Sustainability. 7(2):2045–2065. doi:10.3390/su7022045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [UEIP] uMngeni Ecological Infrastructure Partnership. 2013. Memorandum of understanding concerning the coordination of the uMngeni Ecological Infrastructure Partnership and the implementation of its strategy. Pietermaritzburg: SANBI.
   Google Scholar
• [UEIP] uMngeni Ecological Infrastructure Partnership. 2016. The uMngeni Ecological Infrastructure Partnership (UEIP): a strategy. Pietermaritzburg: SANBI. http://biodiversityadvisor.sanbi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/UEIP-Strategy-July2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Unger RM. 2004. False necessity: anti-necessitarian social theory in the service of radical democracy. Rev. ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• [UW] Umgeni Water. 2007. The Annual Sustainability Report for the year 1 July 2006 – 30 June 2007. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: Umgeni Water.
   Google Scholar
• [UW] Umgeni Water. 2010. Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Water Affairs: Annual Report 2008/09 and tariffs for 2010. Umgeni Water, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• [UW] Umgeni Water. 2013. Annual Report 2012/2013. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: Umgeni Water.
   Google Scholar
• [UW] Umgeni Water. 2021. Laboratory Information Management System data extract of routine Umgeni Water river sampling site data (2000-2019). ISO 9002 certified monitoring programme and ISO/IEC 17025: 2017 standard accredited Laboratory analyses. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: Umgeni Water.
   Google Scholar
• Westley FR, Tjornbo O, Schultz L, Olsson P, Folke C, Crona B, Bodin Ö. 2013. A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 18(3):27. doi:10.5751/ES-05072-180327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2009. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zunckel K. 2013. Supply chain management for PES in the Upper uThukela and Umzimvubu catchments: investments into ecological infrastructure in the Greater uMngeni River catchment. Unpublished Report, Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar