Exploring Indigenous relationality to inform the relational turn in sustainability science

References

• Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B. 2003. Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Boston (MA): MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo S, Hekman S, Hekman SJ. 2008. Material feminisms. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ambler M. 1997. Native scholarship: explorations in the new frontier. Tribal College. 9:8.
   Google Scholar
• Barad K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basso KH. 1996. Wisdom sits in places: landscape and language among the western apache. Albuquerque (NM): Univ of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell SE. 2015. Bridging activism and the academy: exposing environmental injustices through the feminist ethnographic method of photovoice. Hum Ecol Rev. 21:27–9. doi:10.22459/HER.21.01.2015.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett J. 2010. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brattland C, Kramvig B, Verran H. 2018. Doing indigenous methodologies: toward a practice of the ‘careful partial participant. Ab-Original. 2:74–96. doi:10.5325/aboriginal.2.1.0074.
   Google Scholar
• Brayboy BM, Gough HR, Leonard B, Roehl RF, Solyom JA. 2012. Reclaiming scholarship: critical Indigenous research methodologies. In: Lapan S, Quartaroli M, and Riemer F, editors. Qualitative research: an introduction to methods and designs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; p. 423–450.
   Google Scholar
• Cajete G. 2000. Native science: natural laws of interdependence. New Mexico: Clear Light Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh D. 1999. “Just listen”: “Listening” and landscape among the blackfeet. null. 63:250–270. doi:10.1080/10570319909374641.
   Google Scholar
• Castree N. 2003. Environmental issues: relational ontologies and hybrid politics. Prog Hum Geogr. 27(2):203–211. doi: 10.1191/0309132503ph422pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBD (2010) Tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 10)
   Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Boyd DR, Gould RK, Jetzkowitz J, Liu J, Muraca B, Naidoo R, Olmsted P, Satterfield T, Selomane O, et al. 2020. Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People Nat. 2(3):693–717. doi:10.1002/pan3.10124.
   Google Scholar
• Christie M. 2013. Generative and ‘ground-up’ research in aboriginal Australia. Learning Communities. 13:3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Contesse M, Duncan J, Legun K, Klerkx L. 2021. Unravelling non-human agency in sustainability transitions. Technol Forecast Soc. 166:120634. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David-Chavez DM, Gavin MC. 2018. A global assessment of Indigenous community engagement in climate research. Environ Res Lett. 13(12):123005. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda M. 2016. Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze G, Guattari F. 1978. A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press. Translated by Brian Massumi.
   Google Scholar
• Dwiartama A, Rosin C. 2014. Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking. Ecol Soc. 19. doi: 10.5751/ES-06805-190328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnis J. 2020. Natural Law Theories. In: Zalta E, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Fixico D. 2013. The American Indian mind in a linear world: American Indian studies and traditional knowledge. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garnett ST, Burgess ND, Fa JE, Fernández-Llamazares Á, Molnár Z, Robinson CJ, Watson JEM, Zander KK, Austin B, Brondizio ES, et al. 2018. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat Sustain. 1(7):369–374. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg M, Seigworth GJ, Gregg M, Seigworth GJ. 2010. The affect theory reader. Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822393047.
   Google Scholar
• Handler R. 1991. Who owns the past?: history, cultural property and the logic of possessive individualism. In: Williams B, editor. The politics of culture. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institute; p. 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway D. 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud. 14(3):575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoelting KR, Martinez DR, Schuster RM, Gavin MC. 2022. Advancing knowledge pluralism and cultural benefits in ecosystem services theory and application. Pre-print posted in SocArXiv. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/p4wts
   Google Scholar
• Howitt R, Suchet-Pearson S. 2006. Rethinking the building blocks: ontological pluralism and the idea of “management. Geogr Ann B. 88B:323–335. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0459.2006.00225.x.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JT, Howitt R, Cajete G, Berkes F, Louis RP, Kliskey A. 2016. Weaving Indigenous and sustainability sciences to diversify our methods. Sustain Sci. 11:1–11. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0349-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermoal N, Altamirano-Jiménez I, Kermoal N, Altamirano-Jiménez I. 2016. Living on the land: Indigenous women’s understanding of place. Athabasca University Press. doi:10.15215/aupress/9781771990417.01.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerer R. 2017. Speaking of nature. Orion.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerer RW. 2017. The covenant of reciprocity. In: Hart J, editor. The Wiley Blackwell companion to religion and ecology. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; p. 368–381. doi:10.1002/9781118465523.ch26.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach M. 2009. Indigenous Methodologies: characteristics, conversations and contexts. Toronto (CA): University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latulippe N. 2015. Bridging parallel rows: epistemic difference and relational accountability in cross-cultural research. Int Indig Policy J. 6. doi:10.18584/iipj.2015.6.2.7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law J. 2009. Actor network theory and material semiotics. In: Turner, editor. The new Blackwell companion to social theory. Malden (MA): Wiley-Blackwell; p. 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron M. 2021. Pollution is colonialism. In: Pollution is Colonialism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons CO. 2008. Listening to Natural Law. In: Nelson MK, editor. Original instructions: Indigenous teachings for a sustainable future. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez D. 2014. Methodologies of social justice: Indigenous foundations and lessons. In: Henson J, and Wilson A, editors. Exploring Social Justice: Indigenous Perspectives. Vernon (BC): JCharlton Publishing; p. 2–21.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez D. 2016. Holistic social justice: listening to Indigenous voices and telling lessons of our traditions, our ancestors and our futures. In: Hankard, editor. We Still live here: first nations, the Alberta oil sands, and surviving globalism. Vernon (BC): JCharlton Publishing; p. 207–230.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez DE. 2021. Storying traditions, lessons and lives: responsible and grounded indigenous storying ethics and methods. Genealogy. 5(4):84. doi: 10.3390/genealogy5040084
   Google Scholar
• Mohawk J. 2010. Thinking in Indian: a John Mohawk Reader. Golden (CO): Fulcrum.
   Google Scholar
• Muller S. 2014. Co-motion: making space to care for country. GEOFORUM. 54:132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson MK. 2008. Original instructions: Indigenous teachings for a sustainable future. Rochester (VT): Bear & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ogar E, Pecl G, Mustonen T. 2020. Science must embrace traditional and Indigenous knowledge to solve our biodiversity crisis. One Earth. 3(2):162–165. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Raymond CM, Kaaronen R, Giusti M, Linder N, Barthel S. 2021. Engaging with the pragmatics of relational thinking, leverage points and transformations – Reply to West et al. Ecosyst People. 17:1–5. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1867645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redvers N, Poelina A, Schultz C, Kobei DM, Githaiga C, Perdrisat M, Prince D, Blondin B. 2020. Indigenous natural and first law in planetary health. Challenges. 11(2):29. doi: 10.3390/challe11020029
   Google Scholar
• Sandel MJ. 2020. The tyranny of merit: what’s become of the common good? New York (NY): Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson LB. 2017. As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. U of Minnesota Press. doi:10.5749/j.ctt1pwt77c.
   Google Scholar
• Todd Z. 2016. An Indigenous Feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘ontology’ is just another word for colonialism: an Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn. J Hist Sociol. 29:4–22. doi:10.1111/johs.12124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman SE. 2020. Feminist new materialisms. Newbury Park (CA): SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Tuhiwai Smith L. 2005. Decolonizing methodologies: research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren T, Kirksey E, Münster U. 2016. Multispecies studies: cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environ Hum. 8(1):1–23. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3527695
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez-Fernández AM. 2020. Resurgence of relationality: reflections on decolonizing and indigenizing ‘sustainable development’. Curr Opin Env Sust. 43:65–70. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizenor G. 2009. Native liberty: natural reason and cultural survivance. U of Nebraska Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1dgn41k.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh Z, Böhme J, Wamsler C. 2021. Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, andeducation. Ambio. 50:74–84. doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01322-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter M. 2009. Chapter 21: participatory action research. In: Bryman A, editor. Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; p. 151–158.
   Google Scholar
• Watson I. 2018. Aboriginal relationships to the natural world: colonial “protection” of human rights and the environment. J Hum Rights Environ. 9:119–140. doi:10.4337/jhre.2018.02.01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West S, Haider LJ, Stålhammar S, Woroniecki S. 2020. A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosyst People. 16(1):304–325. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West S, Haider LJ, Stålhammar S, Woroniecki S. 2021. Putting relational thinking to work in sustainability science – reply to Raymond et al. Ecosyst People. 17(1):108–113. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2021.1898477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte KP. 2011. The recognition dimensions of environmental justice in Indian country. Environ Justice. 4(4):199–205. doi: 10.1089/env.2011.0036
   Google Scholar
• Whyte KP, Brewer JP, Johnson JT. 2016. Weaving Indigenous science, protocols and sustainability science. Sustain Sci. 11(1):25–32. doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0296-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams L. 2013. Deepening ecological relationality through critical onto-epistemological inquiry: where transformative learning meets sustainable science. J Transform Educ. 11(2):95–113. doi: 10.1177/1541344613490997
   Google Scholar
• Wilson S. 2008. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing, Black Point.
   Google Scholar
• Zanotti L, Palomino-Schalscha M. 2016. Taking different ways of knowing seriously: cross-cultural work as translations and multiplicity. Sustain Sci. 11:139–152. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0312-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar