Cultivating commitment: how cultural ecosystem services affect visitor loyalty attitudes and intention-to-return in parks and protected areas

References

• Allred SB, Ross-Davis A. 2011. The drop-off and pick-up method: an approach to reduce nonresponse bias in natural resource surveys. Small-Scale For. 10(3):305–12. doi: 10.1007/s11842-010-9150-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ament JA, Moore CA, Herbst M, Cumming GS. 2017. Cultural ecosystem services in protected areas: understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies. Conserv Lett. 10(4):440–450. doi: 10.1111/conl.12283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azis N, Amin M, Chan S, Aprilia C. 2020. How smart tourism technologies affect tourist destination loyalty. J Hosp Tour Technol. 11(4):603–625. doi: 10.1108/JHTT-01-2020-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker S. 2018. Eelgrass distribution in the great bay estuary (Report No. P18-UZM17). Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership. https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1408&context=prep
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann-Wubbelt A, Fricke A, Sebesvari Z, Yakouchenkova IA, Frolich K, Saha S. 2021. High public appreciation for the cultural ecosystem services of urban and peri‑urban forests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities Society. 74:103240. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergel M, Frank P, Brock C. 2019. The role of customer engagement facets on the formation of attitude, loyalty, and price perception. J Serv Mark. 33(7):890–903. doi: 10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0024.
   Google Scholar
• Bryce R, Irvine KN, Church A, Fish R, Ranger S, Kenter KO. 2016. Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Iss Environ Sci Tech. 21:258–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015.
   Google Scholar
• Cabana D, Ryfield F, Crowe TT, Brannigan J. 2020. Evaluating and communicating cultural ecosystem services. Iss Environ Sci Tech. 42:101085. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101085.
   Google Scholar
• Chou CP, Bentler PM. 2002. Model modification in structural equation modeling by imposing constraints. Comput Stat Data Anal. 41(2):271–287. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00097-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colding J, Barthel S. 2019. Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later. Ecol Soc. 24(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-10598-240102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danz NP, Regal RR, Niemi GJ, Brady VJ, Hollenhorst T, Johnson LB, Kelly JR. 2005. Environmentally stratified sampling design for the development of Great Lakes environmental indicators. Environ Monit Assess. 102(1–3):41–65. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-1594-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson MD, Caraynoff A, Ferguson LA, Barcelona R, Evensen D, Knox H, Pytlik S, Grosz D. 2022b. Weather they return: modeling outdoor recreation behaviors, decision-making, and intention-to-return in federally designated wilderness. Forests. 13(7):1018. doi: 10.3390/f13071018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson MD, Giles G, Ferguson LA, Barcelona R, Evensen D, Barrows C, Leberman M. 2022d. Seeing the forest for the trees: a social-ecological systems approach to managing outdoor recreation visitation in parks and protected areas. J Outdoor Recr Tour. 38:100473. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2021.100473.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson MD, Lynch ML, Evensen D, Ferguson LA, Barcelona R, Giles G, Leberman M. 2023. The nature of the pandemic: exploring the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon recreation visitor behaviors and experiences in parks and protected areas. J Outdoor Recr Tour. 41:100498. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2022.100498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson MD, McIntosh K, English DB, Ferguson LA, Barcelona R, Giles G, Fraser O, Leberman M. 2022c. The outdoor renaissance: assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon outdoor recreation visitation, behaviors, and decision-making in New England’s national forests. Soc Nat. 35(10):1063–1082. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2022.2055247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson MD, Mueller JT, Graefe AR, Mowen AJ. 2018. Coping with climate change: a study of great lakes water-based recreationists. J Park Recreat Adm. 36(2):52–74. doi: 10.18666/JPRA-2018-V36-I2-8296.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson MD, Perry EE, Lynch M, Ferguson LA, Kiewra LA, Leberman M, Manning RE. 2022a. Expanding the viewshed: insights and implications for examining visitor use management across scales and modalities in an iconic national forest. J Outdoor Recr Tour. 40:100570. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2022.100570.
   Google Scholar
• Great Bay Marine. 2022 Aug 8. Services. [accessed 2022 Dec 18]. https://www.greatbaymarine.com/service/.
   Google Scholar
• Great Bay Visitors Center. 2021. Great Bay visitor center - visitor attendance logs [dataset]. Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve.
   Google Scholar
• Green SB, Thompson MS, Poirier J. 1999. Exploratory analyses to improve model fit: errors due to misspecification and a strategy to reduce their occurrence. Struct Equ Modeling. 6(1):113–126. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzetti B, Liquete C, Pistocchi A, Vigiak O, Zulian G, Bouraoui F, De Roo A, Cardoso AC. 2019. Relationship between ecological condition and ecosystem services in European rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Sci Total Environ. 671:452–465. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. 2008. Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modeling literature. In: 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies, London. p. 195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Hosany S, Prayag G, Van Der Veen R, Huang SS, Deesilatham S. 2017. Mediating effects of place attachment and satisfaction on the relationship between tourists’ emotions and intention to recommend. J Travel Res. 56(8):1079–1093. doi: 10.1177/0047287516678088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson-Smith D, Flint CG, Dolan M, Trentelman CK, Holyoak G, Thomas B, Ma G. 2016. Effectiveness of the drop-off/pick-up survey methodology in different neighborhood types. J Rural Social Sci. 31(3):3.
   Google Scholar
• Kakoyannis C, Stankey G. 2002. Assessing and evaluating recreational uses of water resources: implications for an integrated management framework. USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Martin CL, Momtaz S, Gaston T, Moltschaniwskyj NA. 2020. Estuarine cultural ecosystem services valued by local people in New South Wales, Australia, and attributes important for continued supply. Ocean Coast Manag. 190:105160. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreary A, Seekamp E, Larson LR, Smith JW, Davenport MA. 2019. Predictors of visitors’ climate-related coping behaviors in a nature-based tourism destination. J Outdoor Recr Tour. 26:23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mills K 2009. Ecological trends in the great bay estuary. https://www3.epa.gov/region1/npdes/schillerstation/pdfs/AR-186.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mimbs BP, Boley BB, Bowker JM, Woosnam KM, Green GT. 2020. Importance-performance analysis of residents’ and tourists’ preferences for water-based recreation in the Southeastern United States. J Outdoor Recr Tour. 31:100324. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2020.100324.
   Google Scholar
• Moore SA, Rodger K, Taplin R. 2015. Moving beyond visitor satisfaction to loyalty in nature-based tourism: a review and research agenda. Curr Issues Tour. 18(7):667–683. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2013.790346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse WC. 2020. Recreation as a social-ecological complex adaptive system. Sustainability. 12(3):753. doi: 10.3390/su12030753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Hampshire Coastal Program. n.d. Coastal access map. https://wildlife.state.nh.us/marine/documents/coastal-access-map.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NOAA. 2022. Great bay national estuarine research reserve. https://coast.noaa.gov/nerrs/reserves/great-bay.html
   Google Scholar
• Outdoor Foundation. 2021. Outdoor participation trends report. Outdoorindustry.org. https://outdoorindustry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2021-Outdoor-Participation-Trends-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pinkus E, Moore SA, Taplin R, Pearce J. 2016. Re-thinking visitor loyalty at ‘once in a lifetime’ nature-based tourism destinations: empirical evidence from Purnululu National Park, Australia. J Outdoor Recr Tour. 16:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2016.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Rodger K, Taplin RH, Moore SA. 2015. Using a randomized experiment to test the casual effect of service quality on visitor satisfaction and loyalty in a remote national park. Tourism Manage. 50:172–183. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebunruang J, Burns RC, Arnberger A. 2022. Is national park affinity related to visitors’ satisfaction with park service and recreation quality? A case study from a Thai forest national park. Forests. 13(5):753. doi: 10.3390/f13050753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S. 2015. A sense of place: place, culture and tourism. Tourism Recreat Res. 40(2):220–233. doi: 10.1080/02508281.2015.1049814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey H, Franklin P. 2012. What is culture. A compilation of quotations. GlobalPad Core Concepts. 1:22.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. 2022. Registered boats by state in the U.S. 2021. Statista. [accessed 2022 Dec 18]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1155988/us-recreational-boating-vessels/.
   Google Scholar
• Suhartanto D, Brien A, Primiana I, Wibisono N, Triyuni NN. 2020. Tourist loyalty in creative tourism: the role of experience quality, value, satisfaction, and motivation. Curr Issues Tour. 23(7):867–879. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1568400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton E. 2013. Stratified sampling using cluster analysis: a sample selection strategy for improved generalizations from experiments. Eval Rev. 37(2):109–139. doi: 10.1177/0193841X13516324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukamushaba EK, Xiao H, Ladkin A. 2016. The effect of tourists’ perceptions of a tourism product on memorable travel experience: implications for destination branding. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation. 7(1):2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallecillo S, la Notte A, Zulian G, Ferrini S, Maes J. 2019. Ecosystem service accounts: valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people. Ecol Modell. 392:196–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Li X. 2023. The five influencing factors of tourist loyalty: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 18(4):e0283963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward LG, Bub FL. 2005. Temporal variability in salinity, temperature and suspended sediments in a Gulf of Maine estuary (Great Bay estuary, New Hampshire). High Resolut Morphodynamics Sediment Evol Estuaries. 115–142.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan Q, Song H, Chen N, Shang W. 2019. Roles of tourism involvement and place attachment in determining residents’ attitudes toward industrial heritage tourism in a resource-exhausted city in China. Sustainability. 11(19):5151. doi: 10.3390/su11195151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar