863
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Exploring links between local knowledge, values and livelihoods in land-sea interface: insights on emerging tradeoffs and change in Southern Chile

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2329562 | Received 16 Jun 2022, Accepted 06 Mar 2024, Published online: 03 Apr 2024

References

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J. 2005. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science (1979). 309(5737):1036–14. doi: 10.1126/science.1112122.
  • Allen KE, Quinn CE, English C, Quinn JE. 2018. Relational values in agroecosystem governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 35:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.026.
  • Armah FA, Yawson DO, Yengoh GT, Odoi JO, Afrifa EKA. 2010. Impact of floods on livelihoods and vulnerability of natural resource dependent communities in northern Ghana. Water (Basel). 2(2):120–139. doi: 10.3390/w2020120.
  • Avila-Foucat VS, Rodríguez-Robayo KJ. 2018. Determinants of livelihood diversification: the case wildlife tourism in four coastal communities in Oaxaca, Mexico. Tour Manag. 69:223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.021.
  • Barceló M, Vargas CA, Gelcich S. 2023. Land–sea Interactions and ecosysetem services: research gaps and future challenges. Sustainability. 15(10):8068. doi: 10.3390/su15108068.
  • Barreau A, Ibarra JT, Wyndham FS, Rojas A, Kozak RA. 2016. How can we teach our children if we cannot access the forest? Generational change in Mapuche knowledge of wild edible plants in andean temperate ecosystems of Chile. J Ethnobiol. 36(2):412–432. doi: 10.2993/0278-0771-36.2.412.
  • Bataille CY, Malinen SK, Yletyinen J, Scott N, Lyver POB. 2021. Relational values provide common ground and expose multi-level constraints to cross-cultural wetland management. People Nat. 3(4):941–960. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10244.
  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl. 10(5):1251–1262. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2.
  • Bourdieu P, Wacquant LJD. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Chicago press.
  • Brett JM, Mitchell T. 2019. Searching for trustworthiness: culture, trust and negotiating new business relationships. Int J Conflict Manage. 31(1):17–39. doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-05-2019-0085.
  • Bunce M, Rosendo S, Brown K. 2010. Perceptions of climate change, multiple stressors and livelihoods on marginal African coasts. Environ Dev Sustain. 12(3):407–440. doi: 10.1007/s10668-009-9203-6.
  • Cámara-Leret R, Fortuna MA, Bascompte J. 2019. Indigenous knowledge networks in the face of global change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 116(20):9913–9918. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821843116.
  • Castro FD, Oliveira VG. 2007. Between the sea and the land: the livelihood of estuarine people in Southeastern Brazil. Ambient Soc. 10(1):121–136. doi: 10.1590/S1414-753X2007000100008.
  • Caviedes J, Ibarra JT, Calvet-Mir L, Álvarez-Fernández S, Junqueira AB. 2024. Indigenous and local knowledge on social-ecological changes is positively associated with livelihood resilience in a globally important agricultural heritage system. Agric Syst. 216:103885. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103885.
  • Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gould R, Hannahs N, Jax K, Klain S, et al. 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(6):1462–1465. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.5146.0560.
  • Cinner JE, Bodin Ö. 2010. Livelihood diversification in tropical coastal communities: a network-based approach to analyzing ‘livelihood landscapes’. PLoS One. 5(8):e11999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011999.
  • Cinner JE, Daw T, McClanahan TR. 2009. Socioeconomic factors that affect artisanal fishers’ readiness to exit a declining fishery. Conserv Biol. 23(1):124–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01041.x.
  • Cohen N, Arieli T. 2011. Field research in conflict environments: methodological challenges and snowball sampling. J Peace Res. 48(4):423–435. doi: 10.1177/0022343311405698.
  • Etongo D, Djenontin INS, Kanninen M, Glover EK. 2017. Assessing use-values and relative importance of trees for livelihood values and their potentials for environmental protection in southern Burkina Faso. Environ Dev Sustain. 19(4):1141–1166. doi: 10.1007/s10668-016-9787-6.
  • Fawcett D, Pearce T, Notaina R, Ford JD, Collings P. 2018. Inuit adaptability to changing environmental conditions over an 11-year period in Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories. Polar Rec. 54(2):119–132. doi: 10.1017/S003224741800027X.
  • Gelcich S, Godoy N, Castilla JC. 2009. Artisanal fishers’ perceptions regarding coastal co-management policies in Chile and their potentials to scale-up marine biodiversity conservation. Ocean Coast Manag. 52(8):424–432. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.07.005.
  • Gelcich S, Hughes TP, Olsson P, Folke C, Defeo O, Fernández M, Foale S, Gunderson LH, Rodríguez-Sickert C, Scheffer M, et al. 2010. Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(39):16794–16799. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012021107.
  • Haider LJ, Boonstra WJ, Peterson GD, Schlüter M. 2018. Traps and sustainable development in rural areas: a review. World Dev. 101:311–321. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.038.
  • Harmáčková ZV, Yoshida Y, Sitas N, Mannetti L, Martin A, Kumar R, Berbés-Blázquez M, Collins R, Eisenack K, Guimaraes E, et al. 2023. The role of values in future scenarios: what types of values underpin (un)sustainable and (un)just futures? Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 64:101343. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101343.
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas, 2019. Ciudades, pueblos, aldeas y caseríos 2019. https://geoarchivos.ine.cl/File/pub/Cd_Pb_Al_Cs_2019.pdf.
  • IPBES. 2022. Summary for policymakers of the methodological assessment of the diverse values and valuation of nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.6813144.
  • Jax K, Calestani M, Chan KMA, Eser U, Keune H, Muraca B, O’Brien L, Potthast T, Voget-Kleschin L, Wittmer H. 2018. Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 35:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009.
  • Kassegn A, Endris E. 2021. Review on livelihood diversification and food security situations in Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 7(1): doi: 10.1080/23311932.2021.1882135.
  • Kassie GW, Kim S, Fellizar FP Jr. 2017. Determinant factors of livelihood diversification: evidence from Ethiopia. Cogent Soc Sci. 3(1):1369490.
  • Kramer DB, Stevens K, Williams NE, Sistla SA, Roddy AB, Urquhart GR, Hewitt J. 2017. Coastal livelihood transitions under globalization with implications for trans-ecosystem interactions. PloS One. 12(10):1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186683.
  • Lejano RP. 2019. Relationality and social–ecological systems: going beyond or behind sustainability and resilience. Sustainability. 11(10):2760. doi: 10.3390/su11102760.
  • Lotz-Sisitka H, Mukute M, Chikunda C, Baloi A, Pesanayi T. 2017. Transgressing the norm: transformative agency in community-based learning for sustainability in Southern African contexts. Int Rev Educ. 63(6):897–914. doi: 10.1007/s11159-017-9689-3.
  • Lyver POB, Timoti P, Davis T, Tylianakis JM. 2019. Biocultural hysteresis inhibits adaptation to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol. 34(9):771–780. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.002.
  • Martin SM, Lorenzen K, Bunnefeld N. 2013. Fishing farmers: fishing, livelihood diversification and poverty in rural laos. Hum Ecol. 41(5):737–747. doi: 10.1007/s10745-013-9567-y.
  • Molnár Z, Babai D. 2021. Inviting ecologists to delve deeper into traditional ecological knowledge. Trends Ecol Evol. 36(8):679–690. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.04.006.
  • Murray G, D’Anna L, MacDonald P. 2016. Measuring what we value: the utility of mixed methods approaches for incorporating values into marine social-ecological system management. Mar Policy. 73:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.07.008.
  • Newing H, Eagle C, Puri RK, Watson CW. 2011. Conducting research in conservation. UK: Routledge Oxfordshire.
  • O’Connor S, Kenter JO. 2019. Making intrinsic values work; integrating intrinsic values of the more-than-human world through the life framework of values. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1247–1265. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00715-7.
  • Parga León Á. 2020. An experience of displacement in corral. Alpha. 2020(50):335–343. doi: 10.32735/S0718-2201202000050799.
  • Parra SA, Folchi M, Simonetti JA. 2019. Knowledge of native edible plants in a monoculture plantation-dominated landscape. J Ethnobiol. 39(4):567–583. doi: 10.2993/0278-0771-39.4.567.
  • Pascual U, Balvanera P, Anderson CB, Chaplin-Kramer R, Christie M, González-Jiménez D, Martin A, Raymond CM, Termansen M, Vatn A, et al. 2023. Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature. 620(7975):813–823. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9.
  • Pearce T, Wright H, Notaina R, Kudlak A, Smit B, Ford J, Furgal C. 2011. Transmission of environmental knowledge and land skills among Inuit men in Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories, Canada. Hum Ecol. 39(3):271–288. doi: 10.1007/s10745-011-9403-1.
  • Ramirez-Sanchez S, Pinkerton E. 2009. The impact of resource scarcity on bonding and bridging social capital: the case of fishers’ information-sharing networks in Loreto, BCS, Mexico. Ecol Soc. 14(1): doi: 10.5751/es-02841-140122.
  • Ratner BD, Meinzen-Dick R, Hellin J, Mapedza E, Unruh J, Veening W, Haglund E, May C, Bruch C. 2017. Addressing conflict through collective action in natural resource management. Int J Commons. 11(2):877–906. doi: 10.18352/ijc.768.
  • Reyes-García V, Pascual U, Vadez V, Huanca T. 2011. The role of ethnobotanical skills and agricultural labor in forest clearance: evidence from the bolivian amazon. AMBIO. 40(3):310–321. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0107-3.
  • Riechers M, Betz L, Gould R, Loch T, Lam D, Lazzari N, Martín-López B, Sala J. 2022. Reviewing relational values for future research: insights from the coast. Ecol Soc. 27(4):art44. doi: 10.5751/ES-13710-270444.
  • Riechers M, Martín-López B, Fischer J. 2022. Human–nature connectedness and other relational values are negatively affected by landscape simplification: insights from Lower Saxony, Germany. Sustain Sci. 17(3):865–877. doi: 10.1007/s11625-021-00928-9.
  • Roscher MB, Allison EH, Mills DJ, Eriksson H, Hellebrandt D, Andrew NL. 2022. Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries. Fish Fish. (November 2021). 1–16. doi: 10.1111/faf.12662.
  • Roscher MB, Eriksson H, Harohau D, Mauli S, Kaltavara J, Boonstra WJ, van der Ploeg J. 2022. Unpacking pathways to diversified livelihoods from projects in Pacific Island coastal fisheries. AMBIO. 51(10):2107–2117. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01727-x.
  • Roy A, Basu S. 2020. Determinants of livelihood diversification under environmental change in coastal community of Bangladesh. Asia Pac J Rural Dev. 30(1–2):7–26. doi: 10.1177/1018529120946159.
  • Scoones I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Brighton, UK: Institute for Development Studies.
  • Skubel RA, Shriver-Rice M, Maranto GM. 2019. Introducing relational values as a tool for shark conservation, science, and management. Front Mar Sci. 6. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00053.
  • Stirling A. 2007. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J R Soc Interface. 4(15):707–719. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0213.
  • Sutrop U. 2001. List task and a cognitive salience index. Field Method. 13(3):263–276. doi: 10.1177/1525822X0101300303.
  • van Holt T. 2012. Landscape influences on fisher success: adaptation strategies in closed and open access fisheries in southern Chile. Ecol Soc. 17(1): doi: 10.5751/ES-04608-170128.
  • Van Holt T, Crona B, Johnson JC, Gelcich S. 2017. The consequences of landscape change on fishing strategies. Sci Total Environ. 579:930–939. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.052.
  • West S, Haider LJ, Masterson V, Enqvist JP, Svedin U, Tengö M. 2018. Stewardship, care and relational values. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 35:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.008.