Modelling pollination maps in agroecosystems of a Chilean biodiversity hotspot

References

• Afik O, Dag A, Shafir S. 2006. The effect of avocado (Persea americana) nectar composition on its attractiveness to honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie. 37(3):317–15. doi: 10.1051/apido:2005064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizen MA, Garibaldi LA, Cunningham SA, Klein AM. 2008. Long-term global trends in crop yield and production reveal no current pollination shortage but increasing pollinator dependency. Curr Biol. 18(20):1572–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizen MA, Harder LD. 2009. The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination. Curr Biol. 19(11):915–918. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armesto JJ, Manuschevich D, Mora A, Smith-Ramirez C, Rozzi R, Abarzúa AM, Marquet PA. 2010. From the Holocene to the anthropocene: A historical framework for land cover change in southwestern South America in the past 15,000 years. Land Use Policy. 27(2):148–160. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyo MTK, Marquet P, Marticorena C, Simonetti J, Cavieres L, Squeo F, Simonetti Zambelli, JA, Rozzi, R, Massardo, F. 2008. El hotspot chileno, prioridad mundial para la conservación. In: Rovira J, Ugalde J, Stutzin M, editors. 2nd ed. Biodiversidad de Chile, Patrimonio y Desafíos. Santiago, Chile: Ocho libros editores ltda; p. 90–93.
   Google Scholar
• Basualdo M, Cavigliasso P, de Avila RS Jr, Aldea-Sánchez P, Correa-Benítez A, Harms JM, Ramos AK, Rojas-Bravo V, Salvarrey S. 2022. Current status and economic value of insect-pollinated dependent crops in Latin America. Ecol Econ. 196:107395. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukovinszky T, Verheijen J, Zwerver S, Klop E, Biesmeijer JC, Wäckers FL, Prins HHT, Kleijn D. 2017. Exploring the relationships between landscape complexity, wild bee species richness and reproduction, and pollination services along a complexity gradient in the Netherlands. Biol Conserv. 214:312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariveau DP, Nayak GK, Bartomeus I, Zientek J, Ascher JS, Gibbs J, Winfree R. 2016. The allometry of bee proboscis length and its uses in ecology. PLOS ONE. 11(3):e0151482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carré G, Roche P, Chifflet R, Morison N, Bommarco R, Harrison-Cripps J, Krewenka K, Potts SG, Roberts SPM, Rodet G, et al. 2009. Landscape context and habitat type as drivers of bee diversity in European annual crops. Agricult Ecosys Environ. 133(1–2):40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBD. 2018. Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity: conservation and sustainable use of pollinators. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
   Google Scholar
• Celis-Diez JL, García CB, Armesto JJ, Abades S, Garratt MPD, Fontúrbel FE. 2023. Wild floral visitors are more important than honeybees as pollinators of avocado crops. Agronomy. 13(7):1722. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13071722.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Cambio Global UC. 2019. Análisis Situacional: Principales problemas en seis cuencas de Chile. In: Documento de trabajo en el marco de la iniciativa EH2030. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Cambio Global UC.
   Google Scholar
• De Assis JC, Toppa RH, Martines MR, Arena MVN, da Silva Souza M, Carneiro LT, da Silva-Zacarin ECM, da Silva-Zacarin ECM. 2020. The influence of climate and seasonality on bee communities: a complementary method for bee sampling in forest patches of an anthropic matrix. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 41(1):711–723. doi: 10.1007/s42690-020-00261-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DGA. 2004. Diagnóstico y clasificación de los cursos y cuerpos de agua según objetivos de calidad: cuenca el río Aconcagua. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• DGA. 2022. Planilla decretos zonas de escasez hídrica (2008 – 2022). Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Dymond K, Celis-Diez JL, Potts SG, Howlett BG, Willcox BK, Garratt MPD. 2021. The role of insect pollinators in avocado production: A global review. J Appl Entomol. 145(5):369–383. doi: 10.1111/jen.12869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada-Carmona N, Sánchez AC, Remans R, Jones SK. 2022. Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 119(38):e2203385119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203385119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin J-L. 2011. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett. 14(2):101–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores C. 2020. Modelación Operacional del Río Aconcagua. Santiago, Chile: Dirección general de aguas, Ministerios de obras públicas, Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Gajardo-Rojas M, Muñoz AA, Barichivich J, Klock-Barría K, Gayo EM, Fontúrbel FE, Olea M, Lucas CM, Veas C. 2022. Declining honey production and beekeeper adaptation to climate change in Chile. Prog Phys Geogr: Earth Environ. 46(5):737–756. doi: 10.1177/03091333221093757.
   Google Scholar
• García CB, Chávez-Cárdenas DS, Olmos-Moya N, Neaman A, Celis-Diez JL. 2021. Importancia de insectos silvestres en la polinización del palto cultivado bajo manejo orgánico y convencional en Chile central. Agro Sur. 1(1):13–19%V 49. doi: 10.4206/agrosur.2021.v49n1-03.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiazabal F. 2001. Historia y desarrollo del palto en Chile. In: California Avocado Society 2001 Yearbook. California, USA: California Avocado Society; p. 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kremen C, Morales JM, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, Carvalheiro LG, Chacoff NP, Dudenhöffer JH, Greenleaf SS, et al. 2011. Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. Ecol Lett. 14(10):1062–1072. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, Aizen MA, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Carvalheiro LG, Harder LD, Afik O, et al. 2013. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science. 339(6127):1608–1611. doi: 10.1126/science.1230200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulson D, Nicholls E, BotíBotíAs C, Rotheray EL. 2015. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science. 347(6229):1255957. doi: 10.1126/science.1255957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grab H, Branstetter MG, Amon N, Urban-Mead KR, Park MG, Gibbs J, Blitzer EJ, Poveda K, Loeb G, Danforth BN, et al. 2019. Agriculturally dominated landscapes reduce bee phylogenetic diversity and pollination services. Science. 363(6424):282–284. doi: 10.1126/science.aat6016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenleaf SS, Williams NM, Winfree R, Kremen C. 2007. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia. 153(3):589–596. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara W, Hidalgo-Alcázar C, Rojas JL. 2021. Análisis de la agroindustria chilena del aguacate (Palta) en el mercado internacional. Chil J Agric Anim Sci. 37(1):54–64. doi: 10.29393/CHJAAS37-6AAWG30006.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2016. The assessment report of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services on pollinators, pollination and food production. In: Potts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL & Ngo HT, editors. Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3402856.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. E.S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz & H.T. Ngo, editors. Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy CM, Lonsdorf E, Neel MC, Williams NM, Ricketts TH, Winfree R, Bommarco R, Brittain C, Burley AL, Cariveau D, et al. 2013. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol Lett. 16(5):584–599. doi: 10.1111/ele.12082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein A-M, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B. 274(1608):303. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh I, Lonsdorf EV, Williams NM, Brittain C, Isaacs R, Gibbs J, Ricketts TH. 2016. Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(1):140–145. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517685113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremen C, Williams NM, Bugg RL, Fay JP, Thorp RW. 2004. The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecol Lett. 7(11):1109–1119. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00662.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 99(26):16812–16816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrach A, Sanz MJ, Harris J. 2020. Environmental and social consequences of the increase in the demand for ‘superfoods’ world-wide. People Nat. 2(2):267–278. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10085.
   Google Scholar
• MMA. 2019. Áreas de preservación Ecológica. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de medio ambiente, Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• MMA. 2020. Pisos vegetacionales de Luebert y Pliscoff 2017. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de medio ambiente, Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Montalva J, Ruz L. 2010. Actualización sistemática de las abejas chilenas (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Revista chilena Entomología. 35:15–52.
   Google Scholar
• Monzón VH, Avendaño-Soto P, Araujo RO, Garrido R, Mesquita-Neto JN. 2020. Avocado crops as a floral resource for native bees of Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 93(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40693-020-00092-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403(6772):853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos. 120(3):321–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr MC, Hughes AC, Chesters D, Pickering J, Zhu C-D, Ascher JS. 2021. Global patterns and drivers of bee distribution. Curr Biol. 31(3):451–458.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Giraldo L. 2021. Efectos de las Apoidea nativas sobre la polinización y rendimiento de huertos de palto a escala local y de paisaje en la Región Metropolitana. Chile. https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/182956.
   Google Scholar
• Potts SG, Roberts SPM, Dean R, Marris G, Brown MA, Jones R, Neumann P, Settele J. 2010. Declines of managed honey bees and beekeepers in Europe. J Apic Res. 49(1):15–22. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QGIS Development Team. 2022. QGIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Found Proj. http://www.qgis.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi E, Barghjelveh S, Dong P. 2021. Using the lonsdorf model for estimating habitat loss and fragmentation effects on pollination service. Ecol Processes. 10(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13717-021-00291-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards JA, Richards JA. 2022. Remote sensing digital image analysis Vol. 5. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts TH. 2004. Tropical forest fragments enhance pollinator activity in nearby coffee crops. Biol Conserv. 18(5):1262–1271. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts TH, Regetz J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Bogdanski A, Gemmill‐Herren B, Greenleaf SS, Klein AM, Mayfield MM, et al. 2008. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol Lett. 11(5):499–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez S, Acuña I, Escanilla C. 2022. Polinización Sostenible: Adaptación al cambio climático para la producción de fruta en Chile. Valparaíso, Chile: Centro de Biotecnología de Sistemas, Universidad Andrés Bello. https://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/handle/20.500.13082/148269.
   Google Scholar
• RStudio-Team. 2020. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Boston (MA): RStudio, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz JJ, Cayuela L, Echeverria C, Salas J, Rey Benayas JM. 2010. Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of Central Chile (1975–2008). Appl Geogr. 30(3):436–447. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S, Guerry A, Tallis H, Ricketts T. 2020. InVEST user’s guide. California (USA): The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Soto Bäuerle MV, Arriagada González J, Castro Correa CP, Maerker M, Rodolfi G. 2011. Relación entre el cambio de uso del suelo en la cuenca del Aconcagua y su litoral arenoso correlativo: Chile central. Rev Geogr Norte Gd. (50):187–202. doi: 10.4067/S0718-34022011000300011.
   Google Scholar
• Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T. 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology. 83(5):1421–1432. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry A, Wood SA, Sharp R, Nelson E 2013. InVEST 2.5. 6 user’s guide. California (USA): The Natural Capital Project: Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Grass I, Wanger TC, Westphal C, Batáry P. 2021. Beyond organic farming – harnessing biodiversity-friendly landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol. 36(10):919–930. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett. 8(8):857–874. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana BF, Boscolo D, Mariano Neto EMGC, Lopes L, Lopes A, Fereira P, Pigozzo CM, Primo L. 2012. How well do we understand landscape effects on pollinators and pollination services? J Pollinat Ecol. 7. doi: 10.26786/1920-7603(2012)2.
   Google Scholar
• Wentling C, Campos FS, David J, Cabral P. 2021. Pollination potential in Portugal: Leveraging an ecosystem service for sustainable agricultural productivity. Land. 10(4):431. doi: 10.3390/land10040431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westrich P, International Bee Research, A. and Linnean Society of, L. 1996. Habitat requirements of central European bees and the problems of partial habitats. In: Symposium, Conservation of bees. London, England: Academic Press; p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Williams NM, Crone EE, Roulston TAH, Minckley RL, Packer L, Potts SG. 2010. Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biol Conserv. 143(10):2280–2291. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfree R, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP. 2011. Native pollinators in anthropogenic habitats. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 42(1):1–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042.
   Google Scholar
• Winfree R, Reilly JR, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP, Williams NM, Gibbs J. 2018. Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales. Science. 359(6377):791–793. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfree R, Williams NM, Gaines H, Ascher JS, Kremen C. 2008. Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land-use gradients in new jersey and Pennsylvania, USA. J Appl Ecol. 45(3):793–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01418.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Feng D, Yu L, Wang X, Chen Y, Bai Y, Hernández HJ, Galleguillos M, Estades C, Biging GS, et al. 2016. Detailed dynamic land cover mapping of Chile: accuracy improvement by integrating multi-temporal data. Remote Sens Environ. 183:170–185. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar