Conceptualising the role of values in environmental governance and management: an analytical framework

References

• Anderson JE. 1991. A conceptual framework for evaluating and quantifying naturalness. Conserv Biol. 5(3):347–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00148.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Arévalo P, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Pérez-Rincón M. 2018. Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: a taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods. Environ Values. 27(1):29–53. doi: 10.3197/096327118x15144698637513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Arévalo P, Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E. 2017. Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 22(4). doi: 10.5751/es-09812-220443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage D, De Loë R, Plummer R. 2012. Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conserv Lett. 5(4):245–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber WE, Taylor JN. 1990. The importance of goals, objectives, and values in the fisheries management process and organization: a review. North Am J Fish Manage. 10(4):365–373. doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(1990)010<0365:TIOGOA>2.3.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ, Harwood AR, Abson DJ, Andrews B, Crowe A, Dugdale S, Fezzi C, Foden J, Hadley D, Haines-Young R, et al. 2014. Economic analysis for the UK national ecosystem assessment: synthesis and scenario valuation of changes in ecosystem services. Environ Resour Econ. 57(2):273–297. doi: 10.1007/s10640-013-9662-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengston DN. 1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Soc Natur Resour. 7(6):515–533. doi: 10.1080/08941929409380885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett AF, Haslem A, Cheal DC, Clarke MF, Jones RN, Koehn JD, Lake PS, Lumsden LF, Lunt ID, Mackey BG. 2009. Ecological processes: a key element in strategies for nature conservation. Ecol Manage Restor. 10(3):192–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2009.00489.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett NJ, Satterfield T. 2018. Environmental governance: a practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis. Conserv Lett. 11(6):e12600. doi: 10.1111/conl.12600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentrupperbäumer JM, Day TJ, Reser JP. 2006. Uses, meanings, and understandings of values in the environmental and protected area arena: a consideration of “World heritage” values. Soc Natur Resour. 19(8):723–741. doi: 10.1080/08941920600801140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieling C, Eser U, Plieninger T. 2020. Towards a better understanding of values in sustainability transformations: ethical perspectives on landscape stewardship. Ecosysts People. 16(1):188–196. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1786165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend G, Hill R. 2015. Governance for the conservation of nature. ANU Press. doi: 10.22459/pagm.04.2015.07.
   Google Scholar
• Bouman T, Steg L, Kiers HAL. 2018. Measuring values in environmental research: a test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire [original research]. Front Psychol. 9:9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakey H. 2021. Harnessing multidimensional legitimacy for codes of ethics: a staged approach. J Bus Ethics. 170(2):359–373. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04270-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TC. 1984. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Econ. 60(3):231–246. doi: 10.2307/3146184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gould R, Hannahs N, Jax K, Klain S, et al. 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 113(6):1462–1465. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KM, Gould RK, Pascual U. 2018. Editorial overview: relational values: what are they, and what’s the fuss about? Curr Opin Sust. 35:A1–A7. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie M, Martín-López B, Church A, Siwicka E, Szymonczyk P, Mena Sauterel J. 2019. Understanding the diversity of values of “nature’s contributions to people”: insights from the IPBES assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Sustainability Sci. 14(5):1267–1282. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00716-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinner JE, Barnes ML. 2019. Social dimensions of resilience in social-ecological systems. One Earth. 1(1):51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Clark BM, Turpie JKE. 2014. Analysis of alternatives for the rehabilitation of the lake St Lucia estuarine system.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar A. 1999. After nature: steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Curr Anthropol. 40(1):1–30. doi: 10.1086/515799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish R, Church A, Willis C, Winter M, Tratalos JA, Haines-Young R, Potschin M. 2016. Making space for cultural ecosystem services: insights from a study of the UK nature improvement initiative. Ecosyst Serv. 21:329–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Biggs R, Norström AV, Reyers B, Rockström J. 2016. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol Soc. 21(3). doi: 10.5751/es-08748-210341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey R. 1994. Eye juggling: seeing the world through a looking glass and a glass pane: a workbook for clarifying and interpreting values. Lanham, Maryland US: University Press of Amer.
   Google Scholar
• Gain AK, Giupponi C, Renaud FG, Vafeidis AT. 2020. Sustainability of complex social-ecological systems: methods, tools, and approaches. Reg Environ Change. 20(3). doi: 10.1007/s10113-020-01692-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparatos A. 2010. Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications. J Environ Manag. 91(8):1613–1622. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee K, Kannen A, Adlam R, Brooks C, Chapman M, Cormier R, Fischer C, Fletcher S, Gubbins M, Shucksmith R, et al. 2017. Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning. Ocean Coast Manag. 136:139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould RK, Pai M, Muraca B, Chan KMA. 2019. He ʻike ʻana ia i ka pono (it is a recognizing of the right thing): how one indigenous worldview informs relational values and social values. Sustainability Sci. 14(5):1213–1232. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00721-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert E. 2018. Relational values in environmental assessment: the social context of environmental impact. Curr Opin Sust. 35:100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himes A, Muraca B. 2018. Relational values: the key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Curr Opin Sust. 35:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirons M, Comberti C, Dunford R. 2016. Valuing cultural ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 41(1):545–574. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islar M, Balvanera P, Kelemen E, Pascaul U, Subramanian SM, Nakangu B, Kosmus M, Nuesiri E, de Vos A, Porter-Bolland L. 2022. Methodological assessment report on the diverse values and valuation of nature of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services: chapter 6: policy options and capacity development to operationalize the inclusion of diverse values of nature in decision-making.
   Google Scholar
• Ives CD, Kendal D. 2014. The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. J Environ Manag. 144:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson D. 1995. Ecosystem health: some preventive medicine. Environ Values. 4(4):333–344. doi: 10.3197/096327195776679411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones NA, Shaw S, Ross H, Witt K, Pinner B. 2016. The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 21(1). doi: 10.5751/es-07977-210115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn BP, Linnell JDC, Gómez-Baggethun E, Lindhjem H, Thomassen J, Chan KM. 2017. Ecosystem services and cultural values as building blocks for ‘the good life’. A case study in the community of Røst, Lofoten Islands, Norway. Ecol Econ. 140:166–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney RL. 1996. Value-focused thinking: identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. Eur J Oper Res. 92(3):537–549. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(96)00004-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenter JO, O’Brien L, Hockley N, Ravenscroft N, Fazey I, Irvine KN, Reed MS, Christie M, Brady E, Bryce R, et al. 2015. What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecolog Economic. 111:86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenter JO, Reed MS, Fazey I. 2016. The deliberative value formation model. Ecosyst Serv. 21:194–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klain SC, Olmsted P, Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Zia A. 2017. Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the new ecological paradigm. PLOS ONE. 12(8):e0183962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippenberg L, De Groot WT, Van Den Born RJ, Knights P, Muraca B. 2018. Relational value, partnership, eudaimonia: a review. Curr Opin Sust. 35:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremen C, Ostfeld RS. 2005. A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ. 3(10):540–548. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0540:ACTEMA]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuster C. 2011. In search of common ground: towards a model for the integration of local and scientific perspectives in the selection of community-based marine protected areas. PhD thesis, Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University. https://researchportal.scu.edu.au/esploro/outputs/doctoral/In-search-of-common-ground/991012820334802368?institution=61SCU_INS.
   Google Scholar
• Kuster C, Vuki VC, Zann LP. 2005. Long-term trends in subsistence fishing patterns and coral reef fisheries yield from a remote Fijian island. Fish Res. 76(2):221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey RT. 2001. Values, policy, and ecosystem health. BioScience. 51(6):437–443. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0437:VPAEH]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood M, Davidson J, Curtis A, Stratford E, Griffith R. 2010. Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc Natur Resour. 23(10):986–1001. doi: 10.1080/08941920802178214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque-Lora R. 2010. The trouble with relational values. Environ Values 32(4):411–431. doi: 10.3197/096327122X16611552268681.
   Google Scholar
• Mancilla García M, Hertz T, Schlüter M, Preiser R, Woermann M. 2020. Adopting process-relational perspectives to tackle the challenges of social-ecological systems research. Ecol Soc. 25(1). doi: 10.5751/es-11425-250129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margules CR, Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 405(6783):243–253. doi: 10.1038/35012251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marttunen M, Hämäläinen RP. 2008. The decision analysis interview approach in the collaborative management of a large regulated water course. Environ Manage. 42(6):1026–1042. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9200-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattijssen TJM, Ganzevoort W, Van Den Born RJG, Arts BJM, Breman BC, Buijs AE, Van Dam RI, Elands BHM, De Groot WT, Knippenberg LWJ. 2020. Relational values of nature: leverage points for nature policy in Europe. Ecosyst People. 16(1):402–410. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1848926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer S. 2004. Deliberation in the wilderness: displacing symbolic politics. Env Polity. 13(2):347–372. doi: 10.1080/0964401042000209612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton BG. 2000. Biodiversity and environmental values: in search of a universal earth ethic. Biodivers Conserv. 9(8):1029–1044. doi: 10.1023/A:1008966400817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton BG, Steinemann AC. 2001. Environmental values and adaptive management. Environ Values. 10(4):473–506. doi: 10.3197/096327101129340921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton B, Sanbeg D. 2021. Relational values: a unifying idea in environmental ethics and evaluation? Environ Values. 30(6):695–714. doi: 10.3197/096327120X16033868459458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntona M, Morgera E. 2018. Connecting SDG 14 with the other sustainable development goals through marine spatial planning. Mar Policy. 93:214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor S, Kenter JO. 2019. Making intrinsic values work; integrating intrinsic values of the more-than-human world through the life framework of values. Sustainability Sci. 14(5):1247–1265. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00715-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojeda J, Salomon AK, Rowe JK, Ban NC. 2022. Reciprocal contributions between people and nature: a conceptual intervention. BioSci. 72(10):952–962. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biac053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual U, Balvanera P, Anderson CB, Chaplin-Kramer R, Christie M, González-Jiménez D, Martin A, Raymond CM, Termansen M, Vatn A, et al. 2023. Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature. 620(7975):813–823. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Başak Dessane E, Islar M, Kelemen E, et al. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr Opin Environ Sustainab. 26-27:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlman D, Adelson G. 1997. Biodiversity: exploring values and priorities in conservation. doi: 10.1002/9781444313550.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond CM, Fazey I, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Robinson GM, Evely AC. 2010. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. J Environ Manag. 91(8):1766–1777. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rist L, Campbell BM, Frost P. 2013. Adaptive management: where are we now? Environ Conserv. 40(1):5–18. doi: 10.1017/s0376892912000240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld JS, Ptolemy R. 2017. Trade-offs and the importance of separating science and values in environmental flow assessment. Can Water Resour J/Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques. 42(1):88–96. doi: 10.1080/07011784.2016.1211036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagoff M. 1998. Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: a look beyond contingent pricing. Ecol Econ. 24(2–3):213–230. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00144-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders F, Gilek M, Ikauniece A, Tafon RV, Gee K, Zaucha J. 2020. Theorizing social sustainability and justice in marine spatial planning: democracy, diversity, and equity. Sustain. 12(6):2560. doi: 10.3390/su12062560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund J-L, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M, Boedhihartono AK, Day M, Garcia C, et al. 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 110(21):8349–8356. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210595110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder H. 2013. Sensing value in place. In: Stewart WP, Williams DR Kruger LE, editors. Place-based conservation: perspectives from the social sciences. Springer Netherlands; p. 73–87. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5802-5_6.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz C, Martin-Ortega J. 2018. Quantifying relational values — why not? Curr Opin Sust. 35:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH, Bilsky W. 1987. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. J Pers Soc Psychol. 53(3):550–562. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour E, Curtis A, Pannell D, Allan C, Roberts A. 2010. Understanding the role of assigned values in natural resource management. Australas J Environ Manage. 17(3):142–153. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2010.9725261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skewes T, Wise RM, Dunstan P, Hayes D, Fisher M, Moeseneder C, Butler J, N P. 2017. An ecosystem values framework to support decision makers in the coral triangle. https://png-data.sprep.org/dataset/ecosystem-values-framework-support-decision-makers-coral-triangle.
   Google Scholar
• Stålhammar S, Thorén H. 2019. Three perspectives on relational values of nature. Sustainability Sci. 14(5):1201–1212. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00718-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson RL, Hobday AJ, Allison EH, Armitage D, Brooks K, Bundy A, Cvitanovic C, Dickey-Collas M, Grilli NDM, Gomez C, et al. 2021. The quilt of sustainable ocean governance: patterns for practitioners. Front Mar Sci. 8. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.630547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern PC, Dietz T, Guagnano GA. 1998. A brief inventory of values. Educ Psychol Meas. 58(6):984–1001. doi: 10.1177/0013164498058006008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadaki M, Allen W, Sinner J. 2015. Revealing ecological processes or imposing social rationalities? The politics of bounding and measuring ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 118:168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadaki M, Sinner J, Chan KMA. 2017. Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts. Ecol Soc. 22(1). doi: 10.5751/es-08999-220107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer M, Gladstone W, Goodall H. 2015. Obtaining a social licence for MPAs – influences on social acceptability. Mar Policy. 51:260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer M, Moyle C, Kuster C, Lewis A, Lal KK, Quirk G. 2021. Achieving comprehensive integrated ocean management requires normative, applied, and empirical integration. One Earth. 4(7):1016–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.004.
   Google Scholar