2,246
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Performance of a new model of nasal filter when challenged against PM1 aerosols

, , , , , & show all
Pages 388-394 | Received 21 Jul 2021, Accepted 06 Oct 2021, Published online: 20 Oct 2021

References

  • Gao J, Woodward A, Vardoulakis S, et al. Haze, public health and mitigation measures in China: a review of the current evidence for further policy response. Sci Total Environ. 2017;578:148–157.
  • Hadei M, Hopke PK, Nazari SSH, et al. Estimation of mortality and hospital admissions attributed to criteria air pollutants in tehran metropolis, iran. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2017;17(10):2474–2481.
  • Prueitt RL, Li W, Edwards L, et al. Systematic review of the association between long-term exposure to fine particulate matter and mortality. Int J Environ Health Res. 2021;1–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2021.1901864
  • Stieb DM, Shutt RH, Kauri LM, et al. Associations between air pollution and cardio-respiratory physiological measures in older adults exercising outdoors. Int J Environ Health Res. 2019;1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2019.1699506
  • Zhang J, Feng L, Hou C, et al. Interactive effect between temperature and fine particulate matter on chronic disease hospital admissions in the urban area of tianjin. China Int J Environ Health Res. 2021;31(1):75–84.
  • Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–2260.
  • Caiazzo F, Ashok A, Waitz IA, et al. Air pollution and early deaths in the united states. part i: Quantifying the impact of major sectors in 2005. Atmos Environ. 2013;79:198–208.
  • Beelen R, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Stafoggia M, et al. Effects of long-term exposure to air pollution on natural-cause mortality: An analysis of 22 european cohorts within the multicentre escape project. Lancet. 2014;383:785–795.
  • Li Y, Zhao H, Wu Y. Characteristics of particulate matter during haze and fog (pollution) episodes over northeast China, autumn 2013. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2015;15(3):853–864.
  • Xu P, Zhang J, Ji D, et al. Evaluating the effects of springtime dust storms over beijing and the associated characteristics of sub-micron aerosol. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2017;17(3):680–692.
  • Wu Z, Hu M, Lin P, et al. Particle number size distribution in the urban atmosphere of beijing, China. Atmos Environ. 2008;42(34):7967–7980.
  • Gaita SM, Boman J, Gatari MJ, et al. Characterization of size-fractionated particulate matter and deposition fractions in human respiratory system in a typical african city: Nairobi, Kenya. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2016;16(10):2378–2385.
  • Pope III CA. Epidemiological basis for particulate air pollution health standards. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2000;32(1):4–14.
  • Davidson CS, Green CF, Gibbs SG, et al. Performance evaluation of selected n95 respirators and surgical masks when challenged with aerosolized endospores and inert particles. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(9):461–467.
  • Camner P, Bakke B. Nose or mouth breathing? Environ Res. 1980;21(2):394–398.
  • Pasricha J. Use of nasal filters in naso-bronchial allergy. Indian J Pediatr. 1981;48(1):47–50.
  • D’Amato G, D’amato M, Rumi G, et al. Improvement of quality of life in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis patients using nasal filters, a preliminary study. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;45:167–175.
  • Kenney P, Hilberg O, Sigsgaard T. Clinical application of nasal filters: An obser vational study on the usability of nasal filters in managing seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;4(3):445–452.
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 42 CFR part 84 respiratory protective devices: Final rules and notice. Fed Regist. 1995;60:30336–30402.
  • Cooper E. A comparison of the respiratory work done against an external resistance by man and by a sine-wave pump. Exp Physiol. 1960;45(2):179–191.
  • Eshbaugh JP, Gardner PD, Richardson AW, et al. N95 and P100 respirator filter efficiency under high constant and cyclic flow. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009;6(1):52–61.
  • Wang A, Richardson AW, Hofacre KC. The effect of flow pattern on collection efficiency of respirator filters. J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2012;29:41–54.
  • Zhu J, He X, Guffey S, et al. Performance comparison of N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators with presence of artificial leakage. Ann Work Expo Health. 2020;64(2):202–216.
  • Hinds WC. Respiratory Deposition in Aerosol Technology: filtration, Properties, Behaviour, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. 2nd ed., Vol. 11, New York, America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Publisher; 1999. p. 182–205.
  • Zhi Y, Vena D, Popovic MR, et al. Detecting inspiratory flow limitation with temporal features of nasal airflow. Sleep Med. 2018;48:70–78.
  • Zhu J, He X, Bergman MS, et al. A pilot study of minimum operational flow for loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators used in healthcare cleaning services. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019;16:440–445.
  • Kumar A, Bhattacharjee B, Sangeetha DN, et al. Evaluation of filtration effectiveness of various types of facemasks following with different sterilization methods. J Ind Text. 2021;0:1–36.
  • Kumar A, Sangeetha DN, Yuvaraj R, et al. Quantitative performance analysis of respiratory facemasks using atmospheric and laboratory generated aerosols following with gamma sterilization. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2020;21(1):1–17.
  • Kumar A, Subramanian V, Joshi S, et al. Assessment of N95 respirator for reuse after sterilization: Filtration efficacy, breathing resistance, quality factor, chemical structure and surface charge density. medRxiv. [Preprint] May 27, 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.25.21257801
  • Eninger RM, Honda T, Adhikari A, et al. Filter performance of N99 and N95 facepiece respirators against viruses and ultrafine particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008;52(5):385–396.
  • Huang S, Chen C, Kuo Y, et al. Factors affecting filter penetration and quality factor of particulate respirators. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2013;13(1):162–171.
  • Mukhametzanov IT, Grinshpun SA, Zaripov SK, et al. Assessing the protection provided by facepiece filtering respirator: New model involving spherical porous layer with annular peripheral opening. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2016;16(10):2428–2437.
  • Watson RM, Warren DW, Fischer ND. Nasal resistance, skeletal classification, and mouth breathing in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod. 1968;54(5):367–379.
  • Warren DW, Hinton VA, Pillsbury HC, et al. Effects of size of the na sal airway on nasal airflow rate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(4):405–408.
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO/TS. 16976-1 respiratory protective devices-human factors. In: Part 1: Metabolic rates and respiratory flow rates. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO Copyright Office; 2015: 1-19.
  • Chen S, Wang J, Bahk YK, et al. Carbon nanotube penetration through fiberglass and electret respirator filter and nucleopore filter media: experiments and models. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2014;48(10):997–1008.
  • Lizal F, Elcner J, Jedelsky J, et al. The effect of oral and nasal breathing on the deposition of inhaled particles in upper and tracheobronchial airways. J Aerosol Sci. 2020;150:105649.
  • Niinimaa V, Cole P, Mintz S, et al. The switching point from nasal to oronasal breathing. Respir Physiol. 1980;42(1):61–71.