Interaction of the concentration of S^2–, SO₄^2– and microbial community by controlling nitrogen stripping during sulfate-rich wastewater treatment

References

• Liu CS, Zhao DF, Yan LH, et al. Elemental sulfur formation and nitrogen removal from wastewaters by autotrophic denitrifiers and anammox bacteria. Bioresour Technol. 2015;191:332–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun MY, Cui GW, Wang JF, et al. The Sulfur Distribution Regularities of Huaheng High Sulfur Coal. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science). 2013;32:36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang WQ, Li B, Gao B. Research Status and Development Trend of Mine Roof Water Inrush Prediction. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science). 2017;36:15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Zhang G, Ma C, et al. Antimony removal from wastewater by sulfate-reducing bacteria in a bench-scale upflow anaerobic packed-bed reactor. Acta Geochimica. 2020;39(2):203–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira EW, Godoi L, Yabuki L, et al. Sulfate and metal removal from acid mine drainage using sugarcane vinasse as electron donor: performance and microbial community of the down-flow structured-bed bioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 2021;330:124968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Andrea I, Sanz JL, Bijmans MFM, et al. Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage. J Hazard Mater. 2014;269:98–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao ZG, Meng LQ, Liu XT, et al. Geochemical Characteristics and Ore Genesis of Nanxiaoyao Gold Deposit in Central Yishu Fault Zone, Shandong Province. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science). 2019;38:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pruden A, Messner N, Pereyra L, et al. The effect of inoculum on the performance of sulfate-reducing columns treating heavy metal contaminated water. Water Res. 2007;41(4):904–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay MBJ, Wakeman KD, Rowe OF, et al. Microbiology and Geochemistry of Mine Tailings Amended with Organic Carbon for Passive Treatment of Pore Water. Geomicrobiol J. 2011;28(3):229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiibel SR, Pereyra LP, Breazeal MVR, et al. Effect of Organic Substrate on the Microbial Community Structure in Pilot-Scale Sulfate-Reducing Biochemical Reactors Treating Mine Drainage. Environ Eng Sci. 2011;28(8):563–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiibel SR, Pereyra LP, Inman LY, et al. Microbial community analysis of two field-scale sulfate-reducing bioreactors treating mine drainage. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10(8):2087–2097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins M, Santos ES, Pires C, et al. Production of irrigation water from bioremediation of acid mine drainage: comparing the performance of two representative systems. J Clean Prod. 2010;18(3):248–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez Y, Escobar MC, Saenz JS, et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time on microbial community in biochemical passive reactors during treatment of acid mine drainage. Bioresour Technol. 2018;247:624–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber KP, Werker A, Gehder M, et al. Influence of the Microbial Community in the Treatment of Acidic Iron-Rich Water in Aerobic Wetland Mesocosms. Bioremed J. 2010;14(1):28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Icgen B, Harrison S. Exposure to sulfide causes populations shifts in sulfate-reducing consortia, research in microbiology. Research in Microbiology. 2006;157(8):784–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosa S, Harrison S. Product inhibition by sulphide species on biological sulphate reduction for the treatment of acid mine drainage. Hydrometallurgy. 2006;83(1–4):214–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Q, Huang J, Yang L, et al. Characteristic of metabolism for sulfur-containing components during sulfate bioreduction process. Chin J Environ Eng. 2018;12:2783–2790.
   Google Scholar
• Gao M, Li L, Liu JX. Simultaneous removal of hydrogen sulfide and toluene in a bioreactor: performance and characteristics of microbial community. J Environ Sci. 2011;23(3):353–359.
   Google Scholar
• Postgate JR. The Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Shi K, Xue JL, Xiao XF, et al. Mechanism of Degrading Petroleum Hydrocarbons by Compound Marine Petroleum-Degrading Bacteria: surface Adsorption, Cell Uptake, and Biodegradation. Energy Fuels. 2019;33(11):11373–11379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro W. Ogram, Phylogeny of sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000;31(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorokin DY, Tourova TP, Spiridonova EM, et al. Thioclava pacifica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel facultatively autotrophic, marine, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium from a near-shore sulfidic hydrothermal area. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55(3):1069–1075.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Fan M, Liu L, et al. Treatment of high-concentration chromium-containing wastewater by sulfate-reducing bacteria acclimated with ethanol. Water Sci Technol. 2020;80. 10.2166/wst.2020.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Hanselmann KW, Hurzeler RA. Biological sulfuric acid transformation: reactor design and process optimization. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1993;41(3):303–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Zhu N. Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;58:429–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Ortiz R, Steele TWJ, et al. Toxicants inhibiting anaerobic digestion: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(8):1523–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraz RM, Costa JM, Verola LM, et al. Effects of the inoculum source, electron donor, and immobilization on the microbial community of sulfidogenic bioreactors. Chem Eng J. 2021;404:126549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angélica Marcia Dos S, Martins Costa J, Kawanishi Braga J, et al. Lactate as an effective electron donor in the sulfate reduction: impacts on the microbial diversity. Environ Technol. 2021;1–12. 10.1080/09593330.2021.1916092
   Google Scholar
• Whitman WB. Dethiosulfovibrio. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc;2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jabari L, Gannoun H, Cayol J-L, et al. Macellibacteroides fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Porphyromonadaceae isolated from an upflow anaerobic filter treating abattoir wastewaters. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62(Pt_10):2522–2527.
   Google Scholar
• Simon J, Kroneck PMH. Chapter Two-Microbial Sulfite Respiration. Poole RK, Ed. Adv Microb Physiol. 62 2013. 10.1016/B978-0-12-410515-7.00002-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindaichi T, Ito T, Okabe S. Ecophysiological interaction between nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms as determined by microautoradiography-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(3):1641–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar