345
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Functions, Utilities and Limitations: A Scoping Study of Decision Support Algorithms in Social Work

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahn, E., Gil, Y., & Putnam-Hornstein, E. (2021). Predicting youth at high risk of aging out of foster care using machine learning methods. Child Abuse & Neglect, 117, 105059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105059
  • Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Assadi, A., & Lundin, M. (2018). Street-level bureaucrats, rule-following and tenure: How assessment tools are used at the front line of the public sector. Public Administration, 96(1), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12386
  • Bako, A. T., Taylor, H. L., Wiley, K., Jr., Zheng, J., Walter-McCabe, H., Kasthurirathne, S. N., & Vest, J. R. (2021). Using natural language processing to classify social work interventions. The American Journal of Managed Care, 27(1), e24–e31. https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2021.88580
  • Bono-Nuez, A., Blasco, R., Casas, R., & Martín-del-Brío, B. (2014). Ambient intelligence for quality of life assessment. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 6(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.3233/ais-130241
  • Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00168
  • Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00040
  • Caswell, D., Marston, G., & Larsen, J. E. (2010). Unemployed citizen or ‘at risk’ client? Classification systems and employment services in Denmark and Australia. Critical Social Policy, 30(3), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018310367674
  • Considine, M., McGann, M., Ball, S., & Nguyen, P. (2022). Can robots understand welfare? Exploring machine bureaucracies in welfare-to-work. Journal of Social Policy, 51(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000174
  • Cwikel, J., & Monnickendam, M. (1993). Factors in acceptance of advanced information technology among social workers: An exploratory study. Computers in Human Services, 9(3–4), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1300/j407v09n03_07
  • Desiere, S., Langenbucher, K., & Struyven, L. (2019). Statistical profiling in public employment services: An international comparison. Social Sciences, 8, 281. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/statistical-profiling-in-public-employment-services_b5e5f16e-en
  • Eskelinen, L., Petersen, J. S., & Bolvig, I. (2015). Profilering af ledige. Analyse af profileringsværktøjer i fire lande [Profiling of unemployed: An analysis of tools for profiling in four countries]. VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Reserach.
  • Frey, W. R., Patton, D. U., Gaskell, M. B., & McGregor, K. A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and inclusion: Formerly gang-involved youth as domain experts for analyzing unstructured Twitter data. Social Science Computer Review, 38(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318788314
  • Gillingham, P. (2016). Predictive risk modelling to prevent child maltreatment and other adverse outcomes for service users: Inside the ‘black box’ of machine learning. British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 1044–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv031
  • Gillingham, P. (2019a). Can predictive algorithms assist decision‐making in social work with children and families? Child Abuse Review, 28(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2547
  • Gillingham, P. (2019b). Decision support systems, social justice and algorithmic accountability in social work: A new challenge. Practice, 31(4), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2019.1575954
  • Gillingham, P. (2020). The development of algorithmically based decision-making systems in children’s protective services: Is administrative data good enough? The British Journal of Social Work, 50(2), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz157
  • Grządzielewska, M. (2021). Using machine learning in burnout prediction: A survey. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00733-w
  • Hsieh, T. C., Wang, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. S., Ke, J. T., Liu, C. K., & Chen, S. C. (2018). Measuring the unmeasurable—a study of domestic violence risk prediction and management. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 36(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2017.1417953
  • Ji, S., Pan, S., Li, X., Cambria, E., Long, G., & Huang, Z. (2021). Suicidal ideation detection: A review of machine learning methods and applications. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 8(1), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2020.3021467
  • Jørgensen, A. M., & Nissen, M. A. (2022). Making sense of decision support systems: Rationales, translations and potentials for critical reflections on the reality of child protection. Big Data & Society, 9(2), 20539517221125163. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221125163
  • Kaun, A. (2021). Suing the algorithm: The mundanization of automated decision-making in public services through litigation. Information, Communication & Society, 25(14), 2046–2062. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1924827
  • Keddell, E. (2019). Algorithmic justice in child protection: Statistical fairness, social justice and the implications for practice. Social Sciences, 8(10), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100281
  • Krakouer, J., Tan, W. W., & Parolini, A. (2021). Who is analysing what? The opportunities, risks and implications of using predictive risk modelling with Indigenous Australians in child protection: A scoping review. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.155
  • Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976
  • Lanier, P., Rodriguez, M., Verbiest, S., Bryant, K., Guan, T., & Zolotor, A. (2020). Preventing infant maltreatment with predictive analytics: Applying ethical principles to evidence-based child welfare policy. Journal of Family Violence, 35(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00074-y
  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). MIT Press.
  • Liedgren, P., Elvhage, G., Ehrenberg, A., & Kullberg, C. (2016). The use of decision support systems in social work: A scoping study literature review. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2014.914992
  • Lund, C. (2019). Algoritmer i socialfaglige vurderinger – En undersøgelse af socialarbejderes opfattelse af at anvende algoritmer til vurdering af underretninger. Uden for Nummer, 19(39), 4–19. https://socialraadgiverne.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/39-UdenForNummer.pdf
  • Martinez-Gil, J., Paoletti, A. L., & Schewe, K. D. (2016). A smart approach for matching, learning and querying information from the human resources domain. In M. Ivanović, B. Thalheim, B. Catania, K. D. Schewe, M. Kirikova, P. Šaloun, A. Dahanayake, T. Cerquitelli, E. Baralis, & P. Michiardi (Eds.), Communications in computer and information science: New trends in databases and information systems (pp. 157–167). Springer International Publishing.
  • Meilvang, M. L., & Dahler, A. M. (2022). Decision support and algorithmic support: The construction of algorithms and professional discretion in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2063806
  • Meyers, R., & Houssemand, C. (2010). Socioprofessional and psychological variables that predict job finding. European Review of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2009.11.004
  • Monnickendam, M., Savaya, R., & Waysman, M. (2005). Thinking processes in social workers’ use of a clinical decision support system: A qualitative study. Social Work Research, 29(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/29.1.21
  • Mozzana, C. (2019). A matter of definitions: The profiling of people in Italian active labour market policies. Historical Social Research, 44(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.44.2019.2.225-246
  • O’Connell, P. J., Mcguinness, S., & Kelly, E. (2012). The transition from short- to long-term unemployment: A statistical profiling model for Ireland. Economic and Social Review, 43(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v29n04_02
  • O’Looney, J. (2005). Social work and the new semantic information revolution. Administration in Social Work, 29(4), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v29n04_02
  • Reusens, M., Lemahieu, W., Baesens, B., & Sels, L. (2017). A note on explicit versus implicit information for job recommendation. Decision Support Systems, 98, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.04.002
  • Reusens, M., Lemahieu, W., Baesens, B., & Sels, L. (2018). Evaluating recommendation and search in the labor market. Knowledge-Based Systems, 152, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.04.007
  • Rice, E., Yoshioka-Maxwell, A., Petering, R., Onasch-Vera, L., Craddock, J., Tambe, M., Yadav, A., Wilder, B., Woo, D., Winetrobe, H., & Wilson, N. (2018). Piloting the use of artificial intelligence to enhance HIV prevention interventions for youth experiencing homelessness. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 9(4), 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1086/701439
  • Schneider, D., & Seelmeyer, U. (2019). Challenges in using big data to develop decision support systems for social work in Germany. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(2–3), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2019.1614513
  • Serrano, E., Suárez-Figueroa, M. C., González-Pachón, J., & Gómez-Pérez, A. (2019). Toward proactive social inclusion powered by machine learning. Knowledge and Information Systems, 58(3), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1230-x
  • Søbjerg, L. M. (2022). Developing a statistical model for assessment of referrals of children at risk. Child Abuse Review, 31(4), e2749. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2749
  • Veale, M., & Brass, I. (2019). Administration by algorithm? Public management meets public sector machine learning. In K. Yeung & M. Lodge (Eds.), Algorithmic regulation (pp. 1–30). Oxford University Press.
  • Venturini, T., Jacomy, M., Meunier, A., & Latour, B. (2017). An unexpected journey: A few lessons from sciences Po médialab’s experience. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 2053951717720949. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717720949
  • Walsh, M. C., Joyce, S., Maloney, T., & Vaithianathan, R. (2020). Exploring the protective factors of children and families identified at highest risk of adverse childhood experiences by a predictive risk model: An analysis of the growing up in New Zealand cohort. Children and Youth Services Review, 108, 104556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104556
  • Wandner, S. A. (2008). Employment programs for recipients of unemployment insurance. Monthly Labor Review, 31(10), 17–27.
  • Webb, S. (2002). Evidence-based practice and decision analysis in social work: An implementation model. Journal of Social Work, 2(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730200200104
  • Wijnhoven, M. A., & Havinga, H. (2014). The work profiler: A digital instrument for selection and diagnosis of the unemployed. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 29(6–7), 740–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214545045

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.