Critical insights on the demographic concept of “birth spacing”: locating Nef in family well-being, bodies, and relationships in Senegal

References

• Hunt NR. Le bébé en brousse’: European women, African birth spacing and colonial intervention in breast feed in the Belgian Congo. In: Cooper F, Stoler AL, editors. Tensions of Empire: colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois world. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California; 1997. p. 401–432.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle E, Van de Walle F. Postpartum sexual abstinence in Tropical Africa. 1989; 19 pages p.
   Google Scholar
• Bledsoe C, Banja F, Hill AG. Reproductive mishaps and western contraception: an African challenge to fertility theory. Popul Dev Rev. 1998;24(1):15–57. doi: 10.2307/2808121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castano F, et al. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43(2):93–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00308.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adjambo A, Antoine P. Le Sénégal face au défi démographique. In: Diop C, editor. La société sénégalaise entre le local et le global. Paris: Karthala; 2002. p. 511–547.
   Google Scholar
• Ronsmans C. Birth spacing and child survival in rural Senegal. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(5):989–997. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.5.989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledsoe CH. Contingent lives: fertility, time, and aging in West Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Randall S, Legrand T. Reproductive strategies and decisions in Senegal: the role of child mortality. Population-E. 2003;58(6):687–716. doi: 10.3917/pope.306.0687
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro FL, Duclos D, Baggaley RF, et al. Taking stock: protocol for evaluating a family planning supply chain intervention in Senegal. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0163-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbodj MM. Babacar; Badiane, Waly Population et “développement”: quelle politique? In: Diop M-C, editor. Sénégal Trajectoires d’un État. Dakar: Codesria; 1992. p. 177–204.
   Google Scholar
• Adjambo A, Antoine P. Le Sénégal face au défi démographique. In: Diop C, editor. La société sénégalaise entre le local et le global. Paris: Karthala; 2002. p. 511–547.
   Google Scholar
• Suh S. Rewriting abortion: Deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal. Soc Sci Med. 2014;108:20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanbury JB, Childs JA. A framework for evaluating long-term strategies for the development of the Sahel-Sudan RegionAnnex  2. Health, nutrition, and population center for policy altenatives. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Suh S. Accounting for abortion: Accomplishing transnational reproductive governance through post-abortion care in Senegal. Glob Public Health. 2018;13(6):662–679. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1301513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Population policy. Senegal adopts population policy. 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes J, Bishop A, Cuellar C. Senegal private health sector rapid assessment. Bethesda (MD): Abt Associates, Private Sector Partnerships-One [PSP-One]; 2009; Mar., 2009.
   Google Scholar
• LOI n° 2005-18 du 5 août 2005 relative à la santé de la reproduction. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro FL, Benova L, Macleod D, et al. Examining trends in family planning among harder-to-reach women in Senegal 1992–2014. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41006. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep41006#supplementary-information. doi: 10.1038/srep41006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sante Mdl. Plan Strategique de la Sante de la Reproduction 2012–2015. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Consult CSI. Evaluation a mi-parcours de la campagne de communication sur la planification familiale 2013-2014. Republique du Senegal, Ministère de la Santé et de l’Action Sociale, direction de la Santé de la Reproduction et de la Survie de l’Enfant; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ndiaye S, Demba Diouf P, Ayad M. [Demographic and health survey, Senegal 1992/93. Synthesis report]. Dakar: Direction de la Prevision et de la Statistique, Division des Statistiques Demographiques; 1994; Apr., 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Senegal demographic and health and multiple indicator cluster survey (EDS-MICS) 2010-11, [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Oct 13]. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR258/FR258_English.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Diallo J. La politique de planification familiale au sénégal : approche sanitaire et conflits de norme. Autrepart. 2014;70(2):41–55. doi: 10.3917/autr.070.0041
   Google Scholar
• De Sardan J-P. Anthropologie et Developpement: Essai en Socio-Anthropology du Developpement. Marseille and Paris: Khartala; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack Petchesky R. From population control to reproductive rights: feminist fault lines. Reprod Health Matters. 1995;3(6):152–161. doi: 10.1016/0968-8080(95)90172-8
   Google Scholar
• Foley EE. Overlaps and disconnects in reproductive health care: global policies, national programs, and the micropolitics of reproduction in northern Senegal. Med Anthropol. 2007;26(4):323–354. doi: 10.1080/01459740701619830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy M. Seizing the means of reproduction: entanglements of feminism, health, and technoscience. Durham and London: Duke University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mumtaz Z, Salway S. Understanding gendered influences on women's reproductive health in Pakistan: moving beyond the autonomy paradigm. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(7):1349–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayart J-F. (2012). [cited 2016 Nov 23]. Available from: http://www.theory-talks.org/2012/02/theory-talk-47.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer N. Empowerment, citizenship and gender justice: a contribution to locally grounded theories of change in women’s lives. Ethics and Social Welfare. 2012;6(3):216–232. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2012.704055
   Google Scholar