Building a transformative agenda for accountability in SRHR: lessons learned from SRHR and accountability literatures

References

• Sustainable Development Solutions Network. (n.d.). “Target 5.6.” UNSG. Accessed 30 Mar. 2018 at http://indicators.report/targets/5-6/.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General comment No. 22 on the right to sexual and reproductive health (article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). Washington, DC: United Nations. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Batley R, Mcloughlin C. The politics of public services: a service characteristics approach. World Dev. 2015;74:275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsofa B, Goodman C, Gilson L, et al. Devolution and its effects on health workforce and commodities management early implementation experiences in Kilifi County, Kenya. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):169.
   Google Scholar
• Berer M. Repoliticising sexual and reproductive health and rights. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19(38):4–10. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(11)38596-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren A. Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population. J Soc Hist. 2009;43(1):212–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Belle S, Boydell V, George AS, et al. Broadening understanding of accountability ecosystems in sexual and reproductivehealth and rights: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff DW. Accountability and health systems: toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(6):371–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler A. Conceptualizing accountability. In: Schedler A, Diamond L, Plattner MF, editors. The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner; 1999. p. 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Potts H. Accountability and the right to the highest attainable standard of health. Colchester: University of Essex; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? Eur J Clin Invest. 2018;48:e12931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall A, Welbourn A. (eds). Realizing rights: transforming approaches to sexual and reproductive well-being. London: Zed Books; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cottingham J, Kismodi E, Hilber AM, et al. Using human rights for sexual and reproductive health: improving legal and regulatory frameworks. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:551–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchesky RP. Human rights, reproductive health and economic justice: why they are indivisible. Reprod Health Matters. 2000a;8(15):12–17. doi:10.1016/ S0968-8080(00)90001-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. Catalysing zero discrimination in health-care settings in Thailand and Viet Nam. (2018). Available from: http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2018/july/zero-discrimination-health-care-settings-thailand-viet-nam.
   Google Scholar
•  Brinkerhoff DW, Jacobstein D, Kanthor J, et al. Accountability, Health Governance, and Health Systems: Uncovering the Linkages. Washington (DC): U.S. Agency for International Development, Health Finance and Governance Project. Marshalling the Evidence for Health Governance Thematic Working Group Report, November. 2017; 2017. Available from: https://www.hfgproject.org/accountability-health-governance-health-systems-uncovering-linkages/.
   Google Scholar
• Fox J. Social accountability: what does the evidence really say?. World Dev. 2015;72:346–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa J, McGee R. The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Dev Policy Rev. 2013;31:s3–s28. doi:10.1111/dpr.12017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi A. Reading the local context: a causal chain approach to social accountability. IDS Bull. 2014;45(5):23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott K, George AS, Harvey SA, et al. Negotiating power relations, gender equality, and collective agency: are village health committees transformative social spaces in northern India? Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1). doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0580-4
   Google Scholar
• George AS, Scott K, Garimella S, et al. Anchoring contextual analysis in health policy and systems research: a narrative review of contextual factors influencing health committees in low and middle income countries. Soc Sci Med. 2015;133:159–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandvoinnet H, Aslam G, Shomikho R. Opening the black box: the contextual drivers of social accountability. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• O’Meally SC. Mapping context for social accountability: a resource paper. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Van Belle S, Mayhew S. Public accountability needs to be enforced – a case study of the governance arrangements and the accountability practices in a rural health district in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):568–582.
   Google Scholar
• Reich MR. The politics of agenda setting in international health: child health versus adult health in developing countries. J Int Dev. 1995 May-Jun;7(3):489–502.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George AS, Branchini C. Principles and processes behind promoting awareness of rights for quality maternal care services: A synthesis of stakeholder experiences and implementation factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1446-
   Google Scholar
• Marston C, Hinton R, Kean S, et al. Community participation for transformative action on women’s, children's and adolescents’ health. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(5):376–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy L. Whose feminism counts? gender(ed) knowledge and professionalisation in development. Third World Q. 2016;37(12):2156–2175. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1173511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffman J, Skrabalo M, Subotic J. Reproductive rights and the state in Serbia and Croatia. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(4):625–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell L. Eugenics and equality: does the constitution allow policies designed to discourage reproduction among disfavored groups? Yale Law Policy Rev. 2002;20(2):481–512.
   Google Scholar
• George AS. Using accountability to improve reproductive health care. Reprod Health Matters. 2003;11(21):61–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta J. Ten years of negotiating rights around maternal health in Uttar Pradesh, India. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011;11(3):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell C, Zampas C. The human rights impact of gender stereotyping in the context of reproductive health care. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly MJ. Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
•  Schaaf M. Negotiating sexuality in the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Int J Human Rights. 2011:847–85. Available from: http://sur.conectas.org/en/negotiating-sexuality-convention-rights-persons-disabilities/.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra-Mouli V, Svanemyr J, Amin A, et al. Twenty years after international conference on population and development: where are we with adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights? J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(1):S1–S6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JL, Rushwan H. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health: the global challenges. Int J Gynecol & Obstetrics. 2015;131:S40–S42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchesky RP. Rights and needs: rethinking the connections in debates over reproductive and sexual rights. Health Hum Rights. 2000b;4(2):17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer N. Tracking the gender politics of the millennium development goals: struggles for interpretive power in the international development agenda. Third World Q. 2015;36(2):377–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingenheimer JB, Skuster P. The foreseeable harms of Trump’s global gag rule. Stud Fam Plann. 2017;48(3):279–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrs AM. The Trump global gag rule: an attack on US family planning and global health aid. Lancet. 2017;389(10068):485–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh JA, Karim SSA. Trump's “global gag rule”: implications for human rights and global health. Lancet Global Health. 2017;5(4):e387–e389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Schaaf M, Maistrellis E, McGovern MFL. The global gag rule and closing civil society space for sexual and reproductive health and rights. J Int Affiairs. 2019. Availabele from: https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/online-articles/global-gag-rule-closing-civil-society-space.
   Google Scholar
• Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth. USAID-TRAction Project. Boston: Harvard School of Public Health; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes S. Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Boydell V, Fox J, Shaw S. Transparency and accountability strategies & reproductive health delivery systems. Accountability Research Center, Learning Exchange Report 1. 2017. Available from: http://accountabilityresearch.org/files/transparency-accountability-strategy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta J, Sandhya YK, Lobis S, et al. Using technology to claim rights to free maternal health care: lessons about impact from the my health. My Voice Pilot Project in India. Health & Human Rights: An Int J. 2015;17(2):135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetman C. The need to draw on collective power, “power with” to overcome “power over” of domination by elites. Gend Dev. 2003;21(2):217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt H. Hannah Arendt, Commencement Address 1964. Speeches. 1964. 62. Available from: https://commons.emich.edu/speeches/62
   Google Scholar
• Weldon S, Htun M. Feminist mobilisation and progressive policy change: why governments take action to combat violence against women. Gender & Development. 2013;21(2):231–247. doi:10.1080/13552074.2013.802158.
   Google Scholar
• Béhague DP, Kanhonou LG, Filippi V, et al. Pierre Bourdieu and transformative agency: a study of how patients in Benin negotiate blame and accountability in the context of severe obstetric events. Sociol Health Illness. 2008;30(4):489–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essof S, Khan A. 2015. Enacting social accountability through women’s activism and organising. Available from: https://justassociates.org/sites/justassociates.org/files/jass_malawi_case_study_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seshadri T, Nuggehalli P. Empowering mothers. Glob Health Action. 2016;9(1). doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.34406
   Google Scholar
• Ravindran TKS, Gaitonde R. (eds.) Health inequities in India: a synthesis of recent evidence. Singapore: Springer. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Paiva V. Analysing sexual experiences through ‘scenes’: a framework for the evaluation of sexuality education. Sex Educ. 2005;5(4):345–358.
   Google Scholar
• Frisancho A, Vasquez ML. Citizen monitoring to promote the right to health care and accountability. The Lancet. 2008;371.
   Google Scholar
•  Asiimwe EN, Wairagala W, Gronlund A. Using technology for enhancing transparency and accountability in low resource communities: experiences from Uganda. In: K Sarajeva , editor. ICT for anti-corruption, democracy, and education in East Africa. Stockholm: Stockholm University; 2013. p. 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Schaaf M, Topp S, Ngulube M. From favours to entitlements: community voice and action and health service quality in Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32:847–859. doi:10.1093/heapol/czx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullo S, Galavotti C, Sebert Kuhlmann A, et al. Effects of a social accountability approach, CARE's community score card, on reproductive health-related outcomes in Malawi: A cluster-randomized controlled evaluation. PLoS One. 2017;2(2):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ho LS, Labrecque G, Batonon I, et al. Effects of a community scorecard on improving the local health system in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: Qualitative evidence using the most significant change technique. Con Health. 2015; 9:27.
   Google Scholar
• Halloran B. Accountability ecosystems: directions of accountability and points of engagement. Brighton: IDS; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Van Belle S. Accountability in sexual and reproductive health. How relations between INGOs and state actors shape public accountability. A study of two local health systems in Ghana. University of London; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Scott K, Jessani N, Qiu M et al. Developing more participatory and accountability institutions for health: Identifying health system research priorities for the Sustainable Development Goal-era. Health Policy Plan. 2018; 33:975–987.
   Google Scholar
• Tembo F. Improving service provision: Drawing on collective action theory to fix incentives. In: Whaites A, Gonzalez E, Fyson S, Teskey G, editor. A governance practitioner’s notebook: alternative ideas and approaches. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2015. p. 281–303.
   Google Scholar
• Van Belle S, Mayhew SH. What can we learn on public accountability from non-health disciplines: a meta-narrative review. Br Med J. 2016;6:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifkin SB. Lessons from community participation in health programmes. Health Policy Plan. 1986;1:240–249.
   Google Scholar
• Lodenstein E, Dieleman M, Gerretsen B, et al. Health provider responsiveness to social accountability initiatives in low-and middleincome countries: a realist review. Health Policy Plan. 2016;32(1):125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi A. Legal empowerment and social accountability: Complementary strategies toward rights-based development in health? World Dev. 2017;99:160–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV, Duflo E. The Economic lives of the poor. J Econ Perspect. 2007;21(1):141–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodenstein E, Dieleman M, Gerretsen B, et al. A realist synthesis of the effect of social accountability interventions on health service providers’ and policymakers’ responsiveness. Syst Rev. 2013;2(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoev T, Kane S. What is health systems responsiveness? Review of existing knowledge and proposed conceptual framework. BMJ Global Health. 2017;2(4):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feruglio F. Do more empowered citizens make more accountable states? power and legitimacy in legal empowerment initiatives (Making All Voices Count Research Report). Brighton: IDS; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew SH, Osei I, Bajos N. Providers attitudes towards emergency contraception; provider attitudes to emergency contraception in Ghana and Burkina Faso. Population. 2013;68(1):115–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storeng KT, Ouattara F. The politics of unsafe abortion in Burkina Faso: the interface of local norms and global public health practice. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(8):946–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson HL, Downe S. Discrimination against childbearing Romani women in maternity care in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mulherin K, Miller YD, Barlow FK, et al. Weight stigma in maternity care: women’s experiences and care providers’ attitudes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman LP, Schaaf M. Act global, but think local: accountability at the frontlines. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21(42):103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mæstad O, Mwisongo A. Informal payments and the quality of health care: mechanisms revealed by Tanzanian health workers. Health Policy. 2011;99(2):107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson A, Rothstein B, Teorell J. Why anticorruption reforms fail—systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance. 2013;26:449–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringhini S, Thomas S, Bidwell P, et al. Understanding informal payments in health care: motivation of health workers in Tanzania. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7(53). doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-53
   Google Scholar
• de Savigny D, Adam T (eds). Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. WHO: Geneva; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sriram V, Topp SM, Schaaf M, et al. 10 best resources on power in health policy and systems in low-and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(4):611–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson L, Hanson K, Sheikh K, et al. Building the field of health policy and systems research: social science matters. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores W, Ruano AL, Funchal DP. Social participation within a context of political violence: Implications for the promotion and exercise of the right to health in Guatemala. Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(1):37–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heywood M. South Africa's treatment action campaign: combining law and social mobilization to realize the right to health. J Human Rights Practice. 2009;1(1):14–36.
   Google Scholar
•  World Health Organization. Eliminating forced, coercive and otherwise involuntary sterilization: an interagency statement. OHCHR, UN Women, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and WHO; 2014. p. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kandala NB, Komba PN. Geographic variation of female genital mutilation and legal enforcement in Sub-Saharan Africa: a case study of senegal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. Apr 2015;92(4):838–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin L, Maru V. What do we know about legal empowerment? Mapping the evidence. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. 2017; 9(1):157–194.
   Google Scholar
• Flores W. How Can Evidence Bolster Citizen Action? Learning and Adapting for Accountable Public Health in Guatemala. Accountability Research Center, Accountability Note 2. 2018. Available from: http://accountabilityresearch.org/web/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Accountability-Note2_English_2-22-18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Feinglass E, Gomes N, Maru V. Transforming policy into justice: the role of health advocates in Mozambique. Health & Human Rights. 2016;18(2):233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezer T, Abdikeeva A, McKee M. Legal advocacy as a tool to advance Roma health. Health Econ, Policy Law. 2018;13(1):92–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp SM, Sheikh K. Are we asking all the right questions about quality of care in low and middle income countries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(10):971–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing J, Peters G, Pierre J, et al. Interactive governance: advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Riley C, Garfinkel D, Thanel K, et al. Getting to FP2020: harnessing the private sector to increase modern contraceptive access and choice in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and DRC. PloS One. 2018;13(2):e0192522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters DH, Mirchandani GG, Hansen PM. Strategies for engaging the private sector in sexual and reproductive health: how effective are they? Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(1):5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino G, Nachuk S, Singh Kundra S. Public stewardship of private providers in mixed health systems: synthesis report from the Rockefeller Foundation—sponsored initiative on the role of the private sector in health systems. Washington (DC): Results for Development Institute; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla A.National rural health mission–hope or disappointment?. Indian J Public Health. 2005;49(3):127-132.
   Google Scholar
• Glaiser A, Gulmezogly AM, Schmid G, et al. Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death. The Lancet. 2006;368(9547):1595–1607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George AS, Mohan D, Gupta J, et al. Can community action improve equity for maternal health and how does it do so? research findings from Gujarat, India. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17:1–11. doi:10.1186/s12939-018-0838-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar