Sexual and reproductive health services in universal health coverage: a review of recent evidence from low- and middle-income countries

References

• Starrs AM, Ezeh AC, Barker G, et al. Accelerate progress – sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher–Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2018;391:2642–2692. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/commissions/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-rights.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Health Report. Research for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Repoliticising sexual and reproductive health and rights. In: Report of a global meeting, Langkawi,3-6 August 2010. London, Reproductive Health Matters and Asian-Pacific Resource& Research Centre for Women (ARROW) , 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski S. Universal health coverage may not be enough to ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health beyond 2014. Glob Public Health. 2015;9:661–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen G, Govender V, El-Gamal S. Universal health coverage, gender equality and social protection: A health systems approach. New York (NY) UN Women; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fried ST, Khurshid A, Tarlton D, et al. Universal health coverage: necessary but not sufficient. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21:50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adewole I, Gavira A. Sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: an urgent need to change the narrative. Lancet. 2018;391:2585–2587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, world bank group and the united nations population division: executive summary. World Health Organization; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35. [cited 2019 May 24]. Available from: https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J, Holtz J. Essential package of health services in 24 countries: findings from a cross-country analysis. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Afghanistan. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Bangladesh. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: The democratic republic of the Congo. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Ethiopia. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Ghana. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Haiti. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: India. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Indonesia. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Kenya. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Liberia. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Madagascar. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Malawi. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Mali. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Mozambique. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Nepal. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Nigeria. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Pakistan. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Rwanda. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Senegal. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: The republic of South Sudan. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Tanzania. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Uganda. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Yemen. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright J. Essential package of health services country snapshot: Zambia. Bethesda (MD): Health Finance & Governance Project Abt Associates Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sundewall J. Prioritizing essential packages of health services in six countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Implications and lessons for SRHR. 2019. PMNCH and Swedish International Development Agency. Unpublished report.
   Google Scholar
• Mongkolchati A. Universal health coverage for sexual and reproductive health in the Asia-pacific region. Belgium: HERA Right to Health & Development; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan T, Dutta A, Rosen J, et al. Family planning in the context of Latin America’s universal health coverage agenda. Global Health: Sci Pract. 2017;5:382–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy R. Presentation on accountability mechanisms – SRH services in the context of UHC and inequalities. In: Technical consultative meeting on guidance for integrating sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) within national UHC plans, Geneva, 15–16 May 2019. Geneva : World Health Organization ; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Todd G, Mamdani M, Loewenson R. Literature review: Essential health benefits in EAST and Southern Africa. EQUINET Discussion paper 107, IHI, Tanzania, TARSC, EQUINET , Harare , 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew SH, Adjei S. Sexual and reproductive health: challenges for priority-setting in Ghana’s health reforms. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19:i50–i61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Population Action International. Seizing the moment. How Zambian sexual and reproductive health advocates are accelerating progress towards universal health coverage financing, 2019. [ cited 2019 Aug 15]. Available from: https://pai.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Zambia-Report_Apr-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Teerawattananon Y, Tangcharoensathien V. Designing a reproductive health services package in the universal health insurance scheme in Thailand: match and mismatch of need, demand and supply. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19:i31–i39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Health Report. Health systems financing: The path to universal coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hoehn K, Stratmann J, Schaffler P. New actors, financial mechanisms and reformed aid reporting: what role for SRHR in post-2015 financing for development? Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23:78–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financing demystified. International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), 2015. [cited 2019 Jun 7] Available from: https://www.ippf.org/sites/default/files/ippf_financingdemystified_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Revised Cost Estimates for the Implementation of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development: A Methodological Report. New York, United Nations Population Fund, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen H, Snider J, Ravishankar N, et al. Assessing public and private sector contributions in reproductive health financing and utilization for six sub-Saharan african countries. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19:62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaumont C, Muhorane C, Moreira-Burgos I, et al. Maternal and reproductive health financing in Burundi: public-sector contribution levels and trends from 2010 to 2012. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:446. [ cited 2019 Jun 13] Available from: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-015-1009-7.
   Google Scholar
• Rout SK, Pradhan J, Choudhury S. Estimating financial resources for universal access to sexual reproductive health care: evidence from two states in India. Sexual Reprod Health Care. 2016;9:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila-Burgos L, Cahuana-Hurtado L, Montañez-Hernandez J, et al. Financing maternal health and family planning: are we on the right track? Evidence from the reproductive health subaccounts in Mexico, 2003–2012. PLoS ONE. 2016 ;11 (1 ):e0147923 . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre D, Kutzin J. Health financing country diagnostic: a foundation for national strategy development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016; (Health Financing Guidance No. 1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Gender, women and primary health care renewal – a discussion paper. Geneva, Switzerland; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ntambue AM, Malonga FK, Dramaix-Wilmet M, et al. Commercialization of obstetric and neonatal care in the democratic republic of the Congo: a study of the variability in user fees in lubumbashi, 2014. PLoS One. 2018 ;13 , doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda A, Randaoharison PG, Matsui M. Affordability of emergency obstetric and neonatal care at public hospitals in Madagascar. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19:10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaram A, Vlassoff M, Mugisha F, et al. Documenting the individual- and household-level cost of unsafe abortion in Uganda. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;39:174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone T, Coast E, Parmar D, et al. The individual level cost of pregnancy termination in Zambia: a comparison of safe and unsafe abortion. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31:825–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AM, Dennis M, Anderson R, et al. Comparing women’s financial costs of induced abortion at a facility vs. seeking treatment for complications from unsafe abortion in Zambia. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26:138. DOI:10.1080/09688080.2018.1522195.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts SC, Gould H, Kimport K, et al. Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(2):e211–e218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilboudo PG, Greco G, Sundby J, et al. Costs and consequences of abortions to women and their households: A cross-sectional study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30:500–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akalu T, Guda A, Tamiru M, et al. Examining out of pocket payments for maternal health in rural Ethiopia: paradox of free health care un- affordability. Ethiopian J Health Dev. 2012;26:251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsenault C, Fournier P, Philibert A, et al. Emergency obstetric care in Mali: catastrophic spending and its impoverishing effects on households. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:207–216. [ cited 2019 May 15]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590618/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalaba MA, Akweongo P, Aborigo RA, et al. Cost to households in treating maternal complications in northern Ghana: a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:34. [ cited 2019 Jun 12]. Available from: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-014-0659-1.
   Google Scholar
• Goli S, Rammohan A. Out-of-pocket expenditure on maternity care for hospital births in Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Econ Rev. 2018;8:5.
   Google Scholar
• Hoque ME, Dasgupta SK, Naznin E, et al. Household coping strategies for delivery and related healthcare cost: findings from rural Bangladesh. Trop Med Int Health. 2015;20:1368–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty SK, Kastor A. Out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health spending on maternal care in public and private health centres in India: a comparative study of pre and post national health mission period. Health Econ Rev. 2017;7:31.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee S, Singh A, Chandra R. Maternity or catastrophe: a study of household expenditure on maternal health care in India. Health. 2013;05:109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Myint ANM, Liabsuetrakul T, Htay TT, et al. Impoverishment and catastrophic expenditures due to out-of-pocket payments for antenatal and delivery care in Yangon region, Myanmar: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins M, Brazier E, Themmen E, et al. Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24:289–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinja S, Bahuguna P, Gupta R, et al. Coverage and financial risk protection for institutional delivery: how universal is provision of maternal health care in India? PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137315.
   Google Scholar
• Radovich E, Dennis ML, Barasa E, et al. Who pays and how much? A cross-sectional study of out-of-pocket payment for contraception in Kenya. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e022414. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022414.
   Google Scholar
• Ravit M, Philibert A, Tourigny C, et al. The hidden costs of a free caesarean section policy in West Africa (Kayes region, Mali). Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:1734–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla M, Kumar A, Agarwal M, et al. Out-of-pocket expenditure on institutional delivery in rural Lucknow. Indian J Community Health. 2015;27:241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skordis-Worrall J, Pace N, Bapat U, et al. Maternal and neonatal health expenditure in Mumbai slums (India): a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:150. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-150.
   Google Scholar
• Financing the ICPD Programme of Action. Data for 2012. Estimates for 2013/14. Projections for 2015. New York (NY): United Nations Population Fund; 2014
   Google Scholar
• Barot S, Cohen SA. The global gag rule and fights over funding UNFPA: the issues that won’t go away. Guttmacher Policy Review. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/article_files/gpr1802715.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sidze EM, Pradhan J, Beekink E, et al. Reproductive health financing in Kenya: an analysis of national commitments, donor assistance, and the resources tracking process. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21:139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Country portfolio update. Sixth Investors Group Meeting. Global Financing Facility, The World Bank Group, 2017. [ cited 2019 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.globalfinancingfacility.org/sites/gff_new/files/documents/GFF-IG6-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Global Financing Facility. Fact sheet: sexual and reproductive health and rights. Washington (DC): World Bank Group; 2018. [ cited 2020 Apr 21] Available from: https://www.globalfinancingfacility.org/sites/gff_new/GFF-Annual-report/pdf/SRHR_GFF-FactSheet-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taking Stock: IPPF Recommendations on the Global Financing Facility (GFF). International Planned Parenthood Federation, 2018. [cited 2019 September 21]. Available from: https://www.ippf.org/sites/default/files/2018-09/GFF_Recommendations_IPPF_Feb2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mutunga A, Sundaram P. How will the global financing facility deliver for sexual and reproductive health and rights? Bretton Woods Project, 31 March 2015. Available from: https://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/2015/03/how-will-the-global-financing-facility-deliver-for-sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-rights/.
   Google Scholar
• Kurth A, Bielinski L, Graap K, et al. Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington state. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33:153–179.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra HD. Abortion in the lives of women struggling financially: why insurance coverage matters. Guttmacher Policy Review. 2016;19:46–52. [ cited 2019 May 15]. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/article_files/gpr1904616_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Finnoff K. Gender disparities in access to the Rwandan mutual insurance scheme. Fem Econ. 2015. DOI:10.1080/13545701.2015.1088658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender V, Ataguba JE, Alaba OA. Health insurance coverage within households: the case of private health insurance in South Africa. Geneva Pap Risk Insur – Issues Pract. 2014;39:712–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dake FAA. Examining equity in health insurance coverage: an analysis of Ghana’s national health insurance scheme. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17:85. [ cited 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12939-018-0793-1.
   Google Scholar
• Duku SKO. Differences in the determinants of health insurance enrolment among working-age adults in two regions in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:384. DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3192–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gobah F, Zhang L. The national health insurance scheme in Ghana: prospects and challenges: a cross-sectional evidence. Glob J Health Sci. 2011;3. DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v3n2p90.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington C, Sambo C. Financing health care for adolescents: a necessary part of universal health coverage. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:57–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karra M, Canning D, Hu J, et al. Community-based financing of family planning in developing countries: A systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47:325–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta I, Joe W, Rudra S. Demand side financing in health: How far can it address the issue of low utilization in developing countries? Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010; Background paper no. 27 to World Health Report 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bellows N, Bellows B, Warren C. Systematic review: the use of vouchers for reproductive health services in developing countries: systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16:84–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellows BW, Conlon CM, Higgs ES, et al. A taxonomy and results from a comprehensive review of 28 maternal health voucher programmes. J Health, Popul Nutr. 2013;31:S106–S128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellows B, Bulaya C, Inambwae S, et al. Family planning vouchers in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47:357–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger C, Gorter A, Okal J, et al. Lessons from sexual and reproductive health voucher program design and function: a comprehensive review. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:33. [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-9276-13-33.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman A, Duran D, Fleisher L, et al. Impact of conditional cash transfers on maternal and newborn health. J Health, Popul Nutr. 2013;31: S48–S66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekezie CC, Lamont K, Bhattacharya S. Are cash transfer programs effective in improving maternal and child health in Sub-saharan Africa? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Global Health. 2017. [ cited 2019 May 5]. Available from: http://www.ghjournal.org/are-cash-transfer-programs-effective-in-improving-maternal-and-child-health-in-sub-saharan-africa-a-systematic-review-of-randomized-controlled-trials/.
   Google Scholar
• Lim SS, Dandona L, Hoisington LA, et al. India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: An impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010;375 (9730 ):2009 –2023 . DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60744-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan ME, Hazra A, Kant A, et al. Conditional and unconditional cash transfers to improve use of contraception in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47(4):371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ved R, Sundararaman T, Gupta G, et al. Program evaluation of the Janani Suraksha Yojna. BMC Proc. 2012;6(Suppl 5):O15. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/6/S5/O15.
   Google Scholar
• Witter S, Govender V, Ravindran T, Yates R. Minding the gaps: health financing, universal health coverage and gender. Health Policy Plan. 2017; 32:v4–v12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian P, Ravindran TKS. Pro-poor maternity benefit schemes and rural women: findings from Tamil Nadu. Econ Political Weekly. 2012;25:19.
   Google Scholar
• Cerceau S. Gender equity in access to health care. How social health protection can tackle access barriers for women and improve gender related inequities. A case study on India’s national health insurance scheme Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY). France: Ecoles des Hautes Etudes en Sante Publique; June 2012. [ cited 2019 May 25]. Available from https://documentation.ehesp.fr/memoires/2012/mph/cerceau.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karpagam S, Vasan A, Seethappa V. Falling through the gaps: women accessing care under health insurance schemes in Karnataka. Indian J Gend Stud. 2016;23:69–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramprakash R. Gender analysis of publicly-funded health insurance schemes: a study of the Chief Minister’s Comprehensive Health Insurance of Tamil Nadu. Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, 2018 (unpublished PhD dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Philip NE, Ravindran TKS. Government sponsored health insurance coverage and out-of-pocket spending among elderly in Kerala: a cross-sectional study. J Aging Res Healthcare. 2017;2:15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Reproductive health policies 2017 data booklet. New York, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations, 2017 (ST/ESA/ SER.A/396). [cited 2019 Aug 12]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy/reproductive_health_policies_2017_data_booklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Remez L, Sedgh G, et al. Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress, unequal access. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Against her will: Forced and coerced sterilization of women worldwide. New York, Open Society Foundations, 2011. [cited 2019 May 20]. Available from: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/against-her-will 20111003.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll A, Mendos LR. State sponsored homophobia 2017: a world survey of sexual orientation laws: criminalisation, protection and recognition. Geneva: International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Platt L, Grenfell P, Meiksin R, et al. Associations between sex work laws and sex workers’ health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002680. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002680.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Sexual health, human rights and the law. Geneva; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Haque SE, Rahman M, Mostofa MG, et al. Reproductive health care utilization among young mothers in Bangladesh: does autonomy matter? Womens Health Issues. 2012;22:e171–e180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameyaw EK, Tanle A, Kissah-Korsah K, et al. Women’s health decision-making autonomy and skilled birth attendance in Ghana. Int J Reprod Med. 2016;2016:1. doi:10.1155/2016/6569514.
   Google Scholar
• Obasohan PE, Gana P, Mustapha MA, et al. Decision making autonomy and maternal healthcare utilization among Nigerian women. Int J MCH and AIDS (IJMA). 2019;8:11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Skovdal M, Campbell C, Madanhire C, et al. Masculinity as a barrier to men’s use of HIV services in Zimbabwe. Global Health. 2011;7:13. [ cited 2019 May 19]. Available from: https://globalizationandhealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1744-8603-7-13.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell M, McIntyre J, Myer L. Men and antiretroviral therapy in Africa: our blind spot. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16:828–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, et al. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. The Lancet. 2019;393:2440–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber AM, Cislaghi B, Meausoone V, et al. Gender norms and health: insights from global survey data. Lancet. 2019;393:2455–2468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrapani V, Newman PA, Shunmugam M, et al. Barriers to free antiretroviral treatment access among kothi- identified men who have sex with men and aravanis (transgender women) in Chennai, India. AIDS Care. 2011;23:1687–1694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie TSH, Bhattacharjee P, Suresh M, et al. Personal, interpersonal and structural challenges to accessing HIV testing, treatment and care services among female sex workers, men who have sex with men and transgenders in Karnataka state, South India. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66: ii42–ii48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RJ, Maine D. Spousal veto over family planning services. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:339–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbeba RM, Mkuye MS, Magembe GE, et al. Barriers to sexual reproductive health services and rights among young people in Mtwara district, Tanzania: a qualitative study. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13:13.
   Google Scholar
• Self A, Chipokosa S, Misomali A, et al. Youth accessing reproductive health services in Malawi: drivers, barriers, and suggestions from the perspectives of youth and parents. Reprod Health. 2018;15:108. DOI:10.1186/s12978-018-0549-9.
   Google Scholar
• Alencar Albuquerque G, de Lima Garcia C, da Silva Quirino G, et al. Access to health services by lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons: systematic literature review. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12914-015-0072-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luvuno ZPB, Ncama B, Mchunu G. Transgender population’s experiences with regard to accessing reproductive health care in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: A qualitative study. Afr J Primary Health Care Family Med. 2019;11:a1933. DOI:10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1933.
   Google Scholar
• Kattari SK, Hasche L. Differences across age groups in transgender and gender non-conforming people’s experiences of health care discrimination, harassment, and victimization. J Aging Health. 2016;28:285–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12: e1001847. [ cited 2019 Jun 6]. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz JT, Moreno CMR, Gil L, et al. Obstetric violence and abortion. Contributions to the debate in Colombia. New York (NY): Global Doctors for Choice Network; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Betron ML, McClair TL, Currie S, et al. Expanding the agenda for addressing mistreatment in maternity care: a mapping review and gender analysis. Reprod Health. 2018;15:143. [ cited 2019 June 20]. Available from: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-018-0584-6.
   Google Scholar
• Jardim D, Modena CM. Obstetric violence in the daily routine of care and its characteristics. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26:e3069. doi:10.1590/1518-8345.2450.3069.
   Google Scholar
• Limwattananon S. Public-private mix in health care for women and children in low-income countries: An analysis of demographic and health surveys. Bangkok: International Health Policy Program; 2008. [ cited 2019 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.r4d.org/resources/private-public-mix-woman-child-health-low-income-countries/.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy A, Koblinsky M, Alva S. Private delivery care in developing countries: trends and determinants. Calverton (MD): ICF Macro; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Healthy Partnerships: How Governments Can Engage the Private Sector to Improve Health In Africa. Washington, DC, International Financing Corporation (IFC), The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Madhavan S, Bishai D. Private sector engagement in sexual and reproductive health and maternal and neonatal health: A review of the evidence. Human Development Resource Centre, United States of America; 2010. [ cited 2019 Jul 8]. Available from: https://healthmarketinnovations.org/sites/default/files/Private%20Sector%20Engagement%20in%20SRH%20and%20MNH%202010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sweat MD, Denison J, Kennedy C, et al. Effects of condom social marketing on condom use in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1990–2010. Bull World Health Organ. 2012 ;90 :613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehlmoos TP, Gazi R, Hossain SS, et al. Social franchising evaluations: A scoping review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tougher S, Dutt V, Pereira S, et al. Effect of a multifaceted social franchising model on quality and coverage of maternal, newborn, and reproductive health-care services in Uttar Pradesh, India: a quasi-experimental study. Lancet Global Health. 2018;6:e211.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty NM, Mbondo M, Wanderi J. Evaluating the impact of social franchising on family planning use in Kenya. J Health, Popul Nutr. 2016;35:19. [ cited 2019 July 17]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025970/.
   Google Scholar
• Munroe E, Hayes B, Taft J. Private-sector social franchising to accelerate family planning access, choice and quality: results from Marie Stopes International. Global Health: Sci Pract. 2015;3:195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvall S, Thurston S, Weinberger M, et al. Scaling up delivery of contraceptive implants in sub-Saharan Africa: operational experiences of Marie Stopes International. Global Health: Sci Pract. 2014;2:72–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gold J, Burke E, Cissé B, et al. Increasing access to family planning choices through public-sector social franchising: The experience of Marie Stopes International in Mali. Global Health: Sci Pract. 2017;5:286–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagu D, Goodman C. Prohibit, constrain, encourage, or purchase: how should we engage with the private health-care sector? The Lancet. 2016;388:613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arur A, Peters D, Hansen P, et al. Contracting for health and curative care use in Afghanistan between 2004 and 2005. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25:135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom E, Bhushan I, Clingingsmith D, et al. Contracting for health: evidence from Cambodia. Washington (DC): Brookings Institute; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ravindran TKS. Public private partnerships in maternal health services. Econ Political Weekly. 2011;46:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanan M, Bauhoff S, La Forgia G, et al. Effect of Chiranjeevi Yojana on institutional deliveries and neonatal and maternal outcomes in Gujarat, India: a difference-in- differences analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasobant S, Vora KS, Shewade HD, et al. Utilization of the state led public private partnership program “Chiranjeevi Yojana” to promote facility births in Gujarat, India: a cross sectional community based study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:266 ), DOI:10.1186/s12913-016-1510-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patoillard E, Goodman C, Hanson K, et al. Can working with the private for-profit sector improve utilization of quality health services by the poor? A systematic review of the literature. Int J Equity Health. 2007;6:17. [ cited 2019 May 14]. Available from: https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-9276-6-17.
   Google Scholar
• Beyeler N, York De La Cruz A, Montagu D. The impact of clinical social franchising on health services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60669. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0060669.
   Google Scholar
• Haemmerli M, Santos A, Penn-Kekana L, et al. How equitable is social franchising? case studies of three maternal healthcare franchises in Uganda and India. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:411–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuwissen LE, Gorter AC, Knottnerus AJ. Impact of accessible sexual and reproductive health care on poor and underserved adolescents in Managua, Nicaragua: a quasi-experimental intervention study. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(1):56. e1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boddam-Whetham L, Gul X, Al-Kobati E, et al. Vouchers in fragile states: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception in Yemen and Pakistan. Global Health: Sci Pract 2016;4:S94–S108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindran TKS, Fonn S. Are social franchises contributing to universal access to reproductive health services in low- income countries? Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19:85–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan R, Ensor T, Waters H. Performance of private sector health care: implications for universal health coverage. Lancet. 2016;388:606–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Reproductive Rights (CRR). Breaking ground 2015: human rights treaty bodies and reproductive rights. New York (NY): CRR; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Boydell V, Keesbury J. Social accountability: What are the lessons for improving family planning and reproductive health programs? A review of the literature. Washington, DC: Population Council, Evidence Project, 2014 (Working Paper). [cited 2019 Aug 10]. Available from: (http://evidenceproject.popcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014_RightsBasedProg_SocAcctWP.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hulton L, Matthews Z, Martin-Hilber A, et al. Using evidence to drive action: a “revolution in accountability” to implement quality of care for better maternal and newborn health in Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127 (1):96–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIGO, ICM, WRA, IPA and WHO. Mother-baby friendly birthing facilities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;128:95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp SA, Gogoi A, Campbell C. Improving maternal health through social accountability: a case study from orissa, India. Glob Public Health. 2013;8:449–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisancho A. Citizen-led accountability to improve UHC. In: World bank civil society policy forum, Washington D.C, 19 June 2017. Washington, DC : World Bank ; 2017 . [cited 2019 Aug 5]. Available from: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/240521496934666452/FRISANCHO-Citizen-led-Accountability-for.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur J. The role of litigation in ensuring women’s reproductive rights: an analysis of shanti devi judgement in India. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20(39):21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Belle S, Boydell V, George AS, et al. Broadening understanding of accountability ecosystems in sexual and reproductive health and rights: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0196788. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196788.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, Carolyn & Sarpei, Nii & Bailey, Claire & Ismaila, Yakubu & Deganus, Sylvia & Bosomprah, Samuel & Galli, Francesco & Clark, Sarah. Scorecards and social accountability for improved maternal and newborn health services: a pilot in the Ashanti and Volta regions of Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 135:372-379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullo S, Galavotti C, Sebert Kuhlmann A, et al. Effects of a social accountability approach, CARE’s community score card, on reproductive health-related outcomes in Malawi: A cluster-randomized controlled evaluation. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171316 ), DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakade D. Community-based monitoring as an accountability tool: influence on rural health services in maharashtra, India. BMC Proc. 2012;6:O9. [ cited 2019 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287531/pdf/1753-6561-6-S1-O9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boydell V, Schaaf M, George A, et al. Building a transformative agenda for accountability in SRHR: lessons learned from SRHR and accountability literatures. Sexual Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27:64–75. doi:10.1080/26410397.2019.1622357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage. Final report of the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gwatkin DR, Ergo A. Universal health coverage: friend or foe of health equity? Lancet. 2011;377:2160–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen G, Govender V. Sexual and reproductive health and rights in changing health systems. Glob Public Health, 2015; 10 (2):228–242. DOI:10.1080/17441692.2014.986161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar