Perceptions of quality of care during birth at private Chiranjeevi facilities in Gujarat: lessons for Universal Health Coverage

References

• WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA WBG and the UNPD. Trends in maternal mortality : 2000 to 2017. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell OM, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. The lancet. 2006; 368(9543):1284–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Department of reproductive health and research. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. A joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Joe W, Perkins JM, Kumar S, et al. Institutional delivery in India, 2004-14: unravelling the equity-enhancing contributions of the public sector. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(5):645–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta A, Nundy S. The private health sector in India. Br Med J. 2005; 331:1157–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoI M. Rural health statistics 2014–15 [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Jun 20]. Available from: https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/RHS_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FOGSI. The federation of obstetric and gynaecological societies of India – 53rd annual report and statement of accounts [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Jun 21]. Available from: https://www.fogsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/pdf/FOGSI_Annual_Report_2012_13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kane S, Calnan M. Erosion of trust in the medical profession in India: time for doctors to act. Int J Heal Policy Manag [Internet]. 2017;6(1):5–8. [cited 2020 Jun 27]. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5193507/?report = abstract.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoI M. National program implementation plan RCH phase II – program document. New Delhi; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rao P. The private health sector in India: a framework for improving the quality of care. ASCI J Manag. 2012;41(2):14–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mavalankar D, Singh A, Patel SR, et al. Saving mothers and newborns through an innovative partnership with private sector obstetricians: Chiranjeevi scheme of Gujarat, India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 107:271–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSSO, MoS&PI G. Health in India. NSS 71st round. Jan–Jun 2014 [Internet]. New Delhi: MoSPI; 2016; 53 p. Available from: http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/nss_rep574.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jain N, Kumar A, Nandraj S, et al. NSSO 71st round same data, multiple interpretations. Econ Polit Wkly [Internet]. 2015;1(46 &47):84–87. [cited 2020 Jun 24]. Available from: https://niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2019-01/NSSO_71st_Round _Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GoI NHA. Home | Ayushman Bharat | National Health Authority | GoI [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.pmjay.gov.in/.
   Google Scholar
• Angell BJ, Prinja S, Gupt A, et al. The Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana and the path to universal health coverage in India: overcoming the challenges of stewardship and governance. PLoS Med. 2019;16(3):e1002759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanan M, Hay K, Mor N. Quality of health care in India: challenges, priorities, and the road ahead. Health Affairs. 2016 ;35(10):1753–1758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma KD. Implementing quality process in public sector hospitals in India: the journey begins. Indian J Community Med. 2012 ;37(3):150.
   Google Scholar
• GoI M. My Hospital [Internet]. Available from: https://meraaspataal.nhp.gov.in/.
   Google Scholar
• Jolivet RR. I169 the respectful maternity care charter: a collaborative work. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2012;119(2012):S203–S203.
   Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. Jewkes R, editor. PLOS Med [Internet]. 2015 Jun 30;12(6):e1001847. [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. The lancet. 2006; 368(9542):1189–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Avan BI, Rajbangshi P, et al. Determinants of women’s satisfaction with maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2015 Dec 12;15(1):1–12. [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-015-0525-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong DV, Binns CW, Lee AH. Utilization of delivery services at the primary health care level in rural Vietnam. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(12):2585–2595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Calvert C, et al. Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. The Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2307–2320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, et al. Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2018 ;33(1):e26–e33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, et al. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014; 11(1):71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya S, Srivastava A, Avan BI. Delivery should happen soon and my pain will be reduced: understanding women’s perception of good delivery care in India. Glob Health Action. 2013; 6(1):22635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya S, Issac A, Rajbangshi P, et al. “Neither we are satisfied nor they” – users and provider’s perspective: a qualitative study of maternity care in secondary level public health facilities, Uttar Pradesh, India. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2015 Sep 27;15(1):421. [cited 2020 Jun 24]. Available from: http://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-015-1077-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidney K, Tolhurst R, Jehan K, et al. “The money is important but all women anyway go to hospital for childbirth nowadays” – a qualitative exploration of why women participate in a conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional deliveries in Madhya Pradesh, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16(1):47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma G, Penn-Kekana L, Halder K, et al. An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2019 Jan 23;16(1):1–16. [cited 2020 Jun 25]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-019-0668-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levering B. Epistemological issues in phenomenological research: how authoritative are people’s accounts of their own perceptions? J Philos Educ. 2006; 40(4):451–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Science Academy of Nigeria. Ethics for public health research in Africa Social Science Academy of Nigeria ethics for public health research in Africa. International Workshop in Collaboration with the special programme for research and training in tropical diseases of the World Health Organisation. 2008. 1–79 p.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer V, Sidney K, Mehta R, et al. Availability and provision of emergency obstetric care under a public–private partnership in three districts of Gujarat, India: lessons for universal health coverage. BMJ Glob Heal. 2016 ;1(1):e000019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidney K, Iyer V, Vora K, et al. Statewide program to promote institutional delivery in Gujarat, India: who participates and the degree of financial subsidy provided by the Chiranjeevi Yojana program. J Heal Popul Nutr. 2016; 35(1):2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon EJ. When oral consent will do. Field Methods [Internet]. 2000 Aug 24;12(3):235–238. [cited 2020 Oct 24]. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X0001200304.
   Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer V, Sidney K, Mehta R, et al. Characteristics of private partners in Chiranjeevi Yojana, a public-private-partnership to promote institutional births in Gujarat, India – Lessons for universal health coverage. PLoS One. 2017;12(10): e0185739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cham M, Sundby J, Vangen S. Availability and quality of emergency obstetric care in Gambia’s main referral hospital: women-users’ testimonies. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2009 Dec 14;6(1):5. [cited 2020 Jun 9]. Available from: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-6-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Ambruoso L, Abbey M, Hussein J. Please understand when I cry out in pain: women’s accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2005; 5(1):140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven J, van den Broek N, Tao F, et al. The quality of childbirth care in China: women’s voices: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel V, Rodrigues M, DeSouza N. Gender, poverty, and postnatal depression: a study of mothers in Goa, India. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 ;159(1):43–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adewuya AO, Fatoye FO, Ola BA, et al. Sociodemographic and obstetric risk factors for postpartum depressive symptoms in Nigerian women. J Psychiatr Pract. 2005; 11(5):353–358.
   Google Scholar
• Dindar I, Erdogan S. Screening of Turkish women for postpartum depression within the first postpartum year: the risk profile of a community sample: special features: practice concepts. Public Health Nurs. 2007 ;24(2):176–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinja S, Chauhan AS, Karan A, et al. Impact of publicly financed health insurance schemes on healthcare utilization and financial risk protection in India: a systematic review [Internet]. PLoS ONE. 2017 ;12(2):e0170996. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ith P, Dawson A, Homer CSE. Women’s perspective of maternity care in Cambodia. Women Birth [Internet]. 2013 Mar 1;26(1):71–75. [cited 2020 Jun 9]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma B, Giri G, Christensson K, et al. The transition of childbirth practices among tribal women in Gujarat, India – a grounded theory approach. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013 ;13(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes L. Women’s experience of childbirth in rural Jharkhand. Econ Polit Wkly. 2007: 62–70.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hollen C. Invoking vali: painful technologies of modern birth in south India. Med Anthropol Q. 2003 ;(1):49–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flandermeyer D, Stanton C, Armbruster D. Uterotonic use at home births in low-income countries: a literature review. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Mar 1;108(3):269–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton CK, Deepak NN, Mallapur AA, et al. Direct observation of uterotonic drug use at public health facility-based deliveries in four districts in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Oct 1;127(1):25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silan V, Kant S, Archana S, et al. Determinants of underutilisation of free delivery services in an area with high institutional delivery rate: a qualitative study. N Am J Med Sci. 2014 ;6(7):315.
   Google Scholar
• Peel A, Bhartia A, Spicer N, et al. “If I do 10–15 normal deliveries in a month I hardly ever sleep at home.” A qualitative study of health providers’ reasons for high rates of caesarean deliveries in private sector maternity care in Delhi, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):1–11. [cited 2020 Jun 25]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-018-2095-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000 ;15(3):259–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma J, Leslie HH, Kundu F, et al. Poor quality for poor women? Inequities in the quality of antenatal and delivery care in Kenya. PLoS One. 2017 ;12(1):e0171236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devadasan N, Criel B, Van Damme W, et al. Community health insurance schemes & patient satisfaction – evidence from India. Indian J Med Res. 2011 ;133(1):40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George A. Quality of reproductive care in private hospitals in Andhra Pradesh. Econ Polit Wkly. 2002 :1686–1692.
   Google Scholar
• Haas M. The relationship between expectations and satisfaction: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences of surgery for gynaecological cancer. Heal Expect [Internet]. 1999 Mar 25;2(1):51–60. [cited 2020 Jun 19]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00037.x.
   Google Scholar
• LaVela S, Gallan A. Evaluation and measurement of patient experience. Patient Exp J. 2014 ;(2):75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V, Rennie AM, et al. Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: “What is, must still be best”. Birth. 2003; (2):75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham BR. The truth about patient experience: what we can learn from other industries, and how three Ps can improve health outcomes, strengthen brands, and delight customers. J Healthc Manag. 2012; 57(4):255–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qual Inq. 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenström U. Why do some women change their opinion about childbirth over time? Birth. 2004; 31(2):102–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar