Web-based searching for abortion information during health emergencies: a case study of Brazil during the 2015/2016 Zika outbreak

References

• Smith J. Overcoming the “tyranny of the urgent”: integrating gender into disease outbreak preparedness and response. Gender Dev. 2019;27(2):355–369.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken ARA, Scott JG, Gomperts R, et al. Requests for abortion in Latin America related to concern about Zika virus exposure. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):396–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthwaite LM, Velasquez G. Family planning and the Zika era. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(6):499–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roa M. Zika virus outbreak: reproductive health and rights in Latin America. Lancet. 2016;387(10021):843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenham C, Arevalo A, Coast E, et al. Zika, abortion and health emergencies: a review of contemporary debates. Global Health. 2019;15(1):49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamou A, Hammonds RM, Caluwaerts S, et al. Ebola in Africa: beyond epidemics, reproductive health in crisis. Lancet. 2014;384(9960):2105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menéndez C, Lucas A, Munguambe K, et al. Ebola crisis: the unequal impact on women and children's health. Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(3):e130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KS, Samari G, Garbers S, et al. Centring sexual and reproductive health and justice in the global COVID-19 response. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1175–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein J. COVID-19: what implications for sexual and reproductive health and rights globally? Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):1746065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenham C, Smith J, Morgan R. COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):846–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coast E, Norris AH, Moore AM, et al. Trajectories of women’s abortion-related care: A conceptual framework. Soc Sci Med. 2018;200:199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis BY, Brownstein JS. Measuring the impact of health policies using internet search patterns: the case of abortion. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):514.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossier C. Abortion: an open secret? Abortion and social network involvement in Burkina Faso. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(30):230–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandagiri R. “Like a mother-daughter relationship”: community health intermediaries’ knowledge of and attitudes to abortion in Karnataka, India. Soc Sci Med. 2019;239:112525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomperts RJ, Jelinska K, Davies S, et al. Using telemedicine for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in settings where there is no access to safe services. BJOG. 2008;115(9):1171–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomperts R, van der Vleuten K, Jelinska K, et al. Provision of medical abortion using telemedicine in Brazil. Contraception. 2014;89(2):129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghallagher S. Coronavirus: women in England can now get abortion pills by post following department of health u-turn. The Independent. 2020. Available from: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/coronavirus-abortion-pills-at-home-uk-england-a9455856.html
   Google Scholar
• Nanda K, Lebetkin E, Steiner MJ, et al. Contraception in the Era of COVID-19. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020;8(2):166–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrea S, Palència L, Perez G. Aborto farmacológico dispensado a través de un servicio de telemedicina a mujeres de América Latina: complicaciones y su tratamiento. Gac Sanit. 2015;29(3):198–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eastin MS, Cicchirillo V, Mabry A. Extending the digital divide conversation: examining the knowledge gap through media expectancies. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2015;59(3):416–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho de Souza HA. A não criminalização da Interrupção de gravidez de feto anencéfalo: uma reflexão à luz da ADPF-54 e do Projeto de Lei do Senado n° 50, de 2011. 2011. Available from: https://halisoncarvalho.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/843400568/a-nao-criminalizacao-da-interrupcao-de-gravidez-de-feto-anencefalo-uma-reflexao-a-luz-da-adpf-54-e-do-projeto-de-lei-do-senado-n-50-de-2011?ref=feed
   Google Scholar
• De Assis Machado MR, Maciel DA. The battle over abortion rights in Brazil’s State Arenas, 1995–2006. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(1):119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray A. Brazil: supreme court makes abortion legal in cases of anencephaly. 2012 [cited 2020 Dec 28]. Available from: https://iwhc.org/2012/04/brazil-supreme-court-makes-abortion-legal-in-cases-of-anencephaly/
   Google Scholar
• Machado MRdA, Cook RJ. Constitutionalizing abortion in Brazil. Rev Invest Const. 2018;5:185–231.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira CBdC. Feminisms on the web: lines and forms of action in contemporary feminist debate. Cadernos Pagu. 2015; p 199–228.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe R, Barcellos C, Brasil P, et al. The Zika virus epidemic in Brazil: from discovery to future implications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(1):96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira WK, de França GVA, Carmo EH, et al. Infection-related microcephaly after the 2015 and 2016 Zika virus outbreaks in Brazil: a surveillance-based analysis. Lancet. 2017;390(10097):861–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurocirurgia, SBd. Pela primeira vez no mundo, zika vírus é relacionado a microcefalia em bebê. 2016. Available from: https://portalsbn.org/portal/pela-primeira-vez-no-mundo-zika-virus-e-relacionado-a-microcefalia-em-bebe/
   Google Scholar
• Saúde, Md. PORTARIA N° 1.813, DE 11 DE NOVEMBRO DE 2015. 2015 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2015/prt1813_11_11_2015.html
   Google Scholar
• Diniz D, Medeiros M, Madeiro A. Brazilian women avoiding pregnancy during Zika epidemic. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017;43(1):80–80.
   Google Scholar
• Aguiar R, Araujo IS. A mídia em meio às “emergências” do vírus Zika: questões para o campo da comunicação e saúde. 2016;10(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lima T. A cobertura da epidemia de Zika no Brasil: uma análise das interações no perfil do jornal O Globo no Facebook. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. WHO statement on the first meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR 2005) Emergency Committee on Zika virus and observed increase in neurological disorders and neonatal malformations. 2016 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/01-02-2016-who-statement-on-the-first-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-(ihr-2005)-emergency-committee-on-zika-virus-and-observed-increase-in-neurological-disorders-and-neonatal-malformations
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, et al. Zika virus and birth defects — reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(20):1981–1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estofolete CF, Terzian ACB, Colombo TE, et al. Co-infection between Zika and different Dengue serotypes during DENV outbreak in Brazil. J Infect Public Health. 2019;12(2):178–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady OJ, Osgood-Zimmerman A, Kassebaum NJ, et al. The association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly in Brazil 2015–2017: an observational analysis of over 4 million births. PLoS Med. 2019;16(3):e1002755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges ALV, Moreau C, Burke A, et al. Women’s reproductive health knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to the Zika virus outbreak in northeast Brazil. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Ali A-Q, Nyla N, Mashael RA-A, et al. Zika virus: a new pandemic threat. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10(3):201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressick K, Gelpi A, Chanroo T. Zika and abortion in Brazilian newspapers: how a new outbreak revived an old debate on reproductive rights. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27(2):20–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. Google Trends. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. Available from: https://trends.google.co.uk/trends/
   Google Scholar
• Google. Trends help. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. Available from: https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4355212
   Google Scholar
• Depoux A, Philibert A, Rabier S, et al. A multi-faceted pandemic: a review of the state of knowledge on the Zika virus. Public Health Rev. 2018;39:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro HA, Mylonakis E. Google Trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(10):1557–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nghiem LTP, Papworth SK, Lim FKS, et al. Analysis of the capacity of Google Trends to measure interest in conservation topics and the role of online news. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora VS, McKee M, Stuckler D. Google Trends: opportunities and limitations in health and health policy research. Health Policy. 2019;123(3):338–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. How trends data is adjusted. 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 12]. Available from: https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4365533?hl=en
   Google Scholar
• Yue S, Pilon P, Cavadias G. Power of the Mann–Kendall and Spearman’s rho tests for detecting monotonic trends in hydrological series. J Hydrol. 2002;259(1):254–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önöz B, Bayazit M. The power of statistical tests for trend detection. Turk J Eng Environ Sci. 2003;27:247–251.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza B. Monitoring web traffic source effectiveness with Google Analytics. Aslib Proc. 2009;61:474–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas A, Grotz F. Brazilian Supreme Court opinion re-ignites the abortion rights debate. Sexuality Policy Watch; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Olive M-M, Baldet T, Devillers J, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic should not jeopardize dengue control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(9):e0008716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar