Abortion hotlines around the world: a mixed-methods systematic and descriptive review

References

• Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(9):e1152–e1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2372–2381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):258–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseson H, Bullard KA, Cisternas C, et al. Effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion between 13 and 24 weeks gestation: a retrospective review of case records from accompaniment groups in Argentina, Chile, and Ecuador. Contraception. 2020;102:91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman D, Grindlay K. Safety of medical abortion provided through telemedicine compared with in person. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):778–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill R, Norman WV. Telemedicine and medical abortion: dispelling safety myths, with facts. Mhealth. 2018;4:3.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdts C, Jayaweera RT, Kristianingrum IA, et al. Effect of a smartphone intervention on self-managed medication abortion experiences among safe-abortion hotline clients in Indonesia: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;149(1):48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos S, Romero M, Aizenberg L. Women's experiences with the use of medical abortion in a legally restricted context: the case of Argentina. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;22(44):4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurbriggen R, Keefe-Oates B, Gerdts C. Accompaniment of second-trimester abortions: the model of the feminist Socorrista network of Argentina. Contraception. 2018;97(2):108–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdts C, Hudaya I. Quality of care in a safe-abortion hotline in Indonesia: beyond harm reduction. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(11):2071–2075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endler M, Lavelanet A, Cleeve A, et al. Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review. BJOG. 2019;126(9):1094–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinska K, Yanow S. Putting abortion pills into women's hands: realizing the full potential of medical abortion. Contraception. 2018;97(2):86–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drovetta RI. Safe abortion information hotlines: an effective strategy for increasing women's access to safe abortions in Latin America. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(45):47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseson H, Herold S, Filippa S, et al. Self-managed abortion: a systematic scoping review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;63:87–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdman JN, Jelinska K, Yanow S. Understandings of self-managed abortion as health inequity, harm reduction and social change. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(54):13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassilev ZP, Marcus SM, Jennis T, et al. Assessment of the utilization of a state AIDS/STD hotline by persons with and without HIV infection and their information needs. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2005;19(10):684–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang LW, Kagaayi J, Nakigozi G, et al. Telecommunications and health care: an HIV/AIDS warmline for communication and consultation in Rakai, Uganda. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care. 2008;7(3):130–132.
   Google Scholar
• Yamarat K, Havanond P, Chuemchit M. Reproductive and sexual health problems: reported by Bangkok's telephone hotline. J Health Res. 2014;28(4):263–267.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Safe abortion: technical guidance for health systems. 2nd ed. World Health Organization; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(45).
   Google Scholar
• Gerdts C, Jayaweera RT, Baum SE, et al. Second-trimester medication abortion outside the clinic setting: an analysis of electronic client records from a safe abortion hotline in Indonesia. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018;44:286–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman WV, Hestrin B, Dueck R. Access to complex abortion care service and planning improved through a toll-free telephone resource line. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:913241.
   Google Scholar
• Kimport K, Perrucci A, Weitz TA. Addressing the silence in the noise: how abortion support talklines meet some women's needs for non-political discussion of their experiences. Women Health. 2012;52(1):88–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas L, Vivaldi L. Abortion in Chile: the practice under a restrictive regime. Reprod Health Matters. 2014;22(44):70–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Medical management of abortion. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• AASA Partnership. Experience sharing of hotlines and refresher training 01–03 April 2015. Kathmandu Nepal: Summit Hotel; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Briozzo L. From risk and harm reduction to decriminalizing abortion: the Uruguayan model for women's rights. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;134(S1):S3–S6.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman D, Baum SE, Andjelic D, et al. A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamang A, Puri M, Masud S, et al. Medical abortion can be provided safely and effectively by pharmacy workers trained within a harm reduction framework: Nepal. Contraception. 2018;97(2):137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands S, Wale J. A constructivist vision of the first-trimester abortion experience. Health Human Rights J. 2020;22(1):237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Daly M, De Plecker E, et al. Now is the time: a call for increased access to contraception and safe abortion care during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(7):e003175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Assis MP, Larrea S. Why self-managed abortion is so much more than a provisional solution for times of pandemic. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):1779633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UKDHSC. Temporary approval of home use for both stages of early medical abortion. 2020 [cited 2020 August 13, 2020]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/temporary-approval-of-home-use-for-both-stages-ofearly-medical-abortion-2.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken ARA, Broussard K, Johnson DM, et al. Motivations and experiences of people seeking medication abortion online in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018;50(4):157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRoche KJ, Foster AM. It gives you autonomy over your own choices: a qualitative study of Canadian abortion patients’ experiences with mifepristone and misoprostol. Contraception. 2020;102(1):61–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousaw E, Moo SN, Arnott G, et al. It is just like having a period with back pain: exploring women's experiences with community-based distribution of misoprostol for early abortion on the Thailand-Burma border. Contraception. 2018;97(2):122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamberlin N, Romero M, Ramos S. Latin American women's experiences with medical abortion in settings where abortion is legally restricted. Reprod Health. 2012;9(1):34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar