Permeability of abortion care in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis of women’s experiences, health professional perspectives, and the internet resource of Women on Web

References

• Bitler M, Zavodny M. Child abuse and abortion availability. Am Econ Rev. 2002;92(2):363–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320191624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster D, Biggs M, Raifman S, et al. Comparison of health, development, maternal bonding, and poverty among children born after denial of abortion vs. after pregnancies subsequent to an abortion. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(11):1053–1060. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster D, Biggs M, Ralph L, et al. Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2018a;108(3):407–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster D, Raifman S, Gipson J, et al. Effects of carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term on women’s existing children. J Pediatr. 2019;205:183–189.e1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller S, Wherry L, Foster D. (2020). The economic consequences of being denied an abortion. The National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 26662.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts S, Biggs M, Chibber K, et al. Risk of violence from the man involved in the pregnancy after receiving or being denied an abortion. BMC Med. 2014;12:144, doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0144-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs M, Upadhyay U, McCulloch C, et al. Women’s mental health and well-being 5 years after receiving or being denied an abortion A prospective, longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016; doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478.
   Google Scholar
• Barton K, Redshaw M, Quigley M, et al. Unplanned pregnancy and subsequent psychological distress in partnered women: a cross-sectional study of the role of relationship quality and wider social support. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:44, doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1223-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay U, Biggs M, Foster D. The effect of abortion on having and achieving aspirational one-year plans. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:102), doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0259-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J. Pregnancy intention and pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(3):670–704. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2237-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdts C, Dobkin L, Foster D, et al. Side effects, physical health consequences, and mortality associated with abortion and birth after an unwanted pregnancy. Womens Health Issues. 2016;26(1):55–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zane S, Creanga A, Berg C, et al. Abortion-related mortality in the United States: 1998–2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(2):258–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross L, Solinger R. Reproductive justice: an introduction. University of California Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• UN Human Rights Committee. (2019, September). General comment No. 36 on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CCPR/Pages/GC36-Article6Righttolife.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Coast E, Norris AH, Moore AM, et al. Trajectories of women’s abortion-related care: A conceptual framework. Soc Sci Med. 2018;200:199–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35, doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levels M, Sluiter R, Need A. A review of abortion laws in Western-European countries. A cross-national comparison of legal developments between 1960 and 2010. Health Policy. 2014;118(1):95–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd. (2019). Jaarrapportage 2018 van de Wet afbreking zwangerschap. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2019/11/30/jaarrapportage-2018-van-de-wet-afbreking-zwangerschap.
   Google Scholar
• De Zordo S, Zanini G, Mishtal J, et al. Gestational age limits for abortion and cross-border reproductive care in Europe: a mixed-methods study. BJOG. 2020; doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16534.
   Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid. (2020). Tweede evaluatie Wet afbreking zwangerschap. ZonMw. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2020/07/08/tweede-evaulatie-wet-afbreking-zwangerschap.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken A, Guthrie KA, Schellekens M, et al. Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain. Contraception. 2018;97(2):177–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomperts R, Schellekens M, Leusink P, et al. Abortushulp kent te veel barrières. Med Contact (Bussum). 2019;6, https://www.medischcontact.nl/nieuws/laatste-nieuws/artikel/abortushulp-kent-te-veel-barrieres.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Amsterdam UMC. (2020). Research Code. Principles and guidelines for research integrity, independence and quality. https://www.amsterdamumc.org/research/integrity.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Schoevers M, van den Muijsenbergh M, Lagro-Janssen A. Illegal female immigrants in The Netherlands have unmet needs in sexual and reproductive health. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;31(4):256–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2010.528090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerman J, Frohwirth L, Kavanaugh M, et al. Barriers to abortion care and their consequences for patients traveling for services: qualitative findings from two states. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017;49(2):95–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen D, Joffe C. Obstacle course: the everyday struggle to get an abortion in America. Oakland (CA): University of California Press; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Doran F, Nancarrow S. Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review. J Family Plan Reprod Health Care. 2015;41:170–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditzhuijzen Jv, Have M, Graaf R, et al. Incidence and recurrence of common mental disorders after abortion: results from a prospective cohort study. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:200–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon-Jones S. Untroubling abortion: A discourse analysis of women’s accounts. Fem Psychol. 2017;27(2):225–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517696515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Hessini L, Mitchell EM. Conceptualising abortion stigma. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11:625–639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902842741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnithan M, De Zordo S. Re-situating abortion: bio-politics, global health and rights in neo-liberal times. Int J Res Policy Practice. 2018;13(6), doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2018.1445271.
   Google Scholar
• Norris A, Bessett D, Steinberg J, et al. Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(3):S49–S54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanschmidt F, Linde K, Hilbert A, et al. Abortion stigma: a systematic review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(4):169–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astbury-Ward E, Parry O, Carnwell R. Stigma, abortion, and disclosure—findings from a qualitative study. J Sexual Med. 2012;9(12):3137–3147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02604.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humanistisch Verbond. (2020, August 11). Nederlanders praten niet snel over abortus. https://www.humanistischverbond.nl/nederlanders-praten-niet-snel-over-abortus/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (2020, June). Self-management of medical abortion; WHO recommendations on self-care interventions. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-SRH-20-11.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken ARA, Broussard K, Johnson DM, et al. Knowledge, interest, and motivations surrounding self-managed medication abortion among patients at three Texas clinics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:238.e1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar