Understanding factors associated with continuation of intrauterine device use in Gujarat and Rajasthan, India: a cross-sectional household study

References

• Agarwalla R, Panda M, Gupta E, et al. Snapshot of an improved maternal Health in India: the pillars of strength. Pan Asian J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;2(1):37–42.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN). World contraceptive use 2015. New York: UN; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta RK, Singh P, Gupta R, et al. Contraceptive use: its prevalence, awareness, practices and determinants in a rural population of northern India. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6(10):1543–1548.
   Google Scholar
• Gogoi K, Hazarika PJ, Chanu NS, et al. A study on status of family planning practices and s association with socioeconomic and demographic factors in Manipur, India. Int J Stat Syst. 2017;12(3):441–455.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. India national Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017 : 112–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Alwani AA, Unnikrishnan B, et al. Determinants of intrauterine device acceptance among married women in coastal Karnataka, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(6) LC05–LC09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra N, Panda M, Pyne S, et al. Barriers and enablers to adoption of intrauterine device as a contraceptive method: a multi-stakeholder perspective. J Family Med Prim Care. 2017;6(3):616–621.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Joshi S, Nagar O, et al. Determinants of intrauterine contraceptive device discontinuation among Indian Women. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64 (3):208–311.
   Google Scholar
• Agrahari K, Mohanty SK, Chauhan RK. Socio-economic differentials in contraceptive discontinuation in India. SAGE Open. 2016;6(2):2158244016646612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi S, Jawadagi SA. A study to assess the factors affecting acceptance of intrauterine device (IUD) among rural women of Hirebagewadi, Belgaum. J Nurs Health Sci. 2014;3(2): 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Sanogo D, RamaRao S, Jones H, et al. Improving quality of care and use of contraceptives in Senegal. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003;7(2):57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Jain AK, RamaRao S, Kim J, et al. Evaluation of an intervention to improve quality of care in family planning programme in the Philippines. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44 (1):27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehingia N, Dixit A, Averbach S, et al. Family planning counseling and its associations with modern contraceptive use, initiation, and continuation in rural Uttar Pradesh, India. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamhawi S, Underwood C, Murad H, et al. Client centered counseling improves client satisfaction with family planning visits: evidence from Irbid, Jordan. Glob Health: Sci Pract. 2013;1(2):180–192.
   Google Scholar
• Neuteboom K, de Kroon CD, Dersjant-Roorda M, et al. Follow-up visits after IUD-insertion: sense or nonsense?: a technology assessment study to analyze the effectiveness of follow-up visits after IUD insertion. Contraception. 2003;68(2): 101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadre SS, Ahirwar R. Level of acceptance of IUD insertion in Indian women- a cross-sectional mixed research from Central India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(4):1079–1085.
   Google Scholar
• Hall MA, Stephenson RB, Juvekar S. Social and logistical barriers to the use of reversible contraception among women in a rural Indian village. J Health Popul Nutr. 2008;26(2):241–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck D, Kerner B, Gilles K, et al. encouraging contraceptive uptake by motivating men to communicate about family planning: the Malawi Male Motivator Project. Am J Public Health. 2011;101 (6):1089–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali MM, Cleland JG, Shah IH. Causes and consequences of contraceptive discontinuation: evidence from 60 demographic and health surveys. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hardee K, Harris S, Rodriguez M, et al. Achieving the goal of the London summit on family planning by adhering to voluntary, rights-based family planning: what can we learn from past experiences with coercion? Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;40(4):206–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen BA, Reeves MF, Hayes JL, et al. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroğlu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up. Contraception. 2006;74(5):376–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenland MW, Zapata LB, Brahmi D, et al. The effect of follow-up visits or contacts after contraceptive initiation on method continuation and correct use. Contraception. 2013;87(5):625–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald L, Jones L, Thomas P, et al. Promoting male involvement in family planning in Vietnam and India: HealthBridge experience. Gend Dev. 2013;21(1):31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren R, Cachan J, Jennings V. Engaging men in family planning services delivery: experiences introducing the Standard Days Method® in four countries. World Health Popul. 2012;14(1):44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Prata N, Bell S, Fraser A, et al. Partner support for family planning and modern contraceptive use in Luanda, Angola. Afr J Reprod Health. 2017;21(2): 35–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatya R, Akhter H, McMahan J, et al. The effect of husband counseling on NORPLANT® contraceptive acceptability in Bangladesh. Contraception. 1994;50 (3):263–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghule M, Raj A, Palaye P, et al. Barriers to use contraceptive methods among rural young married couples in Maharashtra, India: qualitative findings. Asian J Res Soc Sci Humanit. 2015;5(6):18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raj A, Ghule M, Ritter J, et al. Cluster randomized controlled trial evaluation of a gender equity and family planning intervention for married men and couples in Rural India. PLoS One. 2016;11 (5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty SK, Mishra S, Chatterjee S, et al. Pattern and correlates of out-of-pocket payment (OOP) on female sterilization in India, 1990-2014. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(13).
   Google Scholar
• Ahman E, Shah IH. New estimates and trends regarding unsafe abortion mortality. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011;115 (2):121–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hollen C. Moving targets: Routine IUD insertion in maternity wards in Tamil Nadu, India. Reprod Health Matters. 1998; 6(11):98–106
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Sethi R, Balasubramaniam S, et al. Women's experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use in India. Reprod Health. 2014;11:32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnaik B, Mishra K. User satisfaction and retention of Cu-T (IUD) amongst rural women in Orissa. Health Popul Perspect. 2003;26:52–58.
   Google Scholar
• The Evidence Project. Dynamics of postpartum IUD use in India: quality of care received and interim results three months after insertion. Research Brief. Washington (DC): Population Council; the Evidence Project; 2018.
   Google Scholar