Association between the place of abortion and post-abortion contraceptive adoption and continuation: the case of India

References

• Blanc AK, Curtis SL, Croft TN. Monitoring contraceptive continuation: links to fertility outcomes and quality of care. Stud Fam Plann. 2002 Jun;33(2):127–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Ali MM. Reproductive consequences of contraceptive failure in 19 developing countries. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):314–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Remez R, Sedgh G, et al. Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress and unequal access. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2018; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Westoff CF. Recent trends in abortion and contraception in 12 countries. DHS Analytical Studies No. 8. Calverton (MD): ORC Macro; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sully E, Biddlecom A, Darroch JE, et al. Adding it up: investing in sexual and reproductive health 2019. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1152–e1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki P, Luukkainen T. Return of ovarian function after abortion. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1978 Feb;8(2):123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber CA, Sober S, Ratcliffe S, et al. Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. Contraception. 2011 Sep;84(3):230–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhlouf MA, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with prior spontaneous or induced abortions. Am J Perinatol. 2014 Oct;31(9):765–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenslade FC, Mckay H, Wolf M, et al. Post-abortion care: a women’s health initiative to combat unsafe abortion. Adv Abort Care. 1994;4(1):1–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for Health Systems. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis C, Huber D, Moss-Knight T. Postabortion family planning: addressing the cycle of repeat unintended pregnancy and abortion. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010 Mar;36(1):44–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee SK, Manning V. Post-abortion contraception: a neglected public health domain. Paper presented at the Asian Population Association Conference: New Delhi; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Huber D, Curtis C, Irani L, et al. Postabortion care: 20 years of strong evidence on emergency treatment, family planning, and other programming components. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Sep 29;4(3):481–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visaria L, Ramachandren V, Ganatra BR, et al. Abortion use and practice: evidence, challenges and emerging issues. In: Visaria L, Ramachandren V, editors. Abortion in India: ground realities. New Delhi: Routledge; 2007. p. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Barge S, Khan ME, Rajagopal S, et al. Availability and quality of MTP services in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh. Working paper # 13. Baroda: Center for Operations Research and Training; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston H, Ved R, Lyall N, et al. Postabortion complications and their management: a community assessment conducted in rural Uttar Pradesh India. Technical Report#23. Chapel Hill (NC): Intrah, PRIME II Project; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanwala S, Acharya R, Francis Zavier AJ. Adoption and continuation of contraception following medical or surgical abortion in Bihar and Jharkhand, India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;118(Suppl 1):S47–S51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavier AJ, Padmadas SS. Postabortion contraceptive use and method continuation in India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jul;118(1):65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon BS, Chandhiok N, Kambo I, et al. Induced abortion and concurrent adoption of contraception in the rural areas of India (an ICMR task force study). Indian J Med Sci. 2004 Nov;58(11):478–484. PMID: 15567905.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banerjee SK, Gulati S, Andersen KL, et al. Associations between abortion services and acceptance of postabortion contraception in six Indian states. Stud Fam Plann. 2015 Dec;46(4):387–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) [India]. Comprehensive abortion care: training and service delivery guidelines. New Delhi: Government of India; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) [India]. A strategic approach to reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCH + A) in India. New Delhi: MOHFW, National Rural Health Mission; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16, India. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Retherford RD, Choe MK. Statistical models for causal analysis. New York: Wiley; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Cox D. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1972 Series B (Methodological). 1972;34(2):187–220.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station (TX): StataCorp LP; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Sethi R, Balasubramaniam S, et al. Women’s experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use in India. Reprod Health. 2014 Apr 23;11:32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhpiego. Revitalizing postpartum family planning services in India. Fact sheet. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University; 2015 Apr.
   Google Scholar
• Jain ML, Chauhan M, Talwar B. Role of private sector in family planning programme in Rajasthan, India – a rapid assessment. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;4:869–874.
   Google Scholar
• Duggal R, Barge S. Abortion services in India: report of a multicentric enquiry. Abortion Assessment Project – India. Mumbai: CEHAT and HealthWatch; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sahoo H, Stillman M, Frost J, et al. Availability, practices and acceptance of postabortion contraceptive services in health facilities: a study in six states of India. Contraception. 2020 Feb;101(2):106–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupte M, Bandewar S, Pisal H. Abortion needs of women in India: a case study of rural Maharashtra. Reprod Health Matters. 1997;5(9):77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gupte M, Bandewar S, Pisal H. Women's perspectives on the quality of general and reproductive health care: evidence from rural Maharashtra. In: Koening M, Khan ME, editors. Improving quality of care in India's Family Welfare programme: the challenge ahead. New York: Population Council; 1999. p. 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Halli SS, Ashwini D, Dehury B, et al. Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira IT, Dias JG, Padmadas SS. Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jejeebhoy S. Women’s education, autonomy and reproductive behavior: experience from developing countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Moursund A, Kravdal O. Individual and community effects of women’s education and autonomy on contraceptive use in India. Popul Stud (Camb). 2003 Nov;57(3):285–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagos G, Tura G, Kahsay G, et al. Family planning utilization and factors associated among women receiving abortion services in health facilities of central zone towns of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Liu Y, Xiong R. Factors associated with seeking post-abortion care among women in Guangzhou, China. BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engender Health. Contraceptive use and discontinuation patterns in Nepal: Norplant, IUCD, Pill, and Injectables. Report. Engender Health; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• FP2020. Family planning 2020 commitment. Government of India. London Summit on Family Planning. London: 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Shekhar C, Acharya R, et al. The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in India, 2015. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jan;6(1):e111–e120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges AL, OlaOlorun F, Fujimori E, et al. Contraceptive use following spontaneous and induced abortion and its association with family planning services in primary health care: results from a Brazilian longitudinal study. Reprod Health. 2015 Oct 15;12:94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchie A, Getahun FA, Bekele YA, et al. Magnitudes of post-abortion family planning utilization and associated factors among women who seek abortion service in Bahir Dar Town health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia, facility-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 20;16(1):e0244808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamaRao S, Lacuesta M, Costello M, et al. The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003 Jun;29(2):76–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar