Definitions, perspectives, and reasons for conscientious objection among healthcare workers, facility managers, and staff in South Africa: a qualitative study

References

• Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I. Facility-based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries. BJOG. 2015;123:1489–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abortion Worldwide 2017. Uneven progress and unequal access. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2346.
   Google Scholar
• Chavkin W, Swerdlow L, Fifield J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: an international comparative multiple-case study. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(1):55–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel AR, Kung S, López-Salm A, et al. Regulating conscientious objection to legal abortion in Argentina: taking into consideration its uses and consequences. Health Hum Rights. 2020;22(2):271–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleming V, Ramsayer B, Škodič Zakšek T. Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion. J Med Ethics. 2018;44:104–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Women’s Health Coalition. Unconscionable: when providers deny abortion care. New York: IWHC; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chavkin W, Leitman L, Polin K. Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a white paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123:S41–S56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Second ed. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Harries J, Cooper D, Strebel A, et al. Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2014;11(16):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. G.A. Res. 1966;2200A(XXI).
   Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights. Law and policy guide: conscientious objection. Accessed on 10 August 2020 at: https://reproductiverights.org/law-and-policy-guide-conscientious-objection.
   Google Scholar
• FIGO. Resolution on “Conscientious Objection” (Kuala Lumpur). (2006). Accessed on 23 January 2022 at: https://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/FIGO%202006%20Resolution%20on%20Conscientious%20Objection-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Faundes A, Duarte GA, Neto JA, et al. The closer you are, the better you understand: the reaction of Brazilian obstetrician-gynaecologists to unwanted pregnancy. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12(24 Suppl):47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zordo S, Mishtal J. Physicians and abortion: provision, political participation and conflicts on the ground – the cases of Brazil and Poland. Women’s Health Issues. 2011;21(Suppl 3):S32–S36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goyal M, Zhao H, Mollen C. Exploring emergency contraception knowledge, prescription practices, and barriers to prescription for adolescents in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2009;123(3):765–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen SA. Facts and consequences: legality, incidence and safety of abortion worldwide. Guttmacher Policy Review. 2009;12(4):2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Navarrete SA, Ramón Michel A. “Re-thinking the use of conscientious objection by health professionals: a regulatory proposal based on legal abortion practices in Argentina.” Available at SSRN 3380668 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Harries J, Constant D. Providing safe abortion services: experiences and perspectives of providers in South Africa. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;62:79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kung SA, Wilkins JD, de Leon F D, et al. “We don’t want problems”: reasons for denial of legal abortion based on conscientious objection in Mexico and Bolivia. Reprod Health. 2021;18(44):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awoonor-Williams JK, et al. Exploring conscientious objection to abortion among health providers in Ghana. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46:51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Bill. Section 2, Gazette, 45. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard K, Fonn S, Xaba M. Abortion law in South Africa: passage of a progressive law and challenges for implementation. Gaceta Médica de México. 2003;139(1):S109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes R, Brown H, Dickson-Tetteh K, et al. Prevalence of morbidity associated with abortion before and after legalization in South Africa. Br Med J. 2002;324:1252–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. Barriers to safe and legal abortion in South Africa. London, England: Amnesty International; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Making abortion services accessible in the wake of legal reforms: a framework and six case studies. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/abortion-services-laws.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed June 15, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Chiwandire D. Conscientious objection and South African medical practitioners’ constructions of termination of pregnancy and emergency contraception. Master’s thesis, Rhodes University. Published 2015. Accessed on 6 March 2023 at: http://vital.seals.ac.za:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:2888?site_name=GlobalView&exact=sm_creator%3A%22Chiwandire%2C+Desire%22&f0=sm_type%3A%22MSocSc%22&sort=sort_ss_title%2F.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor N, O’Sullivan M. Conscientious objection and the implementation of the choice on termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996 in South Africa. Cape Town: Women’s Legal Centre; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ngwena C. Conscientious objection and legal abortion in South Africa: delineating the parameters. J Jurid Sci. 2003;28(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• National Department of Health Republic of South Africa. National Integrated Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy. Edition 1. https://www.knowledgehub.org.za/system/files/elibdownloads/2021-03/National%20Integrated%20SRHR%20Policy_Final_2021.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed February 18, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• National Department of Health Republic of South Africa. National clinical guideline for implementation of the choice on termination of Pregnancy Act. Edition 1. https://www.knowledgehub.org.za/system/files/elibdownloads/2021-03/Termination%20of%20Pregnancy%20Guideline_Final_2021.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed February 18, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Harries J, Stinson K, Orner P. Health care providers’ attitudes towards termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(296):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Favier M, Greenberg JM, Stevens M. Safe abortion in South Africa: “we have wonderful laws but we don’t have people to implement those laws”. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143:38–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman E, Coast E. Conscientious objection to abortion: Zambian healthcare practitioners’ beliefs and practices. Soc Sci Med. 2019;221:106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueman KA, Magwentshu M. Abortion in a progressive legal environment: the need for vigilance in protecting and promoting access to safe abortion services in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):397–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massyn N, et al. District health barometer 2016/2017. Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• All4Women. KZN increases abortion clinics in bid to stamp out illegal practices, December 2015. Available from: https://www.all4women.co.za/586633/news/south-african-news/kzn-increases-abortion-clinics-in-bid-to-stamp-out-illegal-practices.
   Google Scholar
• Meel BL, Kaswa RP. The impact of the choice on termination of Pregnancy Act of 1996 (Act 92 of 1996) on criminal abortions in the Mthatha area of South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2009;1(1):79–81.
   Google Scholar
• Turner KL, Page KC. Abortion attitude transformation: a values clarification toolkit for global audiences. Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• National Women’s Council. Accessing Abortion in Ireland: Meeting the Needs of Every Woman. Available from: https://www.nwci.ie/images/uploads/15572_NWC_Abortion_Paper_WEB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Turner KL, Pearson E, George A, et al. Values clarification workshops to improve abortion knowledge, attitudes and intentions: a pre-post assessment in 12 countries. Reprod Health. 2018;15(40):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanschmidt F, Linde K, Hilbert A, et al. Abortion stigma: a systematic review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Dec;48(4):169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz D, Madeiro A, Rosas C. Conscientious objection, barriers, and abortion in the case of rape: a study among physicians in Brazil. Reprod Health Matters. 2014;22(43):141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris A, Bessett D, Steinberg JR, et al. Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Womens Health Issues. 2011 May 1;21(3):S49–S54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homaifar N, Freedman L, French V. “She’s on her own”: a thematic analysis of clinicians’ comments on abortion referral. Contraception. 2017 May 1;95(5):470–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Hessini L, Mitchell EM. Conceptualising abortion stigma. Cult Health Sex. 2009 Aug 1;11(6):625–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin LA, Debbink M, Hassinger J, et al. Abortion providers, stigma and professional quality of life. Contraception. 2014 Dec 1;90(6):581–587.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris LH, et al. Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: findings from a pilot study of the Providers Share Workshop. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(7):1062–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenton C, Sorhaindo AM, Ganatra B, et al. Implementation considerations when expanding health worker roles to include safe abortion care: a five-country case study synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;17(1):730.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aiken ARA, Starling JE, Gomperts R, et al. Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in the United States during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):835–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken ARA, Starling JE, Gomperts R, et al. Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in eight European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regression discontinuity analysis. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021;47(4):238–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar