“A daily reminder of an ugly incident  … ”: analysis of debate on rape and incest exceptions in early abortion ban legislation in six states in the southern US

References

• Dobbs v. Jackson. US: Supreme Court; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher. Induced Abortion in the United States: Guttmacher Institute; 2019 [updated September 2019. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states?gclid=CjwKCAiA-_L9BRBQEiwA-bm5ftSk7HLD7fo1Dl2jPmjo1TlHoV51XtUXfJAI0fvlKfBJtOepMvXOiRoCptYQAvD_BwE.
   Google Scholar
• Reagan LJ. When abortion was a crime: women, medicine, and law in the United States, 1867-1973 [internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997; [cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from: http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft967nb5z5/.
   Google Scholar
• Packer HL, Gampell RJ. Therapeutic abortion: a problem in law and medicine. Stanford Law Rev [Internet]. 1959;11(3):417–455. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.proxy.library.emory.edu/stable/1226957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planned Parenthood. Historical Abortion Law Timeline:1850 to Today [Internet]. Planned Parenthood. [cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from: https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/issues/abortion/abortion-central-history-reproductive-health-care-america/historical-abortion-law-timeline-1850-today#.
   Google Scholar
• Hevesi D. The Supreme Court; How Debate Over Abortion Evolved With Changes in Science and Society. The New York Times [Internet]. 1989 Jul 4 [cited 2022 Jul 28]; Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/04/us/supreme-court-debate-over-abortion-evolved-with-changes-science-society.html.
   Google Scholar
• Watson K. Scarlet A: The ethics, law, and politics of ordinary abortion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 297.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers P. The purists and the pragmatists: The right-to-life movement and the problem of the exceptional abortion in the United States, 1980s–2010s. In Women's studies international forum 2020 Jan 1 (Vol. 78, No. 102326, pp. 1–7).
   Google Scholar
• Roe v. Wade. US: Supreme Court; 1973. p. 113.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde Amendment Codification Act. Congress; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Congress; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Congress; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• General Assembly G. HB 481 Living Infants Fairness and Equality (LIFE) Act; enact: Georgia General Assembly; 2019 [Available from: https://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/55445.
   Google Scholar
• General Assembly K. Senate Bill 9 Kentucky General Assembly: Kentucky General Assembly; 2019 [Available from: https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/record/19RS/sb9.html.
   Google Scholar
• State Legislature L. SB 184 Louisiana State Legislature: Louisiana State Legislature; 2019 [Available from: http://www.legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.aspx?i=236316.
   Google Scholar
• Legislature M. Senate Bill 2116 Mississippi Legislature: Mississippi Legislature; 2019 [Available from: http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/2019/pdf/history/SB/SB2116.xml.
   Google Scholar
• General Assembly SC. H. 3020 South Carolina General Assembly: South Carolina General Assembly; 2019 [Available from: https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/bills/3020.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Senate Bill 1257 LegiScan2019 [Available from: https://legiscan.com/TN/bill/SB1257/2019
   Google Scholar
• Weitz TA, Yanow S. Implications of the federal abortion ban for women’s health in the United States. Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 2008;16(31):99–107. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.proxy.library.emory.edu/stable/25475407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Injury Prevention and Control D of VP. Fast Facts: Preventing Sexual Violence [Internet]. Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html
   Google Scholar
• Martin AK. Making pro-abortion laws pro-choice for female rape victims. Wis J Law Gender Soc. 2018;33:63.
   Google Scholar
• NPR/PBS. NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 944 National Adults Marist Poll: Marist Poll; 2019 [Available from: http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/NPR_PBS-NewsHour_Marist-Poll_USA-NOS-and-Tables-on-Abortion_1906051428_FINAL.pdf#page=3.
   Google Scholar
• de Londras F, Cleeve A, Rodriguez MI, et al. The impact of “grounds” on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence. BMC Public Health. 2022 May 10;22(1):936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The science, law, and politics of fetal pain legislation. Harv Law Rev. 2002;115(7):2010–2033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simas EN, Bumgardner M. Modern sexism and the 2012 US presidential election: reassessing the casualties of the “war on women”. Pol Gender. 2017;13(3):359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris A, Bessett D, Steinberg JR, et al. Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Womens Health Issues Off Publ Jacobs Inst Womens Health. 2011;21(3 Suppl):S49–S54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rewire. Legislative tracker: heartbeat bans Rewire News Group 2019 [updated May 30 2019. Available from: https://rewirenewsgroup.com/legislative-tracker/law-topic/heartbeat-bans/.
   Google Scholar
• Doe v. Bolton. US: Supreme Court; 1973. p. 179.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher. An overview of Abortion Law Guttmacher Institute 2021 [updated March 1 2021. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws?gclid=CjwKCAjwq_D7BRADEiwAVMDdHnREmtiZPnOWGKy8_zwudWgvKYVLvEXGpniToYzI6_NEBjHpkcAJqRoCxyoQAvD_BwE#.
   Google Scholar
• Szal R. How Black Women Legislators Are Fighting Abortion Bans and Trumpism in State Legislatures Ms.: Ms.; 2021 [Available from: https://msmagazine.com/2021/02/18/black-women-legislators-abortion-bans-state-legislatures-south-carolina-mia-mcleod-ohio-erica-crawley-kentucky-attica-scott/.
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures. State Partisan Composition [Internet]. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from: https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/partisan-composition.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• State Political Parties [Internet]. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Available from: https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/state-political-parties/
   Google Scholar
• Ryman A, Wynn M. For anti-abortion activists, success of “heartbeat” bills was 10 years in the making. USA Today; 2019 December 18 2019. Contract No.: March 25 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Scarfone M. Incoherent Abortion Exceptions. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Evans DP, Narasimhan S. A narrative analysis of anti-abortion testimony and legislative debate related to Georgia’s fetal “heartbeat” abortion ban. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):1686201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forte DF. Life, heartbeat, birth: a medical basis for reform. Ohio State Law J; 74.
   Google Scholar
• Haining CM, Keogh LA, Savulescu J. The unethical Texas heartbeat law. Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(5):535–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The South | Definition, States, & History | Britannica [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/place/the-South-region
   Google Scholar
• Associated Press. Judge won’t block law banning most Mississippi abortions. Politico [Internet]. 2022 Jul 5 [cited 2022 Jul 29]; Available from: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/05/mississippi-abortion-law-judge-00044133.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access after Roe - Mississippi [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/mississippi/abortion-policies.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd K. Louisiana abortion clinics stay open after judge temporarily blocks ban. The Washington Post [Internet]. 2022 Jul 21 [cited 2022 Jul 29]; Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/07/21/louisiana-abortion-ban-preliminary-injunction/.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access after Roe - Louisiana [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/louisiana/abortion-policies.
   Google Scholar
• Lovan D. Kentucky judge extends block of state’s abortion ban. PBS News Hour [Internet]. 2022 Jul 22 [cited 2022 Jul 29]; Available from: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/kentucky-judge-extends-block-of-states-abortion-ban.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access after Roe - Kentucky [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/kentucky/abortion-policies.
   Google Scholar
• Time. Federal Judge blocks Georgia’s Controversial Law banning most abortions after 6 weeks time: Time; 2020 [updated July 14 2020. Available from: https://time.com/5866714/georgia-heartbeat-abortion-law-ban/.
   Google Scholar
• American Civil Liberties Union. Georgia Six-Week Abortion Ban to Take Effect [Internet]. American Civil Liberties Union. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/georgia-six-week-abortion-ban-take-effect.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe - Tennessee [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/tennessee/abortion-policies.
   Google Scholar
• WLTX. South Carolina fetal heartbeat abortion law is now in effect. News 19 [Internet]. 2022 Jun 27 [cited 2022 Jul 29]; Available from: https://www.wltx.com/article/news/local/south-carolina-fetal-heartbeat-bill/101-13edbb76-77ba-437d-ae8a-6cfcbcd7b59c.
   Google Scholar
• Schlotman K. Examining the Types of and Use of Personal Narratives in Abortion Bans at Early Gestation in Four States in the US South. In: University E, editor. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson CE, Malouff JM. Assessing police classifications of sexual assault reports: a meta-analysis of false reporting rates. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(5):1185–1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein C. Inside the Kavanaugh hearings: an oral history. Frontline. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth JC, Cassidy CA. Female lawmakers share personal stories of rapes as abortion bills advance The Daily Jeff: Associated Press; [updated May 19 2019. Available from: https://www.daily-jeff.com/news/20190518/female-lawmakers-share-personal-stories-of-rapes-as-abortion-bills-advance.
   Google Scholar
• Stabile B, Grant A, Purohit H, et al. “She lied”: social construction, rape myth prevalence in social media, and sexual assault policy. Sex Gend Policy. 2019;2(2):80–96.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser DA. Confronting myths about sexual assault: a feminist analysis of the false report literature. Fam Relat. 2017;66(1):46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huda T. “No signs of rape”: corroboration, resistance and the science of disbelief in the medico-legal jurisprudence of Bangladesh*. Sex Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1;29(2):2096186. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108026410397.2022.2096186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lanum N. Biden-cited story of 10-year-old Ohio rape victim needing abortion still not verified by fact-checkers. Fox News [Internet]. 2022 Jul 11 [cited 2022 Jul 29]; Available from: https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-cited-story-10-year-old-ohio-rape-victim-needing-abortion-still-not-verified-fact-checkers.
   Google Scholar
• The Editorial Board. An Abortion Story Too Good to Confirm. The Wall Street Journal [Internet]. 2022 Jul 13 [cited 2022 Jul 29]; Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/an-abortion-story-too-good-to-confirm-joe-biden-ten-year-old-girl-indiana-ohio-caitlin-bernard-11657648618.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson K. Facts Were Sparse on an Abortion Case. But That Didn’t Stop the Attacks. 2022 Jul 14 [cited 2022 Jul 28]; Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/14/business/media/10-year-old-girl-ohio-rape.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_20220714&instance_id=66681&nl=todaysheadlines&regi_id=29113168&segment_id=98565&user_id=b41514bedd48bb0e745d73ce0ab964de.
   Google Scholar
• Sneha B. Abortion Restrictions in U.S. Foreign Aid: The History and Harms of the Helms Amendment [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute; 2013 Sep [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Report No.: Volume 16, Issue 3. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2013/09/abortion-restrictions-us-foreign-aid-history-and-harms-helms-amendment.
   Google Scholar
• McGovern T. Overturning Roe v Wade has had an immediate chilling effect on reproductive healthcare. Br Med J. 2022 Jun 30;377:o1622.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorf MC, Canes-Wrone B. Measuring the Chilling Effect. SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 2]; Available from: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2689185.
   Google Scholar
• Novkov J, Bird CC. Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson on Delegated Enforcement of Abortion Restrictions. In: SCOTUS 2022: Major Decisions and Developments of the US Supreme Court. Springer Nature; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Casas L, Vivaldi L. Abortion in Chile: the practice under a restrictive regime. Reprod Health Matters. 2014 Nov;22(44):70–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaney K. Almost No One Is Falsely Accused of Rape The Cut: The Cut; [updated October 5 2018. Available from: https://www.thecut.com/article/false-rape-accusations.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson LC, Miller KE. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of unacknowledged rape. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016;17(2):149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrea S, Assis MP, Mendoza CO. “Hospitals have some procedures that seem dehumanising to me”: experiences of abortion-related obstetric violence in Brazil, Chile and Ecuador. Agenda. 2021 Jul 3;35(3):54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean E, Desalegn DN, Blystad A, et al. When the law makes doors slightly open: ethical dilemmas among abortion service providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Sep 5;20(1):60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen IG. Are all abortions equal? Should there be exceptions to the criminalization of abortion for rape and incest? Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications Sage CA; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow J. The things we cannot say: witnessing the traumatization of abortion in the United States. Women Stud Q. 2008;36(1/2):28–41.
   Google Scholar
• RepSwalwell. Government-mandated pregnancies for 4th-graders. That’s the MAGA Republican plan for child rape victims: https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1543280074039984129 2022 July [cited 2022 July 30] [Tweet]. Available from: @RepSwalwell
   Google Scholar
• Wyckoff KG, Narasimhan S, Stephenson K, et al. “COVID gave him an opportunity to tighten the reins around my throat”: perceptions of COVID-19 movement restrictions among survivors of intimate partner violence. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;23(1):199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Civil Liberties Union. End Forced Pregnancy [Internet]. American Civil Liberties Union. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.aclu.org/news/topic/end-forced-pregnancy.
   Google Scholar
• The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Joint web statement by UN Human rights experts on Supreme Court decision to strike down Roe v. Wade [Internet]. United Nations. United Nations; 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2022/06/joint-web-statement-un-human-rights-experts-supreme-court-decision-strike-down
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR | General comment No. 36 on article 6: right to life [Internet]. United Nations. [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input/general-comment-no-36-article-6-right-life
   Google Scholar
• Paulina Ramírez v. Mexico (Inter-American Commission on Human Rights) [Internet]. Center for Reproductive Rights. [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Available from: https://reproductiverights.org/case/paulina-ramirez-v-mexico-inter-american-commission-on-human-rights/.
   Google Scholar
• L.C. v. Peru (UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women) [Internet]. Center for Reproductive Rights. [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Available from: https://reproductiverights.org/case/l-c-v-peru-un-committee-on-the-elimination-of-discrimination-against-women/.
   Google Scholar
• P. and S. v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights) [Internet]. Center for Reproductive Rights. [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Available from: https://reproductiverights.org/case/p-and-s-v-poland-european-court-of-human-rights/.
   Google Scholar
• Fried C. Two concepts of interests: some reflections on the Supreme Court’s Balancing Test. Harv Law Rev. 1963;76(4):755–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges KM. Life in the balance: judicial review of abortion regulations. UC Davis Law Rev. 2012 2013;46(4):1285–1338.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott D, Wamsley L. Alabama Governor Signs Abortion Ban Into Law NPR: NPR; 2019 [Available from: https://www.npr.org/2019/05/14/723312937/alabama-lawmakers-passes-abortion-ban.
   Google Scholar
• Vander PL. Can You Drive Alone in the H.O.V. Lane if You’re Pregnant? A Post-Roe Quandary. The New York Times [Internet]. 2022 Jul 12 [cited 2022 Jul 29]; Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/us/pregnant-woman-hov-lane-roe-wade.html.
   Google Scholar
• NAJMABADI S. Gov. Greg Abbott signs into law one of nation’s strictest abortion measures, banning procedure as early as six weeks into a pregnancy The Texas Tribune: The Texas Tribune, 2021 [Available from: https://www.texastribune.org/2021/05/18/texas-heartbeat-bill-abortions-law/.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Injury Prevention and Control D of VP. Fast facts: preventing sexual violence [Internet]. Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe - Texas [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute, 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/texas/abortion-policies.
   Google Scholar