Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya

References

• The World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. 2023 [cited 2023 April]. Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519.
   Google Scholar
• Sully E, Biddlecom A, Darroch JE, et al. Adding it up: investing in sexual and reproductive health 2019. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira LR, Ewerling F, Barros AJD, et al. Reasons for nonuse of contraceptive methods by women with demand for contraception not satisfied: an assessment of low and middle-income countries using demographic and health surveys. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):148, doi:10.1186/s12978-019-0805-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman JG, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: global barriers to women's reproductive control. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001723, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarzia L, Hegarty K. A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):87, doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood SN, Kennedy SR, Akumu I, et al. Reproductive coercion among intimate partner violence survivors in Nairobi. Stud Fam Plann. 2020;51(4):343–360. doi:10.1111/sifp.12141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley HL, Silverman JG, Jones KA, et al. Psychometric properties and refinement of the reproductive coercion scale. Contraception. 2017;95(3):292–298. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrs AM, Ezeh AC, Barker G, et al. Accelerate progress—sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher–lancet commission. Lancet. 2018;391(10140):2642–2692. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E, Jordan B, Levenson R, et al. Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(6):457–459. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallitto CC, García-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, et al. Intimate partner violence, abortion, and unintended pregnancy: results from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;120(1):3–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E, McCauley HL, Tancredi DJ, et al. Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients. Contraception. 2014;89(2):122–128. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey LA, Hitchcock S, Eloff I, et al. The role of reproductive coercion in women’s risk for HIV: A case-control study of outpatients in Gauteng, South Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;151(3):377–382. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay KE, Yee LM. Birth outcomes among women affected by reproductive coercion. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65(5):627–633. doi:10.1111/jmwh.13107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace KT, Fleming C. A systematic review of reproductive coercion in international settings. World Med Health Policy. 2016;8(4):382–408. doi:10.1002/wmh3.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon L, Bevilacqua K, Khan A, et al. 68 Intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and contraception among patients in a reproductive health setting: a mixed methods study of patient preferences regarding a clinic-based intervention. Inj Prev. 2017;23(Suppl 1):A26–A26.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF International. Kenya: Demographic and Health Survey 2014. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ahinkorah BO, Ameyaw EK, Seidu A-A, et al. Sexual violence and unmet need for contraception among married and cohabiting women in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from demographic and health surveys. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0240556, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce SC, Uysal J, DeLong SM, et al. Women’s and girls’ experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):96, doi:10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochache V, Wanje G, Nyagah L, et al. Religious, socio-cultural norms and gender stereotypes influence uptake and utilization of maternal health services among the Digo community in Kwale, Kenya: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):71, doi:10.1186/s12978-020-00919-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tancredi DJ, Silverman JG, Decker MR, et al. Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing reproductive coercion in health settings (ARCHES). BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:57, doi:10.1186/s12905-015-0216-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E, Decker MR, McCauley HL, et al. A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion. Contraception. 2011;83(3):274–280. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E, Tancredi DJ, Decker MR, et al. A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2016;94(1):58–67. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uysal J, Carter N, Johns N, et al. Protocol for a matched-pair cluster control trial of ARCHES (addressing reproductive coercion in health settings) among women and girls seeking contraceptive services from community-based clinics in Nairobi, Kenya. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):77, doi:10.1186/s12978-020-00916-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman JG, Uysal J, Undie CC, et al. Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and pregnancy outcomes: A matched-control trial in Nairobi, Kenya, in Population Association of America (PAA) 2023. 2023: New Orleans, LA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Croft TN, Marshall AMJ, Allen CK et al. Guide to DHS statistics. Rockville: ICF, 2018. 645.
   Google Scholar
• Zegeye B, Olorunsaiye CZ, Ahinkorah BO, et al. Understanding the factors associated with married women’s attitudes towards wife-beating in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):242), doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01809-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Hernán MÁ, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2000;11(5):550–560. doi:10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson T, Ravani P. Marginal structural models in clinical research: when and how to use them? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(suppl_2):ii84–ii90. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfw341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greifer N, Stuward EA. Choosing the estimand when matching or weighting in observational studies. Economics. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Godard-Sebillotte C, Karunananthan S, Vedel I. Difference-in-differences analysis and the propensity score to estimate the impact of non-randomized primary care interventions. Fam Pract. 2019;36(2):247–251. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmz003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart EA, Huskamp HA, Duckworth K, et al. Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014;14(4):166–182. doi:10.1007/s10742-014-0123-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou H, Taber C, Arcona S, et al. Difference-in-differences method in comparative effectiveness research: utility with unbalanced groups. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(4):419–429. doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0249-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mensch B, Arends-Kuenning M, Jain A. The impact of the quality of family planning services on contraceptive Use in Peru. Stud Fam Plann. 1996;27(2):59–75. doi:10.2307/2138134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamaRao S, Lacuesta M, Costello M, et al. The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003;29(2):76–83. doi:10.2307/3181061
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tumlinson K, Pence BW, Curtis SL, et al. Quality of care and contraceptive use in urban Kenya. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015;41(2):69–79. doi:10.1363/4106915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond-Smith N, Warnock R, Sudhinaraset M. Interventions to improve the person-centered quality of family planning services: a narrative review. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):144, doi:10.1186/s12978-018-0592-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibbs A, Hatcher A. Covert family planning as a symbol of agency for young, married women. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;23:100393, doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman JG, Challa S, Boyce SC, et al. Associations of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence with overt and covert family planning use among married adolescent girls in Niger. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;22:100359, doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100359
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kibira SPS, Karp C, Wood SN, et al. Covert use of contraception in three sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative exploration of motivations and challenges. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):865, doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08977-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulley J, et al. Intimate partner violence and barriers to help-seeking among black, Asian, minority ethnic and immigrant women: a qualitative metasynthesis of global research. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022;15248380211050590.
   Google Scholar
• Cho H, Shamrova D, Han J-B, et al. Patterns of intimate partner violence victimization and survivors’ help-seeking. J Interpers Violence. 2020;35(21–22):4558–4582. doi:10.1177/0886260517715027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodson A, Hayes BE. Help-Seeking behaviors of intimate partner violence victims: a cross-national analysis in developing nations. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(9-10):NP4705–NP4727. doi:10.1177/0886260518794508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner K, Mash B. A comprehensive model for intimate partner violence in South African primary care: action research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:399, doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombini M, Dockerty C, Mayhew SH. Barriers and facilitators to integrating health service responses to intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries: a comparative health systems and service analysis. Stud Fam Plann. 2017;48(2):179–200. doi:10.1111/sifp.12021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlbach H, Robinson CD, Finefter-Rosenbluh I, et al. Questionnaires as interventions: can taking a survey increase teachers’ openness to student feedback surveys? Educ Psychol. 2018;38(3):350–367. doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1349876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SMW, Shulman LJ, Richards JE, et al. Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020;18:100554, doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French DP, Sutton S. Reactivity of measurement in health psychology: how much of a problem is it? What can be done about it? Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(Pt 3):453–468. doi:10.1348/135910710X492341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez-Prada A, Delgado-Alvarez C, Bosch-Fiol E, et al. Psychosocial implications of supportive attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women throughout the lifecycle. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6055, doi:10.3390/ijerph17176055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar