Balancing client preferences and population-level goals: a qualitative study of the ways in which public health providers and facility administrators interpret and incentivise quality of care in contraceptive counselling in Ethiopia, Mexico and India

References

• Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990;21(2):61–91. doi:10.2307/1966669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Bruce J, Kumar S. Quality of services, programme efforts and fertility reduction. Fam Plan Programmes Fertil. 1992;202Ō221.
   Google Scholar
• Miller RA, Fisher AA, Miller K, et al. 1997. The situation analysis approach to assessing family planning and reproductive health services: a handbook. New York: Population Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand JT, Sullivan T, Rice J. Quick investigation of quality: measuring quality of care in family planning. Chapel Hill (NC): Caroline Population Centre; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• RamaRao S, Mohanam R. The quality of family planning programs: concepts, measurements, interventions, and effects. Stud Fam Plann. 2003;34(4):227–248. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00227.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Bruce J, Mensch B. Setting standards of quality in family planning programs. Stud Fam Plann. 1992;23(6):392–395. doi:10.2307/1966897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain AK, Hardee K. Revising the FP quality of care framework in the context of rights-based family planning. Stud Fam Plann. 2018;49(2):171–179. doi:10.1111/sifp.12052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Z-W, Wu SC, Garceau RJ, et al. Effect of pretreatment counselling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women given depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception. 1996;53(6):357–361. doi:10.1016/0010-7824(96)00085-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mensch B, Arends-Kuenning M, Jain A. The impact of the quality of family planning services on contraceptive use in Peru. Stud Fam Plann. 1996;27: 59–75. doi:10.2307/2138134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig MA, Hossain MB, Whittaker M. The influence of quality of care upon contraceptive use in rural Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann. 1997;28:278–289. doi:10.2307/2137859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamaRao S, Lacuesta M, Costello M, et al. The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003;29: 76–83. doi:10.2307/3181061
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arends-Kuenning M, Kessy FL. The impact of demand factors, quality of care and access to facilities on contraceptive use in Tanzania. J Biosoc Sci. 2007;39(1):1–26. doi:10.1017/S0021932005001045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Tawab N, RamaRao S. Do improvements in client–provider interaction increase contraceptive continuation? Unraveling the puzzle. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(3):381–387. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain AK, RamaRao S, Kim J, et al. Evaluation of an intervention to improve quality of care in family planning programme in the Philippines. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44(1):27–41. doi:10.1017/S0021932011000460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardee K, Kumar J, Newman K, et al. Voluntary, human rights–based family planning: a conceptual framework. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(1):1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00373.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning F. 2014. Family Planning 2020: Rights and Empowerment Principles for Family Planning. Washington, DC: FP2020.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2014. Framework for Ensuring Human Rights in the Provision of Contraceptive Information and Services..
   Google Scholar
• Kuumba B. Population policy in the era of globalisation: a case of reproductive imperialism. Agenda. 2001;16(48):22–30. doi:10.1080/10130950.2001.9675945
   Google Scholar
• Hendrixson A. Population control in the troubled present: the “120 by 20” target and implant access program. Dev Change. 2019;50(3):786–804. doi:10.1111/dech.12423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFPA. 1994. Programme of Action Adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development. In . Cairo.
   Google Scholar
• Solo J, Festin M. Provider bias in family planning services: a review of its meaning and manifestations. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(3):371–385. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun LM, Speizer IS, Rimal R, et al. Provider imposed restrictions to clients’ access to family planning in urban uttar pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):532, doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lince-Deroche N, Hendrickson C, Moolla A, et al. Provider perspectives on contraceptive service delivery: findings from a qualitative study in Johannesburg, South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):128, doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4900-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L-F, Puri M, Rocca CH, et al. “Service provider perspectives on post-abortion contraception in Nepal. Cult Health Sex. 2016;18(2):221–232. doi:10.1080/13691058.2015.1073358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugisha JF, Reynolds H. Provider perspectives on barriers to family planning quality in Uganda: a qualitative study. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2008;34(1):37–41. doi:10.1783/147118908783332230
   Google Scholar
• Holt K, Lince N, Hargey A, et al. Assessment of service availability and health care workers’ opinions about young women’s sexual and reproductive health in soweto, South Africa. Afr J Reprod Health. 2012;16(2):283–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holt K, Zavala I, Quintero X, et al. Development and validation of the client-reported quality of contraceptive counselling scale to measure quality and fulfillment of rights in family planning programs. Stud Fam Plann. 2019;50(2):137–158. doi:10.1111/sifp.12092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp C, OlaOlorun FM, Guiella G, et al. Validation and predictive utility of a person-centered Quality of Contraceptive Counselling (QCC-10) scale in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicountry study of family planning clients and a new indicator for measuring high-quality, rights-based care. Stud Fam Plann. 2023;54(1):119–143. doi:10.1111/sifp.12229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt K, Gebrehanna E, Sarnaik S, et al. Adaptation and validation of the Quality of Contraceptive Counselling (QCC) scale for use in Ethiopia and India. PLoS ONE. 2023;17(3):1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283925
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 1979. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. New York: United Nations. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-elimination-all-forms-discrimination-against-women.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ethiopia. 2017. Family Planning 2020 Commitment. London. Available from: https://fp2030.org/sites/default/files/Govt.-of-Ethiopia-FP2020-Commitment-2018-Update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. 2017. “Family Planning 2020 Commitment.” London. Available from: https://fp2030.org/sites/default/files/Indias-Vision-FP2020-structure_country-commitment_FINAL_2017_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez AM, Fuentes L, Allina A. Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46(3):171–175. doi:10.1363/46e1614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe P, Rowlands S. Long-acting reversible contraception: targeting those judged to be unfit for parenthood in the United States and the United Kingdom. Glob Public Health. 2022;17(12):1–12. doi:10.1080/17441692.2022.2048408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendix D, Foley EE, Hendrixson A, et al. Targets and technologies: sayana press and jadelle in contemporary population policies. Gend Place Cult. 2020;27(3):351–369. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. 2011. National Guidelines for Family Planning Services in Ethiopia. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Health. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.et/site/sites/default/files/2021-06/National%20Guideline%20final%20for%20Family%20Planning%202020%20edited-final%20version_August%2025_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown CH. The forced sterilization program under the Indian emergency: results in one settlement. Hum Organ. 1984;43(1):49–54. doi:10.17730/humo.43.1.xk724j7682r88686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RJ. Storming the citadels of poverty: family planning under the emergency in India, 1975-1977. J Asian Stud. 2014;73(2):471–492. doi:10.1017/S0021911813002350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2007. Home Delivery of Contraceptives by ASHAs. N. 11019/2/2006. Government of India. Available from: nrhm.gujarat.gov.in/images/pdf/ASHA_at_the_Door-steps_of_Beneficiaries.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2014. Guidelines for Scheme Promotion of PPIUCD through Performance Linked Payment Plan to Service Providers and ASHAs, Annexure 1. Government of Gujarat.
   Google Scholar
• Muttreja P, Singh S. Family planning in India: the way forward. Indian J Med Res. 2018;148(Suppl 1):S1–S9. doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2067_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secretaría de Salud. 2004. “Norma Oficial Mexicana, NOM 005-SSA2-1993, De Los Servicios de Planificación Familiar.” Available from: https://www.cndh.org.mx/sites/default/files/doc/Programas/VIH/Leyes%20y%20normas%20y%20reglamentos/Norma%20Oficial%20Mexicana/NOM-005-SSA2-1993%20Planificaci%C3%B3n%20Familiar.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–1907. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 1996. National Population Policy, 2000. New Delhi: Department of Family Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Sangwan N, Maru RM. The target-free approach: an overview. J Health Manag. 1999;1(1):71–96. doi:10.1177/097206349900100106
   Google Scholar
• Holt K, Uttekar BV, Reed R, et al. Understanding quality of contraceptive services from women’s perspectives in gujarat, India: a focus group study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e049260, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebrehanna E, Langer A, Holt K. in preparation. Women’s experiences with and preferences for contraceptive counselling in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: results from a qualitative study..
   Google Scholar
• Appleford G, RamaRao S, Bellows B. The inclusion of sexual and reproductive health services within universal health care through intentional design. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(2):1799589, doi:10.1080/26410397.2020.1799589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardee K, Jordan S. Advancing rights-based family planning from 2020 to 2030. Open Access J Contracept. 2021;12(December):157–171. doi:10.2147/OAJC.S324678
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colen S. “Like a mother to them”: stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In: Ginsburg F, Rapp R, editors. Conceiving the new world order: the global politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1995. p. 78–102.
   Google Scholar
• Arredondo A, Orozco E. Effects of health decentralization, financing and governance in Mexico. Rev Saude Publica. 2006;40(1):152–160. doi:10.1590/S0034-89102006000100023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman P, Ahuja R, Randon A, et al. 2010. Government Health FInancing in India: challenges in achieving ambitious goals. Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson PJ. The elimination of contraceptive acceptor targets and the evolution of population policy in India. Popul Stud. 2002;56:97–110. doi:10.1080/00324720213793
   Google Scholar
• Debie A, Khatri RB, Assefa Y. Contributions and challenges of healthcare financing towards universal health coverage in Ethiopia: a narrative evidence synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):866. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08151-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar