Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens

References

• Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Int Dent J. 2007;57(5):300–302.
   Google Scholar
• Opdam NJM, Collares K, Hickel R, et al. Clinical studies in restorative dentistry: new directions and new demands. Dent Mater: Off Publication Acad Dent Mater. 2018;34(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Composite–composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dentistry. 2003;31(8):521–525.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, et al. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1276–1282.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson EA 2nd, Phillips RW, Swartz ML. A comparison of the physical properties of four restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc. 1966;73(6):1324–1336.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer L, Schmidli F, Weiger R, et al. A systematic approach to standardize artificial aging of resin composite cements. Dent Mater: Off Publication Acad Dent Mater. 2015;31(7):855–863.
   Google Scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Harper RH, Schnell RJ, Swartz ML, et al. In vivo measurements of thermal diffusion through restorations of various materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43(2):180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Spierings TA, Peters MC, Bosman F, et al. Verification of theoretical modeling of heat transmission in teeth by in vivo experiments. J Dent Res. 1987;66(8):1336–1339.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer DS, Barco MT, Billy EJ. Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(3):325–327.
   Google Scholar
• Youngson CC, Barclay CW. A pilot study of intraoral temperature changes. Clin Oral Invest. 2000;4(3):183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst CP, Canbek K, Euler T, et al. In vivo validation of the historical in vitro thermocycling temperature range for dental materials testing. Clin Oral Invest. 2004;8(3):130–138.
   Google Scholar
• Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;29:295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Soh G, Selwyn MJ. An evaluation of exposure time and temperature in the thermocycling of dental restorative materials. Clin Mater. 1992;9(1):37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Fabris D, Souza JCM, Silva FS, et al. Influence of specimens' geometry and materials on the thermal stresses in dental restorative materials during thermal cycling. J Dent. 2018;69:41–48.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TS 11405. 2015. Dentistry – testing of adhesion to tooth structure, 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong S, Breschi L, Ozcan M, et al. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (muTBS) approach. Dent Mater: Off Publication Acad Dent Mater. 2017;33(2):133–143.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 29022. 2013. Dentistry – Adhesion – Notched-edge shear bond strength test. 1st ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson ST, Tibballs J, Dahl JE. Effect of different surface treatments and adhesives on repair bond strength of resin composites after one and 12 months of storage using an improved microtensile test method. Operative Dentistry. 2014;39(5):E206–E216.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017;3(1):21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Longman CM, Pearson GJ. Variations in tooth surface temperature in the oral cavity during fluid intake. Biomaterials. 1987;8(5):411–414.
   Google Scholar
• Plant CG, Jones DW, Darvell BW. The heat evolved and temperatures attained during setting of restorative materials. Br Dent J. 1974;137(6):233–238.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, et al. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(6):340–353.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid-Schwap M, Graf A, Preinerstorfer A, et al. Microleakage after thermocycling of cemented crowns – a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2011;27(9):855–869.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of thermocycling regimens on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater: Off Publication Acad Dent Mater. 2002;18(3):189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, et al. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25(4):316–323.
   Google Scholar
• Doerr CL, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. Effect of thermocycling on the microleakage of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dentistry. 1996;9(1):19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd BA, McGinley MB, Brown WS. Thermal stress in teeth. J Dent Res. 1978;57(4):571–582.
   Google Scholar
• Kenneth J, Anusavice CC. Phillip`s science of dental materials. 12th ed. New York: Elsevier; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(4):316–322.
   Google Scholar
• Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):E78–E93.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Koc-Dundar B. Composite-composite adhesion in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2014;28:2209–2229.
   Google Scholar