Effect of ceramic material type on the fracture load of inlay-retained and full-coverage fixed dental prostheses

References

• Hemmings K, Harrington Z. Replacement of missing teeth with fixed prostheses. Dent Update 2004;31(3):137–141.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Quran FA, Al-Ghalayini RF, Al-Zu'bi BN. Single-tooth replacement: factors affecting different prosthetic treatment modalities. BMC Oral Health 2011;11(1):34.
   Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(3):241–249.
   Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Spiekermann H, Yildirim M. Metal-free inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 2001;32(4):269–281.
   Google Scholar
• Silva LHd, Miranda R, Favero SS, et al. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31(suppl):e58.
   Google Scholar
• Moradkhani A, Baharvandi H. Effects of additive amount, testing method, fabrication process and sintering temperature on the mechanical properties of Al2O3/3Y-TZP composites. Eng Frac Mech. 2018;191:446–460.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Reveron H, Spies BC, et al. Trade-off between fracture resistance and translucency of zirconia and lithium-disilicate glass ceramics for monolithic restorations. Acta Biomater. 2019;91:24–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam C, Joyner J, Gautam A, et al. Zirconia based dental ceramics: structure, mechanical properties, biocompatibility and applications. Dalton Trans. 2016;45(48):19194–19215.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, et al. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(4):236–261.
   Google Scholar
• Nistor L, Grădinaru M, Rîcă R, et al. Zirconia use in dentistry - manufacturing and properties . Curr Health Sci J. 2019;45(1):28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Elsayed A, Meyer G, Wille S, et al. Influence of the yttrium content on the fracture strength of monolithic zirconia crowns after artificial aging. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(5):344–348.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, et al. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mattiello RDL, Coelho TMK, Insaurralde E, et al. A review of surface treatment methods to improve the adhesive cementation of zirconia-based ceramics. ISRN Biomater. 2013;2013:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Tzanakakis E-G, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(1):9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics—laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater. 2015;31(1):8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, et al. Internal coating of zirconia restoration with silica-based ceramic improves bonding of resin cement to dental zirconia ceramic. Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20:77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Heintze S, Monreal D, Reinhardt M, et al. Fatigue resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures–fatigue tests and finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2018;34(3):494–507.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater. 2016;32(7):908–914.
   Google Scholar
• Traini T, Sinjari B, Pascetta R, et al. The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: lights and shadows of a new material. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(5):748–755.
   Google Scholar
• Mobarak EH, El-Badrawy W, Pashley DH, et al. Effect of pretest storage conditions of extracted teeth on their dentin bond strengths. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(2):92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Thompson K, Swain M. The all‐ceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 1. Ceramic inlay preparation design: a literature review. Aust Dent J. 2010;55(2):120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: a systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):545–551.
   Google Scholar
• Choi J-W, Kim S-Y, Bae J-H, et al. In vitro study of the fracture resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia for three-unit fixed dental prostheses. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(4):244–251.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Oyagüe R, Sancho-Esper R, Lynch CD, et al. All-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses for replacing posterior missing teeth: a systematic review. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62(1):10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaka SE. Optical and mechanical properties of newly developed monolithic multilayer zirconia. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e279–e84.
   Google Scholar
• Belli R, Wendler M, de Ligny D, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater. 2017;33(1):84–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sathyanarayana HP, Premkumar S, Manjula W. Assessment of maximum voluntary bite force in adults with normal occlusion and different types of malocclusions. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13:534–538.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshmi R, Abraham A, Sekar V, et al. Influence of connector dimensions on the stress distribution of monolithic zirconia and lithium-di-silicate inlay retained fixed dental prostheses–A 3D finite element analysis. Tanta Dent J. 2015;12(1):56–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Cai H, Suo L, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2017;59:2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wendler M, Belli R, Petschelt A, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: flexural strength testing. Dent Mater. 2017;33(1):99–109.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira Lino LF, Machado CM, de Paula VG, et al. Effect of aging and testing method on bond strength of CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite to dentin. Dent Mater. 2018;34(11):1690–1701.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly JR, Benetti P, Rungruanganunt P, et al. The slippery slope–critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, et al. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2006;22(2):176–182.
   Google Scholar
• Øilo M, Hardang AD, Ulsund AH, et al. Fractographic features of glass‐ceramic and zirconia‐based dental restorations fractured during clinical function. Eur J Oral Sci. 2014;122(3):238–244.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Thompson M, Field C, et al. Fracture behavior of inlay and onlay fixed partial dentures–An in-vitro experimental and XFEM modeling study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;59:279–290.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Field C, Swain M. The all‐ceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 2. Fixed partial denture design: a finite element analysis. Aus Dental J. 2011;56(3):302–311.
   Google Scholar
• Kermanshah H, Bitaraf T, Geramy A. Finite element analysis of IPS Empress II ceramic bridge reinforced by zirconia bar. J Dent (Tehran, Iran). 2012;9(4):196–203.
   Google Scholar
• Etemadi S, Smales R, Drummond P, et al. Assessment of tooth preparation designs for posterior resin-bonded porcelain restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(9):691–697.
   Google Scholar
• Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Reid M, et al. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(2):109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Puschmann D, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, et al. Load‐bearing capacity of all‐ceramic posterior inlay‐retained fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117(3):312–318.
   Google Scholar
• Lepley CR, Throckmorton GS, Ceen RF, et al. Relative contributions of occlusion, maximum bite force, and chewing cycle kinematics to masticatory performance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(5):606–613.
   Google Scholar