In vitro Candida albicans biofilm formation on different titanium surface topographies

References

• Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;84:9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, et al. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9(2):80–90.
   Google Scholar
• Boioli LT, Penaud J, Miller N. A meta-analytic, quantitative assessment of osseointegration establishment and evolution of submerged and non-submerged endosseous titanium oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(6):579–588.
   Google Scholar
• Setzer FC, Kim S. Comparison of long-term survival of implants and endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res. 2014;93(1):19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, et al. Removable partial dentures: the clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(3):273–280.
   Google Scholar
• Deo PN, Deshmukh R. Oral microbiome: unveiling the fundamentals. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2019;23:122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Tawakoli PN, Al-Ahmad A, Hoth-Hannig W, et al. Comparison of different live/dead stainings for detection and quantification of adherent microorganisms in the initial oral biofilm. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(3):841–850.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalheiro M, Teixeira MC. Candida biofilms: threats, challenges, and promising strategies. Front Med (Lausanne)). 2018;5:28.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer W, Elter C, Demling A, et al. Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(5):377–382.
   Google Scholar
• Ata-Ali J, Candel-Marti ME, Flichy-Fernandez AJ, et al. Peri-implantitis: associated microbiota and treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(7):e937–e943.
   Google Scholar
• Odds FC. Candida infections: an overview. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1987;15(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Calderone R, Gow NA. 2002. Host recognition by Candida species. In: Calderone RA. Candida and candidiasis. Washington DC: ASM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sims CR, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Rex JH. Invasive candidiasis in immunocompromised hospitalized patients. Arch Med Res. 2005;36(6):660–671.
   Google Scholar
• Leonhardt A, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Microbiologic diagnostics at titanium implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(4):226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Pye AD, Lockhart DE, Dawson MP, et al. A review of dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect. 2009;72(2):104–110.
   Google Scholar
• Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP. Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. Periodontol. 2010;53:167–181.
   Google Scholar
• Albertini M, Lopez-Cerero L, O'Sullivan MG, et al. Assessment of periodontal and opportunistic flora in patients with peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(8):937–941.
   Google Scholar
• Lafaurie GI, Sabogal MA, Castillo DM, et al. Microbiome and microbial biofilm profiles of peri-implantitis: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2017;88(10):1066–1089.
   Google Scholar
• Ramage G, Martinez JP, Lopez-Ribot JL. Candida biofilms on implanted biomaterials: a clinically significant problem. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6(7):979–986.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172–184.
   Google Scholar
• Elter C, Heuer W, Demling A, et al. Supra- and subgingival biofilm formation on implant abutments with different surface characteristics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(2):327–334.
   Google Scholar
• Xing R, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, et al. The influence of surface nanoroughness, texture and chemistry of TiZr implant abutment on oral biofilm accumulation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2015;26(6):649–656.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(1):63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Asensio G, Vazquez-Lasa B, Rojo L. Achievements in the topographic design of commercial titanium dental implants: towards anti-peri-implantitis surfaces. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1982.
   Google Scholar
• Aloise JP, Curcio R, Laporta MZ, et al. Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(3):328–335.
   Google Scholar
• Burgers R, Gerlach T, Hahnel S, et al. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(2):156–164.
   Google Scholar
• Koutouzis T, Wallet S, Calderon N, et al. Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model. J Periodontol. 2011;82(4):613–618.
   Google Scholar
• do Nascimento C, Miani PK, Pedrazzi V, et al. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface: culture and DNA checkerboard hybridization analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(10):1168–1172.
   Google Scholar
• Tripodi D, Vantaggiato G, Scarano A, et al. An in vitro investigation concerning the bacterial leakage at implants with internal hexagon and Morse taper implant-abutment connections. Implant Dent. 2012;21:335–339.
   Google Scholar
• Quirynen M, van der Mei HC, Bollen CM, et al. An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra- and subgingival plaque. J Dent Res. 1993;72(9):1304–1309.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang CS, Ng H, McMillan AS. Antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans biofilms on titanium discs with different surface roughness. Clin Oral Invest. 2007;11(4):361–368.
   Google Scholar
• Burgers R, Hahnel S, Reichert TE, et al. Adhesion of Candida albicans to various dental implant surfaces and the influence of salivary pellicle proteins. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(6):2307–2313.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Hirota K, Goto T, et al. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on implant overdenture materials and its removal. J Dent. 2012;40(8):686–692.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz SA, Drutz DJ, Zajic JE. Factors governing adherence of Candida species to plastic surfaces. Infect Immun. 1985;50(1):97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Minagi S, Miyake Y, Inagaki K, et al. Hydrophobic interaction in Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis adherence to various denture base resin materials. Infect Immun. 1985;47(1):11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G, et al. In vitro evaluation of artificial ageing on surface properties and early Candida albicans adhesion to prosthetic resins. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(1):249–255.
   Google Scholar
• Samaranayake LP, McCourtie J, MacFarlane TW. Factors affecting th in-vitro adherence of Candida albicans to acrylic surfaces. Arch Oral Biol. 1980;25(8-9):611–615.
   Google Scholar
• Heo SM, Ruhl S, Scannapieco FA. Implications of salivary protein binding to commensal and pathogenic bacteria. J Oral Biosci. 2013;55(4):169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Kaelble D. Dispersion-polar surface tension properties of organic solids. J Adhes. 1970;2(2):66–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ramage G, Vande Walle K, Wickes BL, et al. Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(9):2475–2479.
   Google Scholar
• Radford DR, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Denture plaque and adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials in vivo and in vitro. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999;10(1):99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau L, Loewy ZG. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(4):251–260.
   Google Scholar
• do Nascimento C, Pita MS, Pedrazzi V, et al. In vivo evaluation of Candida spp. adhesion on titanium or zirconia abutment surfaces. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(7):853–861.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, et al. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9(1):11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Villard N, Seneviratne C, Tsoi JKH, et al. Candida albicans aspects of novel silane system-coated titanium and zirconia implant surfaces. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2015;26(3):332–341.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpadi DV, Lemons JE. Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28(12):1419–1425.
   Google Scholar
• Almas, K, Smith, S, Kutkut, A. What is the Best Micro and Macro Dental Implant Topography? Dent Clin N Am. 2019;63(3):447–460.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim MS, Hasanreisoglu U, Hasirci N, et al. Adherence of Candida albicans to glow-discharge modified acrylic denture base polymers. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(7):518–525.
   Google Scholar
• Law KY. Definitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity: getting the basics right. J Phys Chem Lett. 2014;5(4):686–688.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami RR, Pohare SD, Raut JS, et al. Cell surface hydrophobicity as a virulence factor in Candida albicans. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2017;14:1503–1511.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton DR, Fidel PL, Wozniak KL, et al. Contribution of cell surface hydrophobicity protein 1 (Csh1p) to virulence of hydrophobic Candida albicans serotype A cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;244(2):373–377.
   Google Scholar
• Willaert RG. Adhesins of yeasts: protein structure and interactions. JoF. 2018;4(4):119.
   Google Scholar
• da Rocha JFS, de Avila ED, Rigolin MSM, et al. Biological and physicochemical implications of the aging process on titanium and zirconia implant material surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; Epub ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Elguezabal N, Maza JL, Dorronsoro S, et al. Whole saliva has a dual role on the adherence of Candida albicans to polymethylmetacrylate. Open Dent J. 2008;2:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Dental materials with antibiofilm properties. Dent Mater. 2014;30(2):e1.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton M, Scannapieco FA, Reddy MS, Levine MJ. Human submandibular-sublingual saliva promotes adhesion of Candida albicans to polymethylmethacrylate. Infect Immun. 1993;61(6):2644–2652.
   Google Scholar
• Carlen A, Borjesson AC, Nikdel K, et al. Composition of pellicles formed in vivo on tooth surfaces in different parts of the dentition, and in vitro on hydroxyapatite. Caries Res. 1998;32(6):447–455.
   Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Grogan J, Zehnder M, et al. Compositional analysis of human acquired enamel pellicle by mass spectrometry. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46(4):293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Kielbassa AM, Oeschger U, Schulte-Monting J, et al. Microradiographic study on the effects of salivary proteins on in vitro demineralization of bovine enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(2):90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Katsikogianni M, Missirlis YF. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur Cell Mater. 2004;8:37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Alqahtani F. Role of oral yeasts in the etiopathogenesis of peri-implantitis: an evidence-based literature review of clinical studies. Arch Oral Biol. 2020;111:104650.
   Google Scholar
• Souza JGS, Bertolini M, Thompson A, et al. Biofilm interactions between Candida albicans and mitis group streptococci in a titanium-mucosal interface model. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86(9):e02950–19.
   Google Scholar
• Signori C, van de Sande FH, Maske TT, et al. Influence of the inoculum source on the cariogenicity of in vitro microcosm biofilms. Caries Res. 2016;50(2):97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández C, Aspiras M, Dodds M, et al. The effect of inoculum source and fluid shear force on the development of in vitro oral multispecies biofilms. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;122(3):796–808.
   Google Scholar