Impact of affective attitudes on team outcomes in small business contexts: Lessons from a simulation

References

• Aksin, Z., Deo, S., Jónasson, J.O., & Ramdas, K. (2021). Learning from many: Partner exposure and team familiarity in fluid teams. Management Science, 67(2), 854–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrachan, C. B., Patel, V. K., & Wanzenried, G. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Zanutto, E. L., & Thatcher, S. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R., & Chu, A. (2011). Fluid teams: Solutions to the problems of unstable team membership. Organizational Dynamics, 40(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Klyver, K. (2021). Keeping a keen edge: Social support among new venture team members and venture goal commitment. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1883040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2010). Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(1), 1, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K., & Gillespie, N. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 8. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. The American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Loong Chong, A. Y. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, G. (., & Harms, P. D. (2010). Team identification, trust, and conflict: A mediation model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(1), 20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., & Mortenson, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. Y., Zhang, X., & Tjosvold, D. (2013). Emotion regulation as a boundary condition of the relationship between team conflict and performance: A multi-level examination. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(5), 714–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., & Linstaedt, J. W. (2019). Task conflict, narcissism and entrepreneurial capability in teams planning a business: A moderated moderation approach to explaining business planning performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Meves, Y., & Kensbock, J. M. (2017). When members of entrepreneurial teams differ: Linking diversity in individual-level entrepreneurial orientation to team performance. Small Business Economics, 48(4), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9818-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, H. P., & Patterson, M. (2021). Affect and proactivity in teams. In K. Z. Peng & C.-H. Wu (Eds.), Emotion and proactivity at work: Prospects and dialogues (pp. 215–236). Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, Q., Eva, N., Newman, A., & Cooper, B. (2019). CEO entrepreneurial leadership and performance outcomes of top management teams in entrepreneurial ventures: The mediating effects of psychological safety. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 1119–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. B., Mortensen, M., & Wolley, A. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box, an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Kennel, V., & Allen, J. A. (2021). Teams in small organizations: Conceptual, methodological, and practical considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.530291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solansky, S. T. (2011). Team identification: A determining factor of performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(3), 247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Q., Luo, L., Lau, D. C., & de Jong, B. (2022). United or divided? Entrepreneurial passion and faultlines in new venture teams. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.2010086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veelen, R., & Ufkes, E.G. (2019). Teaming up or down? A multisource study on the role of team identification and learning in the team diversity–performance link. Group & Organization Management, 44(1), 38–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 6, 1063–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinzimmer, L. G. (1997). Top management team correlates of organizational growth in a small business context: A comparative study. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, H. M., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Beal, D. J. (2005). Attentional and regulatory mediation of relationships between affective states and momentary work performance. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams & S. M. Laham (Eds.), Social motivation: Conscious and unconscious processes (pp. 314–331). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, X., Feng, W., & Hu, Q. (2020). Does new venture team power hierarchy enhance or impair new venture performance? A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusubova, A., Andries, P., & Clarysse, B. (2020). Entrepreneurial team formation and evolution in technology ventures: Looking beyond the top management team. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(5), 893–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar