Unlocking the potential of synthetic biology for improving livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa

References

• Amos M, Goñi-Moreno A. 2018. Cellular computing and synthetic biology. In: Stepney S., Rasmussen S., Amos M., editors. Computational matter. Berlin: Springer; p. 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Bagley MA. 2016. Digital DNA: The Nagoya protocol, intellectual property treaties, and synthetic biology. University of Virginia School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 2016. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2725986. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2725986.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin S, Yagur-Kroll S, Kabessa Y, Korouma V, Septon T, Anati Y, Zohar-Perez C, Rabinovitz Z, Nussinovitch A. 2017. Remote detection of buried landmines using a bacterial sensor. Nat Biotechnol. 35(4):308–310. doi:10.1038/nbt.3791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beumer K, Swart JAA. 2021. Who is the African farmer? The importance of actor representations in the debate about Biotechnology crops in Africa. J Agric Environ Ethics. 34:1. doi:10.1007/s10806-021-09841-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busscher N, Colombo EL, van der Ploeg L, Gabella JI, Leguizamón A. 2020. Civil society challenges the global food system: the International Monsanto tribunal. Globalizations. 17(1):16–30. doi:10.1080/14747731.2019.1592067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter SR, Rodemeyer M, Garfinkel MS, Friedman RM. 2014. Synthetic biology and the U.S. Biotechnology Regulatory System: challenges and options. Available from: http://www.jcvi.org/cms/research/projects/synthetic-biology-and-the-us-biotechnology-regulatory-system/overview/.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho Â, Hansen EH, Kayser O, Carlsen S, Stehle F. 2017. Designing microorganisms for heterologous biosynthesis of cannabinoids. FEMS Yeast Res. 17:1–11. doi:10.1093/femsyr/fox037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Blanchard AE, Ting L. 2017. An integrative circuit–host modeling framework for predicting synthetic gene network behaviors. Nat Microbiol. doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0022-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conceição P, Levine S, Lipton M, Warren-Rodríguez A. 2016. Toward a food secure future: ensuring food security for sustainable human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy. 60:1–9. www.sciencedirect.com/article/pii/S030691921600021X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana GV, Kuiken T, Rejeski D, Snow AA. 2012. Four steps to avoid a synthetic-biology disaster. Nature. 29(483):29. doi:10.1038/483029a.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd-Uribe B, Schnurr MA. 2016. ‘Burkina Faso’s Bt cotton reversal: why Africa’s largest producer of GM cotton is phasing out production and what this means for GM crops in Africa’. Food, Farming and Biotechnology. Available from: https://fieldquestions.com/2016/08/06/bt-cotton-in-africa-what-happened-in-burkina-faso/.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards B. 2014. Taking stock of security concerns related to synthetic biology in an age of responsible innovation. Front Public Health. 2:79. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00079.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elgabry M, Nesbeth D, Johnson SD. 2020. A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology. Syst Rev. 9:22. doi:10.1186/s13643-020-1284-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ETC Group, Third World Network, African Centre for Biodiversity. 2018. What does synthetic biology mean for Africa? Available from: https://www.acbio.org.za/sites/default/files/documents/What%20does%20Synthetic%20Biology%20mean%20for%20Africa.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2009. The state of food and agriculture. Livestock in the balance. Rome. Available from: www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e00.htm
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2017. Hunger and food security. State of Food Insecurity (SOFI 2017). Available from: www.fao.org/3/a-I7695e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. 2017. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2017. Rome: FAO. Available from: www.data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/web_I7787EN_SOFI2017_InBrief.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fawole WO, Ozkan B, Ilbasmis E. 2005. Food insecurity in Africa in terms of causes, effects and solutions: A case study of Nigeria. Konya ResearchGate. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v5i6.629–636.1113.
   Google Scholar
• French KE. 2019. Harnessing synthetic biology for sustainable development. Nat Sustain. 2:250–252. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0270-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieß JL, von Gleich A, Giese B. 2019. Gene drives as a new quality in GMO releases – a comparative technology characterization. PeerJ. 7:e6793. doi:10.7717/peerj.6793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk C, Dettinger MD, Michaelsen JC, Verdin JP, Brown ME, Barlow M, Hoell A. 2008. Warming of the Indian ocean threatens eastern and southern African food security but could be mitigated by agricultural development. PNAS. 105:11081–11086. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708196105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garang B, Onkware A. 2016. Redirecting the wheels of natural progression: review of synthetic biology and the African Biotechnology revolution. Bioeng Biosci. 4(2):11–19. [accessed 6 November 2019]. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/81bc/f384afb50e07ed842693de2a9ceeb1d1f26b.pdf?_ga=2.255418056.1331119020.1573054035-240779808.1573054035.
   Google Scholar
• Goñi-Moreno A, Nikel PI. 2019. High-performance biocomputing in synthetic biology-integrated transcriptional and metabolic circuits. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 7:40. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goold HD, Wright P, Hailstones H. 2018. Emerging opportunities for synthetic biology in agriculture. Genes (Basel). 9:341. doi:10.3390/genes.9070341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiziou S, Bonnet J, Moreau V, Ulliana F, Lechere M. 2018. An automated design framework for multicellular recombinanse logic. ACS Synth Biol. 7:1406–1412. doi:10.1012/acssynbio.8b00016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen EH, Moller BL, Kock GR, Bunner CM, Kristensen C, Jensen OR, Okkels FT, Olsen CE, Motawaia MS, Hansen J. 2009. De novo biosynthesis of vanillin in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and baker's yeast(Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Appl Environ Microbiol. 75:2765–2774. doi:10.1128/AEM.02681-08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Z, Yuan X, Xia Y, Hao F, Singh PV. 2017. An overview of drought monitoring and prediction systems at regional and global scales. Am Meteorol Soc. 1879–1896. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00149.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heap JT, Pennington OJ, Cartman ST, Carter GP, Minton NP. 2007. The ClosTron: a universal gene knock-out system for the genus Clostridium. J Microbiol Methods. 70:452–464. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2007.05.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jomane FN, Ishida T, Morimoto K, Fujishita N, Tokunaga T, Hararada H, Morita T. 2015. Genetic Polymorphisms and their Association with growth and carcass traits in Japanese black steer under progeny testing. J Warm Reg Soc Anim Sci. 58:217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kambadur R, Sharma M, Smith TPL, Bass JJ. 1997. Mutations in myostatin (GDF8) in double-muscled Belgian Blue and Piedmontese Cattle. Genome Res. 7:910–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil A, Collins J. 2010. Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet. 11:367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König H, Frank D, Heil R, Coenen C. 2013. Synthetic Genomics and Synthetic biology applications between hopes and concerns. Curr Genomics. 14:11–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambowitz AM, Zimmerly S. 2004. Mobile group II introns. Annual Review of Genetics. 38:1–35. doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Lloyd NDR, Pretorius IS, Borneman AR. 2016. Heterologous production of raspberry ketone in the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae via pathway engineering and synthetic enzyme fusion. Microb Cell Fact. 15:49. doi:10.1186/s12934-016-0446-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Luo Y, Zhao H. 2011. Synthetic biology: putting synthesis into biology. Wiley Interdisc Rev Syst Biol Med. 3:7–20. doi:10.1002/wsbm.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Stewart CN. 2015. Plant synthetic biology. Trends Plant Sci. 20:309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu TK, Khalil AS, Collins JJ. 2009. Next-generation synthetic gene networks. Nat Biotechnol. 27:1139–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukanda IN. 2020. Activists as strategic science communicators on the adoption of GMOs in Uganda. JCOM. 19(06):C06. doi:10.22323/2.19060306.
   Google Scholar
• Mannen H. 2011. Identification and utilization of genes associated with beef qualities. Anim Sci. 82:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel R, Weiss R. 2005. Advances in synthetic biology : on the path from prototypes to applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 16:476–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar-Haskell CS, Dang AM, Gleghorn JP. 2019. Coupling synthetic biology and programmable materials to construct complex tissue ecosystems. MRS Commun. 9(2):421–432. doi:10.1557/mrc.2019.69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell J. 2018. Life 2.0: inside the synthetic biology revolution. COSMOS 78: The Science of Everything.
   Google Scholar
• National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA). 2019. Available from: https://nbma.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Amendment-of-NBMA-Act-2019.pdf [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
   Google Scholar
• National Biotechnology Authority Act. 2006. [Chap.14:31].
   Google Scholar
• Niu D, Wei HJ, Lin L, George H, Wang TB, Lee IH, Zhao HY, Wang Y, Kan Y, Shrock E. 2017. Inactivation of porcine endogenous retrovirus in pigs using CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 357:1303–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham P, Hall S, Burton G. 2012. Synthetic biology: mapping the scientific landscape. PLoS ONE. 7:e34368. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otono BF, Mwaku IM, Ndofunsu DA, Ndiku LS. 2020. Democratic Republic of the Congo – GMOs/Synthetic biology rules/regulations and biodiversity: A legal perspective. In: Chaurasia A, Hawksworth DL, Pessoa de Miranda M, editors. GMOs. Topics in biodiversity and conservation, vol 19. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_22.
   Google Scholar
• Park SY, Peterson FC, Mosquna A, Yao J, Volkman BF, Cutler SR. 2015. Agrochemical control of plant water use using engineered abscisic acid receptors. Nature. 520:545–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Path. 2013. Sanofi and PATH announce the launch of large-scale production of semisynthetic artemisinin against malaria. [online]. [accessed October 23, 2018]. Available from: https://path.org/media-center/sanofi-and-path-announce-the-launch-of-large-scale-production-of-semisynthetic-artemisinin-against-malaria/.
   Google Scholar
• Peccoud J. 2016. Synthetic biology: fostering the cyber-biological revolution. Synth Biol. 1:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Polo M. 2020. Botswana – genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and synthetic biology: their potential applications and the legal perspectives. In: Chaurasia A, Hawksworth DL, Pessoa de Miranda M, editors. GMOs. Topics in biodiversity and conservation. Cham: Springer; p. 19. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_21.
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius S. 2016. Application of synthetic biology to increased agricultural productivity in Australia. Agric Innov. 69:2.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes JI, Mandivenyi W. 2020. South Africa – synthetic biology regulatory considerations and biodiversity – a legal perspective for South Africa. In: Chaurasia A, Hawksworth DL, Pessoa de Miranda M, editors. GMOs. Topics in biodiversity and conservation. Cham: Springer; p. 19. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_24.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro B, Shapira P. 2018. Anticipating governance challenges in synthetic biology: insights from biosynthetic menthol. Elsevier. 139:311–320.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro FP, Rodriguez CAV. 2020. Emerging advanced technologies to mitigate the impact of climate change in Africa. Plants. 9(3):381. doi:10.3390/plants9030381.
   Google Scholar
• Rzymski P, Królczyk A. 2016. Attitudes toward genetically modified organisms in Poland: to GMO or not to GMO? Food Secur. 8 (3):689–697. doi:10.1007/s12571-016-0572-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu AR, Jeichitra V, Ramanujan R, Angamuthu R. 2016. Genetic Polymorphisms of myostatin (MSTN) gene in sheep breeds. J Anim Res. 6:18. doi:10.5958/2277-940X.2016.00013.9.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt C. 2010. Environmental health implications of a new field. Environ Health Perspect Synth Biol. 118:118–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano L. 2007. Synthetic biology: promises and challenges. NCBI. 3:157–158.
   Google Scholar
• Singh A. 2018. Cancer! Roots in our foods. Gut Gastroenterol. 1(1):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Souza CJ, MacDougall C, Campbell BK, McNeilly AS, Baird DT. 2001. The booroola (FecB) phenotype is associated with a mutation in the bone morphogenetic receptor type 1B (BMPR1B) gene. J Endocrinol. 169:R1–R6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo SC. 2014. Whole cell-based biosensors for environmental heavy metals detection. Ann Res Rev Biol. 4(17):2663–2674.
   Google Scholar
• The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. 2015. Regulation of synthetic biology. London: PostNote.
   Google Scholar
• Trump BD. 2017. Synthetic biology regulation and governance: lessons from TAPIC for the United States, European Union, and Singapore. Health Policy. 121:1139–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trump BD, Galaitsi SE, Appleton E, Bleijs DA, Florin MV, Gollihar JD, Hamilton RA, Kuiken T, Lentzos F, Mampuys R, et al. 2020. Building biosecurity for synthetic biology. Mol Syst Biol. 16:e9723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP. 2011. Food security in the horn of Africa: the implications of a drier, hotter and more crowded future, s.l.: unep.org/GEAS/.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs and Biological Weapons. 2018. United Nations. [accessed Feb 25]. Available from: https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/bio/
   Google Scholar
• Wang F, Zhang W. 2019. Synthetic biology: recent progress, biosafety and biosecurity concerns, and possible solutions. Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity. 1(1):22–30. doi:10.1016/j.jobb.2018.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2015. Research and development expenditure (% GPD). Available from: www.data.worldbank.org.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang Y, Dalchau N, Wang B. 2018. Scaling up genetic circuit design for cellular computing: advances and prospects. Nat Comput. 17(4):833–853. doi:10.1007/s11047-018-9715-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidhof MJ, Schneider BL, Carney VL, Korver DR, Robinson FE. 2014. Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 2005. Poult Sci. 93:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar