Developing an ecological visualization system for biodiversity data

References

• Attorre F, Taleb N, De Sanctis M, Farcomeni A, Guillet A, Vitale M. 2011. Developing conservation strategies for endemic tree species when faced with time and data constraints: Boswellia spp. on Socotra (Yemen). Biodiversity and Conservation. 20(7):1483–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beals M, Gross L, Harrell S. 2000. Diversity indices: Shannon’s H and E. Knoxville (TN): The Institute for Environmental Modelling (TIEM), University of Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Broms KM, Hooten MB, Fitzpatrick RM. 2015. Accounting for imperfect detection in Hill numbers for biodiversity studies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6(1):99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess HK, DeBey LB, Froehlich HE, Schmidt N, Theobald EJ, Ettinger AK, HilleRisLambers J, Tewksbury J, Parrish JK. 2017. The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biol Conserv. 208:113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KR, Gorley RN, Somerfield PJ, Warwick RM. 2014. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Primer-E Ltd. 8(2).
   Google Scholar
• Cohn JP. 2008. Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience. 58(3):192–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell RK. 2009. Biodiversity: concepts, patterns, and measurement. The Princeton Guide to Ecology. 663:257–263.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell RK, Gotelli NJ, Ashton LA, Beck J, Brehm G, Fayle TM, Novotny. 2016. Midpoint attractors and species richness: modelling the interaction between environmental drivers and geometric constraints. Ecology letters. 19(9):1009–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. 2007. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol. Soc. 12(2):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosquer A, Raymond R, Prevot-Julliard AC. 2012. Observations of everyday biodiversity: a new perspective for conservation? Ecol. Soc. 17(4):2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsen F, Adrian T, Brofeldt S, Van Noordwijk M, Poulsen MK, Rahayu S, Rutishauser E, et al. 2013. Community monitoring for REDD+ International promises and field realities. Ecol. Soc. 18(3):41–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasmann RF, Jarrell R. 2000. Raymond F. Dasmann: a life in conservation biology. Santa Cruz (CA): University Library University of California, Santa Cruz.
   Google Scholar
• Developers G. 2015. Introduction to the Google Maps SDK for iOS. https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/ios/intro.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries P. 2011. The resilience principles: A framework for new ICT governance. J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 9:137–173.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenfeld DW. 1970. Biological Conservation. New York (NY): Holt, Rinehart and Winiston.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott KC, Rosenberg J. 2019. Philosophical foundations for citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 4(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ESRI. 2018. Coordinate systems, projections, and transformations. Accessed November 15, 2019. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/properties/coordinate-systems-and-projections.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gillis AS. 2020. REST API (RESTful API). 22 September. Accessed December 2020. https://searchapparchitecture.techtarget.com/definition/RESTful-API.
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology letters. 4(4):379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology. 54(2):427–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• iNaturalist. 2020. iNaturalist [online] 2020 January 1. https://www.inaturalist.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Keim DA, Panse C, Sips, M. 2005. Information Visualization: Scope, Techniques and Opportunities for Geovisualization. In: Exploring Geovisualization. Amsterdam: Elseveir.
   Google Scholar
• Laurila-Pant M, Lehikoinen A, Uusitalo L, Venesjärvi R. 2015. How to value biodiversity in environmental management? Ecological indicators. 55:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magurran AE. 2005. Species abundance distributions: pattern or process? Functional Ecology. 19(1):177–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaya, University of. 2013. The RIMBA Project. https://www.um.edu.my/the-rimba-project.
   Google Scholar
• Masse M. 2011. REST API design rulebook: designing consistent RESTful Web service interfaces. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Matheson CA. 2014. “iNaturalist.” Reference Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Moore JC. 2013. Diversity, taxonomic versus functional. Elsevier. 646–656.
   Google Scholar
• Murray MG. 2002. Current issues in biodiversity conservation. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• MySQL. 2016. MySQL 8.0 Release Notes. 12 09. https://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/mysql/8.0/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan D, Lang DT. 2014. Javascript object notation. In: XML and Web technologies for data sciences with R. New York (NY): Springer. p. 227–253.
   Google Scholar
• Peh KSH, Balmford A, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SH, Hughes FM, Birch JC. 2013. TESSA: A toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosystem Services. 5:51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyron M. 2010. Characterizing communities. Nature Education Knowledge. 3(10):39.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Germain M, Larrivée M, Drapeau P, Fahrig L, Buddle CM. 2005. Short-term response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to fire and logging in a spruce-dominated boreal landscape. Forest Ecology and Management. 212(1–3):118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder M. 2005. Intelligent information integration: from infrastructure through consistency management to information visualization. Exploring Geovisualization. 1:477–494.
   Google Scholar
• Scott JM, Csuti B, Jacobi JD, Estes JE. 1987. Species richness. BioScience. 37(11):782–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer C. 2019. Making biodiversity data social, shareable, and scalable: reflections on iNaturalist & citizen science. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. e10197–e10197.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon CE. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication, by CE Shannon (and recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication). Champaign (IL): University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 163(4148):688–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulé ME. 1985. What is conservation biology? BioScience. 35(11):727–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellerberg IF, Fedor PJ. 2003. A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916-2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon-Wiener’ Index. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 12(3):177–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson NG. 2011. Phylogenetic beta diversity metrics, trait evolution and inferring the functional beta diversity of communities. PloS one. 6(6):e21264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald EJ, Ettinger AK, Burgess HK, DeBey LB, Schmidt NR, Froehlich HE, Wagner C, et al. 2015. Global change and local solutions: tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biol Conserv. 181:236–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toogood M. 2013. Engaging publics: biodiversity data collection and the geographies of citizen science. Geography Compass. 7(9):611–621.
   Google Scholar
• Weber J. 2014. About pericopsis. Accessed May 05, 2021. http://pericopsis.org/trees/about.php.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities: numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science. 147(3655):250–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins A, Crowston K. 2011. From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In: 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE; January; p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar