When Inclusion and Diversity Are Not Enough: A Case Study of Instructional Practices and Barriers to Success for First-Generation Engineering Students

References

• Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055004485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cataldi, E. F., Bennett, C. T., & Chen, X. (2018). First-generation students: College access, persistence, and post bachelor’s outcomes. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018421.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, B. H., Eddy, J. M., Dorman, S. M., Glessner, L., Green, B. L., & Lara-Alecio, R. (2007). Development of an instrument to assess student opinions of the quality of distance education courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341679
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Ph, D. (2015). A model for effective online instructional design. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 6(2), 1551–1554. https://doi.org/10.20533/LICEJ.2040.2589.2016.0304
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. S., Yong, A., & Yao, T. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1667–1671. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040719
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, J. (2018). Higher Ed can learn from first-gen students. American Sociological Association, 17(1), 96–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504218767131
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amato, R., Gutierrez, P., Lopez, B., Martinez, E., Candelas, D. R., Heinbach, C., & Mitola, R. (2019, August 6-7). Honoring the unique strengths of first-gen students through community-based participatory research [Conference session]. IDEAL ‘19 Conference, Columbus OH United States. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/libfacpresentation/205
   Google Scholar
• David, S. L., Hitchcock, J. H., Ragan, B., Brooks, G., & Starkey, C. (2018). Mixing interviews and Rasch modeling: Demonstrating a procedure used to develop an instrument that measures trust. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815624586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockertman, D., & Bondie, R. (n.d.). What strategy is most useful in promoting self-efficacy in educators and in learners? Digital Promise. https://researchmap.digitalpromise.org/ask_a_researcher/strategy-useful-promoting-self-efficacy-educators-learners/
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A., & Diloreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 98–119. https://www.ncpeapublications.org/attachments/article/713/Gray_DiLoreto_The_Effects_of_Student_Engagement_Student_Satisfaction_and_Percieved_Learning_in_Online_Learning_Environments.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Family Health International, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkelas, K. K., Daver, Z. E., Vogt, K. E., & Leonard, J. B. (2007). Living–learning programs and first-generation college students’ academic and social transition to college. Research in Higher Education, 48(4), 403–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9031-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200220
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, R. (2018). First-Generation college student experiences: A comparison across ages [ Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. Deep Blue Archive. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/147368/ravenkk.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Kreth, Q., Spirou, M. E., Budenstein, S., & Melkers, J. (2019). How prior experience and self-efficacy shape graduate student perceptions of an online learning environment in computing. Computer Science Education, 29(4), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1601459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, R. V. (2013). Organizing your social sciences research paper: Types of research designs. USC Libraries. University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2014). An exploratory study of effective online learning: Assessing satisfaction levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human and design factors of an online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 111–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1638
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410040401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Academies. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. https://grants.nih.gov/training/minority_participation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1056.9669&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-Generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PNPI. (2021). Factsheets. First-generation students. https://pnpi.org/first-generation-students/
   Google Scholar
• Polyiem, T., Nuangchalerm, P., & Wongchantra, P. (2011). Learning achievement, science process skills, and moral reasoning of ninth grade students learned by 7E learning cycle and socioscientific issue-based learning. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10), 257–564. http://ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2011/October-2011/257-264.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ralston-Berg, P., Buckenmeyer, J., Barczyk, C., & Hixon, E. (2015). Students’ perceptions of online course quality: How do they measure up to the research? Internet Learning Journal, 4(1), 38–55. https://jolrap.scholasticahq.com/article/26919.pdf
   Google Scholar
• RTI International. (2021). First-generation college graduates: Race/ethnicity, age, and use of career planning services [ Data set]. NASPA. https://firstgen.naspa.org/files/dmfile/FactSheet-011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Salehi, S., Burkholder, E., Lepage, G. P., Pollock, S., & Wieman, C. (2019). Demographic gaps or preparation gaps? The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of students in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. Advances in Motivation Science, 8(2021), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 19(2013), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, M., Parchoma, G., Jacobsen, M., Nelson, D., & Bhola, S. (2016). Designing for student engagement in an online doctoral research methods course [Paper presentation]. IDEAS 2016: Designing for Innovation, Calgary, AB, Canada. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/handle/1880/51228
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. M., Verdin, D., & Lucena, J. (2019, June). EAGER: Broadening participation of first-generation college students in engineering – Backgrounds, experiences and strategies for success, Proceedings of the ASEE. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–32258
   Google Scholar
• Soria, K. M., Horgos, B., Chirikov, I., & Jones-White, D. (2020). First-generation students’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. SERU Consortium, University of California - Berkeley and University of Minnesota. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/214934/First-Generation%20Students.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, N., Fryberg, S., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on Independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, B., Demps, J., & Jadav, A. (2017). Reduced contact hour accelerated courses and student learning. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 18(2017), 1–18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1151741.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2004). Student retention and graduation: Facing the truth, living with the consequences. [ Occasional Paper 1]. The Pell Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519709.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tough, A. M. (1971). The adult’s learning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson, W. (2012). Negative impact of employment on engineering student time management, time to degree, and retention faculty, administrator, and staff perspectives. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, 13(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.4.d
   Google Scholar
• Vlasova, H. (2022). Eye-opening college dropout rates & statistics – 2022. Admissionsly. https://admissionsly.com/college-dropout-rates/
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (2019, November 3). UI first generation summit encourages students to remove the stigma behind the first-generation experience. The Daily Iowan. https://dailyiowan.com/2019/11/03/ui-first-generation-summit-encourages-students-to-remove-the-stigma-behind-the-first-generation-experience/
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, G., & Rust, J. P. (2014). Stigma, awareness of support services, and academic help-seeking among historically underrepresented first-year college students. The Learning Assistance Review, 19(2), 19–43. https://nclca.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/Publications/TLAR/Issues/19_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research: Design and methods (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar