Making the Switch: Experiences and Results from Converting a Biostatistics Course to Flipped and Online Formats for Public Health Students

References

• Agresti, A. (2007), An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (2nd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., and Seaman, J. (2014), “Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States.” Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED602449.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., and Straut, T. T. (2016), “Online Report Card: Tracking Online Education in the United States.” Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED572777.
   Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R., and Stephens, J. M. (2009), “Academic Motivation and Self-Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduate and Graduate Students Learning Online,” The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 146–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, D. M., Skiba, D. J., and Connors, H. R. (2005), “Best Practices in Web-Based Courses: Generational Differences Across Undergraduate and Graduate Nursing Students,” Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 21, 126–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, C. (2002), “The Concept of Formative Assessment,” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., and Nygren, T. I. (2012), “Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from Randomized Trials,” Ithaka S + R.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, D. (2002), “Online Students Don’t Fare as Well as Classroom Counterparts, Study Finds,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, 38–41. Available at https://www.chronicle.com/article/online-students-dont-fare-as-well-as-classroom-counterparts-study-finds-116050/.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. A. (2017), “Using a ‘Flipped Classroom’ Approach to Teach Applied Statistics to Nutrition and Biotechnology Students Using Blackboard,” JSM Proceedings 2017, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J., and Dutton, M. (2005), “Characteristics and Performance of Students in an Online Section of Business Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education, 13, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Farmus, L., Cribbie, R. A., and Rotondi, M. A. (2020), “The Flipped Classroom in Introductory Statistics: Early Evidence From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Statistics Education, 28, 316–325. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2020.1834475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GAISE College Report ASA Revision Committee (2016), “Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education College Report 2016,” American Statistical Association. Available at http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1993), “Teaching Statistics Using Small-Group Cooperative Learning,” Journal of Statistics Education, 1, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hahs-Vaughn, D. L., Acquaye, H., Griffith, M. D., Jo, H., Matthews, K., and Acharya, P. (2017), “Statistical Literacy as a Function of Online Versus Hybrid Course Delivery Format for an Introductory Graduate Statistics Course,” Journal of Statistics Education, 25, 112–121. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2017.1370363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, J., and Kelly, A. (2015), “Student Performance in an Introductory Business Statistics Course: Does Delivery Mode Matter?” Journal of Education for Business, 90, 31–43. DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2014.968518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herreid, C. F., and Schiller, N. A. (2013), “Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom,” Journal of College Science Teaching, 42, 62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Immekus, J. C. (2019), “Flipping Statistics Courses in Graduate Education: Integration of Cognitive Psychology and Technology,” Journal of Statistics Education, 27, 79–89. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2019.1629852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, S., Swan, K., and Daston, C. (2016), “Retention, Progression and the Taking of Online Courses,” Online Learning, 20, 75–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpiak, C. P. (2011), “Assessment of Problem-Based Learning in the Undergraduate Statistics Course,” Teaching of Psychology, 38, 251–254. DOI: 10.1177/0098628311421322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe, T. J. (2003), “Using Technology to Enhance a Course: The Importance of Interaction,” Educause Quarterly, 26, 24–34.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1993), “From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side,” College Teaching, 41, 30–35. DOI: 10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, D. W., Menezes, F. M., and Sherwood, C. (2015), “Assessing the Impact of Blended Learning on Student Performance,” Economic Record, 91, 91–106. DOI: 10.1111/1475-4932.12155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., and Treglia, M. (2000), “Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30–43. DOI: 10.1080/00220480009596759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., and Jones, K. (2009), “Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies,” U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Washington D.C. Available at https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. D. (2014), Minds Online: Teaching Effectively with Technology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oster, R. A., and Enders, F. T. (2018), “The Importance of Statistical Competencies for Medical Research Learners,” Journal of Statistics Education, 26, 137–142. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2018.1484674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. (2009), “A Learning Community Approach to Doctoral Education in the Social Sciences,” Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 43–54. DOI: 10.1080/13562510802602533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayens, W., and Ellis, A. (2018), “Creating a Student-Centered Learning Environment Online,” Journal of Statistics Education, 26, 92–102. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2018.1475205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sami, F. (2011), “Course Format Effects on Learning Outcomes in an Introductory Statistics Course,” MathAMATYC Educator, 2, 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer, C. R. (2011), “Comparison of an Introductory Level Undergraduate Statistics Course Taught with Traditional, Hybrid, and Online Delivery Methods,” INFORMS Transactions on Education, 11, 106–110. DOI: 10.1287/ited.1110.0063.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, T. A., Ajazi, E., and Monaco, J. (2018), “Findings from a Survey of Statistics and Biostatistics Instructors in the Health Sciences Who Teach Using an Online or Flipped Format,” Journal of Statistics Education, 26, 143–148. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2018.1484675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinaberger, L. (2017), “Components of a Flipped Classroom Influencing Student Success in an Undergraduate Business Statistics Course,” Journal of Statistics Education, 25, 122–130. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2017.1381056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soesmanto, T., and Bonner, S. (2019), “Dual Mode Delivery in an Introductory Statistics Course: Design and Evaluation,” Journal of Statistics Education, 27, 90–98. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2019.1608874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. (2019), “Creating and Updating Flipped Classrooms,” American Statistical Association’s Section of Teaching Statistics in the Health Sciences [online] [presented May 30, 2019]. Available at https://community.amstat.org/tshs/announcements/educationalactivities.
   Google Scholar
• Touchton, M. (2015), “Flipping the Classroom and Student Performance in Advanced Statistics: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment,” Journal of Political Science Education, 11, 28–44. DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2014.985105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigg, C. A. (2013), “Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Outcomes from Changing the Equation,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45, 6–14. DOI: 10.1080/00091383.2013.806169.
   Google Scholar
• Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., Maher, M. W., and Matthews, H. R. (2003), “A Study Comparing Traditional and Hybrid Internet-Based Instruction in Introductory Statistics Classes,” Journal of Statistics Education, 11, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, B. (2004), “The Best of Both Worlds: A Hybrid Statistics Course,” Journal of Statistics Education, 12, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., and Lazar, N. A. (2016), “The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose,” The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L., and Lazar, N. A. (2019), “Moving to a World Beyond “p <0.05”,” The American Statistician, 73, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. G. (2013), “The Flipped Class,” Teaching of Psychology, 40, 193–199. DOI: 10.1177/0098628313487461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winquist, J. R., and Carlson, K. A. (2014), “Flipped Statistics Class Results: Better Performance than Lecture Over One Year Later,” Journal of Statistics Education, 22, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2002), “‘Hybrid’ Teaching Seeks to End the Drive Between Traditional and Online Instruction,” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Available at https://www.chronicle.com/article/hybrid-teaching-seeks-to-end-the-divide-between-traditional-and-online-instruction/.
   Google Scholar