Questions (and Answers) for Incorporating Nontraditional Grading in Your Statistics Courses

References

• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R, Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Richard, M., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., and Wittrock, M. (2001), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, I. D. (2013), “Standards-Based Grading in Introductory University Physics,” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Blinne, K. C., ed. (2021), Grading Justice: Teacher-Activist Approaches to Assessment, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, S. D. (2020), Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do instead), Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., Clark, D., and OShaughnessy, J. (2020), “Introduction to the Special Issue on Implementing Mastery Grading in the Undergraduate Mathematics Classroom,” PRIMUS, 30(8–10), 837–848. DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2020.1778824.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, S. (2020), “Simple Specifications Grading,” PRIMUS, 30, 926–951. DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1695238.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D., and Talbert, R. (2023), Grading for Growth: A Guide to Alternative Practices That Promote Authentic Learning and Student Engagement in Higher Education, New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003445043.
   Google Scholar
• Elsinger, J., and Lewis, D. (2020), “Applying a Standards-Based Grading Framework across Lower Level Mathematics Courses,” PRIMUS, 30, 885–907. DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1674430.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2018), Grading for Equity: What It is, Why It Matters, and How It Can Transform Schools and Classrooms, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, D., Fox, A., Russell, S., Ambrosio, E., Terrell, N., Silva, M., West, M., Zilles, C., and Shakir, F. (2023), “A’s for All (as Time and Interest Allow),” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023), pp. 1042–1048, New York: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3545945.3569847.
   Google Scholar
• Hafer, G. R. (2014), Embracing Writing: Ways to Teach Reluctant Writers in Any College Course, San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heubach, S., and Krinsky, S. (2020), “Implementing Mastery-Based Grading at Scale in Introductory Statistics,” PRIMUS, 30, 1054–1070. DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1700576.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. (2006), Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: A Practical Guide, Cork: University College Cork. Available at https://cora.ucc.ie/bitstream/handle/10468/1613/A%20Learning%20Outcomes%20Book%20D%20Kennedy.pdf?sequ.
   Google Scholar
• Mullainathan, S., and Shafir, E. (2013), Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means so Much, New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nilson, L. B. (2014), Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time, Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Novicki, A. (2022), “Considering Equity in Grading in Computer Science,” Duke University Learning Innovation Blog. Available at https://learninginnovation.duke.edu/blog/2022/07/considering-equity-in-grading-in-computer-science/.
   Google Scholar
• Pittman, C., and Tobin, T. J. (2022), “Academe Has a Lot to Learn About How Inclusive Teaching Affects Instructors,” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Available at https://www.chronicle.com/article/academe-has-a-lot-to-learn-about-how-inclusive-teaching-affects-instructors?.
   Google Scholar
• Post, S. L. (2017), “Standards-Based Grading in a Thermodynamics Course,” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 7, 173–181. DOI: 10.3991/ijep.v7i1.6472.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, E. (2021). Specifications-Grading: An Example–StatTLC. https://stattlc.com/2021/03/25/specifications-grading-an-example.
   Google Scholar
• Stange, K. E. (2018), “Standards-Based Grading in an Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Course,” PRIMUS, 28, 797–820. DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2017.1408044.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzman, R. Y., and Race, K. H. (2004), “EMRF: Everyday Rubric Grading,” The Mathematics Teacher, 97, 34–39. DOI: 10.5951/MT.97.1.0034.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, R. (2017), “Specifications Grading: We May Have a Winner,” Mastery Grading. Available at https://rtalbert.org/specs-grading-iteration-winner/.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, R. (2021a), “Entering the Feedback Loop: Robert’s Origin Story,” Grading for Growth. Available at https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/entering-the-feedback-loop-roberts.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, R. (2021b), “Finding Common Ground With Grading Systems,” Grading for Growth. Available at https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/finding-common-ground-with-grading.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, R. (2021c), “A Word About Words,” Grading for Growth. Available at https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/a-word-about-words.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, R. (2022), “Giving Marks That Indicate Progress,” Grading for Growth. Available at https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/giving-marks-that-indicate-progress.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. L. (2013), “The Poverty Trap: Slack, Not Grit, Creates Achievement,” available at https://radicalscholarship.com/2013/11/10/the-poverty -trap-slack-not-grit-creates-achievment/.
   Google Scholar
• Townsley, M., and Schmid, D. (2020), “Alternative Grading Practices: An Entry Point for Faculty in Competency-Based Education,” The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 5, e01219. DOI: 10.1002/cbe2.1219.
   Google Scholar
• Tuson, E., and Hickey, T. (2023), “Mastery Learning with Specs Grading for Programming Courses,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023), pp. 1049–1054, New York: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3545945.3569853.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021), “Competencies Proficiency Scale,” National Institutes of Health. Retrieved September 28, 2022, available at https://hr.nih.gov/working-nih/competencies/ competencies-proficiency-scale.
   Google Scholar