46
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comprehensive natural resources evaluation from multi-category aggregation: a case study of Huanggang

, , , , &
Pages 1-21 | Received 27 Apr 2024, Accepted 08 Jul 2024, Published online: 15 Jul 2024

References

  • Al-Shammari, M. M. A., Al-Shamma’a, A. M., Al Maliki, A., Hussain, H. M., Yaseen, Z. M., & Armanuos, A. M. (2021). Integrated water harvesting and aquifer recharge evaluation methodology based on remote sensing and geographical information system: Case study in Iraq. Natural Resources Research, 30(3), 2119–2143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09835-3
  • Behzadian, M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051–13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
  • Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., & Kärrholm, M. (2020). Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability. Developments in the Built Environment, 4, 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100021
  • Bjørn, A., Chandrakumar, C., Boulay, A.-M., Doka, G., Fang, K., Gondran, N., Hauschild, M. Z., Kerkhof, A., King, H., Margni, M., McLaren, S., Mueller, C., Owsianiak, M., Peters, G., Roos, S., Sala, S., Sandin, G., Sim, S., Vargas-Gonzalez, M., & Ryberg, M. (2020). Review of life-cycle based methods for absolute environmental sustainability assessment and their applications. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 083001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab89d7
  • Brown, D. G., Verburg, P. H., Pontius, R. G., & Lange, M. D. (2013). Opportunities to improve impact, integration, and evaluation of land change models. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.012
  • Caglar, A. E., Avci, S. B., Ahmed, Z., & Gökçe, N. (2024). Assessing the role of green investments and green innovation in ecological sustainability: From a climate action perspective on European countries. Science of the Total Environment, 928, 172527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172527
  • Caglar, A. E., Avci, S. B., Daştan, M., & Destek, M. A. (2024). Investigation of the effect of natural resource dependence on environmental sustainability under the novel load capacity curve hypothesis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 31(4), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2296495
  • Caglar, A. E., Daştan, M., Bulut, E., & Marangoz, C. (2024). Evaluating a pathway for environmental sustainability: The role of competitive industrial performance and renewable energy consumption in European countries. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2755
  • Caglar, A. E., Destek, M. A., & Manga, M. (2024). Analyzing the load capacity curve hypothesis for the Turkiye: A perspective for the sustainable environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444, 141232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141232
  • Caglar, A. E., Gökçe, N., & Şahin, F. (2024). Sustaining environment through municipal solid waste: Evidence from European Union economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(4), 6040–6053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31494-5
  • Cai, Y. M., Meng, C., Zhou, J. C., Feng, W. L., Li, J. C., & Dong, C. (2022). Research on the integrated evaluation indicator system of natural resources. Science of Surveying & Mapping, 47(10), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2022.10.022
  • Chen, S. Y., Liu, N., Xiao, L., Gong, Y. W., & Xiao, Y. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of environmental dimension reduction of multi-type islands: A sustainable development perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(14), 20947–20962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17240-9
  • Chenery, H. B., Sherman, R., & Moshe, S. (2015). Industrialization experience. In Q. Wu & S. B. Wang (Eds.) Industrialization and growth: A comparative study (Vol. 2). Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
  • Chopra, R., Magazzino, C., Shah, M. I., Sharma, G. D., Rao, A., & Shahzad, U. (2022). The role of renewable energy and natural resources for sustainable agriculture in ASEAN countries: Do carbon emissions and deforestation affect agriculture productivity? Resources Policy, 76, 102578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102578
  • Dai, J., Guo, L., & Liu, M. B. (2020). Study on evaluation of intensive use of agricultural land in Huanggang City. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 59(3), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.03.007
  • Dimple Singh, P. K., Yadav, M., Kothari, K. K., Bhakar, S. R., & Bhakar, S. R. (2024). Multi-criteria decision analysis for groundwater potential zones delineation using geospatial tools and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Nand Samand catchment, Rajasthan, India. Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 26(6), 14003–14037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03177-1
  • Ding, Z., & Shen, M. (2019). Study on the bearing capacity of geological environment in Huanggang City based on analytic hierarchy process and variation coefficient method. Resources Environment and Engineering, 33(S1), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.16536/j.cnki.issn.1671-1211.2019.S1.014
  • Drobne, S., & Lisec, A. (2009). Multi-attribute decision analysis in GIS: Weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging. Informatica, 33(4), 459–474. www.informatica.si/index.php/informatica/article/view/263
  • Dumanski, J., & Pieri, C. (2000). Land quality indicators: Research plan. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 81(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00183-3
  • El-Araby, A., Sabry, I., & El-Assal, A. (2022). A comparative study of using MCDM methods integrated with entropy weight method for evaluating facility location problem. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta250322151a
  • Fahmi, A., Abdullah, S., Amin, F., & Khan, M. S. A. (2019). Trapezoidal cubic fuzzy number Einstein hybrid weighted averaging operators and its application to decision making. Soft Computing, 23(14), 5753–5783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3242-6
  • Fennessy, M. S., Jacobs, A. D., & Kentula, M. E. (2007). An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands. Wetlands, 27(3), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[543:AEORMF]2.0.CO;2
  • Firozjaei, M. K., Nematollahi, O., Mijani, N., Shorabeh, S. N., Firozjaei, H. K., & Toomanian, A. (2019). An integrated GIS-based ordered weighted averaging analysis for solar energy evaluation in Iran: Current conditions and future planning. Renewable Energy, 136, 1130–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.090
  • Ge, L. S., & Xia, R. (2020). Research on comprehensive investigation work system of natural resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(9), 2254–2269. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200917
  • Hauer, G., Cumming, S., Schmiegelow, F., Adamowicz, W., Weber, M., & Jagodzinski, R. (2010). Tradeoffs between forestry resource and conservation values under alternate policy regimes: A spatial analysis of the western Canadian boreal plains. Ecological Modelling, 221(21), 2590–2603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.013
  • Hirai, T., & Comim, F. (2022). Measuring the sustainable development goals: A poset analysis. Ecological Indicators, 145, 109605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109605
  • Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment, 409(19), 3578–3594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022
  • Huang, L., Solangi, Y. A., Magazzino, C., & Solangi, S. A. (2024). Evaluating the efficiency of green innovation and marketing strategies for long-term sustainability in the context of environmental labeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450, 141870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141870
  • Hussain, M. A., Zhang, S., Muneer, M., Moawwez, M. A., Kamran, M., & Ahmed, E. (2022). Assessing and mapping spatial variation characteristics of natural hazards in Pakistan. The Land, 12(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010140
  • Irfan, M., Elavarasan, R. M., Ahmad, M., Mohsin, M., Dagar, V., & Hao, Y. (2022). Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 177, 121524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121524
  • Jiang, Z., Liu, Z., Xu, J., Wu, M., Xie, X., & Hou, Y. (2021). An integrated energy system evaluation method based on FAHP-EWM-TOPSIS. 2021 IEEE 4th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIEEC50170.2021.9510670
  • Jianing, P., Bai, K., Solangi, Y. A., Magazzino, C., & Ayaz, K. (2024). Examining the role of digitalization and technological innovation in promoting sustainable natural resource exploitation. Resources Policy, 92, 105036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105036
  • Jin, G., Deng, X. Z., Zhao, X. D., Guo, B. S., & Yang, J. (2018). Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River economic belt between 2005 and 2014. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(8), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1545-2
  • Jin, G., Guo, B. S., Cheng, J. H., Deng, X. Z., & Wu, F. (2022). Layout optimization and support system of territorial space: An analysis framework based on resource efficiency. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 77(3), 534–546. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb202203003
  • Jorge-García, D., & Estruch-Guitart, V. (2022). Comparative analysis between AHP and ANP in prioritization of ecosystem services—A case study in a rice field area raised in the Guadalquivir Marshes (Spain). Ecological Informatics, 70(9), 101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101739
  • Kim, H. N., & Ryu, H. (2022). Estimating the economic value of change in ecosystem habitat quality in South Korea using an integrated environmental and economic analysis. The Land, 11(12), 2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122249
  • Kumar, R., Singh, S., Bilga, P. S., Jatin Singh, J., Singh, S., Scutaru, M.-L., Pruncu, C. I., & Pruncu, C. I. (2021). Revealing the benefits of entropy weights method for multi-objective optimization in machining operations: A critical review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 10, 1471–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.114
  • Li, J., Chen, X., Kurban, A., Van de Voorde, T., De Maeyer, P., & Zhang, C. (2021). Identification of conservation priorities in the major basins of Central Asia: Using an integrated GIS-based ordered weighted averaging approach. Journal of Environment Manage, 298, 113442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113442
  • Li, T., Chen, T. Y., & Hui, B. H. (2022). Economic value of forest ecosystem services in Huangshan City Based on meta-analysis. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 42(12), 2179–2188. https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.202212.014
  • Li, W. W., Wang, J. X., Zhou, X. D., & Zhou, S. L. (2020). Research on connotation and evaluation index of intensive use of natural resources. Territory & Natural Resources Study, 2, 12–14. https://doi.org/10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2020.02.004
  • Lin, G., Fu, J., & Jiang, D. (2021). Production–living–ecological conflict identification using a multiscale integration model based on spatial suitability analysis and sustainable development evaluation: A case study of Ningbo, China. The Land, 10(4), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040383
  • Liu, T. K., Jia, M. M., & Ma, P. Z. (2021). Research on economical and intensive utilization and management of water resources of the yellow river under strengthen rigid constraint. Yellow River, 43(7), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2021.08.013
  • Lourdes, K. T., Hamel, P., Gibbins, C. N., Sanusi, R., Azhar, B., & Lechner, A. M. (2022). Planning for green infrastructure using multiple urban ecosystem service models and multicriteria analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 226, 104500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104500
  • Lu, X. H., Zhang, Y. W., Lin, C. R., & Wu, F. (2021). Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of sustainable land use in China: Based on sustainable development goals framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 310, 127205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127205
  • Menció, A., Folch, A., & Mas-Pla, J. (2010). Analyzing hydrological sustainability through water balance. Environmental Management, 45(5), 1175–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9461-y
  • Mendoza, G. A., & Martins, H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology & Management, 230(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023
  • Minea, I., Boicu, D., Chelariu, O.-E., Iosub, M., & Enea, A. (2022). Assessment of recharge capacity potential of groundwater using comparative multi-criteria decision analysis approaches. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(4), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1970-0
  • Mukhametzyanov, I. (2021). Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 76–105. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402076i
  • Peng, Y., Zhu, Z. L., Tan, X. Y., Liu, X., Xiang, L. J., & Wu, F. (2023). Evaluation and forewarning of resources and environment carrying capacity in Hubei Province from the perspective of pressure, support and regulation. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(10), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.0881.23.338
  • Qiu, Q. Q., Zhong, L. R., & Song, Y. B. (2022). Study on comprehensive evaluation methods of natural resources in Jiangsu Province. Science of Surveying & Mapping, 47(8), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2022.08.009
  • Ronald, R. Y. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068
  • Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Computers & Operations Research, 104, 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.12.019
  • Sannigrahi, S., Chakraborti, S., Joshi, P. K., Keesstra, S., Sen, S., Paul, S. K., Kreuter, U., Sutton, P. C., Jha, S., & Dang, K. B. (2019). Ecosystem service value assessment of a natural reserve region for strengthening protection and conservation. Journal of Environment Manage, 244, 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.095
  • Sarkar, P., Kumar, P., Vishwakarma, D. K., Ashok, A., Elbeltagi, A., Gupta, S., & Kuriqi, A. (2022). Watershed prioritization using morphometric analysis by MCDM approaches. Ecological Informatics, 70, 101763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101763
  • Shao, H., Liu, D. D., Wang, X. F., Yin, Z. Q., Wang, Y., Xing, B., Wan, L. Q., & An, Y. L. (2022). Exploration and practice of double evaluation supported by comprehensive investigation of natural resources exemplified by the national ecological civilization demonstration area in Chengde City. Mineral Exploration, 13(4), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.20008/j.kckc.202204016
  • Solangi, Y. A., Alyamani, R., & Magazzino, C. (2024). Assessing the drivers and solutions of green innovation influencing the adoption of renewable energy technologies. Heliyon, 10(9), E30158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30158
  • Świąder, M., Lin, D., Szewrański, S., Kazak, J. K., Iha, K., van Hoof, J., Belčáková, I., & Altiok, S. (2020). The application of ecological footprint and biocapacity for environmental carrying capacity assessment: A new approach for European cities. Environmental Science & Policy, 105, 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.010
  • Thomas, L. S. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  • Ullah, K. M., & Mansourian, A. (2016). Evaluation of land suitability for urban land-use planning: Case study Dhaka City. Transactions in GIS, 20(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12137
  • Wang, X. Q., & Pu, L. J. (2021). A review of the classification of natural resources. Resources Science, 43(11), 2203–2214. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2021.11.05
  • Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Ji, Q., & Shi, X. (2020). Regional renewable energy development in China: A multidimensional assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 124, 109797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109797
  • Xiang, W. X., Chen, M. L., Liu, M. H., Cai, S. W., Chen, C. X., & Chen, J. X. (2022). Pollutants distribution characteristics and environmental quality evaluation of water in a Typical Urban Lake, Huanggang City. Resources Environment and Engineering, 36(3), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.16536/j.cnki.issn.1671-1211.2022.03.003
  • Xu, M. J., Niu, R. Q., Yang, K., & Duan, S. Z. (2021). A weighted clustering model for land eco-environmental sensitivity evaluation. Science of Surveying & Mapping, 46(10), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2021.10.016
  • Xu, Y., Yang, L., Zhang, C., & Zhu, J. Q. (2023). Comprehensive evaluation of water ecological environment in watersheds: A case study of the Yangtze River economic belt, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 30727–30740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24333-6
  • Yager, R. R. (1996). Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199601)11:1<49:AID-INT3>3.0.CO;2-Z
  • Yang, B., Wu, Q. S., Li, Z. H., & Tan, J. (2023). Thoughts on natural resources survey and monitoring in the perspective of ecological civilisation. Natural Resource Economics of China, 36(7), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.19676/j.cnki.1672-6995.000915
  • Yang, Z., Yu, T., Hou, Q., Xia, X., Feng, H., Huang, C., Wang, L., Lv, Y., & Zhang, M. (2014). Geochemical evaluation of land quality in China and its applications. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 139, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.07.014
  • Yavuz, E., Kilic, E., & Caglar, A. E. (2023). A new hypothesis for the unemployment-environment dilemma: Is the environmental Phillips curve valid in the framework of load capacity factor in Turkiye? environment, development and sustainability. Environment, Development, and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04258-x
  • Ye, S., Wei, C., Wang, Z., Wang, H., & Chai, J. (2021). Resources and environment carrying capacity, social development and their decoupling relationship: A case study of Hubei Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 18(23), 12312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312312
  • Zaman-Ul-Haq, M., Kanwal, A., Gardezi, A. A., Fatima, H., Saqib, Z., Bokhari, S. A., Nasr, E. A., Ahmad, S., & Shafiq, M. (2022). Assessing spatial-temporal changes in monetary values of urban ecosystem services through remotely sensed data. Sustainability, 14(22), 15136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215136
  • Zhang, X., & Duan, X. (2024). Evaluating water resource carrying capacity in Pearl River-West River economic belt based on portfolio weights and GRA-TOPSIS-CCDM. Ecological Indicators, 161, 111942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111942
  • Zhang, X. Q., He, S. Y., & Yang, Y. (2021). Evaluation of wetland ecosystem services value of the yellow river delta. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(6), 353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09130-x
  • Zhong, C. M. (2018). On several issues of green development under ecological carrying capacity in Yangtze River economic belt. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 18(6), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.2018.06.002
  • Zuo, S., Hu, L., & Yang, L. N. (2022). Research on the construction of comprehensive evaluation index system of natural resources. Forest Resources Management, 3, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.03.002