Residents’ and farmers’ perspectives on risks and benefits of intensive livestock farming

References

• Asselt, M. V. (2019). Conflicts between chicken welfare and public health risks in poultry husbandry: Stakeholders’ perceptions and moral convictions. Wageningen University. doi:10.18174/469482.
   Google Scholar
• Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2020). Some foundational issues related to risk governance and different types of risks. Journal of Risk Research, 23(9), 1121–1134. doi:10.1080/13669877.2019.1569099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benard, M., & de Cock Buning, T. (2013). Exploring the potential of Dutch pig farmers and urban-citizens to learn through frame reflection. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(5), 1015–1036. doi:10.1007/s10806-013-9438-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstra, T. J., Gremmen, B., & Stassen, E. N. (2015). Moral values and attitudes toward Dutch sow husbandry. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(2), 375–401. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9539-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesheuvel, P. J., Groothuijse, F., Jeurissen, E., Melse, R. W., & van Poll, R. (2019). Acknowledging smell: Combi air washers, pig farms and odor nuisance. [In Dutch: Geur bekennen: combi-luchtwassers, varkenshouderijen en geurhinder]. Commissie geurhinder veehouderijen. Retrieved fromhttps://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/476266
   Google Scholar
• Boase, N., White, M., Gaze, W., & Redshaw, C. (2017). Evaluating the mental models approach to developing a risk communication: A scoping review of the evidence. Risk Analysis, 37(11), 2132–2149. doi:10.1111/risa.12789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokma-Bakker,M., de Bakker, H., Bremmer, B., Commandeur, M., de Lauwere, C., van Os, J.,and Selnes, T. (2011). Societal acceptance of (large-scale) farming in LOG’s: On the attitude of citizens and farmers and roles of governments (1570-8616). Wageningen UR Livestock Research. Retrieved from: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/185307
   Google Scholar
• Boogaard, B. K. (2009). The socio-cultural sustainability of animal farming. In An inquiry into social perceptions of dairy farming in the Netherlands and Norway.(Doctor). Wageningen University. https://edepot.wur.nl/12606
   Google Scholar
• Boogaard, B. K., Bock, B. B., Oosting, S. J., Wiskerke, J. S., & van der Zijpp, A. J. (2011). Social acceptance of dairy farming: The ambivalence between the two faces of modernity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24(3), 259–282. doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9256-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boogaard, B. K., Oosting, S. J., & Bock, B. B. (2008). Defining sustainability as a socio-cultural concept: Citizen panels visiting dairy farms in the Netherlands. Livestock Science, 117(1), 24–33. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2007.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borlée, F. (2018). Respiratory health effects of livestock farm emissions in neighbouring residents. Utrecht University. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/364052
   Google Scholar
• Borlée, F., Yzermans, C. J., Oostwegel, F. S., Schellevis, F., Heederik, D., & Smit, L. A. (2019). Attitude toward livestock farming does not influence the earlier observed association between proximity to goat farms and self-reported pneumonia. Environmental Epidemiology, 3(2), e041. doi:10.1097/EE9.0000000000000041.
   Google Scholar
• Breeman, G. (., Termeer, C. J. A. M. (., & van Lieshout, M. (. V. (2013). Decision making on mega stables: Understanding and preventing citizens’ distrust. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 66, 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2013.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, J. A., Kim, B. F., Larsen, J., Price, L. B., & Nachman, K. E. (2015). Industrial food animal production and community health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2(3), 259–271. doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0061-0.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, L., Bostrom, A., & Timmermans, D. R. (2016). Focal points for improving communications about electromagnetic fields and health: A mental models approach. Journal of Risk Research, 19(2), 246–269. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.961519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, L., Greven, F., Woudenberg, F., & Timmermans, D. (2021). ‘Stay clear from the smoke’: Effects of alternative public messages in case of large-scale chemical fires. Journal of Risk Research, 24(11), 1426–1438. doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1863848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin, W. B., & Bostrom, A. (2013). Assessing what to address in science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Suppl._3), 14062–14068. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212729110.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, P., Robertson, S., Gay, R., Hansell, A. L., & Gant, T. W. (2018). A systematic review of the public health risks of bioaerosols from intensive farming. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 221(2), 134–173. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijrond, V., Claassen, L., van der Giessen, J., & Timmermans, D. (2019). Intensive Livestock Farming and Residential Health: Experts’ Views. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3625. doi:10.3390/ijerph16193625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9(2), 127–152. doi:10.1007/BF00143739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50(1), 1–7. doi:10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. (2004). The public and effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters, 149(1–3), 391–397. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagenaars, T., Hoeksma, P., de Roda Husman, A. M., Swart, A., & Wouters, I. M. (2017). Livestock farming and neighbouring residents’ health (additional studies): Analysis of health effects, risk factors and emission of bio-aerosols https://edepot.wur.nl/417777. [In Dutch: Veehouderij en gezondheid omwonenden (aanvullende studies): Analyse van gezondheidseffecten, risicofactoren en uitstoot van bio-aerosolen]. https://edepot.wur.nl/417777
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., & Sandøe, P. (2003). Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41(2), 111–121. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00079-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heederik, D., Opstal-van Winden, A., Smit, L., Wouters, I., Hooiveld, M., IJzermans, C.,and van Rotterdam, B. (2011). Possible effects of intensive livestock farming on the health of local residents: Research into potential exposure and health problems. [In Dutch: Mogelijke effecten van intensieve-veehouderij op de gezondheid van omwonenden: onderzoek naar potentiële blootstelling en gezondheidsproblemen]. NIVEL. https://edepot.wur.nl/172500
   Google Scholar
• IJzermans, C., Smit, L., Heederik, D., Hagenaars, T., Baliatsas, C., Dückers, M.,and Boender, G. (2018). Livestock farming and health of local residents III: Pneumonia in the vicinity of goat and poultry farms; updating data from general practices 2014-2016. [In Dutch: Veehouderij En Gezondheid Omwonenden III . Longontsteking in de nabijheid van geiten-en pluimveehouderijen; actualisering van gegevens uit huisartspraktijken 2014-2016]: Nivel. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/462811
   Google Scholar
• IJzermans, J., Smit, L., Dückers, M., & Baliatsas, C. (2021). Pneumonia in the vicinity of goat farms in North Brabant and Limburg. [In Dutch: Longontsteking in de Nabijheid van Geitenhouderijen in Noord-Brabant En Limburg]. https://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/1004118.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. K., Lassen, J., Robinson, P., & Sandøe, P. (2005). Lay and expert perceptions of zoonotic risks: Understanding conflicting perspectives in the light of moral theory. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 99(3), 245–255. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkowska, D. A., Boender, G. J., Smit, L. A., Baliatsas, C., Yzermans, J., Heederik, D. J., & Hagenaars, T. J. (2018). Associations between pneumonia and residential distance to livestock farms over a five-year period in a large population-based study. PloS One, 13(7), e0200813. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanne, P., Schelde, A. V. D., & Leensma, F. (2021). What does the livestock farmer want? [In Dutch: Wat wil de veeboer]. I&O Research. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ioresearch.nl/actueel/onbegrepen-veeboeren-wantrouwen-overheid/
   Google Scholar
• Kraaij-Dirkzwager, M., Timen, A., Schuitmaker, T., & Van Steenbergen, J. (2014). Stakeholder analysis and its value for infectious disease control crises. European Journal of Public Health, 24(suppl_2), 165. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku163.022.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, K., Smit, L., Wouters, I., van Duijkeren, E., Janse, I., Hagenaars, T.,and Heederik, D. (2016). livestock farming and health of local residents. [In Dutch: Veehouderij En Gezondheid Omwonenden]. http://hdl.handle.net/10029/617909
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. J. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Health Council of the Netherlands. (2012). Health risks surrounding livestock farms -Advice-Health Council. [In Dutch: Gezondheidsrisico’s rond veehouderijen-Advies-Gezondheidsraad]. https://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/documenten/adviezen/2012/11/30/gezondheidsrisico%E2%80%99s-rond-veehouderijen
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. (2015). StatLine. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/70072NED/table?fromstatweb
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. S. (2017). StatLine. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/70072NED/table?fromstatweb
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A. M., Auvermann, B., Bickett-Weddle, D., Kirkhorn, S., Sargeant, J. M., Ramirez, A., & Von Essen, S. G. (2010). The association between proximity to animal feeding operations and community health: A systematic review. PloS One, 5(3), e9530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A. M., Auvermann, B. W., Dzikamunhenga, R. S., Glanville, J. M., Higgins, J., Kirychuk, S. P.,andVon Essen, S. G. (2017). Updated systematic review: Associations between proximity to animal feeding operations and health of individuals in nearby communities. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–20. doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0465-z.
   Google Scholar
• OIE. (2020). African Swine Fever. https://www.oie.int/en/animal-health-in-the-world/animal-diseases/african-swine-fever/
   Google Scholar
• Police end pig farm occupation, dozens of activists arrested. (2019). DutchNews.nl https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2019/05/police-end-pig-farm-occupation-dozens-of-activists-arrested/
   Google Scholar
• Post, P. M. (2021). Characterizing effects of livestock farming on human health and the environment. Utrecht University. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/405613
   Google Scholar
• Post, P. M., Hogerwerf, L., Bokkers, E. A., Baumann, B., Fischer, P., Rutledge-Jonker, S.,andLiebman, A. (2020). Effects of Dutch livestock production on human health and the environment. Science of the Total Environment, 737, 139702. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2015). Stakeholder and public involvement in risk governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(1), 8–20. doi:10.1007/s13753-015-0037-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., Laubichler, M., Lucas, K., Kröger, W., Schanze, J., Scholz, R. W., & Schweizer, P. J. (2020). Systemic risks from different perspectives. Risk analysis. doi:10.1111/risa.13657.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2021). New challenges for risk analysis: Systemic risks. Journal of Risk Research, 24(1), 127–133. doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1779787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., Klinke, A., & Van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. Ambio, 40(2), 231–246. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T. W., Bostrom, A., Read, D., & Morgan, M. G. (2010). Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(10), 1520–1538, doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01448.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIVM. (2019). Q fever. [In Dutch: Q-Koorts]. https://www.rivm.nl/q-koorts
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Árvai, J. (2020). Risk perception: Reflections on 40 years of research. Risk Analysis, 40(S1), 2191–2206. doi:10.1111/risa.13599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis, 2(2), 83–93. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01369.x.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, L. A., & Heederik, D. (2017). Impacts of intensive livestock production on human health in densely populated regions. GeoHealth, 1(7), 272–277. doi:10.1002/2017GH000103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Velde, H., Aarts, N., & Van Woerkum, C. (2002). Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15(2), 203–219. doi:10.1023/A:1015012403331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. (2018). The significance of the dialogue for issues related to livestock farming and health. [In Dutch: De betekenis van de dialoog voor vraagstukken rondom veehouderij en gezondheid]. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen, 96(2), 51–52. doi:10.1007/s12508-018-0114-5.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. B. (2012). Agriculture, food and society—Philosophy to nanotechnology. WCDS Adv. Dairy Technol, 24, 13. https://acrre.ualberta.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/wcds_archive/Archive/2012/Manuscripts/Thompson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, M., Ekkel, E., Kemp, B., & Stassen, E. (2019). The trade-off between chicken welfare and public health risks in poultry husbandry: Significance of moral convictions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(2), 293–319. doi:10.1007/s10806-019-09774-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, M., Poortvliet, P., Ekkel, E., Kemp, B., & Stassen, E. (2018). Risk perceptions of public health and food safety hazards in poultry husbandry by citizens, poultry farmers and poultry veterinarians. Poultry Science, 97(2), 607–619. doi:10.3382/ps/pex325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, M. B., & Renn, O. (2011). Risk governance. Journal of Risk Research, 14(4), 431–449. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.553730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. A. (2008). Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livestock Science, 116(1–3), 126–136. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, K. (2007). Mental models of flash floods and landslides. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 27(3), 671–682. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00916.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar