The plurality of norms that factor into Canadians’ decisions to engage in transnational egg transactions

References

• Assisted Human Reproduction Act. 2004. SC c 2.
   Google Scholar
• Reimbursement Related to Assisted Human Reproduction Regulations. 2019. SOR/2019193.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Gay. 2000. The Elusive Embryo. London, UK: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Paul Schiff. 2012. Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrows, John. 2010. Canada’s Indigenous Constitution. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, William A. 2005. The Practice of Liberal Pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guichon, Juliet, Ian Mitchell, and Michelle Giroux, eds. 2012. The Right to Know One’s Origins. Brussels, Belgium: Academic and Scientific Publishers nv.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, Monica. 2005. Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and Reproductive Gift Exchange between British Ova Donors and Recipients. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nahman, Michal. 2013. Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. 1993. Proceed with Care: Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Government Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (After Law). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spar, Debora. 2006. The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alberta, Hillary, Roberta Berry, and Aaron Levine. 2014. “Risk Disclosure and the Recruitment of Oocyte Providers: Are Advertisers Telling the Full Story?” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 42 (2): 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, Kamal K. 2015. “Patient Pressure: Is the Tide of Cross-Border Reproductive Care Beginning to Turn?” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 30 (5): 447–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, Rene. 2006. “‘Why Do You Want to Be a Donor?’: Gender and the Production of Altruism in Egg and Sperm Donation.” New Genetics and Society 25 (2): 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770600855184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, Rene. 2017. “The Business of Egg and Sperm Donation.” Contexts 16 (4): 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504217742396.
   Google Scholar
• ASRM (Ethics Committee for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine). 2016. “Financial Compensation of Oocyte Providers: An Ethics Committee Opinion.” Fertility and Sterility 106 (7): e15–e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASRM (Ethics Committee for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine). 2022. “Cross-Border Reproductive Care: An Ethics Committee Opinion.” Fertility and Sterility 117 (5): 954–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baetens, Patricia, Paul Devroey, Michel Camus, Andre C. Van Steirteghem, and Ingrid Ponjaert-Kristoffersen. 2000. “Counselling Couples and Providers for Oocyte Donation: The Decision to Use Either Known or Anonymous Oocytes.” Human Reproduction 15 (2): 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/HUMREP/15.2.476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis, Françoise, and Carolyn McLeod. 2007. “The Stem Cell Debate Continues: The Buying and Selling of Eggs for Research.” Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12): 726–731. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.022129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis, Françoise, Jocelyn Downie, and Dave Snow. 2014. “Fake It Till You Make It: Policymaking and Assisted Human Reproduction in Canada.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 36 (6): 510–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30566-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von. 1981. “Forum Shopping and Shopping Forums: Dispute Processing in a Minangkabau Village in West Sumatra.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 13 (19): 117–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756260.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Paul Schiff. 2007. “Global Legal Pluralism.” Southern California Review 80: 1155–1237. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/scal80&i=1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, Eric. 2010. “Fertility Patients’ Experiences of Cross-Border Reproductive Care.” Fertility and Sterility 94 (1): e11–e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, Eric, and Lucy Frith. 2008. “The UK’s Gamete Provider ‘Crisis’ – A Critical Analysis.” Critical Social Policy 28 (1): 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018307085508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracewell-Milnes, Timothy, Srdjan Saso, Shabana Bora, Alaa M. Ismail, Maya Al-Memar, Ali Hasan Hamed, Hossam Abdalla, and Meen-Yau Thum. 2016. “Investigating Psychosocial Attitudes, Motivations and Experiences of Oocyte Donors, Recipients and Egg Sharers: A Systematic Review.” Human Reproduction Update 22 (4): 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattapan, Alana. 2013. “Rhetoric and Reality: “Protecting” Women in Canadian Public Policy on Assisted Human Reproduction.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 25 (2): 202–220. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.25.2.202.
   Google Scholar
• Cattapan, Alana. 2014. “Risky Business: Surrogacy, Egg Donation, and the Politics of Exploitation.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 29 (03): 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2014.14.
   Google Scholar
• Couture, Vincent, Régen Drouin, Jean-Marie Moutquin, Patricia Monnier, and Chantal Bouffard. 2019. “Reproductive Outsourcing: An Empirical Ethics Account of Cross-Border Reproductive Care in Canada.” Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1): 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deomampo, Daisy. 2016. “Race, Nation, and the Production of Intimacy: Transnational Ova Donation in India.” Positions: Asia Critique 24 (1): 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-3320161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie, Jocelyn, and Françoise Baylis. 2013. “Transnational Trade in Human Eggs: Law, Policy, and (In)Action in Canada.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 41 (1): 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraretti, Anna Pia, Guido Pennings, Luca Gianaroli, Francesca Natali, and M. Cristina Magli. 2010. “Cross-Border Reproductive Care: A Phenomenon Expressing the Controversial Aspects of Reproductive Technologies.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 20 (2): 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, Sonja K., and William Waters. 2011. “Coding Qualitative Data.” Qualitative Data (blog). http://www.abdsurvivalguide.com/News/020603.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Golombok, Susan, Catherine Jones, Poppy Hall, Sarah Foley, Susan Imrie, and Vasanti Jadva. 2023. “A Longitudinal Study of Families Formed through Third-Party Assisted Reproduction: Mother–Child Relationships and Child Adjustment from Infancy to Adulthood.” Developmental Psychology 59 (6): 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, John. 1986. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18 (24): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Jyotsna Agnihotri. 2012. “Reproductive Biocrossings: Indian Egg Providers and Surrogates in the Globalized Fertility Market.” IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (1): 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1353/ijf.2012.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürtin, Zeynep B. 2011. “Banning Reproductive Travel: Turkey’s ART Legislation and Third-Party Assisted Reproduction.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23 (5): 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, Kathleen. 2018. “The Role of Normative Ideologies of Motherhood in Intended Mothers’ Experiences of Egg Donation in Canada.” Anthropology & Medicine 25 (3): 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2018.1507483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, Kathleen. 2022. “Not Worth the Wait: Why the Long-Awaited Regulations under the AHRA Don’t Address Egg Provider Concerns.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 37 (1): 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Edward, and Deirdre DeJean. 2010. “Cross-Border Fertility Services in North America: A Survey of Canadian and American Providers.” Fertility and Sterility 94 (1): e16–e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Nicky. 2020. “Egg Donation Imaginaries: Embodiment, Ethics, and Future Family Formation.” Sociology 54 (2): 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519868625.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, Marcia, and Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli. 2008. “Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Culture Change.” Annual Review of Anthropology 37 (1): 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, Puteri Nemie J. 2009. “Medicine Beyond Borders: The Legal and Ethical Challenges Health Law.” Medicine and Law 3: 439–450. https://europepmc.org/article/med/20157960.
   Google Scholar
• Kroløkke, Charlotte. 2015. “Have Eggs, Will Travel: The Experiences and Ethics of Global Egg Donation.” Somatechnics 5 (1): 12–31. https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2015.0145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, Will. 2003. “Being Canadian.” Government and Opposition 38 (3): 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Marca, Antonio, Martina Capuzzo, Silvia Bartolucci, Francesca Schirinzi, Mariabeatrice Dal Canto, Jose Buratini, Mario Mignini Renzini, Amelia Rodriguez-Aranda, and Rita Vassena. 2020. “Exploring the Pros and Cons of New Approaches for Gamete Cross-Border Donation Based on Fresh and Vitrified Oocytes.” Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn 12 (2): 111–118. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/32832925/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysons, Jo, Susan Imrie, Vasanti Jadva, and Susan Golombok. 2022. ““I’m the Only Mum She Knows”: Parents’ Understanding of, and Feelings about, Identity-Release Egg Donation.” Human Reproduction 37 (10): 2426–2437. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, Sally Engle. 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22 (5): 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Sally Falk. 1972. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law & Society Review 7 (4): 719–746. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967.
   Google Scholar
• Nahman, Michal. 2011. “Reverse Traffic: Intersecting Inequalities in Human Egg Donation.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23 (5): 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, Guido. 2002. “Reproductive Tourism as Moral Pluralism in Motion.” Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6): 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.6.337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, Guido. 2005. “Reply: Reproductive Exile Versus Reproductive Tourism.” Human Reproduction 20 (12): 3571–3572. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, Guido, Candice Autin, Wim Decleer, Anne Delbaere, L. Delbeke, Annick Delvigne, Diane De Neubourg, et al. 2009. “Cross-Border Reproductive Care in Belgium.” Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 24 (12): 3108–3118. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitsky, Vardit. 2017. “The Right to Know One’s Genetic Origins and Cross-Border Medically Assisted Reproduction.” Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 6 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0125-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salama, Mahmoud, Vladimir Isachenko, Evgenia Isachenko, Gohar Rahimi, Peter Mallmann, Lynn M. Westphal, Marcia C. Inhorn, and Pasquale Patrizio. 2018. “Cross Border Reproductive Care (CBRC): A Growing Global Phenomenon with Multidimensional Implications (A Systematic and Critical Review).” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 35 (7): 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1181-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenfield, F., J. de Mouzon, G. Pennings, A. P. Ferraretti, A. Nyboe Andersen, G. de Wert, and V. Goossens. 2010. “Cross Border Reproductive Care in Six European Countries.” Human Reproduction 25 (6): 1361–1368. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrow, Richard F. 2010. “The Pluralism Problem in Cross-Border Reproductive Care.” Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 25 (12): 2939–2943. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrow, Richard F. 2011. “Assisted Reproduction on Treacherous Terrain: The Legal Hazards of Cross-Border Reproductive Travel.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23 (5): 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1993. “The Folly of the ‘Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Law and Society 20 (2): 192. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2000. “A Non-Essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Law and Society 27 (2): 296–321. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1410566. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2008. “Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global.” Sydney Law Review 30 (3): 375–411. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/sydney30&i=373.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, Gunther. 1992. “The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism Closed Systems and Open Justice: The Legal Sociology of Niklas Luhmann.” Cardozo Law Review 5 (13): 1443–1462. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/cdozo13&i=1465.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Charis. 2007. “Why We Should, in Fact, Pay for Egg Transactions.” Regenerative Medicine 2 (2): 203–209. https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.2.2.203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tober, Diane, Christine Garibaldi, Alden Blair, and Kimberly Baltzell. 2021. “Alignment between Expectations and Experiences of Egg Providers: What Does It Mean to Be Informed?” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 12: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahed, Hanis. 2015. “Ethical and Legal Issues in Medical Tourism.” IIUM Law Journal 23 (2): 227–245. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v23i2.130.
   Google Scholar
• Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario. 2021. BORN 2020-2021 Annual Report. Ottawa, ON: BORN Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Colen, Shellee. 1995. ““Like a Mother to Them”: Stratified Reproduction and West Indian Childcare Workers and Employers in New York.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, edited by Faye D. Ginsburg and Rayna Rapp, 78. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Health Canada. 2019. Guidance Document: Reimbursement Related to Assisted Human Reproduction Regulations. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2023. “Fertility Treatment 2021: Preliminary Trends and Figures.” Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Accessed March 5, 2024. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/publications/research-and-data/fertility-treatment-2021-preliminary-trends-and-figures.
   Google Scholar
• Motluk, Alison. 2010. “The Human Egg Trade: How Canada’s Fertility Laws Are Failing Donors, Doctors, and Parents.” The Walrus, April 15, 2020. https://thewalrus.ca/the-human-egg-trade/.
   Google Scholar
• Motluk, Alison. 2019. “Long-Awaited Regulations Bring Clarity to Assisted Reproduction Act.” CMAJ News (blog). July 25, 2019. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/191/32/E902. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5791.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Gery, and H. Russell Bernard. 2000. “Data Management and Analysis Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln, 2nd ed., 769–802. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar