379
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
A Special Issue for Preregistration Templates

Preregistration templates as a new addition to the evidence-based toxicology toolbox

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2314303 | Received 24 Jan 2024, Accepted 30 Jan 2024, Published online: 14 Feb 2024

References

  • Allen, C., and D. M. A. Mehler. 2019. “Open Science Challenges, Benefits and Tips in Early Career and beyond.” PLoS Biology 17 (5):1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246
  • Bakker, M., C. L. S. Veldkamp, M. A. L. M. van Assen, E. A. V. Crompvoets, H. H. Ong, B. A. Nosek, C. K. Soderberg, D. Mellor, and J. M. Wicherts. 2020. “Ensuring the Quality and Specificity of Preregistrations.” PLoS Biology 18 (12): e3000937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000937
  • Banks, G. C., S. G. Rogelberg, H. M. Woznyj, R. S. Landis, and D. E. Rupp. 2016. “Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” Journal of Business and Psychology 31 (3): 323–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7
  • Booth, A., A. S. Mitchell, A. Mott, S. James, S. Cockayne, S. Gascoyne, and C. McDaid. 2020. “An Assessment of the Extent to Which the Contents of PROSPERO Records Meet the Systematic Review Protocol Reporting Items in PRISMA-P.” F1000Research 9: 773. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25181.2
  • Booth, A., M. Clarke, G. Dooley, D. Ghersi, D. Moher, M. Petticrew, and L. Stewart. 2012. “The Nuts and Bolts of PROSPERO: An International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.” Systematic Reviews 1 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-2
  • Braithwaite, R. S., K. F. Ban, E. R. Stevens, and E. C. Caniglia. 2021. “Rounding up the Usual Suspects: confirmation Bias in Epidemiological Research.” International Journal of Epidemiology 50 (4): 1053–1057. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab091
  • Center for Open Science. 2024. About COS: Our mission is to increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility of research. https://www.cos.io/about.
  • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. 2011. PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero.
  • Decker, C., and M. Ottaviani. 2023. Preregistration and Credibility of Clinical Trials. Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=xs0G0AEACAAJ.
  • Evans, I. 2011. Testing treatments: better research for better healthcare. Pinter & Martin.
  • Goldacre, B. 2016. “Make Journals Report Clinical Trials Properly.” Nature 530 (7588): 7–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/530007a
  • Heinl, C., A. M. D. Scholman-Végh, D. Mellor, G. Schönfelder, D. Strech, S. Chamuleau, and B. Bert. 2022. “Declaration of Common Standards for the Preregistration of Animal Research-Speeding up the Scientific Progress.” PNAS Nexus 1 (1): pgac016. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac016
  • Jacobucci, R. 2022. “A Critique of Using the Labels Confirmatory and Exploratory in Modern Psychological Research.” Frontiers in Psychology 13: 1020770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1020770
  • Karlan, D., C. K. Soderberg, G. Alter, S. Bowman, R. K. Wilson, E. L. Paluck, B. A. Nosek, et al. 2014. Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines [dataset]. Center For Open Science. https://osf.io/9f6gx/.
  • Kerr, N. L. 1998. “HARKing: hypothesizing after the Results Are Known.” Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc 2 (3): 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
  • Ledgerwood, A. 2018. “The Preregistration Revolution Needs to Distinguish between Predictions and Analyses [Review of the Preregistration Revolution Needs to Distinguish between Predictions and Analyses].” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (45): E10516–E10517. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812592115
  • Lindsley, K., N. Fusco, T. Li, R. Scholten, and L. Hooft. 2022. “Clinical Trial Registration Was Associated with Lower Risk of Bias Compared with Non-Registered Trials among Trials Included in Systematic Reviews.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 145: 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.012
  • Mathur, M. B., and M. P. Fox. 2023. “Toward Open and Reproducible Epidemiology.” American Journal of Epidemiology 192 (4): 658–664. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad007
  • Nosek, B. A., C. R. Ebersole, A. C. DeHaven, and D. T. Mellor. 2018a. “Reply to Ledgerwood: Predictions without Analysis Plans Are Inert [Review of Reply to Ledgerwood: Predictions without Analysis Plans Are Inert].” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (45): E10518. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816418115
  • Nosek, B. A., C. R. Ebersole, A. C. DeHaven, and D. T. Mellor. 2018b. “The Preregistration Revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (11): 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
  • Percie Du Sert, N., A. Ahluwalia, S. Alam, M. T. Avey, M. Baker, W. J. Browne, A. Clark, et al. 2020. “Reporting Animal Research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0.” PLoS Biology 18 (7): e3000411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411
  • Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edition. Simon and Schuster. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=9U1K5LjUOwEC.
  • Scheel, A. M., M. R. M. J. Schijen, and D. Lakens. 2021. “An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature with Registered Reports.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4 (2): 251524592110074. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467
  • Schulz, K. F., D. G. Altman, and D. Moher. 2010. “CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials.” BMC Medicine 8 (1): 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
  • Soderberg, C. K., T. M. Errington, S. R. Schiavone, J. Bottesini, F. S. Thorn, S. Vazire, K. M. Esterling, and B. A. Nosek. 2021. “Initial Evidence of Research Quality of Registered Reports Compared with the Standard Publishing Model.” Nature Human Behaviour 5 (8): 990–997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4
  • Spitzer, L., and S. Mueller. 2023. “Registered Report: Survey on Attitudes and Experiences regarding Preregistration in Psychological Research.” PloS One 18 (3): e0281086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281086
  • Swanson, N., G. Christensen, R. Littman, D. Birke, E. Miguel, E. L. Paluck, and Z. Wang. 2020. “Research Transparency is on the Rise in Economics.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 110: 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201077
  • West, J. D., and C. T. Bergstrom. 2021. “Misinformation in and about Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912444117
  • Whaley, P., S. Wattam, A. M. Scott, and J. Vidler. 2023. “Using Bench Protocol Platforms to Improve Compliance with Systematic Review Guidance Documents and Reporting Checklists: Proof of Concept.” Evidence-Based Toxicology 1 (1): 2259938. https://doi.org/10.1080/2833373X.2023.2259938
  • Wicherts, J. M., C. L. S. Veldkamp, H. E. M. Augusteijn, M. Bakker, R. C. M. van Aert, and M. A. L. M. van Assen. 2016. “Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832
  • Zarin, D. A., K. M. Fain, H. D. Dobbins, T. Tse, and R. J. Williams. 2019. “10-Year Update on Study Results Submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov.” The New England Journal of Medicine 381 (20): 1966–1974. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1907644
  • Zarin, D. A., T. Tse, R. J. Williams, R. M. Califf, and N. C. Ide. 2011. “The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database–Update and Key Issues.” The New England Journal of Medicine 364 (9): 852–860. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1012065

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.