Impact of Educational Activity Formats, Online or In-Person, on the Intention of Medical Specialists to Adopt a Clinical Behaviour: A Comparative Study

References

• CanMEDS. Accreditation of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Activities. 2023; Available from: https://www.royalcollege.ca/ca/en/cpd/accreditation-continuing-professional-development-cpd-activities.html
   Google Scholar
• Konnyu KJ, McCleary N, Presseau J, et al. Behavior change techniques in continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2020;40(4):268–14. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Bruce D, Campbell CM. Practicing physicians’ needs for assessment and feedback as part of professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S54–62. doi: 10.1002/chp.21202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayivi-Vinz G, Bakwa Kanyinga F, Bergeron L, et al. Use of the CPD-REACTION questionnaire to evaluate continuing professional development activities for health professionals: systematic review. JMIR Med Educ. 2022;8(2):e36948. doi: 10.2196/36948
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dela Cruz AM, Alick S, Das R, et al. Same material, different formats: comparing in-person and distance learning in undergraduate medical education. Acad Psychiatry. 2020;44(6):659–663. doi: 10.1007/s40596-020-01333-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ismail MS, Naseralallah LM, Hussain TA, et al. Learning needs assessments in continuing professional development: a scoping review. Med Teach. 2023;45(2):203–211. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2126756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald C, Aleo G, Affonso D, et al. Development of a European Centre of Excellence (Coe) for Research in Continuing Professional Development (UPGRADE). J Cme. 2023;12(1):2160092. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2022.2160092
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moetsana-Poka F, Lehana T, Lebaka M, et al. Developing a continuing professional development programme to improve nursing practice in Lesotho. Afr J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2014;8(Sup2):10–13. doi: 10.12968/ajmw.2014.8.Sup2.10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samuel A, Cervero RM, Durning SJ, et al. Effect of continuing professional development on health professionals’ performance and patient outcomes: a scoping review of knowledge syntheses. Acad Med. 2021;96(6):913–923. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon GT. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on accredited continuing medical education in the United States. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022;42(4):e125–e127. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy D, Edwards G, Bruen C, et al. Are we ever going back? Exploring the views of health professionals on postpandemic continuing professional development modalities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2023;43(3):172–180. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie K. A comparison of the effectiveness of a game informed online learning activity and face to face teaching in increasing knowledge about managing aggression in health settings. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18(5):917–927. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9430-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu F, Lemonde M. A comparison of online versus face-to-face teaching delivery in statistics instruction for undergraduate health science students. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18(5):963–973. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9435-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockey A, Bland A, Stephenson J, et al. Blended learning in health care education: an overview and overarching meta-analysis of systematic reviews. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022;42(4):256–264. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt A, Murray CM, Kennedy K, et al. Effectiveness of distance learning strategies for continuing professional development (CPD) for rural allied health practitioners: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0949-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, et al. The Kirkpatrick model: a useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. J Intellectual & Dev Disability. 2009;34(3):266–274. doi: 10.1080/13668250903093125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlke RM, McConnell MM, Wisener KM, et al. The disconnect between knowing and doing in health professions education and practice. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2020;25(1):227–240. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09886-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin G, Bélanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, et al. Healthcare professionals’ intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci. 2008;3(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb TL, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull. 2006;132(2):249–268. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin G, Conner M. Intention-behavior relationship based on epidemiologic indices: an application to physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2008;22(3):180–182. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.22.3.180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner M, Norman P. Understanding the intention-behavior gap: the role of intention strength. Frontiers In Psychology. 2022;13:13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLOS Med. 2007;4(10):e297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FMSQ. Fédération des médecins spécialistes du Québec:Qui sommes-nous?. 2023; Available from: https://fmsq.org/fr/propos-de-nous/qui-sommes-nous
   Google Scholar
• FMSQ. Le plus important congrès de médecine spécialisée au Québec : Journées de formation interdisciplinaire. 2023 Available from: https://fmsq.org/fr/journees-de-formation-interdisciplinaire
   Google Scholar
• Presseau J, McCleary N, Lorencatto F, et al. Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0951-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Borduas F, Freitas A, et al. Development of a simple 12-item theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development on clinical behavioral intentions. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Freitas A, Turcotte S, et al. Responsiveness of a simple tool for assessing change in behavioral intention after continuing professional development activities. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0176678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courgeau D, Baccaïni B, Baccaini B. Analyse multi-niveaux en sciences sociales. Population (French Edition) (French Edition), 1997;52(4):831–863. doi: 10.2307/1534616
   Google Scholar
• Park T. A comparison of the generalized estimating equation approach with the maximum likelihood approach for repeated measurements. Stat Med. 1993;12(18):1723–1732. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C-W, Chen Y-H. Model selection for generalized estimating equations accommodating dropout missingness. Biometrics. 2012;68(4):1046–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01758.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(4):364–375. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, et al. To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology. 2010;21(4):467–474. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181caeb90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung IW, Bland VR, Castro-Noriega E, et al. Pilot of a training format for clinicians’ continuing professional development: open house with rotating short segments. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022;42(1):e92–e95. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace S, May SA. Assessing and enhancing quality through outcomes-based continuing professional development (CPD): a review of current practice. veterinary record. Vet Rec. 2016;179(20):515–520. doi: 10.1136/vr.103862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero RM, Gaines JK. The impact of CME on Physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015;35(2):131–138. doi: 10.1002/chp.21290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, et al. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e16504. doi: 10.2196/16504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick D. Great ideas revisited. Training & Devel. 1996;50(1):54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rosby LV, Schmidt HG, Tan GJS, et al. Promotion of knowledge transfer and retention in year 2 medical students using an online training exercise. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26(3):1059–1074. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10037-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Freitas A, Thompson-Leduc P, et al. The majority of accredited continuing professional development activities do not target clinical behavior change. Acad Med. 2015;90(2):197–202. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chyung SY, Hutchinson D, Shamsy JA. Evidence‐based survey design: ceiling effects associated with response scales. Perf Improv. 2020;59(6):6–13. doi: 10.1002/pfi.21920
   Google Scholar
• Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, et al. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;115(2):94–99. doi: 10.1159/000312871
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheval M, Balcerac A, Mhanna E, et al. What to keep? What to discard? Virtual or in-person learning after the pandemic: expectations of French neurology residents. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2022;178(10):1066–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2022.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leimar O, Dall SRX, Houston AI, et al. Behavioural specialization and learning in social networks. Proc Biol Sci. 2022;289(1980):20220954. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siah C-JR, et al. Nursing students’ perceptions of online learning and its impact on knowledge level. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;112:105327. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyaw BM, Posadzki P, Paddock S, et al. Effectiveness of digital education on communication skills among medical students: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(8):e12967. doi: 10.2196/12967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar