Molecular Understanding of Meat Quality Through Application of Proteomics

References

• Wilkins, M.R.; Pasquali, C.; Appel, R.D.; Ou, K.; Golaz, O.; Sanchez, J.C.; Yan, J.X.; Gooley, A.A.; Hughes, G.; HumpherySmith, I.; Williams, K.L.; Hochstrasser, D.F. From proteins to proteomes: Large Scale protein identification by two-dimensional electrophoresis and arnino acid analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 61 –65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixen, E. The use of proteomics in meat science. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 138 –149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollung, K.; Timperio, A. M.; Olivan, M.; Kemp, C.; Coto-Montes, A.; Sierra, V.; Zolla, L. Systems biology: A new tool for farm animal science. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2014, 15, 100 –117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollung, K.; Veiseth, E.; Jia, X.; Færgestad, E.M.; Hildrum, K.I. Application of proteomics to understand the molecular mechanisms behind meat quality. Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 97 –104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixen, E.; Danielsen, M.; Hollung, K.; Gianazza, E.; Miller, I. Farm animal proteomics—A review. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 282 –293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro, A.; Zolla, L. Foodomics to investigate meat tenderness. Trend. Anal. Chem. 2013, 52, 47 –53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercauteren, F.G.G.; Arckens, L.; Quirion, R. Applications and current challenges of proteomic approaches, focusing on two-dimensional electrophoresis. Amino Acids 2007, 33, 405 –414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marouga, R.; David, S; Hawkins E. The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 382, 669 –678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebler, D.C. Proteomic approaches to characterize protein modifications: New tools to study the effects of environmental exposures. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110 (Suppl 1), 3 –9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J.R. Mass spectral analysis in proteomics. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biom. 2004, 33, 297 –316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor, C.F.; Paton, N.W.; Garwood, K.L.; Kirby, P.D.; Stead, D.A.; Yin, Z.; Deutsch, E.W.; Selway, L.; Walker, J.; Riba-Garcia, I.; Mohammed, S.; Deery, M.;J.; Howard, J.A.; Dunkley, T.; Aebersold, R.; Kell, D.B.; Lilley, K.S.; Roepstorff, P.; Yates, J.R.; Brass, A.; Brown, A.J.P.; Cash, P.; Gaskell, S.J.; Hubbard, S; Oliver, S.G. A systematic approach to modeling, capturing, and disseminating proteomics experimental data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 247 –254.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S.; Aebersold, R.; Chen, R.; Rush, J.; Goodlett, D. R.; McIntosh, M. W.; Zhang, J; Brentnall, T. A. Mass spectrometry based targeted protein quantification: Methods and applications. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 8, 787 –797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese, S.; Reidegeld, K. A.; Meyer, H. E.; Warscheid, B. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: A new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. Proteomics 2007, 7, 340 –350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drissi, R.; Dubois, M. L.; Boisvert, F. M. Proteomics methods for subcellular proteome analysis. FEBS J. 2013, 280, 5626 –5634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantscheff, M.; Lemeer, S.; Savitski, M. M.; Kuster, B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: Critical review update from 2007 to the present. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012. 404, 939 –965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiess, R.; Wollscheid, B.; Aebersold, R. Targeted proteomic strategy for clinical biomarker discovery. Mol. Oncol. 2009, 3, 33 –44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z. Y.; Parker, R. B.; Herring, V. L.; Laizure, S. C. Conventional liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry based metabolite identification and semi-quantitative estimation approach in the investigation of in vitro dabigatran etexilate metabolism. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 1695 –1704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredi, G.; Raboni, S.; Bendixen, E.; de Almeida, A.M.; Mozzarelli, A. “Muscle to meat” molecular events and technological transformations: The proteomics insight. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 4275 –4289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, K.L.; Miller, M.F.; Hoover, L.C.; Wu, C.K.; Brittin, H.C.; Ramsey, C.B. Effect of beef tenderness on consumer satisfaction with steaks consumed in the home and restaurant. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 74, 91 –97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M.F.; Carr, M.A.; Ramsey, C.B.; Crockett, K.L.; Hoover, L.C. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 3062 –3068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashie, I.N.A.; Sorensen, T.L.; Nielsen, P.M. Effects of papain and a microbial enzyme on meat proteins and beef tenderness. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 2138 –2142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belew, J.B.; Brooks, J.C.; McKenna, D.R.; Savell, J.W. Warner–Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles. Meat Sci. 2003, 64, 507 –512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dransfield, E. Optimization of tenderization, aging and tenderness. Meat Sci. 1994, 36, 105 –121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suman S.P. Application of proteomics to understand meat quality. In Handbook of Meat and Meat Processing, 2nd ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2012; pp 287 –300.
   Google Scholar
• Laville, E.; Sayd, T.; Terlouw, C.; Chambon, C.; Damon, M.; Larzul, C.; Glenisson J.; Chérel, P. Comparison of sarcoplasmic proteomes between two groups of pig muscles selected for shear force of cooked meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 5834 –5841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, X.; Veiseth-Kent, E.; Grove, H.; Kuziora, P.; Aass, L.; Hildrum, K.I.; Hollung, K. Peroxiredoxin-6—A potential protein marker for meat tenderness in bovine longissimus thoracis muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 2391 –2399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feder, M.E.; Hofmann, G. E. Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: Evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1999, 61, 243 –282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morzel, M.; Terlouw, C.; Chambon, C.; Micol, D.; Picard, B. Muscle proteome and meat eating qualities of Longissimus thoracis of “Blonde d’Aquitaine” young bulls: A central role of HSP27 isoforms. Meat Sci. 2008, 78, 297 –304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N.K.; Cho, S.; Lee, S.H.; Park, H.R.; Lee, C.S.; Cho, Y.M.; Choy, Y.H.; Yoon, D.I.; Seok, K.; Park, E.W. Proteins in longissimus muscle of Korean native cattle and their relationship to meat quality. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 1068 –1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, N.; Bonnet, M.; Jurie, C.; Picard, B. Functional analysis of beef tenderness. J. Proteomics 2011, 75, 352 –365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lametsch, R.; Karlsson, A.; Rosenvold, K.; Andersen, H.J.; Roepstorff, P.; Bendixen, E. Postmortem proteome changes of porcine muscle related to tenderness. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6992 –6997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lametsch, R.; Roepstorff, P.; Møller, H.S.; Bendixen, E. Identification of myofibrillar substrates for μ-calpain. Meat Sci. 2004, 68, 515 –521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouley, J.; Chambon, C.; Picard, B. Mapping of bovine skeletal muscle proteins using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2004, 4, 1811 –1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, B.; Berri, C.; Lefaucheur, L.; Molette, C.; Sayd, T.; Terlouw, C. Skeletal muscle proteomics in livestock production. Brief Funct. Genomics 2010, 9, 259 –278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muroya, S.; Ohnishi-kameyama, M; Oe, M.; Nakajima, I.; Chikuni, K. Postmortem changes in bovine troponin T isoforms on two-dimensional electrophoretic gel analyzed using mass spectrometry and Western blotting: The limited fragmentation into basic polypeptides. Meat Sci. 2007, 75, 506 –514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lametsch, R.; Bendixen, E. Proteome analysis applied to meat science: Characterizing post mortem changes in porcine muscle. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4531 –4537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, X.; Ekman, M.; Grove, H.; Færgestad, E. M.; Aass, L.; Hildrum, K. I.; Hollung, K. Proteome changes in bovine longissimus thoracis muscle during the early postmortem storage period. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 2720 –2731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laville, E.; Sayd, T.; Terlouw, C.; Blinet, S.; Pinguet, J.; Fillaut, M.; Glénisson, J.; Chérel, P. Differences in pig muscle proteome according to HAL genotype: Implications for meat quality defects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4913 –4923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• te Pas, M.F.; Jansen, J.; Broekman, K.C.; Reimert, H.; Heuven, H. Postmortem proteome degradation profiles of longissimus muscle in Yorkshire and Duroc pigs and their relationship with pork quality traits. Meat Sci. 2009, 83, 744 –751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polati, R.; Menini, M.; Robotti, E.; Millioni, R.; Marengo, E.; Novelli, E.; Balzan, S.; Cecconi, D. Proteomic changes involved in tenderization of bovine longissimus dorsi muscle during prolonged ageing. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2052 –2069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnadóttir, S.G.; Hollung, K.; Høy, M.; Bendixen, E.; Codrea, M.C.; Veiseth-Kent, E. Changes in protein abundance between tender and tough meat from bovine Longissimus thoracis muscle assessed by isobaric Tag for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) and 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 2035 –2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro, A.; Rinalducci, S.; Marrocco, C.; Zolla, V.; Napolitano, F.; Zolla, L. Love me tender: An Omics window on the bovine meat tenderness network. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 4360 –4380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro, A.; Marrocco, C.; Rinalducci, S.; Mirasole, C.; Failla, S.; Zolla, L. Chianina beef tenderness investigated through integrated omics. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 4381 –4398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata, I.; Zerby, H. N.; Wick, M. Functional proteomic analysis predicts beef tenderness and the tenderness differential. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4956 –4963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro, A.; Zolla, L. Meat science: From proteomics to integrated omics towards system biology. J. Proteomics 2013, 78, 558 –577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallien, S.; Duriez, E.; Domon, B. Selected reaction monitoring applied to proteomics. J. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 46, 298 –312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquette, J. F.; Cassar-Malek, I.; Bernard-Capel, C.; Picard, B. Functional genomics and new markers for beef production—Minireview. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2009, 27, 273 –279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, N.; Meunier, B.; Jurie, C.; Cassar-Malek, I.; Hocquette, J. F.; Leveziel, H.; Picard, B. Validation of a Dot-Blot quantitative technique for large scale analysis of beef tenderness biomarkers. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2009. 60, 91 –97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgiano, L.; D’Alessandro, A.; Egidi, M. G.; Crisa, A.; Prosperini, G.; Timperio, A. M.; Valentini, A.; Zolla, L. Proteomics and transcriptomics investigation on longissimus muscles in Large White and Casertana pig breeds. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6450 –6466.
   Google Scholar
• Pierzchala, M.; Hoekman, A.J.W.; Urbanski, P.; Kruijt, L.; Kristensen, L.; Young, J.F.; Oksbjerg, N.; Goluch, D.; te Pas, M.F.W. Validation of biomarkers for loin meat quality (M. longissimus) of pigs. J. Anim. Breed Genet. 2014, 131, 258 –270. doi:10.1111/jbg.12081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, R. A.; Hunt, M. Current research in meat color. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 100 –121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suman, S. P.; Rentfrow, G.; Nair, M. N.; Joseph, P. 2013 Early Career Achievement Award—Proteomics of muscle-and species-specificity in meat color stability. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 875 –882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z.; Li, J.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, M.; Jiang, F.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhong, M.; Kaye, J. B.; Du, J.; Shen, B. A synthetic transmembrane segment derived from TRPV4 channel self-assembles into potassium-like channels to regulate vascular smooth muscle cell membrane potential. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 3809 –3818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suman, S.P.; Faustman, C.; Stamer, S.L.; Liebler, D.C. Redox instability induced by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in porcine and bovine myoglobins at pH 5.6 and 4 C. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 3402 –3408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suman, S.P.; Faustman, C.; Stamer, S.L.; Liebler, D.C. Proteomics of lipid oxidation-induced oxidation of porcine and bovine oxymyoglobins. Proteomics 2007, 7, 628 –640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayd, T.; Morzel, M.; Chambon, C.; Franck, M.; Figwer, P.; Larzul, C.; Le Roy, P.; Monin, G.; Cherel, P.; Laville, E. Proteome analysis of the sarcoplasmic fraction of pig semimembranosus muscle: Implications on meat color development. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2732 –2737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, P.; Suman, S.P.; Rentfrow, G.; Li, S.; Beach, C.M. Proteomics of muscle-specific beef color stability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3196 –3203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X. G. Influencing factors on colour stability of lamb muscle and proteomics analysis related to colour. Doctoral dissertation, Doctor of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q.; Sun, D.W. Factors affecting the water holding capacity of red meat products: A review of recent research advances. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2008, 48, 137 –159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melody, J. L.; Lonergan, S. M.; Rowe, L. J.; Huiatt, T. W.; Mayes, M. S.; Huff-Lonergan, E. Early postmortem biochemical factors influence tenderness and water-holding capacity of three porcine muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 1195 –1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff-Lonergan, E.; Lonergan, S.M. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 194 –204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, I. Proteomics approach in meat science: A model study for Hunter L* value and drip loss. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2004, 13, 208 –214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Wiel, D.F.; Zhang, W.L. Identification of pork quality parameters by proteomics. Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 46 –54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phongpa-Ngan, P.; Grider, A.; Mulligan, J.H.; Aggrey, S.E.; Wicker, L. Proteomic analysis and differential expression in protein extracted from chicken with a varying growth rate and water-holding capacity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 13181 –13187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Luca, A.; Mullen, A.M.; Elia, G.; Davey, G.; Hamill, R.M. Centrifugal drip is an accessible source for protein indicators of pork ageing and water-holding capacity. Meat Sci. 2011, 88, 261 –270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Luca, A.; Elia, G.; Hamill, R.; Mullen, A.M. 2D DIGE proteomic analysis of early post mortem muscle exudate highlights the importance of the stress response for improved water-holding capacity of fresh pork meat. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1528 –1544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler, T.L.; Gerrard, D.E. Mechanisms controlling pork quality development: The biochemistry controlling postmortem energy metabolism. Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 7 –16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laville, E.; Sayd, T.; Morzel, M.; Blinet, S.; Chambon, C.; Lepetit, J.; Renand, G.; Hocquette, J.F. Proteome changes during meat aging in tough and tender beef suggest the importance of apoptosis and protein solubility for beef aging and tenderization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10755 –10764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro, A.; Marrocco, C.; Zolla, V.; D’Andrea, M.; Zolla, L. Meat quality of the longissimus lumborum muscle of Casertana and Large White pigs: Metabolomics and proteomics intertwined. J. Proteomics 2011, 75:610 –627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredi, G.; Sentandreu, M.A.; Mozzarelli, A.; Fadda, S.; Hollung, K.; de Almeida, A.M. Muscle and meat: New horizons and applications for proteomics on a farm to fork perspective. J. Proteomics 2013, 88, 58 –82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, C.; Cassar-Malek, I.; Le Cunff, M.; Dubroeucq, H.; Renand, G.; Hocquette, J. F. New indicators of beef sensory quality revealed by expression of specific genes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 5229 –5237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, N.; Jurie, C.; Cassar-Malek, I.; Hocquette, J.F.; Renand, G.; Picard, B. Variations in the abundance of 24 protein biomarkers of beef tenderness according to muscle and animal type. Animal 2011, 5, 885 –894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar