Potential Alternatives of Animal Proteins for Sustainability in the Food Sector

References

• Bhat, Z. F.; Kumar, S.; Bhat, H. F. In vitro Meat: A Future Animal-Free Harvest. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2017, 57, 782–789. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2014.924899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.; Mehta, N.; Malav, O. P.; Verma, A. K.; Umraw, P., and Kanth, M. K. The Structure of Meat Analogs. In Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry; Melton, L., Shahidi, F., Varelis, P. Eds.; Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Inc, 2019; pp 105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, C.; Szejda, K.; Parekh, N.; Deshpande, V.; Tse, B. A Survey of Consumer Perceptions of Plant-Based and Clean Meat in the USA, India, and China. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 3. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00011.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.; Chatli, M. K.; Mehta, N.; Singh, P.; Malav, O. P.; Verma, A. K. Meat Analogues: Health Promising Sustainable Meat Substitutes. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 923–932. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2014.939739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, N.; Di Silvio, L.; Dunsford, I.; Ellis, M.; Glencross, A.; Sexton, A. Bringing Cultured Meat to Market: Technical, Socio-Political, and Regulatory Challenges in Cellular Agriculture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 155–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, T. K.; Shin, D.-M.; Choi, J.; Do, J. T.; Han, S. G. Current Issues and Technical Advances in Cultured Meat Production: A Review. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2021, 41, 355–372. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2021.e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodiou, V.; Moutsatsou, P.; Post, M. J. Microcarriers for Upscaling Cultured Meat Production. Front Nutr. 2020, 7, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyande, A. K.; Chew, K. W.; Rambabu, K.; Tao, Y.; Chu, D. T.; Show, P. L. Microalgae: A Potential Alternative to Health Supplementation for Humans. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2019, 8, 16–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.fshw.2019.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Gençdağ, E.; Görgüç, A.; Yılmaz, F. M. Recent Advances in the Recovery Techniques of Plant-Based Proteins from Agro-Industrial By-Products. Food Rev. Int. 2021, 37, 447–468. DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2019.1709203.
   Google Scholar
• Sha, L.; Xiong, Y. L. Plant Protein-Based Alternatives of Reconstructed Meat: Science, Technology, and Challenges. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 102, 51–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, S. “Friend” Or“fiend”: In vitro Lab Meat and How Canada Might Regulate Its Production and Sale. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Arshad, M. S.; Javed, M.; Sohaib, M.; Saeed, F.; Imran, A.; Amjad, Z. Tissue Engineering Approaches to Develop Cultured Meat from Cells: A Mini Review. Cogent Food Agric. 2017, 3, 1320814. DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2017.1320814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandyal, M.; Malav, O. P.; Chatli, M. K. 3D Printing of Meat : A New Frontier of Food from Download to Delicious : A Review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2021, 10, 2095–2111.
   Google Scholar
• Gahukar, R. T. Edible Insects Collected from Forests for Family Livelihood and Wellness of Rural Communities: A Review. Glob. Food Sec. 2020, 25, 100348. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100348.
   Google Scholar
• van Vliet, S.; Bain, J. R.; Muehlbauer, M. J.; Provenza, F. D.; Kronberg, S. L.; Pieper, C. F.; Huffman, K. M. A Metabolomics Comparison of Plant-Based Meat and Grass-Fed Meat Indicates Large Nutritional Differences Despite Comparable Nutrition Facts Panels. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13828. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93100-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayieko, M. A.; Ogola, H. J.; Ayieko, I. A. Introducing Rearing Crickets (Gryllids) at Household Levels: Adoption, Processing and Nutritional Values. J. Insects Food Feed 2016, 2, 203–211. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2015.0080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C.; Lange, C.; Marette, S. Importance of Additional Information, as a Complement to Information Coming from Packaging, to Promote Meat Substitutes: A Case Study on a Sausage Based on Vegetable Proteins. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 87, 104058. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Luciano, C. A.; de Aguiar, L. K.; Vriesekoop, F.; Urbano, B. Consumers’ Willingness to Purchase Three Alternatives to Meat Proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 78, 103732. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, S.; Mehta, N.; Verma, A. K.; Chemmalar, S.; Sazili, A. Q. In-Vitro Meat: A Promising Solution for Sustainability of Meat Sector. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 693–724. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2021.e85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M.; Sütterlin, B.; Hartmann, C. Perceived Naturalness and Evoked Disgust Influence Acceptance of Cultured Meat. Meat Sci. 2018, 139, 213–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, C.; Barnett, J. Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018–2020). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5201. DOI: 10.3390/app10155201.
   Google Scholar
• Mohorčich, J.; Reese, J. Cell-Cultured Meat: Lessons from GMO Adoption and Resistance. Appetite. 2019, 143, 104408. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, K. D.; Rubio, N. R.; Stout, A. J.; Yuen, J. S. K.; Kaplan, D. L. Prospects and Challenges for Cell-Cultured Fat as a Novel Food Ingredient. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 98, 53–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deroy, O.; Reade, B.; Spence, C. The Insectivore’s Dilemma, and How to Take the West Out of It. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 44, 44–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adámková, A.; Adámek, M.; Mlček, J.; Borkovcová, M.; Bednávrová, M.; Kou\vrimská, L.; Skácel, J.; Vitová, E. Welfare of the Mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor) Breeding with Regard to Nutrition Value and Food Safety. Potravin. Slovak J. Food Sci. 2017, 11, 460–465.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H. S. G.; House, J. Consumer Acceptance of Insects as Food: Integrating Psychological and Socio-Cultural Perspectives. In Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems; Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., Roos, N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 375–386.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V. B. What Governs Selection and Acceptance of Edible Insect Species? In Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems; Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., Roos, N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 331–351.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, A. Insects as Food in Laos and Thailand: A Case of “Westernisation”? Asian J. Soc. Sci. 2019, 47, 204–223. DOI: 10.1163/15685314-04702003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittek, P.; Karbstein, H. P.; Emin, M. A. Blending Proteins in High Moisture Extrusion to Design Meat Analogues: Rheological Properties, Morphology Development and Product Properties. Foods 2021, 10, 1509. DOI: 10.3390/foods10071509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat Doost, A.; Nikbakht Nasrabadi, M.; Wu, J.; A’-Yun, Q.; Van der Meeren, P. Maillard Conjugation as an Approach to Improve Whey Proteins Functionality: A Review of Conventional and Novel Preparation Techniques. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samard, S.; Gu, B.; Ryu, G. Effects of Extrusion Types, Screw Speed and Addition of Wheat Gluten on Physicochemical Characteristics and Cooking Stability of Meat Analogues. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4922–4931. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers, B. L.; Boom, R. M.; van der Goot, A. J. Structuring Processes for Meat Analogues. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 81, 25–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M.; Geerdink, P.; Brier, P.; Van Den Eijnden, P.; Henket, J. T. M. M.; Langelaan, M. L. P.; Stroeks, N.; Van Deventer, H. C.; Martin, A. H. Reprint of “Food-Grade Electrospinning of Proteins. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2014, 24, 138–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2014.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krintiras, G. Intensified Protein Structuring for More Sustainable Foods: Development of the Up-Scaled Couette Cell for the Production of Meat Replacers; Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kurpiewska, K.; Biela, A.; Loch, J. I.; Lipowska, J.; Siuda, M.; Lewiński, K. Towards Understanding the Effect of High Pressure on Food Protein Allergenicity: β-Lactoglobulin Structural Studies. Food Chem. 2019, 270, 315–321. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulla, M. Z.; Subramanian, P.; Dar, B. N. Functionalization of Legume Proteins Using High Pressure Processing: Effect on Technofunctional Properties and Digestibility of Legume Proteins. LWT. 2022, 158, 113106. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langyan, S.; Yadava, P.; Khan, F. N.; Dar, Z. A.; Singh, R.; Kumar, A. Sustaining Protein Nutrition Through Plant-Based Foods. Front Nutr. 2022, 8, 1237. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.772573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukid, F.; Rosell, C. M., and Castellari, M. Pea protein ingredients: A mainstream ingredient to (re) formulate innovative foods and beverages. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 729–742. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weele, C.; Tramper, J. Cultured Meat: Every Village Its Own Factory? Trends Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 294–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraeye, I.; Kratka, M.; Vandenburgh, H.; Thorrez, L. Sensorial and Nutritional Aspects of Cultured Meat in Comparison to Traditional Meat: Much to Be Inferred. Front Nutr. 2020, 7, 35. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Rochow, V. B.; Gahukar, R. T.; Ghosh, S., and Jung, C. Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method. Foods. 2021, 10, 1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Han, S.; Liu, J. Lead in the Soil–mulberry (Morus Alba L.)–silkworm (Bombyx Mori) Food Chain: Translocation and Detoxification. Chemosphere. 2015, 128, 171–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.01.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bux, F., and Chisti, Y. Algae Biotechnology: Products and Processes, 1st ed.; Switzerland: Springer Cham. 2016. ISBN: 978-3-319-12333-2.
   Google Scholar
• Testai, E.; Scardala, S.; Vichi, S.; Buratti, F. M.; Funari, E. Risk to Human Health Associated with the Environmental Occurrence of Cyanobacterial Neurotoxic Alkaloids Anatoxins and Saxitoxins. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2016, 46, 385–419. DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2015.1137865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévesque, B.; Gervais, M. C.; Chevalier, P.; Gauvin, D.; Anassour-Laouan-Sidi, E.; Gingras, S.; Fortin, N.; Brisson, G.; Greer, C.; Bird, D. Exposure to Cyanobacteria: Acute Health Effects Associated with Endotoxins. Public Health. 2016, 134, 98–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.11.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubb, C.; Seba, T. Rethinking Food and Agriculture 2020-2030: The Second Domestication of Plants and Animals, the Disruption of the Cow, and the Collapse of Industrial Livestock Farming. Ind. Biotechnol. 2021, 17, 57–72. DOI: 10.1089/ind.2021.29240.ctu.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Rochow, V. B. Insects (And Other Non-Crustacean Arthropods) as Human Food. In Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability; Ferranti,P., Berry, E. M., Jock, R., Ed.; Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2019; pp 416–421. eBook ISBN: 9780128126882; 9780128126875.
   Google Scholar
• Van Huis, A.; Van Itterbeeck, J.; Klunder, H.; Mertens, E.; Halloran, A.; Muir, G., and Vantomme, P. Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security; Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2013. ISBN: 978-9-25-107596-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kouřimská, L.; Adámková, A. Nutritional and Sensory Quality of Edible Insects. NFS J. 2016, 4, 22–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Varelas, V.; Langton, M. Forest Biomass Waste as a Potential Innovative Source for Rearing Edible Insects for Food and Feed – a Review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 41, 193–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H.; Reay, D. S.; Higgins, P. Potential of Meat Substitutes for Climate Change Mitigation and Improved Human Health in High-Income Markets. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2, 16. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00016.
   Google Scholar
• Baker Emily Plant-Based Meat Market Secures Over $1 Billion Revenue Over COVID-19 Pandemic, Report Claims.
   Google Scholar
• Caporgno, M. P.; Böcker, L.; Müssner, C.; Stirnemann, E.; Haberkorn, I.; Adelmann, H.; Handschin, S.; Windhab, E. J.; Mathys, A. Extruded Meat Analogues Based on Yellow, Heterotrophically Cultivated Auxenochlorella Protothecoides Microalgae. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 59, 102275. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, J.; Wei, Y.; Teng, X.; Zhao, S.; Hua, J. Immortalization of Canine Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Seminiferous Tubule Transplantation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 119, 3663–3670. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.26574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker, G. A.; Fischer, A. R. H.; Tobi, H.; van Trijp, H. C. M. Explicit and Implicit Attitude Toward an Emerging Food Technology: The Case of Cultured Meat. Appetite. 2017, 108, 245–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, C.; Siegrist, M. Consumer Perception and Behaviour Regarding Sustainable Protein Consumption: A Systematic Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 61, 11–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umaraw, P., and Verma, A. K. Consumer Perception Changes Meat Products. Fleischwirtschaft Int. J. Meat Prod. Meat Process. 1/2016. 2016, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlett, C. Who’s Who in the Insect Protein Industry?
   Google Scholar
• Oppert, B.; Perkin, L. C.; Lorenzen, M.; Dossey, A. T. Transcriptome Analysis of Life Stages of the House Cricket, Acheta Domesticus, to Improve Insect Crop Production. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3471. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59087-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren Åand Jansson, A.; Low, M. Using Current Systems to Inform Rearing Facility Design in the Insect-As-Food Industry. J. Insects as Food Feed. 2018, 4, 167–170. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2017.0076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Rochow, V. B.; Jung, C. Insects Used as Food and Feed: Isn’t That What We All Need? Foods. 2020, 9, 1003. DOI: 10.3390/foods9081003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishyna, M.; Chen, J.; Benjamin, O. Sensory Attributes of Edible Insects and Insect-Based Foods – Future Outlooks for Enhancing Consumer Appeal. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 141–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, D. No-Kill, Lab-Grown Meat to Go on Sale for First Time. 2020, DOI:10.15585/mmwr.mm6926a4.
   Google Scholar
• Turck, D.; Bresson, J.-L.-J.; Burlingame, B.; Dean, T.; Fairweather‐tait, S.; Heinonen, M.; Hirsch‐ernst, K. I.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.; Naska, A.; et al. Guidance on the Preparation and Presentation of an Application for Authorisation of a Novel Food in the Context of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2016, 14, e04594.
   Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A.; Marimuthu, S.; Meijer, N. Regulations on Insects as Food and Feed: A Global Comparison. J. Insects as Food Feed. 2021, 7, 849–856. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2020.0066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, R. W.; Adams, L. Electric Shock Causes Physiological Stress Responses in Shore Crabs, Consistent with Prediction of Pain. Biol. Lett. 2015, 11, 20150800. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, S. A. Is It Pain if It Does Not Hurt? on the Unlikelihood of Insect Pain. Can. Entomol. 2019, 151, 685–695. DOI: 10.4039/tce.2019.49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collett, M.; Collett, T. S. How Does the Insect Central Complex Use Mushroom Body Output for Steering? Curr Biol. 2018, 28, R733–R734. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L.; Regenstein, J. M.; Teng, F.; Li, Y. Tofu Products: A Review of Their Raw Materials, Processing Conditions, and Packaging. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 3683–3714. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahnan-Winarno, A. D.; Cordeiro, L.; Winarno, F. G.; Gibbons, J.; Xiao, H. Tempeh: A Semicentennial Review on Its Health Benefits, Fermentation, Safety, Processing, Sustainability, and Affordability. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 1717–1767. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J.; Evans, N. M.; Liu, H.; Shao, S. A Review of Research on Plant‐based Meat Alternatives: Driving Forces, History, Manufacturing, and Consumer Attitudes. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 2639–2656. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar, D.; El-Chaghaby, G. Nutritional Quality, Amino Acid Profiles, Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Scores and Antioxidant Properties of Fried Tofu and Seitan. Food Environ. Saf. J. 2019, 18, 176–190.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, M.; Trivedi, N.; Enamala, M. K.; Kuppam, C.; Parikh, P.; Nikolova, M. P.; Chavali, M. Plant-Based Meat Analogue (PBMA) as a Sustainable Food: A Concise Review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 2499–2526. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-021-03810-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry, M.; George, A.; Thomas, S. Alternatives to Meat for Halting the Stable to Table Continuum – an Update. Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2020, 27, 324–334. DOI: 10.1080/25765299.2020.1807084.
   Google Scholar
• Malav, O. P.; Talukder, S.; Gokulakrishnan, P.; Chand, S. Meat Analog: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 1241–1245. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2012.689381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ButlerFoodsLLC Soy curls. https://www.butlerfoods.com/soycurls.html (accessed Apr 11, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Maung, T. T.; Gu, B. Y.; Kim, M. H.; Ryu, G. H. Fermentation of Texturized Vegetable Proteins Extruded at Different Moisture Contents: Effect on Physicochemical, Structural, and Microbial Properties. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 897–907. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-020-00737-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnigan, T. J. A.; Wall, B. T.; Wilde, P. J.; Stephens, F. B.; Taylor, S. L.; Freedman, M. R. Mycoprotein: The Future of Nutritious Nonmeat Protein, a Symposium Review. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2019, 3. DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzz021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, J. A.; Johnson, R. I.; Finnigan, T. J. A.; Avery, S. V., and Dyer, P. S. The Biotechnology of Quorn Mycoprotein: Past, Present and Future Challenges. In Grand Challenges in Fungal Biotechnology; Nevalainen, H., Ed.; Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020; pp 59–79. ISBN: 978-3-030-29540-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ritala, A.; Häkkinen, S. T.; Toivari, M.; Wiebe, M. G. Single Cell Protein—state-Of-The-Art, Industrial Landscape and Patents 2001–2016. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2009. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratosin, B. C.; Darjan, S.; Vodnar, D. C. Single Cell Protein: A Potential Substitute in Human and Animal Nutrition. Sustainability. 2021, 13, 9284. DOI: 10.3390/su13169284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrou, N. E. Protein Purification: An Overview. In Protein Downstream Processing. Design, Development and Application of High and Low-Resolution Methods; Labrou, N. E., Ed.; New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2014; pp 3–10, ISBN: 978-1-62703-976-5.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Muñoz, R.; Ruby-Figueroa, R. Membrane Technology for the Recovery of High-Added Value Compounds from Meat Processing Coproducts. In Sustainable Meat Production and Processing; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Academic Press: London, United Kingdom, 2019; pp 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Agyei, D.; Ongkudon, C. M.; Wei, C. Y.; Chan, A. S.; Danquah, M. K. Bioprocess Challenges to the Isolation and Purification of Bioactive Peptides. Food Bioprod. Process. 2016, 98, 244–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielser, J. M.; Wolf, M.; Souquet, J.; Broly, H.; Morbidelli, M. Perfusion Mammalian Cell Culture for Recombinant Protein Manufacturing – a Critical Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 1328–1340. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi Gomari, M.; Saraygord-Afshari, N.; Farsimadan, M.; Rostami, N.; Aghamiri, S.; Farajollahi, M. M. Opportunities and Challenges of the Tag-Assisted Protein Purification Techniques: Applications in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 45, 107653. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar