An Analysis of the Effect of Student Prepared Notecards on Exam Performance

References

• Anderson, L. W., and D. R. Krathwohl. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, F., and K. Pransky. 2014. Memory at Work in the Classroom: Strategies to Help Underachieving Students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. C., H. L. Roediger, and M. A. McDaniel. 2014. Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., and N. Crouch. 2011. “Student Experience of Making and Using Cheat Sheets in Mathematical Exams.” Mathematics: Traditions and [New] Practices 25:134–41.
   Google Scholar
• Callender, A. A., and M. A. McDaniel. 2009. “The Limited Benefits of Rereading Educational Texts.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 34 (1):30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, L. M. 2003. “College Students' Choices of Study Strategies.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 96 (1):54–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, N., and P. Kennedy. 2002. “Are Multiple-Choice Exams Easier for Economics Students? a Comparison of Multiple-Choice and ‘Equivalent’ Constructed-Response Exam Questions.” Southern Economic Journal 68 (4):957–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B. G. 1993. Tools for Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, L. K., and J. J. Bauer. 2008. “Do Students Learn Course Material during Crib Sheet Construction?” Teaching of Psychology 35 (2):117–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, L. R., and M. D. Miller. 2005. “Authorized Crib Cards Do Not Improve Exam Performance.” Teaching of Psychology 32 (4):230–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbe, B. 2007. “Reducing Test Anxiety While Increasing Learning: The Cheat Sheet.” College Teaching 55 (3):96–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gharib, A., W. Phillips, and N. Mathew. 2012. “Cheat Sheet or Open-Book? A Comparison of the Effects of Exam Types on Performance, Retention, and Anxiety.” Psychology Research 2 (8):469–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hamouda, S., and C. A. Shaffer. 2016. “Crib Sheets and Exam Performance in a Data Structures Course.” Computer Science Education 26 (1):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijne-Penninga, M., J. Kuks, W. H. Hofman, and J. Cohen-Schotanus. 2008. “Influence of Open- and Closed-Book Tests on Medical Students’ Learning Approaches.” Medical Education 42 (10):967–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindman, D. C. 1980. “Crib Notes in the Classroom: cheaters Never Win.” Teaching of Psychology 7 (3):166–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, I., R. Bennett, and A. Berger. 2000. “Effects of Response Format on Difficulty of SAT-Mathematics Items: It's Not the Strategy.” Journal of Educational Measurement 37 (1):39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., A. C. Butler, and H. L. Roediger, III. 2009. “Metacognitive Strategies in Student Learning: Do Students Practise Retrieval When They Study on Their Own?” Memory 17 (4):471–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larwin, K. H., J. Gorman, and D. A. Larwin. 2013. “Assessing the Impact of Testing Aids on Post-Secondary Student Performance: A Meta-Analytic Investigation.” Educational Psychology Review 25 (3):429–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larwin, K. H., D. A. Larwin, and J. Gorman. 2012. “Mnemonic Aids during Testing: worthless Frivolity or Effective Tool in Statistics Education?” Journal of Instructional Pedagogies 8:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Natalie E, Caitlin Mills, Sidney D'Mello, and Evan F. Risko. 2016. “On the Influence of Re-Reading on Mind Wandering.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006) 69 (12):2338–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., S. Van Etten, L. Yokoi, G. Freebern, and P. Van Meter. 1998. “The Metacognition of College Studentship: A Grounded Theory Approach.” In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 347–66. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Siegfried, J., and P. Kennedy. 1995. “Does Pedagogy Vary with Class Size in Introductory Economics?” The American Economic Review 85 (2):347–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K. 1987. “The Crib Card Examination System.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 12 (1):56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Van Etten, S., G. Freebern, and M. Pressley. 1997. “College Students’ Beliefs about Exam Preparation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 22 (2):192–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visco, D., S. Swaminathan, L. Zagummy, and H. Anthony. 2007. Interpreting student-constructed study guides. ASSE annual meeting and exposition proceedings (pp. 1–10), Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Wachsman, Y. 2002. “Should Cheat Sheets Be Used as Study Aids in Economics Tests?” Economics Bulletin 1:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, H., and D. Thissen. 1993. “Combining Multiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Test Scores: Toward a Marxist Theory of Test Construction.” Applied Measurement in Education 6 (2):103–18.
   Google Scholar
• Walstad, William B. 1998. “Multiple Choice Tests for the Economics Course.” In Teaching Undergraduate Economics: A Handbook for Instructors, edited by William B. Walstad and Phillip Saunders, 287–304. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Walstad, W., and W. Becker. 1994. “Achievement Differences on Multiple-Choice and Essay Tests in Economics.” The American Economic Review 84 (2):193–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. 1996. “Does “Cheating” Help? The Effect of Using Authorized Crib Notes during Examinations.” College Student Journal 30:489–93.
   Google Scholar
• Wozny, N., C. Balser, and D. Ives. 2018. “Low-Cost Randomized Controlled Trials in Education.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 108:307–11.
   Google Scholar