Equivalent but not the Same: Teaching and Learning in Full Semester and Condensed Summer Courses

References

• Allen, J. D. 2005. “Grades as Valid Measures of Academic Achievement of Classroom Learning.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 78 (5):218–23. doi: 10.3200/TCHS.78.5.218-223.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasi, J. S. 2007. “Full-Semester and Abbreviated Summer Courses: An Evaluation of Student Performance.” Teaching of Psychology 34 (1):19–22. doi: 10.1177/009862830703400103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A. M., and L. Gustafson. 2006. “Impact of Course Length on Student Learning.” Journal of Economics and Finance Education 5 (1):26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bahrick, H. P., L. E. Bahrick, A. S. Bahrick, and P. E. Bahrick. 1993. “Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect.” Psychological Science 4 (5):316–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00571.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budé, L., T. Imbos, M. W. van de Wiel, and M. P. Berger. 2011. “The Effect of Distributed Practice on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Statistics.” Higher Education 62 (1):69–79. doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9366-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, C. A., and R. A. Bartsch. 2017. “Relationship Between Course Length and Graduate Student Outcome Measures.” Teaching of Psychology 44 (4):349–52. doi: 10.1177/0098628317727912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., E. Vul, D. Rohrer, J. T. Wixted, and H. Pashler. 2008. “Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention.” Psychological Science 19 (11):1095–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deichert, N. T., S. J. Maxwell, and J. Klotz. 2016. “Retention of Information Taught in Introductory Psychology Courses Across Different Accelerated Course Formats.” Teaching of Psychology 43 (1):4–9. doi: 10.1177/0098628315619725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faught, B. E., M. Law, and M. Zahradnik. 2016. How Much Do Students Remember Over Time? Longitudinal Knowledge Retention in Traditional Versus Accelerated Learning Environments. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhaus, C. R., and P. L. Fox. 2004. “Effectiveness of an Ethics Course Delivered in Traditional and Non-Traditional Formats.” Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):389–400. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0035-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, J. J., D. M. Harrison, and E. Honig. 2015. “Compressed-Format Compared to Regular-Format in a First-Year University Physics Course.” American Journal of Physics 83 (3):272–7. doi: 10.1119/1.4905171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, M., and K. Berry. 2016. “An Investigation into Graduate Student Preference for Compressed Courses.” Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 20 (2):23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T. 2002. “Summative Assessment in Higher Education: Practices in Disarray.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (3):275–86. doi: 10.1080/03075070220000662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., and R. A. Bjork. 2008. “Learning Concepts and Categories: is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?” Psychological Science 19 (6):585–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, K. S., K. W. Dickson, J. A. Lessiter, and J. S. Vassar. 2016. “Student Preference Rates for Predominantly Online, Compressed, or Traditionally Taught University Courses.” Innovative Higher Education 41 (3):255–67. doi: 10.1007/s10755-015-9349-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucsera, J. V., and D. M. Zimmaro. 2010. “Comparing the Effectiveness of Intensive and Traditional Courses.” College Teaching 58 (2):62–8. doi: 10.1080/87567550903583769.
   Google Scholar
• Lutes, L., and R. Davies. 2013. “Comparing the Rigor of Compressed Format Courses to Their Regular Semester Counterparts.” Innovative Higher Education 38 (1):19–29. doi: 10.1007/s10755-012-9226-z.
   Google Scholar
• Mims, S. K. 1983. “The Impact of Time on Art Learning: Intensive vs. Concurrent Scheduling in Higher Education.” Studies in Art Education 24 (2):118–25. doi: 10.2307/1319567.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, A. S., B. C. Murphy, L. S. Curl, and K. A. Broussard. 2015. “The Effect of Immersion Scheduling on Academic Performance and Students’ Ratings of Instructors.” Teaching of Psychology 42 (1):26–33. doi: 10.1177/0098628314562675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D., and K. Taylor. 2006. “The Effects of Overlearning and Distributed Practice on the Retention of Mathematics Knowledge.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 (9):1209–24. doi: 10.1002/acp.1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D., and K. Taylor. 2007. “The Shuffling of Mathematics Problems Improves Learning.” Instructional Science 35 (6):481–98. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon, M. 2004. “Short-and Long-Term Differences in Instructional Effectiveness Between Intensive and Semester-Length Courses.” Teachers College Record 106:852–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, R. 2011. “The Time Factor in EFL Classroom Practice.” Language Learning 61 (1):117–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00591.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, C. Q., and Durdella, N. R. 2009. “Success Rates for Students Taking Compressed and Regular Length Developmental Courses in the Community College.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice 34 (1–2):39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Simunich, B. 2016. “Comparison of Motivation and Learning Outcome Achievement in Shortened, Online Summer Courses Versus Their Full-Term Counterparts.” Summer Academe 10:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2):237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Scyoc, L., and J. Gleason. 1993. “Traditional or Intensive Course Lengths? A Comparison of Outcomes in Economics Learning.” Journal of Economics Education 24 (1):15–22. doi: 10.2307/1183319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whillier, S., and R. P. Lystad. 2013. “Intensive Mode Delivery of a Neuroanatomy Unit: Lower Final Grades but Higher Student Satisfaction.” Anatomical Sciences Education 6 (5):286–93. doi: 10.1002/ase.1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar