Engaging Faculty in Student Success: The Promise of Active Learning in STEM Faculty in Professional Development

References

• Eagan, K. 2016. "Becoming More Student-Centered? An Examination of Faculty Teaching Practices across STEM and Non-STEM Disciplines between 2004 and 2014." Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Higher Education Research Institute, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Advancement via Individual Determination (AVID) n.d. “Making the Note-Taking Process More Accessible: What Educators Can Do.” Retrieved from https://www.avid.org/cms/lib/CA02000374/Centricity/Domain/35/Making%20the%20Note-Taking%20Process%20More%20Accessible.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Advancement via Individual Determination (AVID) 2018. “Critical Reading Lesson: Instructional Model for AVID Teachers with ELL Embedded Strategies.” Retrieved from https://www.avid.org/cms/lib/CA02000374/Centricity/Domain/1061/Sept18-ELL-CriticalReading-InstagramSnapchatFortnite.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amaro-Jiménez, C., H. Hungerford-Kresser, and K. Pole. 2016. “Teaching with a Technological Twist: Exit Tickets via Twitter in Literacy Classrooms.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 60 (3):305–13. doi: 10.1002/jaal.572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, A. J., and T. C. Andrews. 2018. “Pedagogical Knowledge for Active-Learning Instruction in Large Undergraduate Biology Courses: A Large-Scale Qualitative Investigation of Instructor Thinking.” International Journal of STEM Education 5 (1):1–25. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0112-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldwin, Roger G. 2009. “The Climate for Undergraduate Teaching and Learning in the STEM Classroom.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2009 (117):9–17. doi: 10.1002/tl.340.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, A. L., C. Henderson, and N. Finkelstein. 2012. “Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM Education.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 44 (6):52–9. doi: 10.1080/00091383.2012.728955.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice (R. Nice, Trans.) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1980)
   Google Scholar
• Cataldi, E. F., C. T. Bennett, and X. Chen. 2018. “First-Generation Students: College Access, Persistence, and Postbachelor's Outcomes.” Stats in Brief. NCES 2018-421. Available at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018421
   Google Scholar
• Childs, P. E. 2009. “Improving Chemical Education: Turning Research into Effective Practice.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10 (3):189–203. doi: 10.1039/b914496j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dika, S. L., and M. M. D'Amico. 2016. “Early Experiences and Integration in the Persistence of First-Generation College Students in STEM and Non-STEM Majors.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (3):368–83. doi: 10.1002/tea.21301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert-May, D., T. L. Derting, T. P. Henkel, J. Middlemis Maher, J. L. Momsen, B. Arnold, and, H. A. Passmore. 2015. "Breaking the Cycle: Future Faculty Begin Teaching with Learner-Centered Strategies after Professional Development." CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14 (2):ar22. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-12–0222.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., and K. A. Hogan. 2014. “Getting under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?” CBE—Life Sciences Education 13 (3):453–68. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. 2005. “Beyond the Rhetoric: Trends in the Relative Value of Teaching and Research in Faculty Salaries.” The Journal of Higher Education 76 (4):401–22. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3838846. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2005.0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J., and K. Paulson. 2005. “The evolution of scientific fields in American universities: Disciplinary differences, institutional isomorphism.” Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Consortium of Higher Education Researchers, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23):8410–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. 2015. “A Model of Teacher Professional Knowledge and Skill Including PCK.” In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, J. Loughran (Eds.) Re-Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, 28–42. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstein, G. 2013. “Writing is Thinking: Using Writing to Teach Science.” Astronomy Education Review 12 (1):010401–1–7. doi: 10.3847/AER2012037.
   Google Scholar
• Haak, D. C., J. HilleRisLambers, E. Pitre, and S. Freeman. 2011. “Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology.” Science 332 (6034):1213–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1204820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., M. Dancy, and M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj. 2012. “Use of Research-Based Institutional Strategies in Introductory Physics: Where Do Faculty Leave the Innovation-Decision Process?” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 8 (2):020104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffmyer, A., and J. Lemus. 2019. Research and Teaching: Graduate TA Teaching Behaviors Impact Student Achievement in a Research-Based Undergraduate Science Course. Journal of College Science Teaching 48 (3):56–65. doi: 10.2505/4/jcst19_048_03_56.
   Google Scholar
• Leibovich, A. K., M. Hildreth, and L. Columbus. 2017. “Leading Change in Undergraduate STEM Education.” Educational and Outreach Projects from the Cottrell Scholars Collaborative Undergraduate and Graduate Education. vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Cosio, M., C. Amaro-Jiménez, and J. Luken-Sutton. 2015. The IDEAS program. Retrieved from http://www.uta.edu/ideas/
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 1993. “Does Writing about Science Improve Learning about Science.” Journal of College Science Teaching 22 (4):212–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mulnix, A. B. 2016. “STEM Faculty as Learners in Pedagogical Reform and the Role of Research Articles as Professional Development Opportunities.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 15 (4):1–9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-12-0251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulnix, A. B., and E. V. H. Vandegrift. 2014. “A Tipping Point in STEM Education Reform.” Journal of College Science Teaching 043 (03):14–6. doi: 10.2505/4/jcst14_043_03_14.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council 2012. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science and Technology Council (NSCT). 2018. “Charting a Course for Success: America’s Strategy for STEM Education.” Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/STEM-Education-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prevost, Luanna B., Claudia E. Vergara, Mark Urban-Lurain, and Henry Campa. 2018. “Evaluation of a High-Engagement Teaching Program for STEM Graduate Students: Outcomes of the Future Academic Scholars in Teaching (FAST) Fellowship Program.” Innovative Higher Education 43 (1):41– 55. doi: 10.1007/s10755-017-9407-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, J. H., and M. J. Finkelstein. 2006. The American Faculty: The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2):4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1):1–22. 1987), doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldner, Matthew, Heather Rowan-Kenyon, Karen Kurotsuchi Inkelas, Jason Garvey, and Claire Robbins. 2012. “Supporting Students’ Intentions to Persist in STEM Disciplines: The Role of Living-Learning Programs among Other Social-Cognitive Factors.” The Journal of Higher Education 83 (3):311–36. doi: 10.2307/41478295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, S.,. R. E. Gibbons, K. L. Murphy, and J. Raker. 2018. “Flipped Classroom Use in Chemistry Education: Results from a Survey of Postsecondary Faculty Members.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19 (4):1307–18. doi: 10.1039/C8RP00094H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stains, M. 2018. “Anatomy of STEM Teaching in North American Universities.” Science 359 (6383):1468–70. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, N., S. A. Fryberg, H. R. Markus, C. S. Johnson, and R. Covarrubias. 2012. “Unseen Disadvantage: How American Universities' Focus on Independence Undermines the Academic Performance of First-Generation College Students.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 (6):1178–97. doi: 10.1037/a0027143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woosley, S. A., and D. K. Shepler. 2011. “Understanding the Early Integration Experiences of First-Generation College Students.” College Student Journal 45 (4):700–17.
   Google Scholar