Explanation and Facilitation Strategies Reduce Student Resistance to Active Learning

References

• Andrews, Madison E., Matthew Graham, Michael Prince, Maura Borrego, Cynthia Finelli, and Jenefer Husman. 2020. “Student Resistance to Active Learning: Do Instructors (Mostly) Get It Wrong?” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 25 (2):142–54. doi: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1861771.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Donald R., Kim A. Stewart, and William S. Silver. 1999. “Lessons from the Best and Worst Student Team Experiences: How a Teacher Can Make the Difference.” Journal of Management Education 23 (5):467–88. doi: 10.1177/105256299902300503.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., and J. A. Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, Maura, Jeffrey E. Froyd, and T. Simin Hall. 2010. “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in US Engineering Departments.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (3):185–207. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, Kimberly R. 2002. “Using Active Learning Strategies to Motivate Students.” Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 8 (1):48–51. doi: 10.5951/MTMS.8.1.0048.
   Google Scholar
• Chasteen, S. 2014. Measuring and improving students’ engagement [Blog post]. accessed January 9. https://blog.sciencegeekgirl.com/2014/11/02/measuring-and-improving-students-engagement/.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, Michelene T. H., and Ruth Wylie. 2014. “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.” Educational Psychologist 49 (4):219–43. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering, Arthur W., and Zelda F. Gamson. 1987. “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.” AAHE Bulletin 3 (7):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, Michael, and Erik de Graaff. 2017. “The Philosophical and Pedagogical Underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 42 (1):5–16. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1254160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancy, Melissa, Charles Henderson, and Chandra Turpen. 2016. “How Faculty Learn about and Implement Research-Based Instructional Strategies: The Case of Peer Instruction.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (1):1–7. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMonbrun, Matt, Cynthia J. Finelli, Michael Prince, Maura Borrego, Prateek Shekhar, Charles Henderson, and Cindy Waters. 2017. “Creating an Instrument to Measure Student Response to Instructional Practices.” Journal of Engineering Education 106 (2):273–98. doi: 10.1002/jee.20162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue, SusanK, and LarryG. Richards. 2009. “Factors Affecting Student Attitudes toward Active Learning Activities in a Graduate Engineering Statistics Course.” In 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, Jennifer L., and Donald R. Paulson. 1998. “Active Learning in the College Classroom.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 9 (2):3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, Richard M., and Rebecca Brent. 1996. “Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction.” College Teaching 44 (2):43–7. doi: 10.1080/87567555.1996.9933425.
   Google Scholar
• Finelli, CynthiaJ, and Maura Borrego. 2020. “Evidence-Based Strategies to Reduce Student Resistance to Active Learning.” In Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice, edited by Joel J Mintzes and Emily M Walter. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Finelli, Cynthia J., Kevin Nguyen, Matthew DeMonbrun, Maura Borrego, Michael Prince, Jenefer Husman, Charles Henderson, Prateek Shekhar, and Cynthia K. Waters. 2018. “Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning: Strategies for Instructors.” Journal of College Science Teaching 47 (5):80–91.
   Google Scholar
• Finelli, CynthiaJ, Matthew DeMonbron, Prateek Shekhar, Maura Borrego, Charles Henderson, Michael Prince, and CindyK. Waters. 2014. “A Classroom Observation Instrument to Assess Student Response to Active Learning.” In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044084.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, Jennifer A., Phyllis C. Blumenfeld, and Alison H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1):59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Scott, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (23):8410–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak, David C., Janneke HilleRisLambers, Emile Pitre, and Scott Freeman. 2011. “Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 332 (6034):1213–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1204820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmin, Merrill. 1994. Inspiring Active Learning: A Handbook for Teachers. Alexandria, VA: ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Charles, and Melissa H. Dancy. 2009. “Impact of Physics Education Research on the Teaching of Introductory Quantitative Physics in the United States.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 5 (2):020107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora, MatthewT, J. Ferrare, and Amanda Oleson. 2012. “Findings from Classroom Observations of 58 Math and Science Faculty.” In Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Husman, Jenefer, Matthew Graham, Maura Borrego, Cynthia Finelli, Michael Prince, and Bobbie Bermudez. 2020. “Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning: Development and Validation of a Measure.” In CANCELLED: American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, Leah H., and Jack R. Lohmann. 2012. “Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education.” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington 77
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Franziska D., Andrea Dirsch-Weigand, Malte Awolin, Rebecca J. Pinkelman, and Manfred J. Hampe. 2017. “Motivating First-Year University Students by Interdisciplinary Study Projects.” European Journal of Engineering Education 42 (1):17–31. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1193126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, David A. 2001. “Student Performance and Perceptions of a Lecture-Based Course Compared with the Same Course Utilizing Group Discussion.” Physical Therapy 81 (3):896–902. doi: 10.1093/ptj/81.3.896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucke, Terry, Peter K. Dunn, and Michael Christie. 2017. “Activating Learning in Engineering Education Using ICT and the Concept of ‘Flipping the Classroom.” European Journal of Engineering Education 42 (1):45–57. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1201460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, Angela, Rebecca M. Achen, and Regan K. Dodd. 2015. “Student Perceptions of Active Learning.” College Student Journal 49 (1):121–33.
   Google Scholar
• Machemer, Patricia L., and Pat Crawford. 2007. “Student Perceptions of Active Learning in a Large Cross-Disciplinary Classroom.” Active Learning in Higher Education 8 (1):9–30. doi: 10.1177/1469787407074008.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmetoglu, Mehmet, and TorGeorg Jakobsen. 2016. Applied Statistics Using Stata: A Guide for the Social Sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, L.S., G., Gamst, and A. J. Guarino. 2006. Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Cynthia J., and Michael J. Metz. 2014. “A Comparison of Professional-Level Faculty and Student Perceptions of Active Learning: its Current Use, Effectiveness, and Barriers.” Advances in Physiology Education 38 (3):246–52. doi: 10.1152/advan.00014.2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, and National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2019. “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019.” In Special Report NSF 19-304. Alexandria, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Kevin A., Maura Borrego, Cynthia J. Finelli, Matt DeMonbrun, Caroline Crockett, Sneha Tharayil, Prateek Shekhar, Cynthia Waters, and Robyn Rosenberg. 2021. “Instructor Strategies to Aid Implementation of Active Learning: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of STEM Education 8 (1):1–18. doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Kevin, Jenefer Husman, Maura Borrego, Prateek Shekhar, Michael Prince, Matt Demonbrun, and C. Waters. 2017. “Students’ Expectations, Types of Instruction, and Instructor Strategies Predicting Student Response to Active Learning.” International Journal of Engineering Education 33 (1):2–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, Michael. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3):223–31. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, Michael, Maura Borrego, Charles Henderson, Stephanie Cutler, and Jeff Froyd. 2013. “Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Chemical Engineering Courses.” Chemical Engineering Education 47 (1):27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Michael, and Richard M. Felder. 2006. “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2):123–38. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltman, Howard J. 2012. Experimental Design and Analysis. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, Elaine, and Nancy M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, Prateek, Demonbrun, Matt, Maura Borrego, Cynthia, Finelli, Michael Prince, and Charles Henderson, Waters, Cynthia. 2015. “Development of an Observation Protocol to Study Undergraduate Engineering Student Resistance to Active Learning.” International Journal of Engineering Education 31 (2):597–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekhar, P., M. Borrego, M. DeMonbrun, C., Finelli, C. Crockett, and K. Nguyen, 2020. “Negative Student Response to Active Learning in STEM Classrooms: A Systematic Review of Underlying Reasons.” Journal of College Science Teaching 49 (6):45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Veronica, and LeeAnn Cardaciotto. 2011. “Is Active Learning like Broccoli? Student Perceptions of Active Learning in Large Lecture Classes.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 11 (1):53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Karl, Sheri D. Sheppard, David W. Johnson, and Roger T. Johnson. 2005. “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices.” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1):87–101. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stains, M., J. Harshman, M. K. Barker, S. V. Chasteen, R. Cole, S. E. DeChenne-Peters, M. K. Eagan, J. M. Esson, J. K. Knight, F. A. Laski, et al. 2018. “Anatomy of STEM Teaching in North American Universities.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 359 (6383):1468–70. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharayil, Sneha, Maura Borrego, Michael Prince, Kevin A. Nguyen, Prateek Shekhar, Cynthia J. Finelli, and Cynthia Waters. 2018. “Strategies to Mitigate Student Resistance to Active Learning.” International Journal of STEM Education 5 (1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald, Elli J., Mariah J. Hill, Elisa Tran, Sweta Agrawal, E. Nicole Arroyo, Shawn Behling, Nyasha Chambwe, Dianne Laboy Cintrón, Jacob D. Cooper, Gideon Dunster, et al. 2020. “Active Learning Narrows Achievement Gaps for Underrepresented Students in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (12):6476–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916903117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. 2014. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Assessing the Relationship between Education and the Workforce (GAO-14-374).
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, Maryellen. 2002. Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, Maryellen. 2012. Five Characteristics of Learner-Centered Teaching. Madison, WI: Faculty Focus.
   Google Scholar