Promoting Engagement and Learning: Using the Fishbowl Strategy in Online and Hybrid College Courses

References

• Alamri, H., V. Lowell, W. Watson, and S. Watson. 2020. “Using Personalized Learning as an Instructional Approach to Motivate Learners in Online Higher Education: Learner Self- Determination and Intrinsic Motivation.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 52 (3):322–52. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., K. Struyven, and F. Dochy. 2013. “Student-Centred Teaching Methods: Can They Optimise Students’ Approaches to Learning in Professional Higher Education?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (1):14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, W. 2020. “COVID-19 and Online Teaching in Higher Education: A Case Study of Peking University.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2 (2):113–5. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brindley, J. E., L. M. Blaschke, and C. Walti. 2009. “Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 10 (3):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, C. A. 2015. “Rethinking the Fishbowl Discussion Strategy: A Mechanism to Construct Meaning and Foster Critical Thinking and Communication Skills through Student Dialogue.” Journal of Health Education Teaching Techniques 2:23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and Education. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Durrington, V., A. Berryhill, and J. Swafford. 2006. “Strategies for Enhancing Student Interactivity in an Online Environment.” College Teaching 54 (1):190–3. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.54.1.190-193.
   Google Scholar
• Dutt, K. M. 1997. “The Fishbowl Motivates Students to Participate.” College Teaching 45 (4):143. doi: 10.1080/87567559709596217.
   Google Scholar
• Doo, M., C. Bonk, and H. Heo. 2020. “A Meta-Analysis of Scaffolding Effects in Online Learning in Higher Education.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 21 (3):60–80. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., and M. Hänze. 2019. “Back from “Guide on the Side” to “Sage on the Stage”? Effects of Teacher-Guided and Student-Activating Teaching Methods on Student Learning in Higher Education.” International Journal of Educational Research 95:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaytan, J., and B. C. McEwen. 2007. “Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies.” American Journal of Distance Education 21 (3):117–132. doi: 10.1080/08923640701341653.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2008. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2012. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. 2021. “Instructional Strategies for Online Teaching in COVID-19 Pandemic.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 3 (1):199–203. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.218.
   Google Scholar
• Maki, R. H., W. S. Maki, M. Patterson, and P. D. Whittaker. 2000. “Evaluation of a Web-Based Introductory Psychology Course: Learning and Satisfaction in on-Line Ver- Sus Lecture Courses.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32 (2):230–239. doi: 10.3758/BF03207788.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mor, Y. 2015. “Practical Patterns for Active and Collaborative MOOCs: Checkpoints, Fishbowl, and See Do Share.” eLearning Papers 42:48–56. https://bit.ly/2SOWGNm.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwoudt, J. E. 2020. “Investigating Synchronous and Asynchronous Class Attendance as Predictors of Academic Success in Online Education.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 36 (3):15–25. doi: 10.14742/ajet.5137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, K. 2020. “Constructivism, Curriculum and the Knowledge Question: Tensions and Challenges for Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1750585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality Matters. 2020. “Standards from the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric, Sixth Edition.” https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/StandardsfromtheQMHigherEducationRubric.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smart, K. L., and R. Featheringham. 2006. “Developing Effective Interpersonal Communication and Discussion Skills.” Business Communication Quarterly 69 (3):276–283. doi: 10.1177/1080569906291231.
   Google Scholar
• Stigmar, M. 2016. “Peer-to-Peer Teaching in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review.” Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 24 (2):124–136. doi: 10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallent-Runnels, M. K., J. A. Thomas, W. Y. Lan, S. Cooper, T. C. Ahern, S. M. Shaw, and X. Liu. 2006. “Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research.” Review of Educational Research 76 (1):93–135. doi: 10.3102/00346543076001093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., and F. Ke. 2011. “The Role of Students’ Motivation in Peer‐Moderated Asynchronous Online Discussions.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (6):916–930. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. 2006. “Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education.” American Journal of Distance Education 20 (2):65–77. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, F. F., M. C. Bishop, and D. Ferdinand-James. 2017. “Instructional Strategies to Help Online Students Learn: Feedback from Online Students.” TechTrends 61 (5):420–427. doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0216-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. 2020. “Social Learning and Learning to Be Social: From Online Instruction to Online Education.” American Journal of Education 127 (1):137–142. doi: 10.1086/711017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar