College Mathematics Instructors’ Use of Recommended Pedagogical Practices

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2019. Levers for Change: An Assessment of Progress in Changing STEM Education. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A., and K. P. Cross. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T., D. W. Jeong, and S.-W. Cho. 2010. “Referral, Enrollment, and comple0on in Developmental Educa&on Sequences in Community Colleges.” Economics of Education Review 29 (2): 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, R. M., E. E. Kirkman, and J. W. Maxwell. 2018. Statistical Abstract of Undergraduate Programs in the Mathematical Sciences in the United States: Fall 2015 CBMS Survey. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bolles, R. C. 1972. “Reinforcement, Expectancy, and Learning.” Psychological Review 79 (5): 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caleon, I., and R. Subramaniam. 2010. “Do Students Know What They Know and What They Don’t Know? Using a Four-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess the Nature of Students’ Alternative Conceptions.” Research in Science Education 40 (3): 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, M., and R. Powers. 2010. “The Promise of Differentiated Instruction for Enhancing the Mathematical Understandings of College Students.” Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications 29 (3): 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrq006
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. 2016. Remedial Coursetaking at U.S. Public 2- and 4-Year Institutions: Scope, Experiences, and Outcomes (NCES 2016-405). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, N. 2013. Metacognition. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/metacognition/.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, G., A. Taggart, and A. Nora. 2015. “Undergraduate Latina/o Students: A Systematic Review of Research Identifying Factors Contributing to Academic Success Outcomes.” Review of Educational Research 85 (2): 249–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSilver, D. 2017. “U.S. Students’ Academic Achievement Still Lags That of Their Peers in Many Other Countries.” FactTank, Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/15/u-s-students-internationally-math-science/
   Google Scholar
• Digest of Education Statistics. 2017. Table 222.10. Average National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Mathematics Scale Score, by Sex, Race/Ethnicity, and Grade: Selected Years, 1990 through 2017. Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Carmona, A., A. M. Criado, and M. Cruz-Guzmán. 2018. “Prospective Primary Teachers’ Prior Experiences, Conceptions, and Pedagogical Valuations of Experimental Activities in Science Education. (2018).” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (2): 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9773-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, S., D. Bagayoko, and E. L. Kelley. 1999. “Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI).” Physics Education 34 (5): 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304
   Google Scholar
• Hodara, M. 2011. “Reforming Mathematics Classroom Pedagogy: Evidence-Based Findings and Recommendations for the Developmental Math Classroom.” Community College Research Center Working Paper 27.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, M. 2018. “2016-2017 Impact Report: Six Years of Results from the Carnegie Math Pathways™.” Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Kiray, S. A., and S. Simsek. 2020. “Determination and Evaluation of the Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions about Density by Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10:1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5
   Google Scholar
• Kline, M. 1977. Why the Professor Can’t Teach. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leron, U., and E. Dubinsky. 1995. “An Abstract Algebra Story.” The American Mathematical Monthly 102 (3): 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1995.11990563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, R., M. Barreiro-Gen, F. J. Lozano, and K. Sammalisto. 2019. “Teaching Sustainability in European Higher Education Institutions: Assessing the Connections between Competences and Pedagogical Approaches.”  Sustainability 11 (6): 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, T. J., Pilarz, M. Velasco, J. B. Chakraverty, D. Rosploch, K. Undersander, and M. Stains. 2015. “The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice.” CBE Life Science Education 14: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muschla, J. A., and G. R. Muschla. 2011. Hands-On Math Projects with Real-Life Applications: Grades 6–12. Vol. 27. Inglewood Cliffs, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Noben, I., J. F. Deinum, and W. H. A. Hofman. 2022. “Quality of Teaching in Higher Education: Reviewing Teaching Behaviour through Classroom Observations.” International Journal for Academic Development 27 (1): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1830776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, K. A., E. Wostl, M. Crosslin, T. L. Berry, and J. P. Grover. 2018. “Student Ability Best Predicts Final Grade in a College Algebra Course.” Journal of Learning Analytics 5 (3): 167–181. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.11
   Google Scholar
• Patton, J. R., M. E. Cronin, D. S. Bassett, and A. E. Koppel. 1997. “A Life Skills Approach to Mathematics Instruction: Preparing Students with Learning Disabilities for the Real-Life Math Demands of Adulthood.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 30 (2): 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J., D. Lundie, and G. Golder. 2019. “Metacognition in Schools: What Does the Literature Suggest about the Effectiveness of Teaching Metacognition in Schools.” Educational Review 71 (4): 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.144112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. 1992. “Bridging the Gap between School and Real Life: Toward an Integration of Science, Mathematics and Technology in the Context of Authentic Practice.” School Science and Mathematics 92 (6): 307–317. ISSN 0036-6803 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1992.tb15596.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., F. H. Jones, S. L. Gilbert, and C. E. Wieman. 2013. “The Classroom Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 12 (4): 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stains, M., J. Harshman, M. K. Barker, S. V. Chasteen, R. Cole, S. E. DeChenne-Peters, M. K. Eagan, et al. 2018. “Anatomy of STEM Teaching in North American Universities.” Science 359 (6383): 1468–1470. and https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. 2019. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), Various Years, 1992–2019 Mathematics Assessments. Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., and M. van Otterlo. 2012. Reinforcement Learning: State of the Art. New York: Springer-Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. 1999. “Teachers’ Metacognitive Knowledge and the Instruction of Higher Order Thinking.” Teaching and Teacher Education 15 (4): 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00063-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and A. Ben David. 2008. “Explicit Teaching of Meta-Strategic Knowledge in Authentic Classroom Situations.” Metacognition and Learning 3 (1): 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9044-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar