EDITORIAL

REFERENCES

• Olney Si. Quantitative evaluation of cocontraction of knee and ankle muscles in normal walking. In: Winter DA, Norman RW, Wells RP, Hayes KC, Potla AE eds. Biomechanics 1X-A. Champaign IL, Human Kinetics; 1985: 431–435.
   Google Scholar
• Levine MG, Kabat H. Cocontraction and reciprocal innervation in voluntary movement in man. Science. 1952; 116: 115–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb GL, Myklebust BM, Penn RD, Agarwal GC. Reciprocal excitation of muscle antagonists by the primary afferent pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1982; 46: 454–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrington CS. Reciprocal innervation of antagonistic muscles. In: Denny-Brown D ed. Selected Writings of Sir Charles Sherrington. New York, PB Hoeber Inc; 1940: 237–313.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowska F, Roberts WJ. Synaptic actions of single intemeurones mediat-ing reciprocal Ia inhibition of motomeurones. J Physiol. 1972; 222:623–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrington CS. Reciprocal innervation of antagonistic muscles Fourteenth Note. On double reciprocal inhibition. Proc Royal Soc London, Series B. 1909; 91:249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler AE, Hutton RS. Was Sherrington right about co-contractions? Brain Res. 1986; 370:171–175.
   Google Scholar
• Gydikov AA, Kostov KG, Gatev PG. Mechanical properties and discharge frequencies in single motor units in human M. biceps brachii. In: Kumamoto M ed. Neural and Mechanical Control of Movement. Kyoto Japan: Yamaguchi Sho-ten; 1984:20–36.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AM. The coactivation of antagonistic muscles. Can J Physiol Phar-macol. 1981; 59:733–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke JD, Brown SH. Movement-related phasic muscle activation II. generation and functional role of the triphasic pattern. J Neurophysiol. 1990; 63:465–471.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SH, Cooke JD. Movement-related phasic muscle activation I. rela-tions with temporal profile of movement. J Neurophysiol. 1990; 63:455–464.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell SK. Framework for the measurement of neurologic impairment and disability. In: Lister MJ ed. Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems. Proceedings of the II Step Conference. Alexandria VA; Foundation for Physical Therapy; 1991:146–147.
   Google Scholar
• Bekoff A. Ontogeny of leg motor output in the chick embryo: a neural analysis. Brain Res. 1976; 106:271–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myklebust BM, Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC. Stretch reflexes of the normal infant. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986; 28:440.449.
   Google Scholar
• Gatev V. Role of inhibition in the development of motor co-ordination in early childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1972; 14:336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forssberg H, Wallberg H. Infant locomotion: a Preliminary movement and electromyographic study. In: Berg K, Eriksson BO, eds. Children and Exercise IX. Baltimore MD: University Park Press; 1978:32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen E, Cooke DW. Relationship between newborn stepping and later walking: a new interpretation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987; 29:380–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen E, Ridley-Johnson R, Fisher DM. Shifting patterns of bilateral coordination and lateral dominance in the leg movements of young infants. Dev Psychobiol. 1983; 16:29–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda V. Stara V. The role of thigh adductors in movement patterns of the hip and knee joint. Courrier (Centre Intern at de L'Enfance). 1965; 15:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Heriza CB, Thelen E. New dimensions in the development of movement. Presented at the American Physical Therapy Association Annual Conference; June 1990; Anaheim CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lestienne F. Effects of inertial loading and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements. Exp Brain Res. 1979; 35:407–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghez G. Muscles: effectors of the motor systems. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz Jessell TM eds. Principles of Neural Science. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier; 1991:560–562.
   Google Scholar
• Getchell N, Roberton MA. Whole body stiffness as a function of develop-mental level in children's hopping. Dev Psycho'. 1989; 25:920–928.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig DA. EMG changes during acquisition of a motor skill. Am J Phys Med. 1982; 61:229–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsden CD, Obeso JA, Rothwell JC. The function of the antagonist muscle during fast limb movements in man. J Physiol. 1983; 335:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Moore SP, Martenuik RG. Kinematic and electromyographic changes that occur as a function of learning a time-constrained aiming task. J Motor Behav. 1986; 18:397–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamon E, Gormley J. Muscular activity pattern for skilled performance and during learning of a horizontal bar exercise. Ergonomics. 1968; 11:345–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmajian JV. Motor learning and control: a working hypothesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977; 58:38–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1990:114–117.
   Google Scholar
• Karst GM, Hasan Z. Antagonistic muscle activity during human forearm movements under varying kinematic and loading conditions. Exp Brain Res. 1987; 67:391–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey DR, Reed DJ. Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonis-tic muscles. In: Desmedt JE ed. Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Dis-ease. New York: Raven Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Freund H-J. Motor unit and muscle activity in voluntary motor control. Physiol Rev. 1983; 63:387–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca CJ, Mambrito B. Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonistic muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. J Neurophysiol. 1987; 58:525–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendell ER, Schwartz JR. Principles of Neuroscience. New York: Elsevier, 1985:449.
   Google Scholar
• Hobart D, Kelley D, Bradley L. Modifications occurring during acquisition of a novel throwing task. Am J Phys Med. 1975; 54:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhorn R. Agonist and antagonist muscle EMG activity pattern changes with skill acquisition. Res Quart Exercise Sport. 1983; 54:315–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagood S, Solomonow M, Baratta R, Thou BH, D'Ambrosia R. The effect of joint velocity on the contribution of the antagonistic musculature to knee stiffness and laxity. Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 182–187.
   Google Scholar
• Baratta R, Solomonow M, Thou BH, Letson D, Chuinud R, D'Ambrosia R. Muscular coactivation. the role of the antagonistic musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am J Sports Med. 1988; 16:113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Osternig LR, Hamill J, Lander JE, Robertson R. Co-activation of sprinter and distance runner muscles in isokinetic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 1986; 18:431–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myklebust BM, Gottlieb GL, Penn RD, Agarwal GC. Reciprocal excitation of antagonistic muscles add a differentiating feature in spasticity. Ann Neurol. 1982; 12:367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinner S. Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex inter-action. Physiol Rev. 1975; 55:247–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger W, Quintem J, Dietz V. Pathophysiology of gait in children with cerebral palsy. Electroencephalography Clin Neurophysiol. 1982; 53:538–548.
   Google Scholar
• Davis WE, Kelso JAS. Analysis of "invariant characteristics" in the motor control of Down's Syndrome and normal subjects. J Motor Behav. 1982; 14:194–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahnnann SA, Norton BJ. The relationship of voluntary movement to spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1977; 2:460–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks VB. The Neural Basis of Motor Control. New York: Oxford Press; 1986:49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan CL, Bow sher ICA, Sussman MD. Spasticity and gait: knee torques and muscle cocontraction. In: Sussman MD ed. Priorities for Treatment of Chil-dren With Spastic Diplegia. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1992: In press.
   Google Scholar
• Fang J, Barbeau H. A dynamic EMG profile index to quantify muscular activation disorder in spastic paretic gait. Electroencephalography Clin Neuro-physiol. 1989; 73:233–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton NJ, Mortensen OA: An electromyographic study of reciprocal activ-ity of muscles. Mat Rec. 1971; 170:255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Basmajian JV, De Luca Cl. Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. 5th ed. Baltimore MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1985:223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Fenyes I, Gergely C, Toth S. Clinical and electromyographic studies of "spinal reflexes" in premature and full-term infants. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia-try. 1960; 23:63–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheney PD, Kasser R, Holsapple J. Reciprocal effect of corticomotorneu-Tonal cells on wrist extensor and flexor muscle activity in primate. Brain Res. 1982; 247:164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Tilney F, Pike FH. Muscular co-ordination experimentally studied in its relation to the cerebellum. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1925; 1:289–334.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett M, Shahani BT, Young RR. EMG analysis of patients with cerebel-lar deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975; 38:163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney PD, Mewes KH. Properties of rubomotorneuronal cells studied in the awake monkey. Abstracts of Symposium on Neural Control of Limb Move-ment; July 9–11, 1986; Seattle WA.
   Google Scholar