Assessments of Motor Function Post Stroke

References

• Ada L., Westwood P. A kinematic analysis of recovery of the ability to stand up following stroke. Australian Physiotherapy 1992; 38: 135–142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams S. A., Ashburn A., Pickering R. M., Taylor D. The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in acute stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997a; 11: 42–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams S. A., Pickering R. M., Ashburn A., Lincoln N. B. The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in non-acute strokes over 65. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997b; 11: 52–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashburn A. A physical assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1982; 68: 109–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berglund K., Fugl-Meyer A. R. Upper extremity function in hemiplegia: A cross validation study of two assessment methods. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1986; 18: 155–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr J. H., Shepherd R. B., Nordholm L., Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy 1985; 65: 175–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll D. A quantitative test of upper extremity function. Journal of Chronic Disease 1965; 18: 479–491
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chae Belhoux J.F., Bohinc T., Dobos L., Davis T., Friedl A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke 1998; 29: 975–979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen F. M., Wade D. T., Robb G. F., Bradshaw C. M. Mobility after stroke: Reliability of measures of impairment and disability. International Disabilities Studies 1990; 12: 6–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collin C., Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: A pilot reliability study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 1990; 53: 576–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley K., Mayo N., Danys I., Cabot R., Wood-Dauphinee S. The stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM): Refining and validating the content. Physiotherapy Canada 1997; 49: 269–278
   Google Scholar
• Daley K., Mayo N., Wood-Dauphinee S. Reliability of scores on the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) measure. Physical Therapy 1999; 79: 8–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean C., Mackey F. Motor assessment scale scores as a measure of rehabilitation outcome following stroke. Australian Physiotherapy 1992; 38: 31–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demeurisse G., Demol O., Robage E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. European Neurology 1980; 19: 382–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSouza L. H., Langton Hewer R. L., Miller S. Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arm function tests. International Rehabilitation Medicine 1980; 2: 3–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dettman M. A., Linder M. T., Sepic S. B. Relationships among walking performance, postural stability and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. American Journal of Physical Medicine 1987; 66: 77–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Weerdt W., Harrison M. A. Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: A comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer Test and the Action Research Arm Test. Physiotherapy Canada 1985; 37: 65–70
   Google Scholar
• DiFabio R., Badke M. B. Relationship of sensory organization to balance function in patients with hemiplegia. Physical Therapy 1990; 70: 543–548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P. W., Propst M., Nelson S. G. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Physical Therapy 1983; 63: 1606–1610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P., Richards L., Wallace D., Stoker-Yates J., Pohl P., Luchies C., et al. A randomized, controlled pilot study of a home-based exercise program for individuals with mild and moderate stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 2055–2060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres M., Nyary I., Banhidi M., Deak G. Stroke rehabilitation: A method and evaluation. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Research 1990; 13: 225–236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feyes H. M., de Weerdt W. J., Seltz B. E., Steck G. A.C., Spichinger R., Vereeck L. E., et al. Effect of therapeutic intervention for hemiplegic upper limb in acute phase after stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 785–792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatrault J., Arsenault A. B., Dutil E., Bourbonnais D. Motor function and activities of daily living assessments: A study of three tests for persons with hemiplegia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1991; 45: 806–810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer A. R., Jaasko L., Leyman I., Olsson S., Steglind S. Post-stroke hemiplegia: Assessment of physical properties. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1975; 7: 83–93
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C. A. Staging motor impairment after stroke. Stroke 1990; 21(suppl II)II19–II21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gowland C. A., Stratford P., Ward M., Moreland J., Torresin W., Van Hullenaar S. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993; 24: 58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham G. E., Duncan P. W., Stason W. B., et al. Post stroke rehabilitation: Assessment, referral, and patient management. Clinical practice guidelines. Quick reference guide for clinicians, No. 16. AHCPR Pub. No. 95–0663, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD 1995, May 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Guide for the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM SM, version 4). State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 1993
   Google Scholar
• Guttman L. The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method of scale construction. The prediction of personal adjustment, P. Horst. Social Science Research Council, New York 1941; 318–343
   Google Scholar
• Heller A., Wade D. T., Wood V. A., Sunderland A., Langton Hewer R., Ward E. Arm function after stroke: Measurement and recovery over the first three months. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 1987; 50: 714–719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henley S., Pettit S., Todd-Pokropek A., Tupper A. Who goes home: Predictive factors in stroke recovery. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 1985; 48: 1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummelsheim H., Maier-Loth M. L., Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1997; 29: 3–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kopp B., Kunkel A., Flor H., Platz T., Rose U., Mauritz K., Gresser K., McCulloch K. L., Taub E. The Arm Motor Ability Test: Reliability, va-lidity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 615–620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft G. H., Fitts S. S., Hammond M. C. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 220–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel A., Kopp B., Muller G., Villringer K., Villringer A., Taub E., Flor H. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999; 80: 624–628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln N., Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979; 65: 48–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loewen S. C., Anderson B. A. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990; 21: 78–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen S. C., Anderson B. A. Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. Physical Therapy 1988; 68: 1077–1081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle R. C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1981; 4: 483–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney F. I., Barthel D. W. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal February, 1965; 61–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malouin F., Pkchard L., Bonneau C., Durand A., Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: Comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the motor assessment scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 1206–1212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch K., Cook E. W., III, Fleming W. C., Novack T. A., Taub E. A reliabile test of upper ADL function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988; 69: 755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent J. A., Schurr K. A., Adams R. D. A dose-response relationship between amount of weight-bearing exercise and walking outcome following cerebrovascular accident. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 399–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostendorf C. G., Wolf S. L. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. Physical Therapy 1981; 61: 1022–1028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker V. M., Wade D. T., Langton Hewer R. Arm function after stroke: An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1986; 8: 1267–1272
   Google Scholar
• Polit D. F., Hungler B. P. Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott, Philadelphia 1987
   Google Scholar
• Poole J. L., Whitney S. L. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: Concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988; 69: 195–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackley C. M., Lincoln N. B. The verbal administration of the gross function scale of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Clinical Rehabilitation 1990; 4: 301–303
   Google Scholar
• Sanford J., Moreland J., Swanson L. R., Stratford P. W., Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Physical Therapy 1993; 73: 447–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilbeck C. E., Wade D. T., Langton Hewer R., Wood V. A. Recovery after stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1983; 46: 5–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonde L., Gip C., Fernaeus S. E., Nilsson C. G., Viitanen M. Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low TENS) increase motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1988; 30: 95–99
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland A., Tinson D. J., Bradley E. L., Fletcher D., Langton Hewer R., Wade D. T. Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm functional after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 1992; 55: 530–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A., Tinson D., Bradley L., Langton Hewer R. Arm function after stroke: An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 1989; 52: 1267–1272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E., Miller N. E., Novack T. A., Cook E. W., Fleming W. C., Nepomuceno C. S., Connell J. S., Crago J. E. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 347–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lee J. H., Wagenaar R. C., Lankhorst G. J., Vogelaar T. W., Deville W. L., Bouter L. M. Forced use from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369–2375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lee J. H., De Groot V., Beckerman H., Wagenaar R. C., Lankhorst G. J., Bouter L. M. The intra- and interrater reliability of the Action Research Arm Test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Stroke 2001; 82: 14–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo C. A. Should occupational therapy choose a single functional outcome measure?. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1994; 48: 946–947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. T., Langton Hewer R., Wood V. A., Skilbeck C. E., Ismail H. M. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: Measurement and recovery. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 1983; 46: 521–524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. T., Wood V. A., Langton Hewer R. Recovery after stroke: The first 3 months. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 1985; 48: 7–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar R. C., Meijer O. G., van Wieringen P. C.W., Kuik D. J., Hazenberg G. J., Lindeboom J., Wichers F., Rijswijk H. The functional recovery of stroke: A comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1990; 22: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson P. R., Wolfe C. D.A., Warburton F. G., Rudd A. G., Howard R. S., Ross-Russell R. W., et al. A long-term follow-up of stroke patients. Stroke 1997; 28: 507–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson D. J., Baker L. L., Craddock J. A. Functional test for the hemiparetic upper extremity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1984; 38: 159–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S. L., LeCraw D. E., Barton L. A., Jann B. J. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Experimental Neurology 1989; 104: 125–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee S., Williams J. I., Shapiro S. H. Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke. Stroke 1990; 21: 731–739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: International classification of impairments, activities and participation. Author, GenevaSwitzerland 1997
   Google Scholar