REFERENCES
- Chasan-Taber L, Stampfer MJ. Epidemiology of oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:467–77
- World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception. Venous thromboembolic disease and combined oral contraceptives: results of international multicentre case–control study. World Health Organi- zation Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception. Lancet 1995; 346: 1575–82
- World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contra- ception. Effect of different progestagens in low oestro- gen oral contraceptives on venous thromboembolic disease. Lancet 1995;346:1582–8
- Wood R, Botting B, Dunnell K. Trends in contracep- tion before and after the 1995 pill scare. Popul Trends 1997;89:5–12
- Skjeldestad FE. Increased number of induced abortions in Norway after media coverage of adverse vascular events from the use of third-generation oral contracep- tives. Contraception 1997;55:11–14
- Pitsavos C, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas P. Contraception in women at high risk or with established cardiovascular disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 2000;900:215–27
- Hannaford PC, Webb AMC. Evidence-guided prescribing of combined oral contraceptives: consensus statement. Contraception 1996;54:125–9
- Sihvo S, Hemminki E, Kosunen E. Contraceptive health risks – women’s perceptions. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1998;19:117–25
- Oddens BJ. Women’s satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women. Contraception 1999;59:277–86
- Fuchs N, Printz H, Koch U. Attitudes to current oral contraceptive use and future developments: the women’s perspective. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 1996;1:275–84
- Turner R. Most British women use reliable contracep- tive methods, but many fear health risks from use. Fam Plann Perspect 1994;26:183–4
- Makkonen K, Hemminki E, Tuimala R. Pros and cons of intrauterine contraception – do perceptions of users and physicians differ? Scand J Prim Health Care 1994; 12: 190–6
- Gupta S, Miller JE. A survey of GPs’ views on intra- uterine contraception. Br J Fam Plann 2000;26:81–4
- Ollila E, Hemminki E, Kajesalo K. Physicians’ experi- ence with Norplant implantable contraceptives in Finland. Scand J Soc Med 1995;23:47–52
- Miller MD, Ferris DG. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the visual analogue scale. Fam Pract Res J 1993;1:15–24
- Kosunen EA-L, Rimpelä AH, Kaprio JA, Berg MA. Oral contraception and smoking. Time trends for a risk behaviour in Finland. Eur J Public Health 1997;7:29–33