References
- Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo Å, Heinonen OP. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: Controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. Lancet 1990; 336: 387–91.
- Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frogoletto FD, LeFevre ML, Bain RP, McNellis D. Effect of perinatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 821–7.
- Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaaps JP, Defoort Å, Coulon R, Buekens P. Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: The Belgian multicentric study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991; 1: 366–71.
- Luck CA. Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19weeks: a four year study of 8849 deliveries. BMJ 1992; 304: 1474–8.
- Crane JP, LeFevre ML, Winborn RC, Evans JK, Ewigman BG, Bain RP. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 392–9.
- Van Dorsten JP, Hulsey TC, Newman RB, Menard MK. Fetal anomaly detection by second-trimester ultrasonography in a tertiary center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 742–9.
- Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P, Jørgensen NP, Lokvik B. Normal range curves for BPD and MAD. Drammen, Norway: Scand Medical a/s, 1983.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Abnormalities: report of the RCOG Working Party. London: RCOG, 1997.
- Isaksen CV. Prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings. A ten year correlative study of fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Thesis. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2000.
- Backe B, Buhaug H. Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapet. [Use of Ultrasound in Pregnancy]. (In Norwegian with English abstract) Rapport nr 8/86. Trondheim: Norsk Institutt for syke- husforskning, 1986.
- Johansen I, Grimsmo A, Nakling J. Ultralyddiagnostikk i primærhelsetjenesten- erfaring innen obstetrikk [Ultrasonography in primary care – experiences within obstetrics 1983–99]. (In Norwegian with English abstract) Tidskr Nor Laegeforen 2002; 122: 1995–8.
- Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Cnattingius S, Eriksson L, Norsted T. Second trimester ultrasound screening performed by midwifes; sensitivity for detection of fetal anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 98–104.
- Levi S, Schaaps JP, De Havay Å, Coulon R, Defoort P. Endresult of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: the Belgian Multicentric Study 1984–92. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 366–71.
- Chitty LS, Hunt GH, Moore J, Lobb MO. Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. BMJ 1991; 303: 1165–9.
- Health Technology Assessment 2000; 4: 21–3.
- Roberts JP, Burge DM. Antenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects: a missed opportunity? Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 687–9.
- Choen DM. Surgical management of congenital heart disease in the 1990s. Am J Dis Child 1992; 146: 1447–52.
- Brantberg A, Blaas HG, Salvesen KA, Haugen SE, Eik-Nes SH. Surveillance and outcome of fetuses with gastroschisis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 4–13.
- Skari H, Bjornland K, Bjornstad-Ostensen A, Haugen G, Emblem R. Consequenses of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis: A preliminary report on neonates with congenital malformations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 635–42.