Term breech delivery in Sweden: mortality relative to fetal presentation and planned mode of delivery

References

• Westin B. Handläggning av sätesändläge. In: Rybo G, ed. Sätesförlossning. Symposium vid Svensk Gynekologisk Förenings årsmöte, Växjö. 1974: 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kubli F, Rüttgers H, Meyer-Menk M. Die fetale Acidosegefahrdung bei vaginaler Geburt aus Beckenendlage. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1975; 179: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hellsten C, Lindqvist PG, Olofsson P. Vaginal breech delivery: is it still an option? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 111: 122–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bistoletti P, Nisell H, Palme C, Lagercrantz H. Term breech delivery. Early and late complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981; 60: 165–71.
   Google Scholar
• Svenningsen NW, Westgren M, Ingemarsson I. Modern strategy for the term breech delivery – A study with a 4-year followup of the infants. J Perinat Med 1985; 13: 117–26.
   Google Scholar
• Westgren LM, Ingemarsson I. Breech delivery and mental handicap. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 2: 187–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luterkort M, Marsál K. Umbilical cord acid-base state and Apgar score in term breech neonates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 57–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist A, Nordén-Lindeberg S, Hansson U. Perinatal mortality and routine delivery in term breech presentations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1288–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roman J, Bakos O, Cnattingius S. Pregnancy outcome by mode of delivery among term breech births: Swedish experience 1987–93. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 945–50.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst A, Thorngren-Jerneck K. Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: Increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 731–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlov K, Larsson G. Results of a five-year prospective study using a feto-pelvic scoring system for term singleton breech delivery after uncomplicated pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 315–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned caesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The international Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 864–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Reigstad H, Markestad T, Irgens LM, Dalaker K. Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 586–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfrage P, Gjessing L. The term breech presentation. A retrospective study with regard to the planned mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 544–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sibony O, Luton D, Oury JF, Blot P. Six hundred and ten breech versus 12,405 cephalic deliveries at term: is there any difference in the neonatal outcome? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 107: 140–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietberg C, Elferink-Stinkens P, Brand R, van Loon A, Van Hemel O, Visser G. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to mode of delivery of 33 824 infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 110: 604–9.
   Google Scholar
• Øian P, Albrechtsen S, Berge LN, Børdahl PE, Egeland T, Henriksen T et al. Fødsel av barn i seteleie til termin. Assistert vaginal fødsel eller keisersnitt? SMM-rapport Nr. 3/ 2003. Senter for medicinsk metodevurdering, SINTEF, Oslo. (http://www.sintef.no/smm).19. Ulander V-M, Gissler M, Nuutila M, Ylikorkala O. Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 180–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eide MG, Oyen N, Skjaerven R, Irgens LM, Jerkedal T, Nilsen ST. Breech delivery and intelligence: a population-based study of 8,738 breech infants. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Marsál K, Persson P-H, Larsen T, Lilja H, Selbing A, Sultan B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 843–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cnattingius S, Ericson A, Gunnarskog J, Källén B. A quality study of a medical birth registry. Scand J Soc Med 1990; 18: 143–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Källén B, Källén K, Otterblad Olausson P. The Swedish Medical Birth Register – A summary of content and quality. Research Report from EpC. Centre for Epidemiology, The National Board of Health and Welfare, 2003. (http:// www.sos.se/fulltext/112/2003-112-3/2003-112-3.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Winbo IGB, Serenius FH, Dahlquist GG, Källén B. A computer-based method for cause of death classification in stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: 1298–306.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen OS. Simple interval estimation of risk ratio. Am J Epidemiol 1974; 100: 515–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar