The term breech presentation. A retrospective study with regard to the planned mode of delivery

References

• Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Irgens LM. Factors influencing delivery method in breech presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 416–21.
   Google Scholar
• Songane F, Thobani S, Himansugekhar M, Bingham P, Lil-ford RJ. Balancing the risks of planned caesarean section and trial of vaginal delivery for the mature, selected, singleton breech presentation. J Perinat Med 1987; 15: 531–43.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Irgens L. Secular trends in peri-and neonatal mortality in breech presentation; Norway 1967–94. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 508–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.
   Google Scholar
• Halmesmäki E. Vaginal term breech delivery – a time for reappraisal? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 187–90.
   Google Scholar
• Medical birth registry. Bergen, Norway 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Borell U, Rådberg C. Orthodiagraphic pelvimetry with special reference to capacity of distal part of pelvis and pelvic outlet. Acta Radiol Diagn 1962; 2: 273–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gjessing L. Clinical outcome at KK SiR. http://www.sir.no/kk, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol 1976; 33: 696–705.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst A, Thorngren-Jerneck K. Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: Increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 731–7.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Reigstad H, Markestad T, Irgens LM, Dalaker K. Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 586–92.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwary C. Testicular injury in breech delivery: Possible implications. Urology 1989; 34: 210–2.
   Google Scholar
• Badawi N, Kurinczuk J, Keogh J, Alessandri L, O’Sullivan F, Burton P et al. The Western Australian case-control study. BMJ 1998; 317: 1554–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson K. Ellenberg. J. Apgar scores as predictors of chronic neurological disability. Pediatrics 1981; 68: 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Thorngren-Jerneck K, Herbst A. Low 5-minute Apgar score. a population-based register study of 1 million term births. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Roman J, Bakos O, Cnattingius S. Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among term breech birth: Swedish experience 1987–93. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 945–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KS, Khoshnood B, Sriram S, Hsieh HL, Singh J, Mittendorf R. Relationship of Caesarean delivery to lower birth weight-specific neonatal mortality in singleton breech infants in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 769–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist A, Norden-Lindeberg S, Hanson U. Perinatal mortality and route of delivery in term breech presentations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1288–91.
   Google Scholar
• Obwegeser R, Ulm M, Simon M, Ploeckinger B, Gruber W. Breech infants; vaginal or caesarean delivery? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 912–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior caesarean delivery. N Eng J Med 2001; 345: 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rageth J, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after a previous caesarean; a risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 332–7.
   Google Scholar
• Backe B, Nakling J. Effectiveness of antenatal care; a population-based study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 727–32.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts CL, Algert CS, Peat B, Henderson-Smart D. Small fetal size: a risk factor for breech birth at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 67: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Luterkort M. The natural history of breech pregnancy and its consequences. PhD thesis, Lund, Sweden: University of Lund, 1986.
   Google Scholar